I am building a website over a database of music tracks. The database is as follows :
music table contains musicid and title
musicrights table contains musicid and memberid
members table contains memberid and memberinfo.
I'm trying to build an array of objects in my database service, which each entry represents a track containing its rightholders (contains information aubout one rightholder but not his name) and their member info (contains name etc). The backend is sailsjs and the code is as follows :
angular.module("myapp").service("database", ["$q", "$http", function($q, $http) {
var database = {};
function getHolderMember(rightHolder) {
return ($http.get("/api/members?where=" + JSON.stringify({
memberid: rightHolder.memberid
})).then(function (res) {
rightHolder.member = res.data[0];
return (rightHolder);
}));
}
function getRightHolders(doc) {
return ($http.get("/api/musicrights?where=" + JSON.stringify({
musicid: doc.musicid
})).then(function(res) {
// array of promises :
// each rightholder of a document has to solve member info
var rightHolders = [];
for (var i in res.data) {
var rightHolder = {
member: res.data[i].memberid,
type: res.data[i].membertype,
rights: res.data[i].memberrights
};
rightHolders.push(getHolderMember(rightHolder));
}
return ($q.all(rightHolders));
}).then(function(rightHolders) {
// expected array of one or two rightholders,
// enriched with member information
// actually returns array of one or two arrays of 30 members
// without rightholder info
console.log(rightHolders);
doc.rightHolders = rightHolders;
return (doc);
}));
}
database.music = function(q) {
return ($http.get("/api/music?where=" + JSON.stringify({
or: [{
title: {
contains: q
}
}, {
subtitle: {
contains: q
}
}]
})).then(function(res) {
// array of 30 promises :
// each one of 30 documents has to resolve its rightholders
var documents = [];
for (var i in res.data) {
documents.push(getRightHolders(res.data[i]));
}
return ($q.all(documents));
}));
}
return (database);
}]);
The first array of promises seems to work as expected, but not the second one in getRightHolders. What is strange is that this function returns an array of one or two promises, which are rightHolders waiting for their memberinfo. But in the callback where I console.log the response, i get an array of one or two (as per the number of pushed promises) but this array's elements are arrays of 30 memberinfo instead of one memberinfo. I don't understand how this $q.all() call gets mixed with the previous-level $q.all.
The data structure is roughly like this
documents [ ] ($http => 30 responses)
music.musicid
music.rightHolders [ ] ($http => 1, 2, 3 responses)
rightholder.rights
rightholder.member ($http => 1 response)
member.memberinfo
Any help appreciated. Thank you !
UPDATE : Thank you for your answer, it worked like a charm. Here's the updated code, with also the migrate service which formats data differently (there is some database migration going on). I kept it out of the first example but your answer gave me this neat syntax.
angular.module("myApp").service("database", ["$q", "$http", "migrate", function($q, $http, migrate) {
var database = {};
function getHolderMember(rightHolder) {
return ($http.get("/api/members?where=" + JSON.stringify({
memberID: rightHolder.member
})).then(function(res) {
return (migrate.member(res.data[0]));
}).then(function(member) {
rightHolder.member = member;
return (rightHolder);
}));
}
function getRightHolders(doc) {
return ($http.get("/api/rightHolders?where=" + JSON.stringify({
musicID: doc.musicID
})).then(function(res) {
return (
$q.all(res.data
.map(migrate.rightHolder)
.map(getHolderMember)
)
);
}).then(function(rightHolders) {
doc.rightHolders = rightHolders;
return (doc);
}));
}
database.music = function(q) {
return ($http.get("/api/music?where=" + JSON.stringify({
or: [{
title: {
contains: q
}
},
{
subtitle: {
contains: q
}
}
]
})).then(function(res) {
return (
$q.all(res.data
.map(migrate.music)
.map(getRightHolders)
)
);
}));
}
return (database);
}
I'm not quite sure how you're getting the result you describe, but your logic is more convoluted than it needs to be and I think this might be leading to the issues you're seeing. You're giving the getRightsHolders function the responsibility of returning the document and based on your comment above, it sounds like you previously had the getHolderMember() function doing something similar and then stopped doing that.
