I am developing my first EXT js mvc application. I have a problem adding events listeners to my grid panel from controller class.
My question is why i am getting below error while adding event handlers through 'on' method using below code
Error:
Uncaught TypeError:
gridPanel.on is not a function
at constructor.init
Relevant Code:
var gridPanel = Ext.ComponentQuery.query('userlist');
gridPanel.on('itemdblclick', this.editUser, gridPanel);
I am able to add handlers through a different method though but i am trying to figure out what is wrong with adding through 'on' method on grid panel reference. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
Here is my complete controller class
Ext.define('AM.controller.Users', {
extend: 'Ext.app.Controller',
views: ['user.List'],
init: function() {
var gridPanel = Ext.ComponentQuery.query('userlist');
gridPanel.on('itemdblclick', this.editUser, gridPanel);
},
editUser: function() {
console.log('User edit has begun..');
}
}, function() {
});
And my grid panel class:
Ext.define('AM.view.user.List', {
extend: 'Ext.grid.Panel',
alias: 'widget.userlist',
title: 'All Users',
id: 'usergrid',
initComponent: function() {
this.store = {
fields: ['name', 'email'],
data : [
{name: 'Ed', email: 'ed#sencha.com'},
{name: 'Tommy', email: 'tommy#sencha.com'}
]
};
this.columns = [
{header: 'Name', dataIndex: 'name', flex: 1},
{header: 'Email', dataIndex: 'email', flex: 1}
],
this.callParent(arguments);
}
});
Ext.ComponentQuery.query('userlist') returns an array of found components - so you need to select the first item in the array to actually get your component:
Ext.ComponentQuery.query('userlist')[0]
The Ext.first('userlist') shorthand makes this simpler. (As #sceborati mentioned in the comments)
When you use component query you are querying by its xtype*
You have also specified an id in your component, which is OK if you will only have one instance on a page, (as soon as you have more than one - you should not use ids)
You can find components much quicker using Ext.getCmp('componentid') so Ext.getCmp('userlist') would also work for you.
All that being said, to make better use of ExtJs MVC capabilities, you could switch to using a ViewController, and then you don't need to do any lookups for your components at all:
Ext.define('AM.controller.Users', {
extend: 'Ext.app.ViewController',
alias: 'controller.userlist',
editUser: function () {
console.log('User edit has begun..');
}
});
Ext.define('AM.view.user.List', {
extend: 'Ext.grid.Panel',
xtype: 'userlist',
title: 'All Users',
id: 'usergrid',
controller: 'userlist',
store: {
fields: ['name', 'email'],
data: [{
name: 'Ed',
email: 'ed#sencha.com'
}, {
name: 'Tommy',
email: 'tommy#sencha.com'
}]
},
columns: [{
header: 'Name',
dataIndex: 'name',
flex: 1
}, {
header: 'Email',
dataIndex: 'email',
flex: 1
}],
listeners:{
itemdblclick:'editUser'
}
});
Notice the alias config added to controller, and the corresponding controller config on the view.
This means you can specify listeners just by providing the method name on the controller.
listeners:{
itemdblclick:'editUser'
}
You may also notice I have moved your column and store configuration out of the initComponent method - your use of initComponent would work, but this method is much cleaner.
I have created a fiddle to demonstrate this updated code:
https://fiddle.sencha.com/#view/editor&fiddle/1qvu
You also seem to be passing an extra function as a third argument when defining your controller - you should remove this.
* you have used alias:'widget.userlist' which is the same as xtype:'userlist'
The query method on Ext.ComponentQuery returns an array of components. So you would need to provide an index, like:
var gridPanel = Ext.ComponentQuery.query('userlist')[0];
Related
I need to create a contextmenu in ExtJS 7.4 on right click but there's only childtap which only triggers on left-click event.
Is there a way to trigger that event or another for right-click?
I added two solutions. The first is a component solution (here Grid) and the second a global one.
COMPONENT
The solution would be the childcontextmenu listener.
