I write test script in C, compiled it and put to /usr/bin directory, to execute it from anywhere like mkdir or ls. But then I wrote $ test nothing happen, if i wrote $ /usr/bin/test it works well. What I did wrong? I got Ubuntu 14.
In shells (such as bash), there's a shell builtin named test. So, when you execute test, shell builtin test is executed even though you have test in /usr/bin/ assuming you have /usr/bin/ in your PATH. When you give full path, there's no ambiguity there (like other binaries namedtest which might be there in PATH or builtins).
You can test this by running:
$type test
Name your binary to something else that doesn't interfere with system binaries or shell builtins. It's generally recommended to put your binaries in designated locations such as usr/local/bin/ even if your binary is uniquely named.
Related
I have written a c program. I want to pipe the program and I want to make it look meaningful. So instead of writing ./a.out each time, I want to name it changetext. To achieve that, I compiled my program following way: gcc -o changetext myprog.c. To the best of my knowledge, this should replace the use of ./a.out and changetext should do that instead. But I'm getting command not found. I am new to c and unix environment. Any suggestion appreciated.
As I said in a comment, you can either put a dot slash (./) in front of the executable to run it
./changetext
Or you put in in a directory that is referenced in the PATH environment variable. A nice explanation of this safety feature can be found here (thanks to rubenvb):
http://www.linfo.org/dot_slash.html
It says that this is more or less to distinguish built-in commands from user-written commands with the same name. I am not convinced though. The shell could simply prefer built-in names to user-supplied ones, and look in the current directory as well as in the PATH.
But this is the *nix way.
In order to compile and run a program such as your changetext with just the command chanhetext, you must put the binary in a directory listed in your PATH environment variable. It is recommended that you put programs that you made for your own use in the ~/bin/ directory. The command you would use to accomplish this would be the following, assuming ~/bin/ already exists:
gcc -o ~/bin/changetext myprog.c
If it does not exist, you can simply create it, then log out and back in.
If you are tired of doing the ./ before the program name you can always make an alias such as
alias a='./a.out' or alias changetext='./changetext'
this just basically look for everytime you type changetext or a and then replaces it to have the ./ infront of it
I'm trying to find a way to convert simple C code to NASM assembly. I have tried using objconv and downloaded and unzipped and built it since I am using a MAC; however, it doesn't seem to be working. I keep getting "-bash: objconv: command not found". Does anyone know another way or can help me solve the -bash error.
Bash is the program that takes the words you type in a terminal and launches other programs. If it is reporting an error, it is because it cannot find the program you want to run (at least in this case).
You need to either find a pre-packaged installation of objconv, or you need to do the work to "integrate" your copy of objconv yourself.
If you can identify the executable you want to run (probably called objconv) you need to add that to your path. The easiest way (if it is just for you) is to verify that your ~/.bashrc or ~/.bashprofile has a line that looks something like
PATH=$PATH:${HOME}/bin
Don't worry if it doesn't look exactly the same. Just make sure there's a ${HOME}/bin or ~/bin (~ is the short version of ${HOME}).
If you have that then type the commands
cd ~/bin
ln -fs ../path/to/objconv
and you will create a soft link (a type of file) in your home binary directory, and the program should be available to the command line.
If you create the file, and nothing above has any errors, but it is not available to the command line, you might need to set the executable bit on your "real" (not link) copy of objconv.
If this doesn't work, by now you should be well primed for a better, more specific question.
If you have gcc installed, try gcc -masm=intel -S source.c to generate assembly files in a syntax very similar to that of MASM.
i have created (executable) binary "sample" from .c using
gcc sample.c -o sample
it's created binary named sample sucessfully.
when i run this from terminal like ./sample it display a result..
but when i run this from my tcl like exec ./sample it shows error like ./sample no such file or directory..
can anyone help me to solve the above error?
If sample in the current directory is executable, exec ./sample should work. Assuming that the binary itself does not generate that error message when it runs, of course. (Messages on stderr will become errors in Tcl by default.)
