I have edited my SQL code blocks to more accurately show what is going on
Say I have a simple stored procedure:
CREATE PROCEDURE [DBO].[FOO]
(#VARIABLE VARCHAR(500))
AS
BEGIN
SELECT AVG(BAR)
FROM MYTABLE
WHERE THING = #VARIABLE AND RTRIM(LTRIM(THING)) <> ''
END
When I call this stored procedure from my classic ASP page; which in this case would be with:
Set foo = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.RecordSet")
curCmd = "Foo 'MYVARIABLE'"
foo.Open curCmd, connectionString
I get this error (on the same line as the page opens the foo object):
Arithmetic overflow error converting varchar to data type numeric.
If I call the stored procedure manually in the terminal (IDE?); then it works fine.
Also if I recreate the stored procedure as the following:
CREATE PROCEDURE [DBO].[FOO]
(#VARIABLE VARCHAR(500))
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #VARIABLE2 VARCHAR(500) = #VARIABLE
SELECT AVG(BAR)
FROM MYTABLE
WHERE THING = #VARIABLE2 AND RTRIM(LTRIM(THING)) <> ''
END
Then the stored procedure runs fine.
I have tried dropping and recreating the stored procedure (without using the re-declaration trick), but it does not fix the issue.
*As an aside; there is validation on the data being inserted into the table to ensure that only numbers (integers) are being entered for the THING field. The THING field can also be blank; hence the where clause.
I basically have two questions:
Why does re-declaring the same variable type with the same data fix the issue?
Is there a way I can fix my problem without using this silly "re-declaration" trick?
Thanks in advance for any help with this.
I think you can get the same error if you use begin/end:
CREATE PROCEDURE [DBO].[FOO] (
#VARIABLE VARCHAR(500)
)
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE #VARIABLE2 VARCHAR(500) = #VARIABLE;
SELECT AVG(BAR) FROM MYTABLE WHERE THING = #VARIABLE2;
END;
Then, both statements will be part of the stored procedure body and you can work on fixing the data so it will work.
I have a stored procedure that can NOT be modified, the result of this stored procedure is normal select statement as following :
CREATE PROCEDURE LockedProcedure
AS
BEGIN
SELECT * FROM COLORS_TABLE
END
my problem is that I need to get its result as XML result like how the select statement returns when you provide "FOR XML" but without modifying the procedure itself, maybe we can create another stored procedure to call that or user defined function.
This is an example of the procedure that we CAN NOT modify because it is locked.
how to get its result as XML result NOT XML FILE...I don't want any physical file on hard disk.
Thanks.
Solution 1)
Create a temp table matching the output definition of stored procedure.
Use INSERT INTO #Tmp EXEC SPName to insert the stored procedure results into the temp table.
Use FOR XML in combination with SELECT command to fetch the results as xml from temp table.
Solution 2)
Create a CLR User-Defined function to execute the stored procedure and use the BCL facilities to convert the results to xml.
I had a similar problem to this but in my case editing the stored procedure is possible. Even though the OP mentions the stored procedure is locked, I still wanted to post this solution here for others that stumble upon it. This solution assumes the stored procedure uses dynamic SQL to select some data, but could just as easily be adapted to a non-dynamic SQL case.
Add a parameter to the sp such as "#lp_ReturnAsXML BIT = 0". When set to true, you will return the result set as XML using "FOR XML RAW" or some similar command.
Then add this to the end of the stored procedure as an alternative for running the dynamic SQL:
IF #lp_ReturnAsXML = 1
BEGIN
DECLARE #l_XML XML
SET #l_SQL = 'SET #l_XML = (SELECT * FROM ( ' +
#l_SQL + '
) d FOR XML RAW)'
EXEC sp_executesql #l_SQL, N'#l_XML XML OUTPUT', #l_XML = #l_XML OUTPUT
SELECT #l_XML
END
Now something like this should work:
DECLARE #table TABLE
(
Results XML
)
INSERT INTO #table
EXEC p_MyStoredProc ..., #lp_ReturnAsXML = 1
I have query in a stored procedure that calls some linked servers with some dynamic SQL. I understand that EF doesn't like that, so I specifically listed all the columns that would be returned. Yet, it still doesn't like that. What am I doing wrong here? I just want EF to be able to detect the columns returned from the stored procedure so I can create the classes I need.