Have a look at the following example (Modern toolkit 6+7)
const menu = new Ext.menu.Menu({
items: [{
text: 'Menu Item 1'
}, {
text: 'Menu Item 2'
}]
});
Ext.define('MyApp.MyGrid', {
extend: 'Ext.grid.Grid',
store: Ext.create('Ext.data.Store', {
fields: ['name', 'email', 'phone'],
data: [{
name: 'Lisa',
email: 'lisa#simpsons.com',
phone: '555-111-1224'
}]
}),
columns: [{
text: 'Name',
dataIndex: 'name',
width: 200
}],
listeners: {
childcontextmenu: function (grid, eObj) {
grid.deselectAll();
grid.setSelection(eObj.record);
menu.showAt(eObj.event.getX(), eObj.event.getY());
eObj.event.stopEvent()
}
}
})
GLOBAL
I can show you how to fire global events, but the problem is the target. In the following example I am using document but you can also use any view.el.on and the target will be always the view. More answers might be found here
Ext.getDoc().on(
'contextmenu',
function(e){
Ext.GlobalEvents.fireEvent('contextmenu', e);
},
Ext.GlobalEvents
);
Ext.GlobalEvents.on('contextmenu', function(eObj) {
console.log('Who dares to RightClick me?');
});
I am still learning EXTJs and one of the thing I was trying to to was extend a component. Below is my example:
Ext.define('MyApp.view.CustomTextField',{
extend: 'Ext.field.Text',
xtype: 'customtextfield',
config:
{
fieldID: null,
langID: null
},
initialize: function() {
alert("init"); //1. called before I navigate to view
Call a controller method here
this.callParent(arguments);
},
initComponent: function () {
alert("initComp"); //2. not called at all
Call a controller method here
this.callParent(arguments);
}
I want to call a controller method to validate if user has permission to see this field and accordingly do next actions. I want this validation to happen when I navigate to the view
I used this custom field in my View as:
xtype: 'fieldset',
margin: 10,
bind: '{workOrders}',
title: 'Dispatch Information',
items: [
{
id: 'Tag',
xtype: 'customtextfield',
name: 'Tag',
label: 'Tag',
bind: '{Tag}',
labelAlign: 'top'
},
But the initComponent is never fired.
The initialize is fired to soon ,even before my stores are loaded. How do I properly extend this control?
In ExtJS 6 modern there is no initComponent event for textfield . initComponent event have
in classic for textfield.
For calling events in controller you need to create controller and define to you view.
In this FIDDLE, I have created a demo using form, ViewController, textfield and ViewModel. I hope this will help/guide you to achieve your requirements.
For more details please refer ExtJS Docs.
CODE SNIPPET
Ext.application({
name: 'Fiddle',
launch: function () {
//Define the cutsometext from extending {Ext.field.Text}
Ext.define('CustomText', {
extend: 'Ext.field.Text',
xtype: 'customtext',
labelAlign: 'top',
listeners: {
initialize: 'onInitializeCutsomText'
}
});
Ext.define('FormModel', {
extend: 'Ext.app.ViewModel',
alias: 'viewmodel.formmodel',
data: {
user: {
firstName: 'Narendra',
lastName: 'Jadhav',
email: 'narendrajadhav105#gmail.com'
},
permissionCng: {
firstName: false,
lastName: false,
email: true,
isAdmin: false
}
}
});
//Define the FormController from extending {Ext.app.ViewController}
Ext.define('FormController', {
extend: 'Ext.app.ViewController',
alias: 'controller.formctn',
onInitializeCutsomText: function (textfield) {
var permissionCng = this.getViewModel().get('permissionCng');
// Here is just basic example for disabled textfield on initialize event.
//In your case you can put your requirement.
textfield.setDisabled(permissionCng[textfield.getName()]);
}
});
//Creating form
Ext.create('Ext.form.Panel', {
fullscreen: true,
viewModel: {
type: 'formmodel'
},
controller: 'formctn',
items: [{
xtype: 'fieldset',
title: 'Personal Info',
defaults: {
xtype: 'customtext' //Here I am using {customtext}
},
items: [{
label: 'First Name',
name: 'firstName',
bind: {
value: '{user.firstName}',
//You can also use like property
//hidden:'{permissionCng.firstName}'
}
}, {
label: 'Last Name',
name: 'lastName',
bind: {
value: '{user.lastName}',
//You can also use like property
//hidden:'{permissionCng.firstName}'
}
}, {
label: 'Email Id',
name: 'email',
bind: {
value: '{user.email}',
//You can also use like property
//hidden:'{permissionCng.firstName}'
}
}, {
label: 'Admin Name',
name: 'isAdmin',
bind: {
value: '{user.isAdmin}',
//You can also use like property
hidden: '{!permissionCng.isAdmin}'
}
}]
}]
});
}
});
I'm new to EXTJS 6 and MVVM and I'm not sure if I'm understanding things properly. Please help me with this basic example and whether this is the correct way to do things in the MVVM architecture
I started by creating the sample app via sencha cmd. I see that it created in /view/main/MainModel.js a "variable"? named loremIpsum. I see in the main view there are some bindings to loremIpsum.
