Hello i have been coding with Tm4c123gh6pm lately and i have faced a part where i want to use the edge timing mode , now i haven't went for the tivaware api's i just went for traditional register level and following the datasheet and i faced this problem
i want to know which pin to use as the one where the timer is waiting for the rising edge to come so it moves the current timer value ?
i checked the data sheet all i can find is that timer 0 is somehow related to PB6 and PF0 now i tried PB6 and it didn't work but is that even the correct approach ?
are these the correct pins the microcontroller's timer waits for the rising edge to move the current timer value ?
here is a sample of my code and please note that this is just a testing code im trying its not a final code what i did was copy the initialization section in the datasheet for the timer mode i want and followed it step by step
this code will make the counter start running from 0xFF downwards but when i place a 'high' signal i.e 3.3 volts on PB6 nothing is moved to the GPTMTnR register.
i just wonder if there is something im doing wrong and im not noticing ?
#include "tm4c123gh6pm.h"
void Timer0Init(void);
int main(void)
{
int i=0;
Timer0Init();
while(1){
for(i=0;i<100000;i++){
}
}
return 0;
}
void Timer0Init(void)
{
//initialize PORT B
volatile unsigned long delay;
SYSCTL_RCGC2_R |= 0x00000002; // 1) B clock
delay = SYSCTL_RCGC2_R; // delay to allow clock to stabilize
GPIO_PORTB_AMSEL_R &= 0x00; // 2) disable analog function
GPIO_PORTB_PCTL_R &= 0x00000000; // 3) GPIO clear bit PCTL
GPIO_PORTB_DIR_R &= 0x00; // 4.2) PB all input
GPIO_PORTB_AFSEL_R &= 0x40; // 5) no alternate function
GPIO_PORTB_DEN_R |= 0xFF; // 7) enable digital pins PF4-PF1
GPIO_PORTB_PCTL_R = 7;
//timer clock
SYSCTL_RCGCTIMER_R |=0x01;
delay = SYSCTL_RCGCTIMER_R;
//1. Ensure the timer is disabled (the TnEN bit is cleared) before making any changes.
TIMER0_CTL_R &= 0xFE;
//2. Write the GPTM Configuration (GPTMCFG) register with a value of 0x0000.0004.
TIMER0_CFG_R= 0x00000004;
//3. In the GPTM Timer Mode (GPTMTnMR) register, write the TnCMR field to 0x1 and the TnMR field to 0x3.
TIMER0_TAMR_R= TIMER0_TAMR_R | 0x007;
//4. Configure the type of event that the timer captures by writing the TnEVENT field of the GPTM Control (GPTMCTL) register.
TIMER0_CTL_R = TIMER0_CTL_R & 0xFFFFFFF3;
//5. If a prescaler is to be used, write the prescale value to the GPTM Timer n Prescale Register (GPTMTnPR).
//no prescaler for now
//6. Load the timer start value into the GPTM Timer n Interval Load (GPTMTnILR) register.
TIMER0_TAILR_R = 0xFF;
//7. If interrupts are required, set the CnEIM bit in the GPTM Interrupt Mask (GPTMIMR) register.
//no interrupts required
//8. Set the TnEN bit in the GPTM Control (GPTMCTL) register to enable the timer and start counting.
TIMER0_CTL_R= TIMER0_CTL_R & 0x00000001;
TIMER0_CTL_R |= 0x01;
//9. Poll the CnERIS bit in the GPTMRIS register or wait for the interrupt to be generated (if enabled). In both cases,
//the status flags are cleared by writing a 1 to the CnECINT bit of the GPTM Interrupt Clear (GPTMICR) register.
//The time at which the event happened can be obtained by reading the GPTM Timer n (GPTMTnR) register.
/*In Input Edge Timing mode, the timer continues running after an edge event has been detected,
but the timer interval can be changed at any time by writing the GPTMTnILR register. The change
takes effect at the next cycle after the write.*/
}
there was a problem with my portb initialization i used tivaware for that part and it worked perfectly fine now on placing high on PB6 it passes the current timer value to the other register
also note that when counting up the timer counts up to the value initialized in the TAIL_R register also if u want to reset the timer you need to write the value u want the timer to begin with in the TAV_R register
Best Of Luck everyone
Related
I am trying to implement a 16-bit timer overflow interrupt on the ATMEGA168. The idea is to write a message to the UART I/O register when the timer overflows.
I've tested the UART separately and it works fine via RealTerm (baudrate of 9600 bits/s).
I created a base project from https://start.atmel.com/#dashboard where I had to set the input clock frequency to 16MHz to be compatible with the debugger (see page 5). So I would expect to see a 0x1 on my serial terminal every (16x106 / 1024)-1 x 216 = 4.194 seconds.
However, I'm not seeing anything on the terminal regardless of the prescaler I select. Can anyone please advise what could be going wrong?