We can clean this up by having each function be responsible for the entities it's handling and by using .map() instead of for (please don't use for..in with arrays).
Please give this a try:
angular
.module("myapp")
.service("database", ["$q", "$http", function($q, $http) {
var database = {};
function getHolderMember(memberId) {
var query = JSON.stringify({ memberid: memberid });
return $http.get("/api/members?where=" + query)
.then(function (res) {
return res.data[0];
});
}
function populateRightsHolderWithMember(rightsHolder) {
return getHolderMember(rightsHolder.memberid)
.then(function (member) {
rightsHolder.member = member;
return rightsHolder;
});
}
function getRightHolders(doc) {
var query = JSON.stringify({ musicid: doc.musicid });
return $http.get("/api/musicrights?where=" + query)
.then(function(res) {
return $q.all(res.data.map(populateRightsHolderWithMember));
});
}
function populateDocumentWithRightsHolders(document) {
return getRightsHolders(document)
.then(function(rightsHolders) {
document.rightsHolders = rightsHolders;
return document;
});
}
database.music = function(q) {
return $http.get("/api/music?where=" + JSON.stringify({
or: [{
title: {
contains: q
}
}, {
subtitle: {
contains: q
}
}]
})).then(function(res) {
return $q.all(res.data.map(populateDocumentWithRightsHolders));
});
}
return (database);
}]);
Related
2nd UPDATE
We are implementing a BulkEdit functionality which sends async CRUD requests to a Backend.
So what I require here is a dynamically created set of nested promises.
In an abstract version the data array could look like:
var objArr = [
{
name: 'A',
subs: [
{
id: 1,
_action: 'create'
},
{
id: 2,
_action: 'create'
},
{
id: 3,
_action: 'delete'
}
]
},
{
name: 'B',
subs: [
{
id: 4,
_action: 'create'
},
{
id: 5,
_action: 'put'
}
]
},
{
name: 'C',
subs: []
}
];
I try to illustrate how the requests should be sent for this data following the order given by '_action'.
Get some transaction ID (see below)
As soon as transaction ID is there start to send requests for every Object in the Array given the following rules:
Per Object send all 'delete' requests at once if there are any.
After that or if there weren't any 'delete' requests send all 'put'
requests if there are any.
After 'delete' and/or 'put' send all 'create' requests if there are any.
As soon as all requests for an Object are done, do something per Object.
As soon as all Objects are done, close the Transaction.
How is it possible to create this dynamic nested/non-nested promise chain?
UPDATED CODE contains now Promise Creation
When calling the function below, first a TransactionService gets a transaction id which is required to be sent with each request. When everything is successful, the Transaction will be closed.
My current issue is that promises are not resolved in the correct order (while the OPTIONS preflight requests seem to be) and that this example creates Promises even if they are not required (e.g. for Object 'C' in the example above).
function startIt(objArr) {
TransactionService.getTransaction().then(function (transaction) {
var promiseArray = MyService.submit(objArr, transaction.id);
$q.all(promiseArray).then(function () {
Transactions.closeTransaction(transaction.id, function () {}).then(function () {
});
};
});
}
This is the function for 'submit':
function submit(objArr, transactionId) {
var promises = objArr.map(function (obj) {
return submitWithTransId(transactionId, obj)
.then(function (response) {
// Object done
});
});
return promises;
}
And this function is actually creating the Promises:
function submitWithTransId(transactionId, obj) {
var promisesDelete = [];
var promisesUpdate = [];
var promisesCreate = [];
angular.forEach(obj['subs'], function (sub) {
switch (sub._action) {
case 'delete':
promisesDelete.push(createPromise(sub, bulktransactionId));
break;
case 'put':
promisesUpdate.push(createPromise(sub, bulktransactionId));
break;
case 'create':
promisesCreate.push(createPromise(sub, bulktransactionId));
break;
}
});
var chainedPromises = $q.all(promisesDelete).then(function (deleteResponse) {
return $q.all(promisesUpdate).then(function (updateResponse) {
return $q.all(promisesCreate).then(function (createResponse) {
});
});
});
return chainedPromises;
And this is my createPromise function:
/** only simplified handling create case **/
function createPromise(sub, bulktransactionId) {
var queryParams = {};
if (bulktransactionId !== undefined && bulktransactionId !== null) {
queryParams.transaction_id = bulktransactionId;
}
var promise = MyResourceService.create(queryParams, sub).$promise;
promise.then(function (newSub) {
// do something with the new/updated/deleted sub, especially update view model
});
return promise;
}
/** MyResourceService **/
return $resource(ENV.apiEndpoint + 'api/v1/subs/:_id',
{
_id: '#id'
}, {
create: {
method: 'POST'
}
}
);
You can have a look at the following solution. The objective is to provide you some sort of structure. Please see, you will have to modify to your use.