Check that puts [pwd] tells you the place you expected; if you had a cd elsewhere in your script then that relative path would no longer work. If this is the problem, use the full, absolute path to the compiled file. (You can compute this at the start of your script using file normalize sample, but you have to do this before you cd; good library packages do not use cd precisely because it is so confusing while simultaneously being usually totally unnecessary for them…)
If file exists ./sample is true (and file executable ./sample is also true, which it should be if it has just been produced by a compiler) then check immediately after the failed execution what the contents of the errorInfo and errorCode global variables are. They may give a bit more indication of what went wrong. (Or maybe not; can't tell for sure.)
I'm on a Mac and in terminal I'm compiling my program
gcc -Wall -g -o example example.c
it compiles (there are no errors), but when I try to provide command line arguments
example 5 hello how are you
terminal responds with "-bash: example: command not found"
how am supposed to provide the arguments I want to provide after compiling?
Run it like this with path:
./example 5 hello how are you
Unless the directory where the example binary is part of the PATH variable, what you have won't work even if the binary you are running is in the current directory.
It is not a compilation issue, but an issue with your shell. The current directory is not in your PATH (look with echo $PATH and use which to find out how the shell uses it for some particular program, e.g. which gcc).
I suggest testing your program with an explicit file path for the program like
./example 5 hello how are you
You could perhaps edit your ~/.bashrc to add . at the end of your PATH. There are pro and conses (in particular some possible security issues if your current directory happens to be sometimes a "malicious" one like perhaps /tmp might be : bad guys might put there a gcc which is a symlink to /bin/rm so you need to add . at the end of your PATH if you do).
Don't forget to learn how to use a debugger (like gdb). This skill is essential when coding in C (or in C++). Perhaps consider also upgrading your gcc (Apple don"t like much its current GPLv3 license so don't distribute the recent one; try just gcc -v and notice that the latest released GCC is today 4.8.1).
./example 5 Hello how are you is the syntax you're looking for.
This article lends a good explanation as to why this is important.
Basically, when you hit Enter, the shell checks to see if the first set of characters is an absolute path. If it's not, it checks the PATH variable to find executables with the name of the command you are trying to run. If it's found, it will be run, but otherwise it will crash and burn and you will become very sad.
hello everyone
i try to debug a program, which have been installed by makefile.
it have a binary file of OpenDPI_demo.o and a shell shellscript OpenDPI_demo.
when i gdb OpenDPI_demo.o,i have a problem. i can't run it. the error is:
Starting program: /home/lx/ntop/test/opendpi/src/examples/OpenDPI_demo/OpenDPI_demo.o
/bin/bash: /home/lx/ntop/test/opendpi/src/examples/OpenDPI_demo/OpenDPI_demo.o：can't execute the binary file.
please tell me why. actually i can run the program by ./OpenDPI_demo.
thank you.
Based on the extension, the file is an object file. It is used by the linker (alongside other object files) to produce an executable. It's the real executable the one you want to run/debug.
This is another example of difficulties encountered with programs using libtool.
the file OpenDPI_demo alongside OpenDPI_demo.o is actually, as you said, a shell script which wraps the execution of the real compiled file, probably in .libs/OpenDPI_demo.
libtool needs this wrapper to adjust the runtime library paths and such so that you can execute the program transparently, as if it was actually installed on your system.
The way to correctly debug this application is not
/home/lx/ntop/test/opendpi $ gdb src/examples/OpenDPI_demo/.libs/OpenDPI_demo
but rather using libtool --mode=execute on the shell script, like the following (it's an example):
/home/lx/ntop/test/opendpi $ ./libtool --mode=execute gdb --args \
src/examples/OpenDPI_demo/OpenDPI_demo -f capture.pcap
Suggest you use
gdb OpenDPI_demo
instead
In your makefile if it depens on the object, make it depend on OpenDPI_demo, e.g.