I guess my question is, if I wanted to create a 2nd view, like a popup window from the main view, how could I access loremIpsum from Main's viewModel?
I'm getting confused as to whether I should be "sharing" Main's viewModel, or whether I should be moving loremIpsum to model/Base.js which I guess would be a shared model, and then I could have multiple viewModels looking at that view?
What is MVVM?
Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) is another architectural pattern for writing software that is largely based on the MVC pattern. The key difference between MVC and MVVM is that MVVM features an abstraction of a View (the ViewModel) which manages the changes between a Model’s data and the View‘s representation of that data (i.e. data bindings) — something which typically is cumbersome to manage in traditional MVC applications.
The MVVM pattern attempts to leverage the architectural benefits of MVC (separation of functional responsibilities) yet also provides the additional advantages of data binding. The result is that the Model and framework perform as much work as possible, minimizing (and in some cases eliminating) application logic that directly manipulates the View.
Elements of the MVVM pattern include:
The Model describes a common format for the data being used in the application, just as in the classic MVC pattern.
The View represents the data to the user, just as in the classic MVC pattern.
The ViewModel is an abstraction of the view that mediates changes between the View and an associated Model. In the MVC pattern, this would have been the responsibility of a specialized Controller, but in MVVM, the ViewModel directly manages the data bindings and formulas used by the View in question.
MVVM: An Example
In this FIDDLE, I have created a demo usng grid and window. I hope this will help you to understand concept of MVVM.
CODE SNIPPET
//Define model
Ext.define('NJDHV10.model.UserModel', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
//Define fields in store
fields: ['fullname', 'email', 'phone'],
});
//Define Store
Ext.define('NJDHV10.store.UserStore', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Store',
model: 'NJDHV10.model.UserModel',
alias: 'store.userstore',
data: [{
fullname: 'Chunk P',
email: 'alias#njdhv10.com',
phone: 9827623311
}, {
fullname: 'Champ M',
email: 'super#njdhv10.com',
phone: 9827623312
}, {
fullname: 'David W',
email: 'david#njdhv10.com',
phone: 9827623313
}, {
fullname: 'Marin d',
email: 'marin#njdhv10.com',
phone: 9827623314
}]
});
//Define ViewModel for user list
Ext.define('NJDHV10.view.UserListModel', {
extend: 'Ext.app.ViewModel',
alias: 'viewmodel.userlistvm',
stores: {
userstore: {
type: 'userstore'
}
}
});
//Define Controller
Ext.define('NJDHV10.view.UserController', {
extend: 'Ext.app.ViewController',
alias: 'controller.user',
/**
* This function will fire on grid item click
* #param { Ext.selection.RowModel} selModel
* #param {Ext.data.Model} rec
*/
onGridItemClick: function (selModel, rec) {
var form = Ext.ComponentQuery.query('userform')[0];
if (!form) {
form = Ext.create('NJDHV10.view.UserForm');
}
if (form.isHidden()) {
form.show();
}
form.getViewModel().set('userData', rec)
}
});
//Define ViewModel for user form data
Ext.define('NJDHV10.view.UserFormModel', {
extend: 'Ext.app.ViewModel',
alias: 'viewmodel.userformvm',
data: {
userData: null
}
});
//User form for entry
Ext.define('NJDHV10.view.UserForm', {
extend: 'Ext.window.Window',
closable: true,
width: 320,
//Define xtype
// xtype: 'userform',
alias: 'widget.userform',
model: true,
autoDestroy: true,
floating: true, // make this panel an absolutely-positioned floating component
//provide viewmodel to form
viewModel: {
type: 'userformvm'
},
title: 'User Form',
layout: {
align: 'stretch',
type: 'vbox'
},
defaults: {
xtype: 'textfield',
margin: 10,
labelAlign: 'top'
},
items: [{
fieldLabel: 'Full Name',
bind: {
value: '{userData.fullname}' //bind data using viewmodel in form
},
name: 'fullname'
}, {
fieldLabel: 'Email',
bind: {
value: '{userData.email}' //bind data using viewmodel in form
},
name: 'email',
vType: 'email'
}, {
fieldLabel: 'Phone Number',
bind: {
value: '{userData.phone}' //bind data using viewmodel in form
},
name: 'phone'
}]
});
//Define user grid
Ext.define('NJDHV10.view.UserGrid', {
extend: 'Ext.grid.Panel',
xtype: 'usergrid',
title: 'User List (Click to any row and see details in window)',
controller: 'user',
//provide view model to gridQA8sjZHC