var objArr = [{
name: 'A',
subs: [{
id: 1,
_action: 'create'
},
{
id: 2,
_action: 'create'
},
{
id: 3,
_action: 'delete'
}
]
},
{
name: 'B',
subs: [{
id: 4,
_action: 'create'
},
{
id: 5,
_action: 'put'
}
]
},
{
name: 'C',
subs: []
}
];
var promises = objArr.map(function(obj) {
return firstLevelPromise(obj)
.then(function(response) {
console.log(response); // promise for each object
return response;
});
});
$q.all(promises)
.then(function(response) {
console.log(response); // completion - close transaction
});
function firstLevelPromise(obj) {
var deletePromises = [];
var putPromies = [];
var insertPromies = [];
obj.subs.forEach(function(sub) { // Preparing promises array for delete, put and insert
if (sub._action === "delete") {
deletePromises.push(deletePromise(sub));
} else if (sub._action === "put") {
putPromies.push(putPromise(sub));
} else {
insertPromies.push(insertPromise(sub));
}
});
return $q.all(deletePromises) // executing delete promises
.then(function(deleteResponse) {
console.log("deleteExecuted: " + obj.name);
return $q.all(putPromies) // on completion of delete, execute put promies
.then(function(putResponse) {
console.log("putExecuted: " + obj.name);
return $q.all(insertPromies) // on completion of put, execute insert promises
.then(function(insertResponse) {
console.log("insertExecuted: " + obj.name);
return "object promise completed: " + obj.name; // on completion, return
});
});
});
}
function deletePromise(task) {
return $q.resolve(task); // write your delete code here
}
function putPromise(task) {
return $q.resolve(task); // write your put code here
}
function insertPromise(task) {
return $q.resolve(task); // write your insert code here
}
Please note, the above code will do the following
Prepare a collection of promises where there is one promise for each object in objectArray
Each promise will have promises chain i.e. delete promises, followed by put promises and finally followed by insert promises i.e. it ensures that for each object perform the delete tasks, then on completion perform the put tasks and then on its completion perform the insert tasks.
Here is a plunker and documentation for $q
UPDATE
The problem is with the createPromise function only. Update your code to following. The problem was that you are calling the then before returning, hence, it is likely that the you are returning a resolved promise like $q.resolve(). In this case, it is possible that a create request gets resolved before delete or put and a put calls gets resolved before delete. Hence, you should return the promise from here and perform the post action things in the $q.all block.
function createPromise(sub, bulktransactionId) {
var queryParams = {};
if (bulktransactionId !== undefined && bulktransactionId !== null) {
queryParams.transaction_id = bulktransactionId;
}
return MyResourceService.create(queryParams, sub).$promise;
}
Try this - the trick is to accumulate the promise (that's what I'm using the reduce for. Hope it helps.
// reversed the order => delete actions first; otherwise you may have to do extra logic may be needed
var objArr = [
{ name: 'A',
subs: [
{ id: null,
_action: 'delete'
},
{ id: 2,
_action: 'create']
}
},
{ name: 'B',
subs: [
{ id: 3.
