Delay testing of a value until a promise has resolved - angularjs

I'm attempting to test that a value is changed to true after a promise is resolved inside $onInit. I'm following, as best I can, the example in this Stack Overflow question/answer. Here is my code:
class TestCtrl {
constructor(SearchService) {
this.testValue = false;
this.SearchService = SearchService;
}
$onInit() {
this.SearchService.getResults()
.then(function () {
this.testValue = true;
});
}
}
TestCtrl.$inject = ['SearchService'];
And here's the test I'm attempting to run (using mocha, chai, sinon):
it('should work', function() {
ctrl = $componentController('test', {
SearchService: SearchService
}, {});
sinon.stub(SearchService, 'getResults').resolves({response:{data: 'data'}});
ctrl.$onInit();
$rootScope.$apply();
ctrl.testValue.should.equal(true);
});
Should I be testing ctrl.testValue inside a then? Also, is using this example a bad idea because that example doesn't use a component with an $onInit lifecycle hook?
From what I've read, no, "don't use expect inside then in tests." But I'm not so sure based on what I've read elsewhere.
I wouldn't be surprised if I'm missing something obvious in how to test promises (maybe a stub wasn't the way to go?) and/or how to test what happens in the $onInit lifecycle hook.
If the question needs more details, please ask and I'll do my best to add them.

Edit: Checkout you $onInit method:
$onInit() {
this.SearchService.getResults()
.then(function () {
// `this` in anonymous function is reffering to window not the controller instance
this.testValue = true;
});
}
$onInit() {
var self = this;
self.SearchService.getResults()
.then(function () {
self.testValue = true;
});
}
Your example is correct
This is the way to test async code in angularjs - it is tested like synchronous code. Stubs' returning promises are resolved when you execute $rootScope.$apply().
Why it doesn't work
The promise returned from stub.resolves() is not an angular promise. It cannot be triggered to resolve using $rootScope, because it's not a part of angular's world. It's promise resolution queue is tied to something else and hence the need to test like you usually test async code.
Angular doesn't depend on JavaScript's native Promise implementation - it uses a light implementation of Q's promise library that is wrapped in a service called $q
The answer you have quoted uses the same service to create and return a promise from a stub
In order for your code to work - to test like you test synchronous code - you should return a $q promise (By wrapping a value in $q.when(value)) calling $rootScope.$apply() will execute the code in the then block, then proceed with the code below $rootScope.$apply() line.
Here is an example:
it('Sinon should work with angular promises', function () {
var resolved = 'resolved';
var promise = $q.when(resolved);
// Our async function
var stub = sinon.stub().returns(promise);
// Callback to be executed after the promise resolves
var handler = sinon.stub();
stub().then(handler); // async code
// The handler will be called only after $rootScope.$apply()
handler.callCount.should.equal(0);
// triggers digest which will resolve `ready` promises
// like those created with $q.when(), $q.resolve() or those created
// using the $q.defer() and deferred.resolve() was called
// this will execute the code inside the appropriate callback for
// `then/catch/finally` for all promises and then continue
// with the code bellow -> this is why the test is considered `synchronous`
$rootScope.$apply();
// Verify the handler was called and with the expected value
handler.callCount.should.equal(1);
handler.should.have.been.calledWith(resolved);
})
Here it is in action test promise synchronously in angular

For starters, you should read up on how Mocha expects you to test async code.
To start out with the quick bits:
You are on the right path - there are just some bits missing.
Yes you should do your test inside a then.
The example you linked to is fine. Just understand it.
There is absolutely no reason to avoid asserting a test inside a then. In fact, it is usually the only way to assert the resolved value of a promise.
The main problem with your test code is it tries to assert the result before it is available (as promises resolve in a later tick, they are asynchronous).
The main problem with the code you are trying to test is that there is no way of knowing when the init function has resolved.
We can deal with #2 by waiting for the stubbed SearchService.getResults to resolve (as we control the stub in the test), but that assumes too much knowledge of the implementation of onInit, so that is a bad hack.
Instead, we fix the code in TestCtrl, simply by returning the promise in onInit:
//main code / TestCtrl
$onInit() {
return this.SearchService.getResults()
.then(function () {
this.testValue = true;
});
}
Now we can simply wait for any call to onInit to resolve before we test what has happened during its execution!
To fix your test we first add a parameter to the wrapping test function. Mocha will see this and pass in a function that you can call when your test finishes.
it('should work', function(done) {
That makes it an async test. Now lets fix the test part:
ctrl.$onInit().then( () => {
ctrl.testValue.should.equal(true);
done(); // signals to mocha that the test is finished ok
}).catch(done); // pass any errors to the callback
You might find also find this answer enlightening (upvote if it helps you out). After reading it you might also understand why Mocha also supports dropping the done callback by returning a promise from the test instead. Makes for shorter tests:
return ctrl.$onInit().then( () => {
ctrl.testValue.should.equal(true);
});

