Related
This is the credit problem from CS50x
I wrote this code on Windows and it didn't work there. After entering a 15 digit card number on windows it wasn't accepting the number and was prompting me again and again.
But when i pasted the same code on CS50's cloudspace in VSCode which is on linux, the code runs perfectly fine there.
The issue seems to be in the get_long function, it wasnt letting me input a 15 digit card number on windows.
#include <stdio.h>
#include "cs50.h"
int main()
{
long number;
number = get_long("Enter your card number: ");
//Check length of number
int i = 0;
long length = number;
while (length > 0 )
{
length = length / 10;
i++;
}
if (i != 16 && i != 15 && i!= 13)
{
printf ("INVALID");
}
else
{
int sum1 = 0;
int sum2 = 0;
long x = number;
int mod1 = 0;
int mod2 = 0;
int d1 = 0;
int d2 = 0;
int final_sum = 0;
do
{
//Remove last digit and add to sum1
mod1 = x % 10;
x = x / 10;
sum1 = sum1 + mod1;
//Remove second last digit
mod2 = x % 10;
x = x / 10;
//Multiply second last digit by two
mod2 = mod2 * 2;
//Extract the digits
d1 = mod2 % 10;
d2 = mod2 / 10;
//Add to sum2
sum2 = sum2 + d1 + d2;
} while (x > 0 );
final_sum = sum1 + sum2;
//Check Luhns Algorithm
if (final_sum % 10 != 0)
{
printf("INVALID\n");
}
else
{
long y = number;
int j = 0;
do
{
y = y / 10;
j++;
} while (y > 100 );
if ( y / 10 == 4)
{
printf ("VISA");
}
else if ((y / 10 == 5) && (0 < y % 10 && y % 10 < 6))
{
printf("MASTERCARD");
}
else if ((y / 10 == 3) && (y % 10 ==4 || y % 10 == 7) )
{
printf("AMEX");
}
}
}
}
Your code works because on your Linux platform, type long happens to be an 8-byte, 64-bit type that can easily handle integers matching even 15- or 16-digit credit card numbers.
Your code fails on Windows because there, type long is a 32-bit type, not capable of handling numbers greater than 2,147,483,647 or 4,294,967,295 (depending on whether signed or unsigned).
This discrepancy between the two platforms is not a bug: C's short, int, and long types have always been somewhat loosely defined. The requirement for type long is, in effect, that it have at least 32 bits, which on both platforms it certainly does.
It was rather unfair and misleading for your assignment to have said "Best to use get_long from CS50’s library to get users’ input". This is a nonportable programming practice for this task.
In portable C, type long long is guaranteed to be at least 64 bits long, so it would work reliably here. I do not know if CS50's library has a get_long_long function. (Update: per comments below, it does.)
In the long run, it's generally easier to deal with credit card numbers as strings, not integers. But during week 1 of CS50, students haven't learned about strings yet.
The discussion in the comments of 32-bit v. 64-bit should be educational for you, and I hope that you can integrate that information into your program.
Compliments to the layout and logic of your beginner code. Very clear and very easy to read and follow (including appropriate comments.) Keep this up and you will become a fine programmer!
I've revised your code (without appreciably changing any of its logic) to suggest how it may be slightly improved. The following is offered for your consideration. It is your code only slightly modified. It's up to you to consider if you want to apply any of these "alterations" to your code.
#include <stdio.h>
#include "cs50.h"
int main()
{
long number = get_long("Enter A card number: ");
long x = number; // will reload and reuse x several times
int i = 0; // handy to have around
// Check length of number
while (x > 0 )
{
x = x / 10;
i++;
}
if (i != 16 && i != 15 && i!= 13)
{
printf ("INVALID");
return 1; // early termination saves one level of indentation
}
int sum1 = 0;
int sum2 = 0;
int mod1 = 0;
int mod2 = 0;
int d1 = 0;
int d2 = 0;
int final_sum = 0;
x = number; // reload
while ( x > 0 )
{
//Remove last digit and add to sum1
mod1 = x % 10;
x = x / 10;
sum1 = sum1 + mod1;
//Remove second last digit
mod2 = x % 10;
x = x / 10;
//Multiply second last digit by two
mod2 = mod2 * 2;
//Extract the digits
d1 = mod2 % 10;
d2 = mod2 / 10;
//Add to sum2
sum2 = sum2 + d1 + d2;
}
final_sum = sum1 + sum2;
//Check Luhns Algorithm
if (final_sum % 10 != 0)
{
printf("INVALID\n");
return 1; // early termination
}
x = number; // reload
while ( x > 99 ) // NB! subtle change!!
{
x = x / 10; // shrink until 10 <= x <= 99
}
if ( 40 <= x && x <= 49 ) // check this
{
printf ("VISA");
}
else if ( 50 <= x && x < 56 ) // check this
{
printf("MASTERCARD");
}
else if ( x == 34 || x == 37 ) // check this
{
printf("AMEX");
}
else
{
printf("INVALID\n");
return 1; // early termination
}
return 0;
}
The instructions for your task state the following:
But do not assume that the user’s input will fit in an int! Best to use get_long from CS50’s library to get users’ input.
This advice is misleading when using the Microsoft Windows platform.
