Array pointers and functions - c

Question

I have to write a C program to do the following:
Write a function that takes three arguments: a pointer to the first
element of a range in an array, a pointer to the element following
the end of a range in an array, and an int value. Have the function
set each element of the array to the int value.
My code is not working. Here is what I have so far. Any help is appreciated.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <iostream>
int listNumbers[3]{ 1,2,3 };
void Sorter(int *first, int * last, int *value);
int * first = &listNumbers[0];
int * last = &listNumbers[2];
int value;
int main() {
printf("your list numbers are:\n");
int i;
for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i) {
printf("%d", listNumbers[i]);
}
printf("\n");
printf("enter an integer:\n");
scanf_s("%d", &value);
Sorter( first, last, &value);
printf("your new list numbers are:\n");
int j;
for (int j = 0; j < 3; ++j) {
printf("%d", listNumbers[j]);
}
printf("\n");
system("PAUSE");
return 0;
}
void Sorter(int *first, int * last, int *value) {
int i=0;
printf("value = %d\n", &value);
*first = value;
while (i <= *last) {
*(first + i) = value;
i++;
}
}

Answer 1

First, work out the different between the 2 pointers.
int count = last - first + 1;
The compiler will automatically divide by the size of an integer. We add 1 to make the range inclusive. Now just iterate through each element:
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
first[i] = value;
}
Also, why are you passing the value as a pointer? This should just be a value.
void Sorter(int *first, int *last, int value) {
And when you call it...
Sorter(first, last, value);

Answer 2

Your Sorter function does not satisfy the problem criteria. The parameters are supposed to be two pointers into an array, and an int. Your function instead accepts three pointers.
You could nevertheless have made it implement at least the apparent spirit of the exercise, by using the value to which the third argument points as the fill value, but you don't do that. Instead you assign the pointer itself to each array element. That ought to at least elicit a warning from your compiler, and you ought not to be ignoring its warnings, especially when your code it not doing what you think it should.
Furthermore, the last pointer is expected to point to just past the last element to set, but you use it as if it points to an integer offset from the start pointer. This is almost the opposite of the previous problem: here, you need to use the pointer value itself, not the int to which it points.