sinon.stub(SearchService, 'getResults').resolves({response:{data: 'data'}}); is not returning a promise. Use $q.
I would suggest doing this:
ctrl = $componentController('test', {
SearchService: SearchService
}, {});
let deferred =$q.defer();
deferred.resolve({response:{data: 'data'}});
sinon.stub(SearchService, 'getResults').resolves(deferred.promise);
ctrl.$onInit();
$rootScope.$apply();
ctrl.testValue.should.equal(true);
You don't need to test ctrl.testValue inside a then. And generally, I would recommend not assert inside .then() in your specs. The specs will not fail if the promise never gets resolved. That can give you a false sense of security when in reality, your tests are not doing anything. But that's just my opinion.
Your test will pass once the stub returns a promise. Ideally, I would recommend using $httpBackend if the service is making an http call.
Cheers.

Related

How to test a method that uses async/await?

I've seen a lot of articles about how use async/await in your unit tests, but my need is the opposite.
How do you write a test for a method that uses async/await?
My spec is not able to reach any code after the 'await' line. Specifically, the spec fails in two ways.
1) HelloWorld.otherCall returns undefined instead of the return value I specify
2) HelloWorld.processResp never gets called
class HelloWorld {
async doSomething(reqObj) {
try {
const val = await this.otherCall(reqObj);
console.warn(val); // undefined
return this.processResp(val);
}
}
}
describe('HelloWorld test', function () {
let sut = new HelloWorld(); //gross simplification for demo purposes
describe('doSomething()', function () {
beforeEach(function mockInputs() {
this.resp = 'plz help - S.O.S.';
});
beforeEach(function createSpy() {
spyOn(sut, 'otherCall').and.returnValue( $q.resolve(this.resp) );
spyOn(sut, 'processResp');
});
it('should call otherCall() with proper arguments', function () {
//this test passes
});
it('should call processResp() with proper arguments', function () {
sut.doSomething({});
$rootScope.$apply(); //you need this to execute a promise chain..
expect(sut.processResp).toHaveBeenCalledWith(this.resp);
//Expected spy processResp to have been called with [ 'plz help SOS' ] but it was never called.
});
});
});
Running angular 1.5 and jasmine-core 2.6.
The .then of a promise is overloaded to handle either promises or values, and await is syntactic sugar for calling then.
So there is no reason your spy would be required to return a promise, or even a value. Returning at all, even if undefined, should trigger the await to fire, and kick off the rest of your async function.
I believe your problem is that you are not waiting for the doSomething promise to resolve before trying to test what it did. Something like this should get you more in the ballpark.
it('should call processResp() with proper arguments', async function () {
await sut.doSomething({});
// ...
});
Jasmine has Asynchronous Support. You can probably find a solution that way.
Personally, I think you should not test such methods at all.
Testing state means we're verifying that the code under test returns the right results.
Testing interactions means we're verifying that the code under test calls certain methods properly.
At most cases, testing state is better.
At your example,
async doSomething(reqObj) {
try {
const val = await this.otherCall(reqObj);
return this.processResp(val);
}
}
As long as otherCall & processResp are well covered by unit tests your good.
Do something should be covered by e2e tests.
you can read more about it at http://spectory.com/blog/Test%20Doubles%20For%20Dummies