On Microsoft Windows, the data type long has a width of only 32 bits, whereas on most other common platforms, such Linux and MacOS, it has a width of 64 bits. The ISO C standard only requires long to have a minimum width of 32 bits, so all the mentioned operating systems are complying with the standard in this respect.
A 32-bit signed integer is able to represent numbers up to 2,147,483,647, whereas a 64-bit signed integer is able to represent numbers up to 9,223,372,036,854,775,807. Therefore, a 32-bit integer data type is insufficient to represent a credit card number; you require a 64-bit integer data type.
In constrast to long, the data type long long is guaranteed to be at least 64 bits wide on all platforms.
For the reasons stated above, if you want your program to work on Microsoft Windows, you will have to use the long long data type to represent a credit card number, instead of long. You will also have to use the function get_long_long instead of get_long.
So i'm supposed to find out the last 10 digits of 2^n(0<=n<=100) where n is the input. I found a method to handle large numbers but the program fails when n>64. Any leads on how to go about with this would be appreciated.
#include<stdio.h>
#include<math.h>
/* Iterative Function to calculate (x^y)%p in O(log y) */
int power(long long int x, long long int y, long long int p)
{
long long int res = 1; // Initialize result
x = x % p; // Update x if it is more than or
// equal to p
while (y > 0) {
// If y is odd, multiply x with result
if (y & 1)
res = (res * x) % p;
// y must be even now
y = y >> 1; // y = y/2
x = (x * x) % p;
}
return res;
}
// C function to print last 10 digits of a^b
void printLastDigits(long long int a,long long int b)
{
long long int temp = pow(10,10);
// Calling modular exponentiation
temp = power(a, b, temp);
if (temp)
printf("%d",temp);
}
int main()
{
long long int n;
scanf("%d",&n);
printLastDigits(2,n);
return 0;
}
You don't need to worry about the 'high' bits, since multiplication by 2 left shifts them out of range of the lower part of the product you're interesting in. Just be sure you're using the unsigned long long type (of at least 64 bits) to hold integral types that are wide enough, e.g.,
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdio.h>
void low_digits (unsigned int n)
{
unsigned long long base = 2, modulus = 10000000000ULL;
for (unsigned int i = 1; i <= n; i++)
{
fprintf(stdout, "2^%u mod 10^10 = %llu\n", i, base);
base = (base * 2) % modulus;
}
}
You can test 2^1000 with a bignum calculator:
10715086071862673209484250490600018105614048117055336074437503883703\
51051124936122493198378815695858127594672917553146825187145285692314\
04359845775746985748039345677748242309854210746050623711418779541821\
53046474983581941267398767559165543946077062914571196477686542167660\
429831652624386837205668069376
while n = 1000 above yields: 5668069376
Others have noted, that this is a naive method, and modular exponentiation is far more efficient for sufficiently large values of (n). Unfortunately, this is going to require products that exceed the range of an unsigned 64-bit value, so unless you're prepared to implement [hi64][lo64] multi-precision mul / mod operations, it's probably beyond the scope of your task.
Fortunately, later versions of gcc and clang do provide an extended 128 bit integral type:
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <stdio.h>
void low_digits (unsigned int n)
{
unsigned long long base = 2, modulus = 10000000000ULL;
__extension__ unsigned __int128 u = 1, w = base;
while (n != 0)
{
if ((n & 0x1) != 0)
u = (u * w) % modulus; /* (mul-reduce) */
if ((n >>= 1) != 0)
w = (w * w) % modulus; /* (sqr-reduce) */
}
base = (unsigned long long) u;
fprintf(stdout, "2^%u mod 10^10 = %llu\n", n, base);
}
The following uses strings to perform the multiplication:
void lastdigits(char digits[11], int n)
{
int i, j, x, carry;
for (i=0; i<n;i++) {
for (j=9, carry=0; j>=0; j--) {
x= digits[j]-'0';
x *= 2;
x += carry;
if (x>9) {carry= 1; x -= 10;}
else carry= 0;
digits[j]= x+'0';
}
}
}
void test(void)
{
char digits[11];
strcpy(digits,"0000000001");
lastdigits(digits,10);
printf("%s\n",digits);
strcpy(digits,"0000000001");
lastdigits(digits,20);
printf("%s\n",digits);
strcpy(digits,"0000000001");
lastdigits(digits,100);
printf("%s\n",digits);
}
Output:
0000001024
0001048576
6703205376
Since the other answers you've received don't actually show what you're doing wrong:
x = (x * x) % p;
You're assuming that x * x still fits in long long int. But if x is 0x100000000 (4294967296, for 10 decimal digits) and long long int is 64 bits, then it will not fit.
Either:
You need a way to accurately multiply two arbitrary 10-digit numbers. The result may have 20 digits and may not fit in long long int or even unsigned long long int. This means you'd need to use some bigint library or implement something like that yourself.
Or:
You need to avoid multiplying multiple possibly-10-digit numbers.
The answer you've accepted opts for simple repeated multiplication by 2. This is sufficient for your problem now, but beware that this does significantly increase the complexity if you want to allow very large exponents.
Let's say you are finding the last digit of 2^n, you just need to consider last digit and ignore every other digit
1. 2*2 = 4
2. 4*2 = 8
3. 8*2 = 16 (ignore last-but-one digit i.e 1)
4. 6*2 = 12 (ignore last-but-one digit i.e 1)
5. 2*2 = 4
6. 4*2 = 8
7. 8*2 = 16 (ignore last-but-one digit i.e 1)
8. 6*2 = 12 (ignore last-but-one digit i.e 1)
9. 2*2 = 4
... n-1 iterations
To find the last 2 digits of 2^n, ignore all digits except last 2 digits.