Please see the following code that makes up the last lines of my stored procedure:
SELECT
#TempMain.ID,
#TempMain.Class_Data,
#TempMain.Web_Store_Class1,
#TempMain.Web_Store_Class2,
#TempMain.Web_Store_Status,
#TempMain.Cur_1pc_Cat51_Price,
#TempMain.Cur_1pc_Cat52_Price,
#TempMain.Cur_1pc_Cat61_Price,
#TempMain.Cur_1pc_Cat62_Price,
#TempMain.Cur_1pc_Cat63_Price,
#TempMain.Flat_Length,
#TempMain.Flat_Width,
#TempMain.Item_Height,
#TempMain.Item_Weight,
#TempMain.Um,
#TempMain.Lead_Time_Code,
#TempMain.Wp_Image_Nme,
#TempMain.Wp_Mod_Dte,
#TempMain.Catalog_Price_Chg_Dt,
#TempMain.Description,
#TempMain.Supersede_Ctl,
#TempMain.Supersede_Pn,
TempDesc.Cust_Desc,
TempMfgr.Mfgr_Item_Nbr,
TempMfgr.Mfgr_Name,
TempMfgr.Vendor_ID
FROM
#TempMain
LEFT JOIN TempDesc ON #TempMain.ID = TempDesc.ID
LEFT JOIN TempMfgr ON #TempMain.ID = TempMfgr.ID
EF doesn't support importing stored procedures which build result set from:
Dynamic queries
Temporary tables
The reason is that to import the procedure EF must execute it. Such operation can be dangerous because it can trigger some changes in the database. Because of that EF uses special SQL command before it executes the stored procedure:
SET FMTONLY ON
By executing this command stored procedure will return only "metadata" about columns in its result set and it will not execute its logic. But because the logic wasn't executed there is no temporary table (or built dynamic query) so metadata contains nothing.
You have two choices (except the one which requires re-writing your stored procedure to not use these features):
Define the returned complex type manually (I guess it should work)
Use a hack and just for adding the stored procedure put at its beginning SET FMTONLY OFF. This will allow rest of your SP's code to execute in normal way. Just make sure that your SP doesn't modify any data because these modifications will be executed during import! After successful import remove that hack.
Adding this Non-Logical block of code solved the problem. Even though it will never Hit
IF 1=0 BEGIN
SET FMTONLY OFF
END
Why does my typed dataset not like temporary tables?
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/adodotnetdataset/thread/fe76d511-64a8-436d-9c16-6d09ecf436ea/
Or you can create a User-Defined Table Type and return that.
CREATE TYPE T1 AS TABLE
( ID bigint NOT NULL
,Field1 varchar(max) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AI NOT NULL
,Field2 bit NOT NULL
,Field3 varchar(500) NOT NULL
);
GO
Then in the procedure:
DECLARE #tempTable dbo.T1
INSERT #tempTable (ID, Field1, Field2, Field3)
SELECT .....
....
SELECT * FROM #tempTable
Now EF should be able to recognize the returned columns type.
As some others have noted, make sure the procedure actually runs. In particular, in my case, I was running the procedure happily without error in SQL Server Management Studio completely forgetting that I was logged in with admin rights. As soon as I tried running the procedure using my application's principal user I found there was a table in the query that that user did not have permission to access.
Interesting side note: Had the same problem which I first solved by using Table Variables, rather than Temp Tables (just for the import). That wasn't particularly intuitive to me, and threw me off when initially observing my two SProcs: one using Temp tables and one with Table Variables.