_action: 'create'
}
]
];
Promise.all(objArr.map(obj => {
return obj.subs.reduce((accumulatedPromisedSub, sub) => {
return accumulatedPromisedSub.then(_ => yourRequestCallHere(sub) )
},
Promise.resolve(true) // you could also do your delete here if you like
)
}))
// OR going sort order agnostic:
Promise.all(objArr.map(obj => {
const deleteAction = obj.subs.find(sub => sub._action === 'delete');
return obj.subs.reduce((accumulatedPromisedSub, sub) => {
if (sub._action === 'delete') return accumulatedPromisedSub;
return accumulatedPromisedSub.then(_ => yourRequestCallHere(sub) )
},
deleteAction ? yourRequestCall(deleteAction) : Promise.resolve(true)
)
}))
I am so happy and thankful, I found it.
To my understanding I had two main issues in my code.
As $resource is not providing a (please forgive me, pros!) real $promise even when I use something like .get().$promise I had to
use bind to map the createPromise function to my arrays
do the mapping only directly before returning the $q.all promise.
In any other case $resource seemed to immediately fill its promise with an empty object and $q.all did not work anymore as promises looked like they where resolved.
Special thanks to #nikhil who supported me in finding this ugly complex thing and who earned the bounty.
This is the working snippet:
function submitWithTransId(transactionId, obj) {
var arrayDelete = [];
var arrayUpdate = [];
var arrayCreate = [];
angular.forEach(obj['subs'], function (sub) {
switch (sub._action) {
case 'delete':
arrayDelete.push(sub);
break;
case 'update':
arrayUpdate.push(sub);
break;
case 'create':
arrayCreate.push(sub);
break;
}
});
var promisesDelete = flattenArray(arrayDelete.map(createPromise.bind(undefined, obj, transactionId)));
return $q.all(promisesDelete).then(function (deleteResponse) {
console.log('Delete Promises ' + obj.name + ' resolved');
var promisesUpdate = flattenArray(arrayUpdate.map(createPromise.bind(undefined, obj, transactionId)));
return $q.all(promisesUpdate).then(function (updateResponse) {
var promisesCreate = flattenArray(arrayCreate.map(createPromise.bind(undefined, obj, transactionId)));
console.log('Update Promises ' + obj.name + ' resolved');
return $q.all(promisesCreate).then(function (createResponse) {
console.log('Create Promises ' + obj.name + ' resolved');
});
});
}).catch(function (error) {
console.log('Catched an error: ');
console.log(error);
});
});
I want to compare the data which I got from Mongo to javascript array. I am using lodash to compare. But it always return incorrect result.
var editUser = function(userData, getOutFunction) {
var status = CONSTANTS.NG;
checkExistUser(userData._id).then(function(user) {
if (user !== null) {
var userGroup = JSON.stringify(user.group);
user.group = user.group.map((groupId) => {
return groupId.toString();
});
var removedGroups = _.difference(userGroup, userData.group);
var addedGroups = _.difference(userData.group, userGroup);
console.log('Removed Groups: ', removedGroups);
console.log('Added Groups: ', addedGroups);
} else {
status = CONSTANTS.NG;
logger.debug(DEBUG_CLASS_NAME, "Cannot find object");
if (typeof(getOutFunction) !== 'undefined') {
getOutFunction(status, null);
} else {
NO_CALLBACK();
}
}
}).catch(function() {
console.log('Promise is error');
});
var checkExistUser = function(userId) {
return new Promise(function(resolve, reject) {
UserDAO.findById(userId, function(err, user) {
if (err) {
logger.debug(DEBUG_CLASS_NAME, {
name: err.name,
code: err.code,
message: err.message,
method: "checkExist"
});
resolve(null);
} else {
resolve(user);
}
});
});
}
For example:When I try to input value for lodash difference function
var user.group = ["58b8da67d585113517fed34e","58b8da6ed585113517fed34f"];
var userData.group = [ '58b8da67d585113517fed34e' ];
I want lodash difference return below result:
Removed Groups: ['58b8da6ed585113517fed34f']
Added Groups: []
However, the function gave me the result like:
Removed Groups: []
Added Groups: [ '58b8da67d585113517fed34e' ]
Can anyone help me in this case?