1. 2*2 = 4
2. 4*2 = 8
3. 8*2 = 16
4. 16*2 = 32
5. 32*2 = 64
6. 64*2 = 128 (Consider last 2 digits)
7. 28*2 = 56
8. 56*2 = 112 (Consider last 2 digits)
9. 12*2 = 24
... n-1 iterations
Similarly, to find the last 10 digits of 2^n, consider just last 10 digits at each iteration and repeat it for n-1 iterations.
Note:
With this approach, the biggest number you'll get during the calculation can be of 11 digits ~ 10^11, while for a 64-bit machine the max value is ~ 2^64 = ~ 10^18
I am trying to solve Project Euler+ #97 from Hackerrank. The problem asks to calculate the last 12 digits of A x B ** C + D. My attempt was to use the modular exponentiation mod 10 ** 12 from Wikipedia in order to efficiently calculate the last 12 digits and avoid overflow. However, for all cases aside from the sample 2 x 3 ** 4 + 5 I am getting wrong. According to the constraints there should be no overflow for unsigned long long.
The problem:
Now we want to learn how to calculate some last digits of such big numbers. Let's assume we have a lot of numbers A x B ** C + D and we want to know last 12 digits of these numbers.
Constraints:
1 ≤ T ≤ 500000
1 ≤ A, B, C, D ≤ 10 ** 9
Input: First line contains one integer T - the number of tests.
T lines follow containing 4 integers (A, B, C and D) each.
Output: Output exactly one line containing exactly 12 digits - the last 12 digits of the sum of all results. If the sum is less than 10 ** 12 print corresponding number of leading zeroes then.
My attempt in C
#include <stdio.h>
int main() {
const unsigned long long limit = 1000000000000;
int cases;
for (scanf("%d", &cases); cases; --cases) {
// mult = A, base = B, exp = C, add = D
unsigned long long mult, base, exp, add;
scanf("%llu %llu %llu %llu", &mult, &base, &exp, &add);
base = base % limit;
while (exp) {
if (exp & 1) {
mult = (mult * base) % limit;
}
exp >>= 1;
base = (base * base) % limit;
}
printf("%012llu\n", (mult + add) % limit);
}
return 0;
}
I think you can overflow unsigned long long math (e.g. - modulo 2^64) because your computation of base in your inner loop can get as high as (10^12 - 1)^2 ~= 10^24 ~= 2^79.726, which is much more than 2^64. For example, think about B = 10^6 - 1 and C = 4.
On my MacBook Pro running a 64b version of Mac OS X with clang 8.1.0:
#include <stdio.h>
int main()
{
fprintf(stdout, "sizeof(unsigned long long) = %u\n", (unsigned) sizeof(unsigned long long));
fprintf(stdout, "sizeof(__uint128_t) = %u\n", (unsigned) sizeof(__uint128_t));
fprintf(stdout, "sizeof(long double) = %u\n", (unsigned) sizeof(long double));
return 0;
}
Says:
sizeof(unsigned long long) = 8
sizeof(__uint128_t) = 16
sizeof(long double) = 16
If your platform says 16 or 10 instead for long long, then I think you are in the clear. If it says 8 like mine does, then you need to rework your answer to either force 128b (or 80b) integer math natively or mimic it some other way.
You can try __uint128_t, which is supported by gcc and clang. Otherwise, you'd need to resort to something like long double and fmodl(), which might have enough mantissa bits but might not give exact answers like you want.
Also, you don't accumulate multiple results like the task says. Here's my shot at it, based on your program, but using __uint128_t.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#define BILLION 1000000000
#define TRILLION 1000000000000
int main()
{
const __uint128_t limit = TRILLION;
unsigned long cases = 0;
__uint128_t acc = 0;
if (scanf("%lu", &cases) != 1 || cases == 0 || cases > 500000)
abort();
while (cases-- > 0)
{
unsigned long a, b, c, d;
__uint128_t b2c = 1, bbase;
if (scanf("%lu %lu %lu %lu", &a, &b, &c, &d) != 4 ||
a == 0 || a > BILLION || b == 0 || b > BILLION ||
c == 0 || c > BILLION || d == 0 || d > BILLION)
abort();
for (bbase = b; c > 0; c >>= 1)
{
if ((c & 0x1) != 0)
b2c = (b2c * bbase) % limit; // 64b overflow: ~10^12 * ~10^12 ~= 10^24 > 2^64
bbase = (bbase * bbase) % limit; // same overflow issue as above
}
// can do modulus on acc only once at end of program instead because
// 5 * 10^5 * (10^9 * (10^12 - 1) + 10^9) = 5 * 10^26 < 2^128
acc += a * b2c + d;
}
acc %= limit;
printf("%012llu\n", (unsigned long long) acc);
return 0;
}
I need generate random 64-bit unsigned integers using C. I mean, the range should be 0 to 18446744073709551615. RAND_MAX is 1073741823.