(SET FMTONLY OFF never worked for me, so I just changed my SProcs temporarily to get the column info, rather than bothering with the hack on the EF side just as an FYI.)
My best option was really just manually creating the complex type and mapping the function import to it. Worked great, and the only difference ended up being that an additional FactoryMethod to create the properties was included in the Designer.
What I would add is:
That the import also fails if the stored procedures has parameters and returns no result set for the default parameter values.
My stored procedure had 2 float parameters and would not return anything when both parameters are 0.
So in order to add this stored procedure to the entity model, I set the value of these parameters in the stored procedure so that it is guaranteed to return some rows, no matter what the parameters actually are.
Then after adding this stored procedure to the entity model I undid the changes.
both solutions :
1- Define the returned complex type manually (I guess it should work)
2- Use a hack and just for adding the stored procedure put at its beginning SET FMTONLY OFF.
not working with me in some procedure however it worked with other one!
my procedure ends with this line:
SELECT machineId, production [AProduction]
, (select production FROM #ShiftBFinalProd WHERE machineId = #ShiftAFinalProd.machineId) [BProduction]
, (select production FROM #ShiftCFinalProd WHERE machineId = #ShiftAFinalProd.machineId) [CProduction]
FROM #ShiftAFinalProd
ORDER BY machineId
Thanks
In addition to what #tmanthley said, be sure that your stored procedure actually works by running it first in SSMS. I had imported some stored procedures and forgot about a couple dependent scalar functions, which caused EF to determine that the procedure returned no columns. Seems like a mistake I should have caught earlier on, but EF doesn't give you an error message in that case.
Entity Framework will try to get the columns by executing your stored procedure, passing NULL for every argument.
Please make sure that the stored procedure will return something under all the circumstances. Note it may have been smarter for Entity Framework to execute the stored proc with default values for the arguments, as opposed to NULLs.
ER does the following to get the metadata of the table:
SET FMTONLY ON
This will break your stored procedure in various circumstances, in particular, if it uses a temporary table.
So to get a result as complex type; please try by adding
SET FMTONLY OFF;
This worked for me - hope it works for you too.
Referred from https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e7f598a2-6827-4b27-a09d-aefe733b48e6/entity-model-add-function-import-stored-procedure-returns-no-columns?forum=adodotnetentityframework
In my case adding SET NOCOUNT ON; at the top of the procedure fixed the problem. It's best practice anyway.
In my case SET FMTONLY OFF did not work. The method I followed is, I took backup of original stored procedure and replace with only column name like the below query.
Select Convert(max,'') as Id,Convert(max,'') as Name
After this change, create new function import, complex type in entity framework.
Once the function import and complex type is created, replace the above query with your original stored procedure.
SET FMTONLY OFF
worked for me for one of the procedure but failed for other procedure. Following steps helps me to resolve my problem
Within a stored procedure, I have created temporary table with the same column type and inserted all the data returned by dynamic query to temp table.
and selected the temp table data.
Create table #temp
(
-- columns with same types as dynamic query
)
EXEC sp_executeSQL #sql
insert into #temp
Select * from #temp
drop table #temp
Deleted existing complex type, import function and stored procedure instance for old stored procedure and updated entity model for current new procedure.
Edit the imported Function in entity modal for desired complex type, you will get all the column information there which is not getting for previous stored procedure.
once you have done with the type creation you can delete the temporary table from stored procedure and then refresh Entity Framework.
In Entity framework, while getting column information the sql executes the procedure with passing null values in parameter. So I handled null case differently by creating a temp table with all the required columns and returning all the columns with no value when null is passed to the procedure.
In my procedure there was dynamic query, something like
declare #category_id int
set #category_id = (SELECT CATEGORY_ID FROM CORE_USER where USER_ID = #USER_ID)
declare #tableName varchar(15)
declare #sql VARCHAR(max)
declare #USER_IDT varchar(100)
declare #SESSION_IDT varchar(10)
IF (#category_id = 3)
set #tableName = 'STUD_STUDENT'
else if(#category_id = 4)
set #tableName = 'STUD_GUARDIAN'
if isnull(#tableName,'')<>''
begin
set #sql = 'SELECT [USER_ID], [FIRST_NAME], SCHOOL_NAME, SOCIETY_NAME, SCHOOL_ID,
SESSION_ID, [START_DATE], [END_DATE]
from #tableName
....