Typescript async/await doesnt update AngularJS view

I'm using Typescript 2.1(developer version) to transpile async/await to ES5.
I've noticed that after I change any property which is bound to view in my async function the view isn't updated with current value, so each time I have to call $scope.$apply() at the end of function.
Example async code:
async testAsync() {
await this.$timeout(2000);
this.text = "Changed";
//$scope.$apply(); <-- would like to omit this
}
And new text value isn't shown in view after this.
Is there any workaround so I don't have to manually call $scope.$apply() every time?
The answers here are correct in that AngularJS does not know about the method so you need to 'tell' Angular about any values that have been updated.
Personally I'd use $q for asynchronous behaviour instead of using await as its "The Angular way".
You can wrap non Angular methods with $q quite easily i.e. [Note this is how I wrap all Google Maps functions as they all follow this pattern of passing in a callback to be notified of completion]
function doAThing()
{
var defer = $q.defer();
// Note that this method takes a `parameter` and a callback function
someMethod(parameter, (someValue) => {
$q.resolve(someValue)
});
return defer.promise;
}
You can then use it like so
this.doAThing().then(someValue => {
this.memberValue = someValue;
});
However if you do wish to continue with await there is a better way than using $apply, in this case, and that it to use $digest. Like so
async testAsync() {
await this.$timeout(2000);
this.text = "Changed";
$scope.$digest(); <-- This is now much faster :)
}
$scope.$digest is better in this case because $scope.$apply will perform dirty checking (Angulars method for change detection) for all bound values on all scopes, this can be expensive performance wise - especially if you have many bindings. $scope.$digest will, however, only perform checking on bound values within the current $scope making it much more performant.
This can be conveniently done with angular-async-await extension:
class SomeController {
constructor($async) {
this.testAsync = $async(this.testAsync.bind(this));
}
async testAsync() { ... }
}
As it can be seen, all it does is wrapping promise-returning function with a wrapper that calls $rootScope.$apply() afterwards.
There is no reliable way to trigger digest automatically on async function, doing this would result in hacking both the framework and Promise implementation. There is no way to do this for native async function (TypeScript es2017 target), because it relies on internal promise implementation and not Promise global. More importantly, this way would be unacceptable because this is not a behaviour that is expected by default. A developer should have full control over it and assign this behaviour explicitly.
Given that testAsync is being called multiple times, and the only place where it is called is testsAsync, automatic digest in testAsync end would result in digest spam. While a proper way would be to trigger a digest once, after testsAsync.
In this case $async would be applied only to testsAsync and not to testAsync itself:
class SomeController {
constructor($async) {
this.testsAsync = $async(this.testsAsync.bind(this));
}
private async testAsync() { ... }
async testsAsync() {
await Promise.all([this.testAsync(1), this.testAsync(2), ...]);
...
}
}
I have examined the code of angular-async-await and It seems like they are using $rootScope.$apply() to digest the expression after the async promise is resolved.
This is not a good method. You can use AngularJS original $q and with a little trick, you can achieve the best performance.
First, create a function ( e.g., factory, method)
// inject $q ...
const resolver=(asyncFunc)=>{
const deferred = $q.defer();
asyncFunc()
.then(deferred.resolve)
.catch(deferred.reject);
return deferred.promise;
}
Now, you can use it in your for instance services.
getUserInfo=()=>{
return resolver(async()=>{
const userInfo=await fetch(...);
const userAddress= await fetch (...);
return {userInfo,userAddress};
});
};
This is as efficient as using AngularJS $q and with minimal code.
As #basarat said the native ES6 Promise doesn't know about the digest cycle.
What you could do is let Typescript use $q service promise instead of the native ES6 promise.
That way you won't need to invoke $scope.$apply()
angular.module('myApp')
.run(['$window', '$q', ($window, $q) => {
$window.Promise = $q;
}]);