I found some solutions in the links which might be possible duplicates but the answers mostly concatenates some rand() results or making some incremental arithmetic operations. So results are always 18 digits or 20 digits. I also want outcomes like 5, 11, 33387, not just 3771778641802345472.
By the way, I really don't have so much experience with the C but any approach, code samples and idea could be beneficial.
Concerning "So results are always 18 digits or 20 digits."
See #Thomas comment. If you generate random numbers long enough, code will create ones like 5, 11 and 33387. If code generates 1,000,000,000 numbers/second, it may take a year as very small numbers < 100,000 are so rare amongst all 64-bit numbers.
rand() simple returns random bits. A simplistic method pulls 1 bit at a time
uint64_t rand_uint64_slow(void) {
uint64_t r = 0;
for (int i=0; i<64; i++) {
r = r*2 + rand()%2;
}
return r;
}
Assuming RAND_MAX is some power of 2 - 1 as in OP's case 1073741823 == 0x3FFFFFFF, take advantage that 30 at least 15 bits are generated each time. The following code will call rand() 5 3 times - a tad wasteful. Instead bits shifted out could be saved for the next random number, but that brings in other issues. Leave that for another day.
uint64_t rand_uint64(void) {
uint64_t r = 0;
for (int i=0; i<64; i += 15 /*30*/) {
r = r*((uint64_t)RAND_MAX + 1) + rand();
}
return r;
}
A portable loop count method avoids the 15 /*30*/ - But see 2020 edit below.
#if RAND_MAX/256 >= 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFF
#define LOOP_COUNT 1
#elif RAND_MAX/256 >= 0xFFFFFF
#define LOOP_COUNT 2
#elif RAND_MAX/256 >= 0x3FFFF
#define LOOP_COUNT 3
#elif RAND_MAX/256 >= 0x1FF
#define LOOP_COUNT 4
#else
#define LOOP_COUNT 5
#endif
uint64_t rand_uint64(void) {
uint64_t r = 0;
for (int i=LOOP_COUNT; i > 0; i--) {
r = r*(RAND_MAX + (uint64_t)1) + rand();
}
return r;
}
The autocorrelation effects commented here are caused by a weak rand(). C does not specify a particular method of random number generation. The above relies on rand() - or whatever base random function employed - being good.
If rand() is sub-par, then code should use other generators. Yet one can still use this approach to build up larger random numbers.
[Edit 2020]
Hallvard B. Furuseth provides as nice way to determine the number of bits in RAND_MAX when it is a Mersenne Number - a power of 2 minus 1.
#define IMAX_BITS(m) ((m)/((m)%255+1) / 255%255*8 + 7-86/((m)%255+12))
#define RAND_MAX_WIDTH IMAX_BITS(RAND_MAX)
_Static_assert((RAND_MAX & (RAND_MAX + 1u)) == 0, "RAND_MAX not a Mersenne number");
uint64_t rand64(void) {
uint64_t r = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < 64; i += RAND_MAX_WIDTH) {
r <<= RAND_MAX_WIDTH;
r ^= (unsigned) rand();
}
return r;
}
If you don't need cryptographically secure pseudo random numbers, I would suggest using MT19937-64. It is a 64 bit version of Mersenne Twister PRNG.
Please, do not combine rand() outputs and do not build upon other tricks. Use existing implementation:
http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~m-mat/MT/emt64.html
Iff you have a sufficiently good source of random bytes (like, say, /dev/random or /dev/urandom on a linux machine), you can simply consume 8 bytes from that source and concatenate them. If they are independent and have a linear distribution, you're set.
If you don't, you MAY get away by doing the same, but there is likely to be some artefacts in your pseudo-random generator that gives a toe-hold for all sorts of hi-jinx.
Example code assuming we have an open binary FILE *source:
/* Implementation #1, slightly more elegant than looping yourself */
uint64_t 64bitrandom()
{
uint64_t rv;
size_t count;
do {
count = fread(&rv, sizeof(rv), 1, source);
} while (count != 1);
return rv;
}
/* Implementation #2 */
uint64_t 64bitrandom()
{
uint64_t rv = 0;
int c;
for (i=0; i < sizeof(rv); i++) {
do {
c = fgetc(source)
} while (c < 0);
rv = (rv << 8) | (c & 0xff);
}
return rv;
}
If you replace "read random bytes from a randomness device" with "get bytes from a function call", all you have to do is to adjust the shifts in method #2.
You're vastly more likely to get a "number with many digits" than one with "small number of digits" (of all the numbers between 0 and 2 ** 64, roughly 95% have 19 or more decimal digits, so really that is what you will mostly get.
If you are willing to use a repetitive pseudo random sequence and you can deal with a bunch of values that will never happen (like even numbers? ... don't use just the low bits), an LCG or MCG are simple solutions. Wikipedia: Linear congruential generator can get you started (there are several more types including the commonly used Wikipedia: Mersenne Twister). And this site can generate a couple prime numbers for the modulus and the multiplier below. (caveat: this sequence will be guessable and thus it is NOT secure)
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdint.h>
uint64_t
mcg64(void)
{
static uint64_t i = 1;
return (i = (164603309694725029ull * i) % 14738995463583502973ull);
}
int
main(int ac, char * av[])
{
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
printf("%016p\n", mcg64());
}
I have tried this code here and it seems to work fine there.
