Currently working with WinSCP through the command line. Simple process that when run, copies remote files to local directory. I get a good way through the first-time download of files when I encounter this error:
Error listing directory '/FE_HDD_SyncFolder/Diags Old PC and Tape/DIAGS NON DG/QAPLUS 5.5 pc diags'.
Unexpected directory listing line 'EMM386.EXE////120926/0/0/3082/80/91/40/24/1/1/1'.
Invalid argument to date encode [3082-80-91]
(A)bort, (R)etry, (S)kip: Abort
I am unsure what it means and I can't find any other questions here that give a straight answer to what this error means. Is the [3082-80-91] the error code or the date that the code is reaching and reading it as invalid?
Let me know if you need anything else to answer the question.
Thanks again!
EDIT: Tried doing it though the client. I get the same error. With the client I can skip the file causing the error. I did that and the rest seems to be downloading just fin. Maybe it's just that specific file that is causing the error? Still don't know what the error is so if someone could lend a hand still, I'd appreciate it.
Related
I have been getting this error in my VisualBasic 2017 console since last night, for no apparent reason. I have been coding and compiling the same code for a while now and it hasn't give me any issues. I tried looking for this specific error, but could not find anywhere. The whole text of the error was:
MSB6003: The specified task executable "CL.exe" could not be run. The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters.
I found a temporary solution to this issue, I moved my project folder (all the *.c and *.h and vcxproj and all these files to a folder directly under a drive name, such as E:\VB_project and now its compiling fine again.
I didnot change anything to the directory at all but it just started happening. Hope it helps others as well, and I hope someone can give me a logical reason why this happened.
Thanks!
I have a Menu Form and it has 7 UserControls every time I execute my program I keep seeing this error.
I have no idea what error is this. I tried searching but there are no error close related to mine. Then I compare my error with this Project Assemblies error
Can anyone help me with this? I have no idea what causes this error.
The error is caused by your code looking for the MS Access database file called:
MonitoringSystemDatabase.mdb
...is located at path:
C:\Users\crims\AppData\Local\Microsoft\VisualStudio\10.0\ProjectAssemblies\cjz5kapb01\
...but it is not.
Locate file MonitoringSystemDatabase.mdb (perhaps with +E to Search), note the actual path of the file, and correct the path in MainMenu.vb.
The error message is very clear, so why all the searching?
Either the file isn't there, or the application can't see it where it expects to find it.
Try moving the file to:
C:\Users\Public\Documents\MonitoringSystemDatabase.mdb
and adjust you project accordingly.
I had some lua code with the following line:
JSON = loadfile("JSON.lua")()
The file JSON.lua is in the same directory as the lua code that line came from. This code worked for me for a while, and then, without my changing either the lua source, or the JSON.lua, or permission of any of the files, or the directory from where I was running the lua code, I started getting a nil error on that line. (I simply recall NO relevant changes that could have any impact on the lua code.)
Adding an assert revealed that the error was caused by the file not being found. Playing with file permissions, restarting my machine didn't resolve the issue, and pulling back code that I had checked in and was working perfectly did not resolve the error.
I resolved the error by changing the line above to provide the absolute path to that JSON.lua file.
Is there anything explaining why the code without the absolute path could have worked for a while and then stopped working?
Note: This behavior of working and then not working happened to me twice over a week. I am puzzled and though I have now found a fix, I am really curious as to the explanation for that intermittent behavior.
Lua uses package.path, whose default value comes from the environment variable LUA_PATH if it is set, as the list of directories to search. You can put . of the front of this list to load files from the current directory, or you can put your files in a path on the list.
A late answer on this, as I found exactly the same problem.
First, contrary to the previous answer, loadfile doesn't use the package.path search path. It only looks in the specified directory. And if you don't specify a directory, it only look in the 'current directory'. I can't explain exactly why it stopped working for you, but probably your Lua code is somehow being run with a different 'current directory' than previous.
There are two possible fixes: One is to specify an absolute path to loadfile.
JSON = loadfile("c:\\my_folder\\JSON.lua")()
The alternative fix depends on the particular library you're using, which I suspect is Jeffrey Friedl's Lua JSON lilbrary. Because this supports the newer Lua module mechanism, you can just load the module with require, which does support the package.path search path.