I will do appreciate it.
I have had this issue as well, the result from mongodb is an ObjectId type so you can compare the someObjectId.toString() value with your array of strings, or you could use
someObjectId.equals(stringOrObjectIdValue)
However, if you want to keep using lodash functions you will either have to force both arrays to strings or to ObjectIds before passing them into the function.
I have the following factory to send query to server:
app.factory('Request', ['$resource',
function ($resource) {
var res = $resource("bin/server.fcgi/REST/" + ':resourceName/:ID', {}, {
get : {
method : 'GET'
},
put : {
method : "PUT"
}
});
return {
get : function (arguments, b, c) {
return res.get(arguments, b, c).$promise;
},
put : function(arguments,b,c){
return res.put(arguments, b, c).$promise;
}
};
}
]);
I call it like this:
Request[methodName](params).then(successFunction).catch (failFunction);
However, if i want to send a PUT query:
Request["put"](params).then(successFunction).catch (failFunction);
where
params = {
resourceName : "ATable",
ID : 222,
AProperty : "changedValue"
}
I take then following request: (so an error)
http://myadres.com/REST/ATable/222?AProperty=changedValue
instead of
http://myadres.com/REST/ATable/222
with payload
{ AProperty:changedValue }
What is wrong with this?
app.service('Request', ['$resource',function ($resource) {
var res = $resource('bin/server.fcgi/REST/:resourceName/:ID',
{resourceName: "#resourceName", ID: "#ID"},
{
get : { method : 'GET'},
put : { method : "PUT", params: {resourceName:"#resourceName", ID: "#ID"}//you can leave the string empty if you dont want it to be a defualt value like ID:""
});
this.get = function () {
return res.get().$promise;
}
this.put = function(obj){
return res.put(obj).$promise; // it can be also {like json with your params}
}
]);
and then call it from controller by
var obj = {
ID:222,
resourceName:'ATable'
}
Request.put(obj).then(function(data){
//check whats the data
})
this is how it should be done
maybe not the best way but should work
I think I am getting my keys, arrays, values and IDs mixed up here but can't seem to figure it out.
I want a way to get the current user in a ProfileCtrl controller. This is my current implementation using promises, $waitForAuth and once. But I am not sure if implementing currently.
var user = "";
var key = "";
var uids = Users.allUIDs();
console.log(uids);
Auth.$waitForAuth().then(function () {
var uid = Auth.$getAuth().uid;
console.log(uid);
for (var i = 0; i < uids.length; i++) {
console.log(uids[i].value().toString());
if (uids[i].value() == uid) {
var userKeyRef = new Firebase(firebaseUrl + uids + uids[i]);
userKeyRef.once('value').then(function(snapshot) {
key = snapshot.val();
}).then(function(){
user = new Firebase(firebaseUrl + users).child(key).val();
});
console.log(user);
console.log('User exists')
break;
}
}
$scope.user =user;
}).catch(function (error) {
console.log(error);
})
I do a check of the uids in an array, and if they match the authenticated user, I get the key from within the uids array and use that key to find the user object in the users array. Here is my database:
{
"uids" : {
"7d34fb85-813c-4586-857e-f062aed67f32" : {
"-KDQDk5vwJXmFngwI7iQ" : {
"registered" : true
}
}
},
"users" : {
"-KDQDk5vwJXmFngwI7iQ" : {
"email" : "random#gmail.com",
"firstname" : "Random",
"lastname" : "Person",
"uid" : "7d34fb85-813c-4586-857e-f062aed67f32"
}
}
}
For a clearer example, when I console.log the uids as it is returned from my service, it looks like:
Which means the uids are coming through?