EXECUTE (#sql)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SELECT * from #UserPrfTemp
END
I was not getting the column information in
my case after using the set FMTONLY OFF trick.
This is temp table I created to get the blank data.
Now I am getting the column info
Create table #UserPrfTemp
(
[USER_ID] bigint,
[FIRST_NAME] nvarchar(60),
SCHOOL_NAME nvarchar(60),
SOCIETY_NAME nvarchar(200)
.....
}
I solved this problem creating a table variable and then returning from it.
DECLARE #VarTable TABLE (
NeededColumn1 VARCHAR(100),
NeededColumn2 INT,
NeededColumn3 VARCHAR(100)
)
...
--Fetch Data from Linked server here
...
INSERT INTO #VarTable (NeededColumn1,NeededColumn2,NeededColumn3)
SELECT Column1, Column2, Column3
FROM #TempTable
SELECT * FROM #VarTable.
In that manner, your the SP result will be bounded to the table variable, which EF has access to.
I discovered a method that should help most people out whatever's happening.
Pull up your favourite SQL client and run the proc that you're trying to update with every parameter = null. Visual Studio is literally trying to do this when SET FMTONLY ON. Run a trace. You'll see.
You'll probably get an error, or unexpected data out. Fix that and your issue is fixed.
In my case the function read in JSON and failed because the JSON string was empty.
I just put something like
IF(#FooJSON IS NULL)
BEGIN
SELECT 1 VAR1, 2 VAR2;
END
ELSE
--OTHER LOGIC
That's probably an ugly solution, but I inherited this mess and we don't go into Ravenholm.
Change #Temp tables with WITH SQL EXPRESSION
Is there any chance to create temporary stored procedure or function on MS SQL 2005? I would like to use this stored procedure only in my query so after execution it will be gone.
I have a query I would like to EXEC against some data. But for every table I will process this command, I need to change some parts of it. So I thought I would create temporary SP that would return for me a query from arguments I provide (like table name and so on) and than execute this query by EXEC.
And this stored procedure will be not useful for me later so I would like to have it temporary so that when I end executing my query - it will disappear.
This question is a bit old, but the other answers failed to provide the syntax for creating temporary procedures. The syntax is the same as for temporary tables: #name for local temporary objects, ##name for global temporary objects.
CREATE PROCEDURE #uspMyTempProcedure AS
BEGIN
print 'This is a temporary procedure'
END
This is described in the "Procedure Name" section of the official documentation. http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms187926%28v=sql.90%29.aspx
I'm using this technique to deduplicate the code for my primitive T-SQL unit tests. A real unit testing framework would be better, but this is better than nothing and "garbage collects" after itself.
Re your edit - it sounds like you should be using sp_ExecuteSQL against a (parameterized) nvarchar that contains TSQL.
Search on sp_ExecuteSQL; a simple example:
DECLARE #SQL nvarchar(4000),
#Table varchar(20) = 'ORDERS',
#IDColumn varchar(20) = 'OrderID',
#ID int = 10248
SET #SQL = 'SELECT * FROM [' + #Table + '] WHERE ['
+ #IDColumn + '] = #Key'
EXEC sp_executesql #SQL, N'#Key int', #ID
Note that table and column names must be concatenated into the query, but values (such as #Key) can be parameterized.
There is a temporary stored procedure - but it is per connection, not per sp.
However, you might want to look at Common Table Expressions - they may be what you are after (although you can only read from them once).
Maybe if you can clarify what you are trying to do?
Just use the SQL of the stored proc inside your query. No need to create a stored procedure inside the DB, it won't give you any advantage over a normal query inside your query.