#include <time.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <math.h>
int main(){
srand(time(NULL));
int a = rand();
int b = rand();
int c = rand();
int d = rand();
long e = (long)a*b;
e = abs(e);
long f = (long)c*d;
f = abs(f);
long long answer = (long long)e*f;
printf("value %lld",answer);
return 0;
}
I ran a few iterations and i get the following outputs :
value 1869044101095834648
value 2104046041914393000
value 1587782446298476296
value 604955295827516250
value 41152208336759610
value 57792837533816000
If you have 32 or 16-bit random value - generate 2 or 4 randoms and combine them to one 64-bit with << and |.
uint64_t rand_uint64(void) {
// Assuming RAND_MAX is 2^31.
uint64_t r = rand();
r = r<<30 | rand();
r = r<<30 | rand();
return r;
}
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>
unsigned long long int randomize(unsigned long long int uint_64);
int main(void)
{
srand(time(0));
unsigned long long int random_number = randomize(18446744073709551615);
printf("%llu\n",random_number);
random_number = randomize(123);
printf("%llu\n",random_number);
return 0;
}
unsigned long long int randomize(unsigned long long int uint_64)
{
char buffer[100] , data[100] , tmp[2];
//convert llu to string,store in buffer
sprintf(buffer, "%llu", uint_64);
//store buffer length
size_t len = strlen(buffer);
//x : store converted char to int, rand_num : random number , index of data array
int x , rand_num , index = 0;
//condition that prevents the program from generating number that is bigger input value
bool Condition = 0;
//iterate over buffer array
for( int n = 0 ; n < len ; n++ )
{
//store the first character of buffer
tmp[0] = buffer[n];
tmp[1] = '\0';
//convert it to integer,store in x
x = atoi(tmp);
if( n == 0 )
{
//if first iteration,rand_num must be less than or equal to x
rand_num = rand() % ( x + 1 );
//if generated random number does not equal to x,condition is true
if( rand_num != x )
Condition = 1;
//convert character that corrosponds to integer to integer and store it in data array;increment index
data[index] = rand_num + '0';
index++;
}
//if not first iteration,do the following
else
{
if( Condition )
{
rand_num = rand() % ( 10 );
data[index] = rand_num + '0';
index++;
}
else
{
rand_num = rand() % ( x + 1 );
if( rand_num != x )
Condition = 1;
data[index] = rand_num + '0';
index++;
}
}
}
data[index] = '\0';
char *ptr ;
//convert the data array to unsigned long long int
unsigned long long int ret = _strtoui64(data,&ptr,10);
return ret;
}
I have an array of unsigned chars in c I am trying to print in base 10, and I am stuck. I think this will be better explained in code, so, given:
unsigned char n[3];
char[0] = 1;
char[1] = 2;
char[2] = 3;
I would like to print 197121.
This is trivial with small base 256 arrays. One can simply 1 * 256 ^ 0 + 2 * 256 ^ 1 + 3 * 256 ^ 2.
However, if my array was 100 bytes large, then this quickly becomes a problem. There is no integral type in C that is 100 bytes large, which is why I'm storing numbers in unsigned char arrays to begin with.
How am I supposed to efficiently print this number out in base 10?
I am a bit lost.
There's no easy way to do it using only the standard C library. You'll either have to write the function yourself (not recommended), or use an external library such as GMP.
For example, using GMP, you could do:
unsigned char n[100]; // number to print
mpz_t num;
mpz_import(num, 100, -1, 1, 0, 0, n); // convert byte array into GMP format
mpz_out_str(stdout, 10, num); // print num to stdout in base 10
mpz_clear(num); // free memory for num
When I saw this question, I purpose to solve it, but at that moment I was very busy.
This last weekend I've could gain some prize hours of free time so I considered my pending challenge.
First of all, I suggest you to considered above response. I never use GMP library but I'm sure that it's better solution than a handmade code.
Also, you could be interest to analyze code of bc calculator; it can works with big numbers and I used to test my own code.
Ok, if you are still interested in a code do it by yourself (only with support C language and Standard C library) may be I can give you something.
Before all, a little bit theory. In basic numeric theory (modular arithmetic level) theres is an algorithm that inspire me to arrive at one solution; Multiply and Power algorithm to solve a^N module m:
Result := 1;
for i := k until i = 0
if n_i = 1 then Result := (Result * a) mod m;
if i != 0 then Result := (Result * Result) mod m;
end for;
Where k is number of digits less one of N in binary representation, and n_i is i binary digit. For instance (N is exponent):
N = 44 -> 1 0 1 1 0 0
k = 5
n_5 = 1
n_4 = 0
n_3 = 1
n_2 = 1
n_1 = 0
n_0 = 0
When we make a module operation, as an integer division, we can lose part of the number, so we only have to modify algorithm to don't miss relevant data.