viewModel: {
type: 'userlistvm'
},
//Bind store to grid
bind: {
store: '{userstore}'
},
//Add listeners into item click
listeners: {
itemclick: 'onGridItemClick'
},
columns: [{
xtype: 'rownumberer'
}, {
text: 'Name',
flex: 1,
dataIndex: 'fullname'
}, {
text: 'Email',
dataIndex: 'email',
flex: 1
}, {
text: 'Phone Number',
flex: 1,
dataIndex: 'phone'
}]
});
Ext.application({
name: 'NJDHV10',
launch: function () {
//Create grid to view
Ext.create('NJDHV10.view.UserGrid', {
layout: 'fit',
renderTo: Ext.getBody()
});
}
});
I don't know if this is a configuration issue in my app because I have done the same thing on one server which works perfectly. On a different web server I am trying to set up I am just trying to get an example working and I'm running into some extremely odd behavior. For some reason whenever the store loads it does a get request for a file that has the same name as the model name of the store. I don't understand why it's requesting a model file when the model is defined in the same file!? I didn't always have the model or store defined in the same file, they were in the proper directory structure but I moved them into one file to troubleshoot this issue and rule out possibilities but it's the same result, so for simplicity it's in the same file:
Ext.define('FPTModel', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
fields: [
{name: 'f1', type: 'int'},
{name: 'f2', type: 'string'},
]
});
Ext.define('appName.view.main.Main', {
extend: 'Ext.container.Container',
requires: [...my controller and viewModel are here...],
xtype: 'app-main',
initComponent: function() {
var myStore = Ext.create('Ext.data.Store', {
model: 'FPTModel',
data: [
{f1: 1, f2: 'someData'},
{f1: 2, f2: 'some more data'},
],
autoLoad: true
});
this.testStore = myStore;
this.callParent();
},
controller: 'main',
viewModel: {
type: 'main'
},
layout: {
type: 'border'
},
items: [{
region: 'center',
xtype: 'tabpanel',
items: [{
title: 'tab 1',
xtype: 'container',
layout: 'vbox',
items: [{
xtype: 'grid',
height: 300,
width: '100%',
columns: [
{header: 'Field 1', dataIndex: 'f1' },
{header: 'Field 2',dataIndex: 'f2'},
],
store: this.testStore
}]
}]
}]
});
When the page loads everything is fine and there are no errors. Whenever the store loads I see a GET request go out for https://my.site/FPTModel?_dc=1432862899334&page=1&start=0&limit=25
I know this is happening when the store loads because when I remove the autoLoad it doesn't send the get request and if I call testStore.load anywhere it does the get request.
This get request returns 404 obviously because that file doesn't exist. I don't understand why it's trying to load the model file from the server's root directory, or at all, when it's already defined. When I had this defined in it's proper directory structure (appName.model.FPTModel) then the get request was for .../appName.model.FPTModel...
I have been using extjs for about 2 years now and I have never seen anything like this.... Hoping someone out there can shed some light on this as it's driving me crazy. I hope there is something simple that I am missing somewhere...
This is because you do an Ext.define on the model.
Then Extjs is going to look in namespace of your app and tries to find the model FPTModel as an FPTModel.js file, because you used just "FPTModel", in the root of your app.
You should use Ext.create to create the model as a variable result and use that variable (containing the model object) in in your store. Or you should create an additional file with the model description in folder: appName/model/ and refer to it in the store.
But then you have to add a require config setting in your store to the model. Something like
require: ['appName.model.FPTModel']
You don't have to do this if you have add the model and store to the requires of your application.js in your app.
If you have no further needs for the model I would include the fields in the store definition.
I have done some restructuring of your object (not complete). I have added some panels for clarity. Don't use a border layout if you don't need one and avoid overdoing layouts and unneccessary nesting of panels.
I have added the function getGridStore which you can call with this.getGridStore(), to avoid functions like this.teststore = myStore.
So if you have to reload the store you simply do: this.getGridStore().load(), or in the application or view controller something like: this.getMainPanel.getGridStore().load().
