How to compile sticky state plugin for Angular 1 - angularjs

I need the Sticky States feature for my project.
I'm using UI Router 1.0.0-rc.1 so i can't use the ui-router-extras library (that was designed for 0.xxx)
Recently the author ported that feature for the 1.xx router
https://github.com/ui-router/sticky-states
This release comes only with .ts sources.
My project is written in plain ES5 js, so i tried to build myself the final js to be used in browser with <script src="..." type="text/javascript">
I have npm install all dependancies and then npm run build
What i got are two folders 'lib' and 'lib-esm' that contains each more than one js files that i don't understand how to reference them from .html file (files are index.js & stickyStates.js)
Also tried to run webpack but what i get is a huge file with more than 8K lines of code (probabile also ui-router get bundled within..)
NOTE: Author has already been asked for that by someone but he didn't provided a solution yet:
https://github.com/ui-router/sticky-states/issues/4
Thank you very much

Related

Embedding full react application into an existing web page

I'm looking to embed my react application into an existing plain html / javascript website. What I've found so far is that you are only able to embed individual components into existing websites, not entire react applications.
Naturally I have an app component which contains the entire application. Am I able to embed the full application by embedding this component? My concern is all the modules I'm using (e.g. axios, bootstrap) will break.
I've been looking for a good tutorial on how to do this but I'm not finding many examples of trying to embed the entire application into an existing page.
My understanding of how to do this, is to reference the react javascript source links in the html page head, possibly also babel although its unclear to me if babel will work. Then we can use the renderDom method like we normally would.
On page load can I run my index.js file to insert my react app component into the dom? If this would work, are there any issues with file structure, file updates I would need to take care of?
If I'm driving off path out into the wilderness and there is a better way to handle it I'm open to suggestions. I'm just looking to see if someone else has experience doing this before I start down a bad path.
I was able to embed my full react application by doing the following...
I built my react app production files with npm run build
I copied those files into the existing web project at the root level
Then I opened the index.html file generated from npm run build and copied the scripts in the head and body sections to the page I wanted to drop in my application
Finally I added a div with the id root (this is what my renderDOM method is looking for) where I wanted my application to appear on the existing web page.
That was it. Super easy, thanks for the help!
Just wanted to add a quick additional approach here.
If you already have a Flask app and you're trying to put React components or an app (so the base component of an app) onto an existing HTML page in the Flask app, basically the only thing that you need is Babel, unless you are able to write React components without using JSX (so in plain Javascript) in which case you'd need nothing.
Step 1: To attach Babel to your project, you'll have to grab the Babel node modules which means your project will be associated with NPM for the sole purpose of using the Babel functions. You can do this by running the following commands in your project root directory (Node.js must be installed):
npm init -y
npm install babel-cli#6 babel-preset-react-app#3
Step 2: Once Babel is attached to your project, you'll have to actually transpile the existing React component .js files from JSX into plain Javascript like so:
npx babel --watch (jsdirectory) --out-dir (outputdirectory) --presets react-app/prod
where (jsdirectory) is the path to the directory where your React component files written using JSX are, and (outputdirectory) is where you want your translated files to show up--use . for (outputdirectory) to have transpiled files appear in your root directory.
Step 3: After the plain Javascript versions of your React files appear, make sure they are linked to your HTML page instead of the original JSX-utilizing files (replace the original script tag's .js file)
Step 4: Make sure the HTML page in question is linked to the .CSS files you want (they will modify the transpiled Javascript in the same manner as they did the JSX files in a project made using Create-React-App because the class names are the same) as well as the required React resources:
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react#16/umd/react.production.min.js" crossorigin></script>
<script src="https://unpkg.com/react-dom#16/umd/react-dom.production.min.js" crossorigin></script>
After you do those quick steps your React components should render no problem on that page in your Python-Flask application.

Using webpack with angular.1.5 , php and bower

my index.php is like the following :
<script src="app/bower_components/jquery/dist/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script src="app/bower_components/angular/angular.min.js"></script>
<script src="app/bower_components/angular-ui-router/release/angular-ui-router.min.js"></script>
<script src="app/bower_components/angular-sanitize/angular-sanitize.min.js"></script>
I would like to add webpack to bundle all these files and minify them
I did not find the way to do that.
I have installed npm , node and webpack
I manged to us webpack to simple files like: webpack entry.js bundle.js . but not for my angular app
Let me answer it in general and then specific to your use case.
IN GENERAL:
Webpack
is a module bundler
needs entry and output as minimum
configuration
Where do i configure/list-out all my application code?
You dont configure it but code it. Please read on...
How webpack knows what code/modules to pick up to bundle?
Webpack will look at the code configured for entry and then internally builds its module dependencies (as dependency graph).
How do you declare module dependencies?
In short: by using require("module-or-path-here") or import "module-or-path-here". Do note that the javascript (ES6 a.k.a ES2015) itself has native module support now. Here is a good article on JS modules.
What is dependency graph?
Webpack will start with the code configured for entry and then pick up its immediate dependencies. It then goes to find out the dependencies of those immediate dependencies and so on...
Once the dependency graph is complete, webpack will start processing them and bundle them into output.filename located at output.path
Fine, but i want to perform some resource (JS / CSS / SCSS / images, etc..) specific work for ex. minify js code. How to do that?
Webpack is flexible (and powerful) and allows to configure resource specific work via loaders and plugins.
IN SPECIFIC:
The modules in AngularJS (i.e. 1.x) are not same as the modules that webpack works with. As you can see, while declaring the modules in angularJS, you are defining modules with angular by calling angular.module.
One option is to make sure to bundle all your angular module definition files (i.e that consists of angular.module("module-name-here", ["depenndencies"])) first followed by the angular components that needs those modules. There are several way to do that. For ex. name all your angular modules declaration files with a common pattern and then configure webpack to pick them up first.
Minification is pretty simple to achieve with webpack. You can try one of the options pointed out in the webpack documentation.