Here is my code (take care that it is an adhoc code, strong dependency of may computer arch. Basically I play with data length of C language so, be carefully because my data length could not be the same):
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <math.h>
enum { SHF = 31, BMASK = 0x1 << SHF, MODULE = 1000000000UL, LIMIT = 1024 };
unsigned int scaleBigNum(const unsigned short scale, const unsigned int lim, unsigned int *num);
unsigned int pow2BigNum(const unsigned int lim, unsigned int *nsrc, unsigned int *ndst);
unsigned int addBigNum(const unsigned int lim1, unsigned int *num1, const unsigned int lim2, unsigned int *num2);
unsigned int bigNum(const unsigned short int base, const unsigned int exp, unsigned int **num);
int main(void)
{
unsigned int *num, lim;
unsigned int *np, nplim;
int i, j;
for(i = 1; i < LIMIT; ++i)
{
lim = bigNum(i, i, &num);
printf("%i^%i == ", i, i);
for(j = lim - 1; j > -1; --j)
printf("%09u", num[j]);
printf("\n");
free(num);
}
return 0;
}
/*
bigNum: Compute number base^exp and store it in num array
#base: Base number
#exp: Exponent number
#num: Pointer to array where it stores big number
Return: Array length of result number
*/
unsigned int bigNum(const unsigned short int base, const unsigned int exp, unsigned int **num)
{
unsigned int m, lim, mem;
unsigned int *v, *w, *k;
//Note: mem has the exactly amount memory to allocate (dinamic memory version)
mem = ( (unsigned int) (exp * log10( (float) base ) / 9 ) ) + 3;
v = (unsigned int *) malloc( mem * sizeof(unsigned int) );
w = (unsigned int *) malloc( mem * sizeof(unsigned int) );
for(m = BMASK; ( (m & exp) == 0 ) && m; m >>= 1 ) ;
v[0] = (m) ? 1 : 0;
for(lim = 1; m > 1; m >>= 1)
{
if( exp & m )
lim = scaleBigNum(base, lim, v);
lim = pow2BigNum(lim, v, w);
k = v;
v = w;
w = k;
}
if(exp & 0x1)
lim = scaleBigNum(base, lim, v);
free(w);
*num = v;
return lim;
}
/*
scaleBigNum: Make an (num[] <- scale*num[]) big number operation
#scale: Scalar that multiply big number
#lim: Length of source big number
#num: Source big number (array of unsigned int). Update it with new big number value
Return: Array length of operation result
Warning: This method can write in an incorrect position if we don't previous reallocate num (if it's necessary). bigNum method do it for us
*/
unsigned int scaleBigNum(const unsigned short scale, const unsigned int lim, unsigned int *num)
{
unsigned int i;
unsigned long long int n, t;
for(n = 0, t = 0, i = 0; i < lim; ++i)
{
t = (n / MODULE);
n = ( (unsigned long long int) scale * num[i] );
num[i] = (n % MODULE) + t; // (n % MODULE) + t always will be smaller than MODULE
}
num[i] = (n / MODULE);
return ( (num[i]) ? lim + 1 : lim );
}
/*
pow2BigNum: Make a (dst[] <- src[] * src[]) big number operation
#lim: Length of source big number
#src: Source big number (array of unsigned int)
#dst: Destination big number (array of unsigned int)
Return: Array length of operation result
Warning: This method can write in an incorrect position if we don't previous reallocate num (if it's necessary). bigNum method do it for us
*/
unsigned int pow2BigNum(const unsigned int lim, unsigned int *src, unsigned int *dst)
{
unsigned int i, j;
unsigned long long int n, t;
unsigned int k, c;
for(c = 0, dst[0] = 0, i = 0; i < lim; ++i)
{
for(j = i, n = 0; j < lim; ++j)
{
n = ( (unsigned long long int) src[i] * src[j] );
k = i + j;
if(i != j)
{
t = 2 * (n % MODULE);
n = 2 * (n / MODULE);
// (i + j)
dst[k] = ( (k > c) ? ((c = k), 0) : dst[k] ) + (t % MODULE);
++k; // (i + j + 1)
dst[k] = ( (k > c) ? ((c = k), 0) : dst[k] ) + ( (t / MODULE) + (n % MODULE) );
++k; // (i + j + 2)
dst[k] = ( (k > c) ? ((c = k), 0) : dst[k] ) + (n / MODULE);
}
else
{
dst[k] = ( (k > c) ? ((c = k), 0) : dst[k] ) + (n % MODULE);
++k; // (i + j)
dst[k] = ( (k > c) ? ((c = k), 0) : dst[k] ) + (n / MODULE);
}
for(k = i + j; k < (lim + j); ++k)
{
dst[k + 1] += (dst[k] / MODULE);
dst[k] %= MODULE;
}
}
}
i = lim << 1;
return ((dst[i - 1]) ? i : i - 1);
}
/*
addBigNum: Make a (num2[] <- num1[] + num2[]) big number operation
#lim1: Length of source num1 big number
#num1: First source operand big number (array of unsigned int). Should be smaller than second
#lim2: Length of source num2 big number
#num2: Second source operand big number (array of unsigned int). Should be equal or greater than first
Return: Array length of operation result or 0 if num1[] > num2[] (dosen't do any op)
Warning: This method can write in an incorrect position if we don't previous reallocate num2
*/
unsigned int addBigNum(const unsigned int lim1, unsigned int *num1, const unsigned int lim2, unsigned int *num2)
{
unsigned long long int n;
unsigned int i;
if(lim1 > lim2)
return 0;
for(num2[lim2] = 0, n = 0, i = 0; i < lim1; ++i)
{
n = num2[i] + num1[i] + (n / MODULE);
num2[i] = n % MODULE;
}
for(n /= MODULE; n; ++i)
{
num2[i] += n;
n = (num2[i] / MODULE);
}
return (lim2 > i) ? lim2 : i;
}
To compile:
gcc -o bgn <name>.c -Wall -O3 -lm //Math library if you wants to use log func
To check result, use direct output as and input to bc. Easy shell script:
#!/bin/bash
select S in ` awk -F '==' '{print $1 " == " $2 }' | bc`;
do
0;
done;
echo "Test Finished!";
We have and array of unsigned int (4 bytes) where we store at each int of array a number of 9 digits ( % 1000000000UL ); hence num[0] we will have the first 9 digits, num[1] we will have digit 10 to 18, num[2]...