I've set up a fiddle showcasing the desired behavior. It can be seen here: Promises with AngularJS.
Please note that it's using a bunch of Promises which resolve after 1000ms, an async function, and a Promise.race and it still only requires 4 digest cycles (open the console).
I'll reiterate what the desired behavior was:
to allow the usage of async functions just like in native JavaScript; this means no other 3rd party libraries, like $async
to automatically trigger the minimum number of digest cycles
How was this achieved?
In ES6 we've received an awesome featured called Proxy. This object is used to define custom behavior for fundamental operations (e.g. property lookup, assignment, enumeration, function invocation, etc).
This means that we can wrap the Promise into a Proxy which, when the promise gets resolved or rejected, triggers a digest cycle, only if needed. Since we need a way to trigger the digest cycle, this change is added at AngularJS run time.
function($rootScope) {
function triggerDigestIfNeeded() {
// $applyAsync acts as a debounced funciton which is exactly what we need in this case
// in order to get the minimum number of digest cycles fired.
$rootScope.$applyAsync();
};
// This principle can be used with other native JS "features" when we want to integrate
// then with AngularJS; for example, fetch.
Promise = new Proxy(Promise, {
// We are interested only in the constructor function
construct(target, argumentsList) {
return (() => {
const promise = new target(...argumentsList);
// The first thing a promise does when it gets resolved or rejected,
// is to trigger a digest cycle if needed
promise.then((value) => {
triggerDigestIfNeeded();
return value;
}, (reason) => {
triggerDigestIfNeeded();
return reason;
});
return promise;
})();
}
});
}
Since async functions rely on Promises to work, the desired behavior was achieved with just a few lines of code. As an additional feature, one can use native Promises into AngularJS!
Later edit: It's not necessary to use Proxy as this behavior can be replicated with plain JS. Here it is:
Promise = ((Promise) => {
const NewPromise = function(fn) {
const promise = new Promise(fn);
promise.then((value) => {
triggerDigestIfNeeded();
return value;
}, (reason) => {
triggerDigestIfNeeded();
return reason;
});
return promise;
};
// Clone the prototype
NewPromise.prototype = Promise.prototype;
// Clone all writable instance properties
for (const propertyName of Object.getOwnPropertyNames(Promise)) {
const propertyDescription = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(Promise, propertyName);
if (propertyDescription.writable) {
NewPromise[propertyName] = Promise[propertyName];
}
}
return NewPromise;
})(Promise) as any;
In case you're upgrading from AngularJS to Angular using ngUpgrade (see https://angular.io/guide/upgrade#upgrading-with-ngupgrade):
As Zone.js patches native Promises you can start rewriting all $q based AngularJS promises to native Promises, because Angular triggers a $digest automatically when the microtask queue is empty (e.g. when a Promise is resolved).
Even if you don't plan to upgrade to Angular, you can still do the same, by including Zone.js in your project and setting up a similar hook like ngUpgrade does.
Is there any workaround so I don't have to manually call $scope.$apply() every time?
This is because TypeScript uses the browser native Promise implementation and that is not what Angular 1.x knows about. To do its dirty checking all async functions that it does not control must trigger a digest cycle.
As #basarat said the native ES6 Promise doesn't know about the digest cycle. You should to promise
async testAsync() {
await this.$timeout(2000).toPromise()
.then(response => this.text = "Changed");
}
As it already has been described, angular does not know when the native Promise is finished. All async functions create a new Promise.
The possible solution can be this:
window.Promise = $q;
This way TypeScript/Babel will use angular promises instead.
Is it safe? Honestly I'm not sure - still testing this solution.
I would write a converter function, in some generic factory (didnt tested this code, but should be work)
function toNgPromise(promise)
{
var defer = $q.defer();
promise.then((data) => {
$q.resolve(data);
}).catch(response)=> {
$q.reject(response);
});
return defer.promise;
}
This is just to get you started, though I assume conversion in the end will not be as simple as this...