The autoLoad config is not required, because the store already holds the data. It is only required if you load the data from a proxy (server).
Ext.define('appName.view.main.Main', {
extend: 'Ext.panel.Panel',
layout: 'border',
requires: [],
xtype: 'app-main',
controller: 'main',
viewModel: {
type: 'main'
},
initComponent: function () {
var myModel = Ext.create('Ext.data.Model', {
fields: [
{name: 'f1', type: 'int'},
{name: 'f2', type: 'string'},
]
});
var myStore = Ext.create('Ext.data.Store', {
model: myModel,
data: [
{f1: 1, f2: 'someData'},
{f1: 2, f2: 'some more data'},
],
autoLoad: true
});
Ext.applyIf(this, {
items: [{
region: 'center',
title: 'Center Panel',
flex: 3,
xtype: 'tabpanel',
items: [{
title: 'tab 1',
xtype: 'gridpanel',
layout: 'fit', // maybe not even neccessary
columns: [
{header: 'Field 1', dataIndex: 'f1'},
{header: 'Field 2', dataIndex: 'f2'},
],
store: myStore
}, {
xtype: 'panel',
html: 'Some other tab',
layout: 'fit'
}]
}, {
xtype: 'panel',
region: 'east',
flex: 1,
html: 'East panel',
title: 'East Panel'
}]
});
this.callParent();
},
getGridStore: function() {
return this.down('gridpanel').getStore();
}
});
Because you're specifying autoLoad, which is triggering the store to send a load request. Since you've not provided a URL for the proxy, it defaults to the name of the model. Remove autoLoad, it's redundant.
I have two models: Page and Department. I am showing pages in a list view in extjs and I would like to display the Department's Name instead of the department_id in the List view. I have not gotten to the part of actually adding the department to the page VIA the GUI, only through direct db insert statements, but I would like to at least be able to display the department name in the list view.
I have the following so far, this is showing department_id
models
Ext.define('ExtMVC.model.Department', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
fields: ['name']
});
Ext.define('ExtMVC.model.Page', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
fields: ['title','body','department_id'],
associations: [
{type: 'belongsTo', model: 'Department'}
]
});
stores
Ext.define('ExtMVC.store.Pages', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Store',
model: 'ExtMVC.model.Page',
autoLoad: true,
proxy: {
type: 'rest',
url: '/admin/pages',
format: 'json'
}
});
Ext.define('ExtMVC.store.Departments', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Store',
model: 'ExtMVC.model.Department',
autoLoad: true,
proxy: {
type: 'rest',
url: '/admin/departments',
format: 'json'
}
});
List View
Ext.define('ExtMVC.view.page.List' ,{
extend: 'Ext.grid.Panel',
alias : 'widget.pagelist',
title : 'All Pages',
store: 'Pages',
initComponent: function() {
this.tbar = [{
text: 'Create Page', action: 'create'
}];
this.columns = [
{header: 'Title', dataIndex: 'title', flex: 1},
{header: 'Department', dataIndex: 'department_id', flex: 1}
];
this.callParent(arguments);
}
});
controller (fwiw)
Ext.define('ExtMVC.controller.Pages', {
extend: 'Ext.app.Controller',
init: function() {
this.control({
'pagelist': {
itemdblclick: this.editPage
},
'pagelist > toolbar > button[action=create]': {
click: this.onCreatePage
},
'pageadd button[action=save]': {
click: this.doCreatePage
},
'pageedit button[action=save]': {
click: this.updatePage
}
});
},
onCreatePage: function () {
var view = Ext.widget('pageadd');
},
onPanelRendered: function() {
console.log('The panel was rendered');
},
doCreatePage: function (button) {
var win = button.up('window'),
form = win.down('form'),
values = form.getValues(),
store = this.getPagesStore();
if (form.getForm().isValid()) {
store.add(values);
win.close();
this.getPagesStore().sync();
}
},
updatePage: function (button) {
var win = button.up('window'),
form = win.down('form'),
record = form.getRecord(),
values = form.getValues(),
store = this.getPagesStore();
if (form.getForm().isValid()) {
record.set(values);
win.close();
this.getPagesStore().sync();
}
},
editPage: function(grid, record) {
var view = Ext.widget('pageedit');
view.down('form').loadRecord(record);
},
stores: [
'Pages',
'Departments'
],
models: [
'Page'
],
views: [
'page.List',
'page.Add',
'page.Edit'
]
});
Ext's associations have visibly not been designed for use in stores, but rather for working with single records... So, I agree with what has already been said, that you'd better flatten your model on the server-side. Nevertheless, it is possible to achieve what you want.