I use convencional memory to work but an improvement can do it with dinamic memory. Ok, but how length It could be the array? (or how many memory we need to allocate?). Using bc calculator (bc -l with mathlib) we can determine how many digits has a number:
l(a^N) / l(10) // Natural logarith to Logarithm base 10
If we know digits, we know amount integers we needed:
( l(a^N) / (9 * l(10)) ) + 1 // Truncate result
If you work with value such as (2^k)^N you can resolve it logarithm with this expression:
( k*N*l(2)/(9*l(10)) ) + 1 // Truncate result
to determine the exactly length of integer array. Example:
256^800 = 2^(8*800) ---> l(2^(8*800))/(9*l(10)) + 1 = 8*800*l(2)/(9*l(10)) + 1
The value 1000000000UL (10^9) constant is very important. A constant like 10000000000UL (10^10) dosen't work because can produce and indetected overflow (try what's happens with number 16^16 and 10^10 constant) and a constant more little such as 1000000000UL (10^8) are correct but we need to reserve more memory and do more steps. 10^9 is key constant for unsigned int of 32 bits and unsigned long long int of 64 bits.
The code has two parts, Multiply (easy) and Power by 2 (more hard). Multiply is just multiplication and scale and propagate the integer overflow. It take the principle of associative property in math to do exactly the inverse principle, so if k(A + B + C) we want kA + kB + kC where number will be k*A*10^18 + k*B*10^9 + kC. Obiously, kC operation can generate a number bigger than 999 999 999, but never more bigger than 0xFF FF FF FF FF FF FF FF. A number bigger than 64 bits can never occur in a multiplication because C is an unsigned integer of 32 bits and k is a unsigned short of 16 bits. In worts case, we will have this number:
k = 0x FF FF;
C = 0x 3B 9A C9 FF; // 999999999
n = k*C = 0x 3B 9A | 8E 64 36 01;
n % 1000000000 = 0x 3B 99 CA 01;
n / 1000000000 = 0x FF FE;
After Mul kB we need to add 0x FF FE from last multiplication of C ( B = kB + (C / module) ), and so on (we have 18 bits arithmetic offset, enough to guarantee correct values).
Power is more complex but is in essencial, the same problem (multiplication and add), so I give some tricks about code power:
Data types are important, very important
If you try to multiplication an unsigned integer with unsigned integer, you get another unsigned integer. Use explicit cast to get unsigned long long int and don't lose data.
Always use unsigned modifier, dont forget it!
Power by 2 can directly modify 2 index ahead of current index
gdb is your friend
I've developed another method that add big numbers. These last I don't prove so much but I think it works well. Don't be cruels with me if it has a bug.
...and that's all!
PD1: Developed in a
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1.70GHz
Data length:
unsigned short: 2
unsigned int: 4
unsigned long int: 4
unsigned long long int: 8
Numbers such as 256^1024 it spend:
real 0m0.059s
user 0m0.033s
sys 0m0.000s
A bucle that's compute i^i where i goes to i = 1 ... 1024:
real 0m40.716s
user 0m14.952s
sys 0m0.067s
For numbers such as 65355^65355, spent time is insane.
PD2: My response is so late but I hope my code it will be usefull.
PD3: Sorry, explain me in english is one of my worst handicaps!
Last update: I just have had an idea that with same algorithm but other implementation, improve response and reduce amount memory to use (we can use the completely bits of unsigned int). The secret: n^2 = n * n = n * (n - 1 + 1) = n * (n - 1) + n.
(I will not do this new code, but if someone are interested, may be after exams... )
I don't know if you still need a solution, but I wrote an article about this problem. It shows a very simple algorithm which can be used to convert an arbitrary long number with base X to a corresponding number of base Y. The algorithm is written in Python, but it is really only a few lines long and doesn't use any Python magic. I needed such an algorithm for a C implementation, too, but decided to describe it using Python for two reasons. First, Python is very readable by anyone who understands algorithms written in a pseudo programming language and, second, I am not allowed to post the C version, because it I did it for my company. Just have a look and you will see how easy this problem can be solved in general. An implementation in C should be straight forward...
Here is a function that does what you want:
#include <math.h>
#include <stddef.h> // for size_t
double getval(unsigned char *arr, size_t len)
{
double ret = 0;
size_t cur;
for(cur = 0; cur < len; cur++)
ret += arr[cur] * pow(256, cur);
return ret;
}
That looks perfectly readable to me. Just pass the unsigned char * array you want to convert and the size. Note that it won't be perfect - for arbitrary precision, I suggest looking into the GNU MP BigNum library, as has been suggested already.