Typescript transpiles differently for build vs save

I have an angular 1.6.x project being served up by a MVC project. When I hit save on any ts file, it transpiles my javascript as expected. When I build the site it transpiles the javascript into a different format from when I save.
On build, the angular modules are moved into an order which causes an angular $injector error.
How can I make build transpile method the same as the save transpile?
These are the typescript build settings within the MVC project properties:
For every typescript file in your project there is a line in your proj file which looks like this:
<TypeScriptCompile Include="app\app.ts" />
Somehow my app.ts include was placed towards the bottom of the xml of my proj file. The build transpile method uses the order of your TypeScriptCompile include statements, whereas the transpile on save method is apparently a little more intelligent about re-ordering.
Life can move forward now...

How to debug typescript in angular-meteor

I followed the angular-meteor tutorial for the Socially app in Angular2. It basically works (after a few manual steps to fix package dependencies, etc), however, I am unable to debug the client side code in Chrome Dev Tools. When I navigate to the sources for my *.ts files, all I see are things like
module.export("default",exports.default=("<div> <ul> <li *ngFor=\"let party of parties\"> {{party.name}} <p>{{party.description}}</p> <p>{{party.location}}</p> </li> </ul> </div>"));
Other strange things in dev tools: my app.ts is blank. I see html files with !raw suffixes.... (e.g. app.html!raw). What is the !raw suffix and what causes that?
How can I debug my typescript?
I may be able to help with some parts of your question.
You don't mention which version of meteor you're using, but I assume version 1.4 or 1.4.0.1. I have seen that these versions of Meteor seem to have issues with sourcemaps for Typescript files (probably as they have to go through multiple transpilation steps).
I don't yet know where exactly the bug lies (Meteor or the Typescript compiler package).
Here's one github issue for this: https://github.com/barbatus/typescript/issues/23
UPDATE: This issue has now been fixed.
For now, my suggestion would be to try reverting to a 1.3.x.x version of Meteor. For something like the Socially tutorial, the easiest option is to specify the Meteor release at creation time:
$ meteor create --release 1.3.5.1 Socially
(list of releases is at: https://github.com/meteor/meteor/releases)
The 'app.html' and 'app.html!raw' files are generated by the meteor angular compilers as a way of working around issues with using templateUrl and the meteor build process. My understanding is that the preferred approach is to have inline templates or import the templates like this:
// This import loads the content of the html file into 'template'
import template from './app.html';
#Component({
selector: 'app',
// Instead of templateUrl, use:
template, // <--- 'template,' is syntactic sugar for: 'template: template,'
directives ... etc.
The import statement is a bit unusual, and this magic is achieved by the meteor angular pre-compiler that converts every html and css file into a couple of js files. That's what strange app.html and app.html!raw are.
The funny characters in the first app folder seem to be a bug. Meteor tries to generate put in a computer emoji, but sometimes this gets handled incorrectly. I'm not sure if this is a bug Chrome, ChromeDevTools or Meteor. (Personally, I wish they'd ditch the emoji).

Add new library

I'm trying to figure out the right way to add any eventual new library (for example I need angularJS ui-router) in an onsen app.
I installed bower and then downloaded ui-router.
Since I do not know exactly the way Gulp is used, I got confused on what I'm suppose to do.
At the moment, I have the following folders:
bower_components, hooks, merges, node, modules, platforms, plugins, www
The index.html has the following reference:
What I suppose to do, now?
manually copy the ui-router js files in /www/lib/
configure gulp to copy the files automatically
change the script tag src and make the reference to the bower_component folder
change the Bower default folder
could you please guide me on sort it out?
tnx
At the end I chose the option 2.
I edited the file gulpfile.js adding a new custom task supposed to copy the missing bower libraries.
var mainBowerFiles = require('main-bower-files');
gulp.task('copy-bower-libs', function() {
return gulp.src(mainBowerFiles())
.pipe(gulp.dest(__dirname + "/www/lib/bower/js"))
});

Resources