I have a MS Word Add in and it is rejected by MS when I submit to Office store because it is not compatible with MS Word 2013 and MS Word 2016. But I just want to use my add in in MS Word online environment, how can I config my add on manifest file to prevent using from MS Word?
If it is impossible, can we prevent using from MS 2013? I see this add-in only available for MS Word 2016 and Word online only. How can we config it?
Please help me,
Thanks
I had the same problem. The solution is easy.
You must change your manifest xml. If you add the requirements for Word API 1.1 Office 2013 disappears automaticly when you submit it to the Office Store.
<Requirements>
<Sets DefaultMinVersion="1.1">
<Set Name="WordApi" MinVersion="1.1"/>
</Sets>
</Requirements>
For some crazy reason the order of the elements in the manifext xml is important. Add Requirements between Hosts and DefaultSettings.
Related
So LogParser has been a tool that I have used to load IIS Logs into a SQL Server database on a daily basis.
The problem is that if you use the new IIS 8.5 custom fields it will break LogParser with this sort of error:
Unknown field found in #Fields directive
I have looked at the various formats and don't see anything that is very interesting. It would appear that I would have to write a COM object to read the IIS file.
Looks like I am going to be creating my own loader for the IIS Logs unless anyone has any other ideas?
I wish the LogParser code was released to GitHub.
On my domain server 2012r2I am trying to deploying office 2007 but not all of the office I need to install only excel and word
I found an .msi file within the dvd installation and found many .msi packages
called ExcelMUI.msiand WordMUI.msi at directory
...\English\Excel.en-us\ExcelMUI.msi
...\English\Excel.en-us\WordMUI.msi
can I use them to deploy only excel and word through domain server 2012r2?
are they valid as .msi packages installer ?
Best Guess: I wonder if those MUI-setups are Multilingual User Interface setups. I think you should get on a virtual machine and try to run the setup.exe instead (if there is one) and then go to "Custom" or equivalent to see if you get a feature selection dialog. Then you should select Word and Excel to install fully and you can disable most other features (don't disable the shared features, just the other apps would be my suggestion - Outlook, PowerPoint, etc...). It is possible that those MSI files you mention can be used directly. You could try to run them - but only on a virtual of course. Or on a computer which does not matter - test computer of some sort. Look for a custom option and a feature dialog there too. Sorry, all I can suggest without installation media access.
Sure?: With all that said, Office on a domain server? Do you mean domain controller? (hope not). Sounds like a very dangerous move if you ask me - with all the security holes Office contains. At least make sure to run Windows Update or Office Update or whatever mechanism you have to deploy security fixes. Can I be curious and ask why the server needs Office? Is it for automation only?
Viewer for MSI Files: You can open and inspect MSI files using the free tools Orca, SuperOrca or InstEd (links towards bottom). I have an old answer on superuser showing how MSI features can be seen inside the MSI file.
As a .NET Desktop developer, I have a lot of experience working with various databases that are already up and running; but I'm not a DBA. I'm currently working at a company where I am ther only software guy here to build them software from scratch -- their previous enterprise-level solution was an Access database with macros and a couple forms built it. So, I basically have no one else to go to.
With that preface, how the heck do I get a database -- ANY DATABASE!!! -- added to my VS solution? I've been beating my head against this for almost 6 hours and have made zero headway. At this point, I'm ready to say, "Screw MS databases!" and start looking at MySQL or PostgreSQL or something.
The desktop application I'm developing has to work whether there is an internet connection or not, so I need a local database that installs with ClickOnce. From what I've found so far:
SQL Server [Express] 2016+ requires Windows 8 or later (a non-starter since 95% our customers are still running Windows 7)
SQL Server Compact is being deprecated and won't work past VS2013
I think LocalDB is what replaces Compact in 2016+ (?)