As a bonus, I don't like your storing your numbers in little-endian order, so here's a version if you want to store base-256 numbers in big-endian order:
#include <stddef.h> // for size_t
double getval_big_endian(unsigned char *arr, size_t len)
{
double ret = 0;
size_t cur;
for(cur = 0; cur < len; cur++)
{
ret *= 256;
ret += arr[cur];
}
return ret;
}
Just things to consider.
It may be too late or too irrelevant to make this suggestion, but could you store each byte as two base 10 digits (or one base 100) instead of one base 256? If you haven't implemented division yet, then that implies all you have is addition, subtraction, and maybe multiplication; those shouldn't be too hard to convert. Once you've done that, printing it would be trivial.
As I was not satisfied with the other answers provided, I decided to write an alternative solution myself:
#include <stdlib.h>
#define BASE_256 256
char *largenum2str(unsigned char *num, unsigned int len_num)
{
int temp;
char *str, *b_256 = NULL, *cur_num = NULL, *prod = NULL, *prod_term = NULL;
unsigned int i, j, carry = 0, len_str = 1, len_b_256, len_cur_num, len_prod, len_prod_term;
//Get 256 as an array of base-10 chars we'll use later as our second operand of the product
for ((len_b_256 = 0, temp = BASE_256); temp > 0; len_b_256++)
{
b_256 = realloc(b_256, sizeof(char) * (len_b_256 + 1));
b_256[len_b_256] = temp % 10;
temp = temp / 10;
}
//Our first operand (prod) is the last element of our num array, which we'll convert to a base-10 array
for ((len_prod = 0, temp = num[len_num - 1]); temp > 0; len_prod++)
{
prod = realloc(prod, sizeof(*prod) * (len_prod + 1));
prod[len_prod] = temp % 10;
temp = temp / 10;
}
while (len_num > 1) //We'll stay in this loop as long as we still have elements in num to read
{
len_num--; //Decrease the length of num to keep track of the current element
//Convert this element to a base-10 unsigned char array
for ((len_cur_num = 0, temp = num[len_num - 1]); temp > 0; len_cur_num++)
{
cur_num = (char *)realloc(cur_num, sizeof(char) * (len_cur_num + 1));
cur_num[len_cur_num] = temp % 10;
temp = temp / 10;
}
//Multiply prod by 256 and save that as prod_term
len_prod_term = 0;
prod_term = NULL;
for (i = 0; i < len_b_256; i++)
{ //Repeat this loop 3 times, one for each element in {6,5,2} (256 as a reversed base-10 unsigned char array)
carry = 0; //Set the carry to 0
prod_term = realloc(prod_term, sizeof(*prod_term) * (len_prod + i)); //Allocate memory to save prod_term
for (j = i; j < (len_prod_term); j++) //If we have digits from the last partial product of the multiplication, add it here
{
prod_term[j] = prod_term[j] + prod[j - i] * b_256[i] + carry;
if (prod_term[j] > 9)
{
carry = prod_term[j] / 10;
prod_term[j] = prod_term[j] % 10;
}
else
{
carry = 0;
}
}
while (j < (len_prod + i)) //No remaining elements of the former prod_term, so take only into account the results of multiplying mult * b_256
{
prod_term[j] = prod[j - i] * b_256[i] + carry;
if (prod_term[j] > 9)
{
carry = prod_term[j] / 10;
prod_term[j] = prod_term[j] % 10;
}
else
{
carry = 0;
}
j++;
}
if (carry) //A carry may be present in the last term. If so, allocate memory to save it and increase the length of prod_term
{
len_prod_term = j + 1;
prod_term = realloc(prod_term, sizeof(*prod_term) * (len_prod_term));
prod_term[j] = carry;
}
else
{
len_prod_term = j;
}
}
free(prod); //We don't need prod anymore, prod will now be prod_term
prod = prod_term;
len_prod = len_prod_term;
//Add prod (formerly prod_term) to our current number of the num array, expressed in a b-10 array
carry = 0;
for (i = 0; i < len_cur_num; i++)
{
prod[i] = prod[i] + cur_num[i] + carry;
if (prod[i] > 9)
{
carry = prod[i] / 10;
prod[i] -= 10;
}
else
{
carry = 0;
}
}
while (carry && (i < len_prod))
{
prod[i] = prod[i] + carry;
if (prod[i] > 9)
{
carry = prod[i] / 10;
prod[i] -= 10;
}
else
{
carry = 0;
}
i++;
}
if (carry)
{
len_prod++;
prod = realloc(prod, sizeof(*prod) * len_prod);
prod[len_prod - 1] = carry;
carry = 0;
}
}
str = malloc(sizeof(char) * (len_prod + 1)); //Allocate memory for the return string
for (i = 0; i < len_prod; i++) //Convert the numeric result to its representation as characters
{
str[len_prod - 1 - i] = prod[i] + '0';
}
str[i] = '\0'; //Terminate our string
free(b_256); //Free memory
free(prod);
free(cur_num);
return str;
}
The idea behind it all derives from simple math. For any base-256 number, its base-10 representation can be calculated as:
num[i]*256^i + num[i-1]*256^(i-1) + (···) + num[2]*256^2 + num[1]*256^1 + num[0]*256^0
which expands to:
(((((num[i])*256 + num[i-1])*256 + (···))*256 + num[2])*256 + num[1])*256 + num[0]
So all we have to do is to multiply, step-by step, each element of the number array by 256 and add to it the next element, and so on... That way we can get the base-10 number.