How to test an AngularJS controller value that is set within a promise using Sinon

I'm having troubling testing a controller's value that's set within a promise returned by a service. I'm using Sinon to stub the service (Karma to run the tests, Mocha as the framework, Chai for assertions).
I'm less interested in a quick fix than I am in understanding the problem. I've read around quite a bit, and I have some of my notes below the code and the test.
Here's the code.
.controller('NavCtrl', function (NavService) {
var vm = this;
NavService.getNav()
.then(function(response){
vm.nav = response.data;
});
})
.service('NavService', ['$http', function ($http) {
this.getNav = function () {
return $http.get('_routes');
};
}]);
Here's the test:
describe('NavCtrl', function () {
var scope;
var controller;
var NavService;
var $q;
beforeEach(module('nav'));
beforeEach(inject(function($rootScope, $controller, _$q_, _NavService_){
NavService = _NavService_;
scope = $rootScope.$new();
controller = $controller;
}));
it('should have some data', function () {
var stub = sinon.stub(NavService, 'getNav').returns($q.when({
response: {
data: 'data'
}
}));
var vm = controller("NavCtrl", {
$scope: scope,
NavService: NavService
});
scope.$apply();
stub.callCount.should.equal(1);
vm.should.be.defined;
vm.nav.should.be.defined;
});
});
The stub is being called, i.e. that test passes, and vm is defined, but vm.nav never gets data and the test fails. How I'm handling the stubbed promise is, I think, the culprit. Some notes:
Based on reading elsewhere, I'm calling scope.$apply to set the value, but since scope isn't injected into the original controller, I'm not positive that will do the trick. This article points to the angular docs on $q.
Another article recommends using $timeout as what would "actually complete the promise". The article also recommends using "sinon-as-promised," something I'm not doing above. I tried, but didn't see a difference.
This Stack Overflow answer use scope.$root.$digest() because "If your scope object's value comes from the promise result, you will need to call scope.$root.$digest()". But again, same test failure. And again, this might be because I'm not using scope.
As for stubbing the promise, I also tried the sinon sandbox way, but results were the same.
I've tried rewriting the test using $scope, to make sure it's not a problem with the vm style, but the test still fails.
In the end, I could be wrong: the stub and the promise might not be the problem and it's something different and/or obvious that I've missed.
Any help is much appreciated and if I can clarify any of the above, let me know.
Sorry but a quick fix was all that you needed:
var stub = sinon.stub(NavService, 'getNav').returns($q.when({
response: {
data: 'data'
}
}));
Your promise is resolved to object containing response.data not just data
Checkout this plunk created from your code: https://plnkr.co/edit/GL1Xuf?p=preview
The extended answer
I have often fallen to the same trap. So I started to define the result returned from a method separately. Then if the method is async I wrap this result in a promise like $q.when(stubbedResult) this allow me to, easily run expectations on the actual result, because I keep the stubbed result in a variable e.g.
it('Controller should have some data', function () {
var result = {data: 'data'};
var stub = sinon.stub(NavService, 'getNav').returns($q.when(result));
var vm = controller(/* initController */);
scope.$apply();
stub.callCount.should.equal(1);
vm.nav.should.equal(result.data)
})
Also some tests debugging skill will come in handy. The easiest thing is to dump some data on the console just to check what's returned somewhere. Working with an actual debugger is preferable of course.
How to quickly catch mistakes like these:
Put a breakpoint at the $rootScope.apply() line (just before it is executed)
Put a breakpoint in the controller's NavService.getNav().then handler to see whether it is called and what it was called with
Continue with the debugger to execute the $rootScope.$apply() line. Now the debugger should hit the breakpoint set at the previous step - that's it.
I think you should use chai-as-promised
and then assert from promises like
doSomethingAsync().should.eventually.equal("foo");
or else use async await
it('should have some data', async function () {
await scope.$apply();
});
you might need to move then getNav() call in init kinda function and then test against that init function