The association won't load your associated model (i.e. Department) until you call the generated getter method (i.e. getDepartment()). Trying to go this way, that is calling this method for each Page record loaded in your store would require an incredible amount of hack because the grid reacts synchronously to the refresh event of the store, while the getDepartment() method returns asynchronously...
That's why you will have to load your departments data in the same request that loads your pages. That is, your server must return records of the form:
{title: 'First Page', body: 'Lorem', department_id: 1, department: {name: 'Foo'}}
In order for your Page model's proxy to consume this, you need to configure your association this way:
Ext.define('ExtMVC.model.Page', {
// ...
associations: [{
type: 'belongsTo'
// You need the fully qualified name of your associated model here
// ... which will prevent Ext from generating everything magically
,model: 'ExtMVC.model.Department'
// So you must also configure the getter/setter names (if you need them)
,getterName: 'getDepartment'
// Child data will be loaded from this node (in the parent's data)
,associationKey: 'department'
// Friendly name of the node in the associated data (would default to the FQ model name)
,name: 'department'
}]
});
Then comes the really ugly part. Your grid's columns cannot access the associated data with the classic dataIndex property. However, provided the associated records have already been loaded, this can be accessed from a TemplateColumn like this:
{
header: 'Department'
,xtype: 'templatecolumn'
,tpl: '{department.name}'
}
Unfortunately, that will prevent you from using some more appropriate column class (date column, etc.), that you may have configured globally. Also, this column loses track of the model field it represents, which means that some features based on introspection won't be able to do their magic (the grid filter ux, for example, uses the field type to decide automatically on the type of filter).
But in the particular case you've exposed, that won't matter...
Complete Example
Here's what it gives when you bring it all together (or see it in action)...
Ext.define('ExtMVC.model.Department', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
fields: ['name'],
proxy: {
type: 'memory'
,reader: 'json'
,data: [
{id: 1, name: 'Foo'}
,{id: 2, name: 'Bar'}
,{id: 30, name: 'Baz'}
]
}
});
Ext.define('ExtMVC.model.Page', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Model',
fields: ['title','body','department_id'],
associations: [{
type: 'belongsTo'
,model: 'ExtMVC.model.Department'
,getterName: 'getDepartment'
,associationKey: 'department'
,name: 'department'
}],
proxy: {
type: 'memory'
,reader: 'json'
,data: [
{title: 'First Page', body: 'Lorem', department_id: 1, department: {name: 'Foo'}}
,{title: 'Second Page', department: {name: 'Bar'}}
,{title: 'Last Page', department: {name: 'Baz'}}
]
}
});
Ext.define('ExtMVC.store.Pages', {
extend: 'Ext.data.Store',
model: 'ExtMVC.model.Page',
autoLoad: true
});
Ext.define('ExtMVC.view.page.List', {
extend: 'Ext.grid.Panel',
alias : 'widget.pagelist',
title : 'All Pages',
store: Ext.create('ExtMVC.store.Pages'),
initComponent: function() {
this.tbar = [{
text: 'Create Page', action: 'create'
}];
this.columns = [
{header: 'Title', dataIndex: 'title', flex: 1}
,{header: 'Department', xtype: 'templatecolumn', flex: 1, tpl: '{department.name}'}
];
this.callParent(arguments);
}
});
Ext.widget('pagelist', {renderTo: 'ct', height: 200});
As one of the comments mentions, it would be a lot simpler to bind the department name to the Pages model when working with a grid/list. Denormalisation for display is not a bad thing.
An alternative is perhaps reverse the modelling, in that you could say the a department 'hasMany' Pages.
This allows you define the primary and foreign keys on the relationship and then your department store will (per row) have a automatic 'pages()' store which will contain the child info.
I've typically done this for master/detail forms where I want to bind 'pages()' to a list/grid, but keep the department model as the master record on a form for example.
Why shouldn't use renderer config function on the grid's column ?
This implies to (auto)load the departments store upfront on application launch (you might need it in more places anyway, think of grid cell editor as full department list).
{
name:'Department',
dataIndex:'department_id',
renderer: function(deptId){
return Ext.data.StoreManager.lookup('Departments').getById(deptId).get('name');
}
}
PS: I was using myself denormalisation for display, but doesn't feel good ;)