JSON = require("JSON")
I've been working on a project I have to do for school,
They basically asked us to separate every question to a file of its own,
so what I was trying to do was comment the rest of the files or exclude them off the project, and when I try to 'Start without debugging', I end up getting this message. I did this before and everything was fine:
the weird part is that if i remove the solution and make a new one and only make one .c file it works...
I was also trying to remove the "Ex2" folder and made it again, it didn't help.
When I choose move to vault it doesn't find the file.
Edit: I've run a scan and it didn't find any infections on the computer and now that i'm trying to run the program i don't see the threat anymore, I only get this message:
Please, i would really appreciate some help (again... )
I it find very interesting that your build failed. As a result, it is HIGHLY likely that no output was built.Yet your virus scanner flags a compiled file.
If your code didn't compile, where did this executable come from?
Perhaps you do have a real virus?
It seems the last error, that is partially cut off, is "Link: Fatal Error LNK1104. Cannot Open File". That suggests that the file is locked, write-protected, or otherwise blocked.
Is anything else holding open your executable, which prevents recompilation?
I wouldn't blame your virus scanner from flagging an attempt to write to a running .exe as suspicious.
I'm attempting to build Firefox on my Windows Vista Ultimate machine. I keep getting the following error:
nsinstall: Bad file number
I've read that this error is caused because of UAC in Vista. Here are the two articles that lead me to this conclusion. https://wiki.mozilla.org/Penelope_Developer_Page#Windows_Vista and http://www.kevinbrosnan.net/mozilla-build-error-nsinstall-bad-file-number
Using the standard "Run as Administrator", I've attempted to redo my build but I get the exact same error. I also started a normal command prompt as admin and then went to the batch file in mozilla-build (start-msvc8.bat) and ran it. Still, same error at the same point.
Any other insights on how I might either get around this error or perhaps something else is causing the error?
Note: I also posted something here in the hopes to get topic-specific help but I've not heard a peep... After I posted that I found the info on nsinstall. Anyway, I prefer SO so I thought I'd try here...
Update: I've attempted to completly disable UAC to correct the problem as is suggested by cnemelkasr. I've received the exact same error. This new knowledge is making me think that a file or folder is missing... Does anyone who has experience with NSInstall know what the given error -- Bad file number -- might mean? I figure it might be referring to a file handle...
If it really is a UAC error, you can try turning off UAC altogether. I've had to do this for several packages. There are numerous places on the web to get the instructions for doing that.
http://www.petri.co.il/disable_uac_in_windows_vista.htm is one of them.
I found the answer to my question. I'm posting the answer here to share the answer with others and to close this question.
After disabling the UAC, it was suggested that the directory depth was interfering with NSInstall. I moved the folder from c:/Users/Frank/Documents/hg-repos/firefox-src-hgRepo/mozilla-fv-expirement/ to C:/mozilla-fv-expirement/. Cleaned all previous build attempts and finally redid my build (with UAC off) and I received a working debug binary.
The suggestion was posted at: mozilla.dev.builds
The "Bad file number" message in the cases I have seen, is caused by too many arguments passed to execvp (command, argv) (or similar) function. But only from some programs. An old bash, sh or a Borland/Watcom program in your PATH is an likely candidate.
So when you shorten the name of the build directory, the total size of the command line (that eventually gets passed to CreateProcess()) gets shorter. I don't think UAC has anything to do with this since I've seen this on Win-XP too. But it's a bit strange Mozilla would not use relative paths while building. I guess it uses some directory prefix value in it's makefiles (I've never tried building it).
If you look at the documentation for _execvp():
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/3xw6zy53.aspx
E2BIG is one of the possible errno values:
The space required for the arguments and environment settings exceeds 32 KB.
Now, here is the strange part.
Fact 1:
On Visual-C/MingW (any version), strerror(EBADF) doesn't return "Bad file number" .
(it return "Bad file descriptor").
Fact 2:
On Borland's CBuilder 5.6 and Watcom 1.9 (these do not use the MSVC runtime), strerror(EBADF) does indeed return "Bad file number".
Theory:
Is possible that Borland, Watcom (and other CRTs too?) mixes up the meaning of E2BIG and EBADF. Did that make any sense? Someone please correct me if you have a better theory.
I'm a bit confused myself...
Conclusion: Either shorten the size of your environment (easiest) or shorten the command-line (not always easy).
--gv