chai-as-promised tests don't work with $q promises

I'm trying to get chai-as-promised to work with $q promises with karma unit tests.
svc.test = function(foo){
if (!foo){
// return Promise.reject(new Error('foo is required'));
return $q.reject(new Error('foo is required'));
} else {
// get data via ajax here
return $q.resolve({});
}
};
it.only('should error on no foo', function(){
var resolvedValue = MyServices.test();
$rootScope.$apply();
return resolvedValue.should.eventually.be.rejectedWith(TypeError, 'foo is required');
});
The unit test just times out. I am not sure what I'm doing wrong here to get the promise to resolve properly. It seems to be an issue with using $q -- when I use native Promise.reject() it works fine.
I filed a ticket here, but nobody seems to be responding:
https://github.com/domenic/chai-as-promised/issues/150
The way chai-as-promised expects to modify promise assertions is transferPromiseness method.
By default, the promises returned by Chai as Promised's assertions are
regular Chai assertion objects, extended with a single then method
derived from the input promise. To change this behavior, for instance
to output a promise with more useful sugar methods such as are found
in most promise libraries, you can override
chaiAsPromised.transferPromiseness.
For Angular 1.3+ support, $q promises can be duck-typed by $$state property, so native promises won't be affected:
chaiAsPromised.transferPromiseness = function (assertion, promise) {
assertion.then = promise.then.bind(promise);
if (!('$$state' in promise))
return;
inject(function ($rootScope) {
if (!$rootScope.$$phase)
$rootScope.$digest();
});
};
chaiAsPromised chains each asserted promise with then. Even if the promise is settled, the rest of the chain still requires the digest to be triggered manually with $rootScope.$digest().
As long as the spec contains no asynchronous code, it becomes synchronous, no promise is required to be returned:
it('...', () => {
...
expect(...).to.eventually...;
expect(...).to.eventually...;
});
And is equal to mandatory $rootScope.$digest() after each set of eventually assertions/expectation when transferPromiseness wasn't set:
it('...', () => {
...
expect(...).to.eventually...;
expect(...).to.eventually...;
$rootScope.$digest();
});
You need to change the order of execution in your tests. Asynchronous tasks with chai-as-promised need to happen before the expectation.
it('does not work', () => {
$timeout.flush();
expect(myAsyncTask()).to.eventually.become('foo');
})
it('does work', () => {
expect(myAsyncTask()).to.eventually.become('foo');
$timeout.flush();
})
You need to initiate the call to the asynchronous task before flushing the queue of asynchronous tasks.
Also, don't use $rootScope.$digest. That may have other side effects that are not desirable within your test(s).
$timeout.flush is what you're looking for.
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ngMock/service/$timeout
To get your specific test(s) working:
it('should error on no foo', function(){
MyServices.test().should.eventually.be.rejectedWith(TypeError, 'foo is required')
$rootScope.$apply();
});
it('should pass on foo', function(){
MyServices.test('foo').should.eventually.become({});
$rootScope.$apply();
}
tl;dr
it('async test', () => {
setup();
expect();
execute();
})
it('sync test', () => {
setup();
execute();
expect();
})
Given the comments posted:
Should it be mentioned that it is unethical to downvote 'rival' answers on the question you're answering?
Fair enough. I think the answer is misleading, given that there is no extra setup necessary to get chai-as-promised working with Angular without having to deal with the done callback. Fwiw, I'll go ahead and try to revoke said downvote and be ethical about it.
The OP has no signs of timeout in his code and doesn't state that the task is asynchronous. $rootScope.$digest() has no side effects in specs when called outside of scope digest. The reason why it is not recommended in production is because it doesn't have the safeguards that $apply has.
$rootScope.$digest is effectively the same as $rootScope.$apply (and $scope.$apply for that matter). source
$timeout.flush will flush non-$timeout based functions just as well. It is not exclusive to $timeout based functions.
Plunker to showcase how it just works™:
plunker

Unit test the call count of method in then part of a promise in Jasmine and AngularJS

In code below, userService.addPreference is mocked, and so is $state.go, but still the call count of $state.go is always zero. Is there something I may have missed in the setup of userService.addPreference mocked method?
Code that is being unit tested
userService.addPreference(preference).then(function (dashboard) {
$state.go('authenticated.dashboard.grid', {id: dashboard.id});
});
Unit Test Mocked methods and the Unit Test
sinon.stub(userService, 'addPreference', function (preference) {
var defer = $q.defer();
defer.resolve(preference);
return defer.promise;
});
sinon.stub($state, 'go', function () { });
it('dashboard.confirm should call $state.go', function () {
vm.confirm();//this is the function containing code being unit tested
expect($state.go.callCount).to.equal(1);//this is always ZERO and so failing
});
The service call
userService.addPreference(preference).then(function (dashboard) {
$state.go('authenticated.dashboard.grid', {id: dashboard.id});
});
involves a async callback, which will not fire unless we explicitly tell it to. To force the callback to evaluate we need to run a digest cycle using $scope.$apply, so change your test code to:
it('dashboard.confirm should call $state.go', function () {
vm.confirm();//this is the function containing code being unit tested
$scope.$apply();
expect($state.go.callCount).to.equal(1);//this is always ZERO and so failing
});
Remember is a sequential flow callback are never fired.

Resources