Here is my code to get the uids:
app.factory('Users', ['$firebaseArray','$firebaseObject', 'Auth', function ($firebaseArray, $firebaseObject, Auth) {
var ref = new Firebase("https://urlformyapp.firebaseio.com");
var users = $firebaseArray(ref.child('users'));
var uids = $firebaseArray(ref.child('uids'));
return {
all: function () {
return users;
},
allUIDs: function () {
return uids;
},
get: function (id) {
// Simple index lookup
return users[id];
}
}
}])
Could someone tell me what is going wrong? Why does uids[i].value.toString() not print anything? Is there anything wrong with my code logic given the structure of my DB?
I'm having some problems with one async process on nodejs.
I'm getting some data from a remote JSON and adding it in my array, this JSON have some duplicated values, and I need check if it already exists on my array before add it to avoid data duplication.
My problem is when I start the loop between the JSON values, the loop call the next value before the latest one be process be finished, so, my array is filled with duplicated data instead of maintain only one item per type.
Look my current code:
BookRegistration.prototype.process_new_books_list = function(data, callback) {
var i = 0,
self = this;
_.each(data, function(book) {
i++;
console.log('\n\n ------------------------------------------------------------ \n\n');
console.log('BOOK: ' + book.volumeInfo.title);
self.process_author(book, function() { console.log('in author'); });
console.log('\n\n ------------------------------------------------------------');
if(i == data.length) callback();
})
}
BookRegistration.prototype.process_author = function(book, callback) {
if(book.volumeInfo.authors) {
var author = { name: book.volumeInfo.authors[0].toLowerCase() };
if(!this.in_array(this.authors, author)) {
this.authors.push(author);
callback();
}
}
}
BookRegistration.prototype.in_array = function(list, obj) {
for(i in list) { if(list[i] === obj) return true; }
return false;
}
The result is:
[{name: author1 }, {name: author2}, {name: author1}]
And I need:
[{name: author1 }, {name: author2}]
UPDATED:
The solution suggested by #Zub works fine with arrays, but not with sequelize and mysql database.
When I try to save my authors list on the database, the data is duplicated, because the system started to save another array element before finish to save the last one.
What is the correct pattern on this case?
My code using database is:
BookRegistration.prototype.process_author = function(book, callback) {
if(book.volumeInfo.authors) {
var author = { name: book.volumeInfo.authors[0].toLowerCase() };
var self = this;
models.Author.count({ where: { name: book.volumeInfo.authors[0].toLowerCase() }}).success(function(count) {
if(count < 1) {
models.Author.create(author).success(function(author) {
console.log('SALVANDO AUTHOR');
self.process_publisher({ book:book, author:author }, callback);
});
} else {
models.Author.find({where: { name: book.volumeInfo.authors[0].toLowerCase() }}).success(function(author) {
console.log('FIND AUTHOR');
self.process_publisher({ book:book, author:author }, callback);
});
}
});
// if(!this.in_array(this.authors, 'name', author)) {
// this.authors.push(author);
// console.log('AQUI NO AUTHOR');
// this.process_publisher(book, callback);
// }
}
}
How can I avoid data duplication in an async process?
This is because you are comparing different objects and result is always false.
Just for experiment type in the console:
var obj1 = {a:1};
var obj2 = {a:1};
obj1 == obj2; //false
When comparing objects (as well as arrays) it only results true when obj1 links to obj2:
var obj1 = {a:1};
var obj2 = obj1;
obj1 == obj2; //true
Since you create new author objects in each process_author call you always get false when comparing.
In your case the solution would be to compare name property for each book:
BookRegistration.prototype.in_array = function(list, obj) {
for(i in list) { if(list[i].name === obj.name) return true; }
return false;
}
EDIT (related to your comment question):
I would rewrite process_new_books_list method as follows:
BookRegistration.prototype.process_new_books_list = function(data, callback) {
var i = 0,
self = this;
(function nextBook() {
var book = data[i];
if (!book) {
callback();
return;
}
self.process_author(book, function() {
i++;
nextBook();
});
})();
}
In this case next process_author is being called not immediately (like with _.each), but after callback is executed, so you have consequence in your program.
Not sure is this works though.
Sorry for my English, I'm not a native English speaker