Okay, so I started with this tutorial:https: //learn.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/data-tools/create-a-sql-database-by-using-a-designer However, trying to add a "Service-based Database" just gives me this error once: "The 'DBProviderFactories' section can only appear once per config file." I try again and get this error repeatedly: "Unable to find DbProviderFactory for type System.Data.SqlClientConnection" I've Googled both errors and all the answers that I've been able to find pertain to VS2010 or earlier and their solutions are either not applicable or don't work.
Next, I tried this tutorial: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa983322.aspx I've tried adding new data connections through the "Server Explorer" panel. I don't see "[*] Compact" as an option. When I try "Microsoft SQL Server Database File", I just get the error: Unable to find the requested .Net Framework Data Provider. It may not be installed."
I've even tried adding data sources through the "Data Sources" panel; that doesn't work either.
I've installed the "Data storage and development" addon from the Visual Studio Installer, several versions of SQL Server 2014, SQL Server Compact 4.0, and maybe a few other executables from Microsoft's website.
Nothing works.
Help...
I think I just found it!
Evidently, there are "machine.config" files on your computer. Search for them all, and make sure that there is only a single tag for "DbProviderFactories". I can add a database object now. Hopefully, this puts me in business...
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/vstudio/en-US/7b4f353b-77fd-427c-976b-5968abc88c13/visual-studio-2010-unable-to-find-the-requested-net-framework-data-provider-for-sql?forum=vseditor
If what you are saying is that you are writing a browser based application - then one would migrate the tables to SQL Server (Express) or even MySQL - it really doesn't matter. Then write a new web app. The existing Access app would serve as a model for seeing features & screen layout but is otherwise not portable.
On the other hand, if you are re-writing a Windows application; then the decision is whether the payload requires a server solution or if one can stay at the PC level. If the payload is suitable for PC then a re-write using either Visual Studio or Access again.
Access is a front end db - the tables in the back end whether they be stored in SQL Server or an Access file are entirely passive. All the processing is done by the user's PC. If the payload allows that then this is the lowest cost re-write option.
If you've outgrown a PC level payload - then one must develop a back end database feature set with a more passive front end.
I got a SSRS 2008 web edition instance (which was migrated from 2005 standard edition) and I need to change some security for a new folder I`ve just created.
When I go on report server web page (http://rsServerName.xyz/Reports), enter the new folder, go on folder properties, then when I click on Security, web page returns an error The user or group name 'xxx' is not recognized. (rsUnknownUserName)
I`ve checked the user in database - it exists, it has some items (reports) assigned to it, seems fine just like other users from database.
I first thought to just go into database and remove the entries from PolicyUserRole for users that aren't allowed into that folder, but there's also some info in SecData, and maybe some other places, and also found that microsoft doesn't support any queries against their reportserver database, so that might not be the brightest idea :)
Does anyone know any other way to remove the security from a specific folder ? Or maybe things to look at for this user name that it fails ? Another thing to mention, all security problems started when server was migrated from 2005 standard to 2008 web edition.
Thanks.
The only possible way to fix this was to remove the user completely and add it back. During the migration described above several user's permissions were affected, and the only way to fix was to re-create them from scratch - not elegant, but worked.
Solution - find the user, remove, add back.
We are using Elmah with MS SQL Server to log exceptions. The problem is that I do not find easy way how to navigate exceptions logged in database. Is there any Elmah SQL Server logs viewer or I missing something?
ELMAH logs are designed to be viewed using the ELMAH handler aka elmah.axd (assuming you have it configured correctly).
You are supposed to go onto the site and go to the handler to see the errors.
For example:
http://example.com/elmah.axd
Have you added the httpHandler used to view exceptions to your web.config file? Have a look at the example web.config here: http://code.google.com/p/elmah/downloads/detail?name=ELMAH-1.2-sample-web.config
Whilst not specifically using MS-SQL as your question states and although it's a paid service, you could use Elmah.io - a cloud based log viewer with a ton of neat features. Plus there's a free 30 day trial for you to test it out.
You can install a nuget package, which takes care of the integration into your apps for you here.
(Disclaimer: I am in no way affiliated with elmah.io).