I have attached the ISR and the main() below:
#include <atmel_start.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <usart_basic.h>
#include <atomic.h>
#include <avr/interrupt.h>
#include <avr/io.h>
// timer1 overflow
ISR(TIMER1_OVF_vect) {
// Send 0x1 over UART
UDR0 = 0x1;
}
int main(void) {
atmel_start_init();
// enable timer overflow interrupt for Timer1
TIMSK1 = (1<<TOIE1); // also tried |=
// start 16-bit counter with /1024 prescaler
TCCR1B = (1 << CS10) | (1 << CS12); // also tried |=
TCCR1A = 0x0;
// enable interrupts
sei();
while(true) {
// more code here...
}
}
I have tried to isolate the problem by not writing to UART in the ISR, but just incrementing a counter (declared with the volatile qualifier) and then printing its value to the screen via UART in the while(true) loop. But the counter doesn't increment either and remains stuck at 0.
You have no USART initialisation code. Specifically you don't enable the transmitter or set the baud rate. I accept that you have tried it with a counter, but that is not the code shown so we can come to no conclusion about its correctness or otherwise.
Without initialisation, the transmitter will not run, and the baud rate will be 1Mbps. Your need at least:
// Set baud rate 9600
uint16_t brr = (FOSC / 16 / 9600) - 1
UBRR0H = (uint8_t)(ubrr >> 8);
UBRR0L = (uint8_t)ubrr;
// Enable transmitter
UCSR0B = (1<<TXEN0);
// Note reset state frame is N,8,1
I am not convinced that it matters but your timer initialisation order is not idiomatic. You would normally enable the interrupt after setting the prescaler and any other configurations, and to ensure the first period is a complete period, reset the counter to zero immediately before enabling interrupts.
// set up timer with prescaler = 1024
TCCR1B = (1 << CS12) & (1 << CS11);
// initialise counter
TCNT1 = 0;
// enable overflow interrupt
TIMSK = (1 << TOIE1);
// enable global interrupts
sei();
As I said, I am not sure that will fix your problem but the elided part:
while(true) {
// more code here...
}
may well be the code that is breaking it. You would do well to discount that possibility by disabling or removing any code there temporarily.
OK so I have been attempting to create some code using a MSP430FR5994 TI launch pad that utilizes Timer0 and 3 separate compare registers to trigger 3 separate isr's. I have successfully got one to work however as soon as I add another compare register the CCIFE flag sets and never competes the execution of the second isr. I have watched the code in the debugger on both CCstudio and IAR same thing happens in both, the set up registers are correct and the TA0R registers is counting and will trigger the first isr based on the TA0CCR0 but all other compare regs R1 2 3 etc will not trigger and execute successfully. The code is below, idea's on what I am doing wrong would be much appreciated.
#include "msp430.h"
#include <stdbool.h>
#define COUNT_1 12000
#define COUNT_2 800
int main( void )
{
// Stop watchdog timer to prevent time out reset
WDTCTL = WDTPW + WDTHOLD;
PM5CTL0 &= ~LOCKLPM5;
P1DIR |= BIT0 + BIT1;
P1OUT = BIT0 + BIT1;
//set up and enable timer A or TA0 for continous mode
TA0CCR0 = COUNT_1;
TA1CCR1 = COUNT_2;
TA0CTL = TASSEL__ACLK + MC_2; //set the max period for 16bit timer operation
TA1CTL = TASSEL__ACLK + MC_2;
TA0CCTL0 = CCIE; //enable compare reg 0
TA1CCTL1 = CCIE; //enable compare reg 1
//TA0CTL |= TAIE;
_BIS_SR( GIE); //ENABLE GLOBAL INTERRRUPTS
//set the max period for 16bit timer operation
while(true){}
}
#pragma vector= TIMER0_A0_VECTOR //compare interrupt 0 flahse red led
__interrupt void TIMER0_A0(void) {
P1OUT ^= BIT1 ;
}
#pragma vector = TIMER1_A1_VECTOR //compare interrupt 1 flashes green led
__interrupt void TIMER1_A1(void) {
P1OUT ^= BIT0;
}
The User's Guide says in section 25.2.6.1:
The TAxCCR0 CCIFG flag is automatically reset when the TAxCCR0 interrupt
request is serviced.
However, this does not happen for the other CCRx interrupts, because multiple ones use the same interrupt vector.
Section 25.2.5.2 says:
The highest-priority enabled interrupt generates a number in the TAxIV register (see register description). […]
Any access, read or write, of the TAxIV register automatically resets the highest-pending interrupt flag.
So you always have to read the TAxIV register (and with three or more CCRs, you need it to find out which CCR triggered the interrupt):
__interrupt void TIMER1_A1(void) {
switch (TA1IV) {
case TAIV__TACCR1:
P1OUT ^= BIT0;
break;
case TAIV__TACCR2:
...
break;
}
}
I am working on an auto-parking car robot and I am using 8 (hc-sr04) ultrasonic sensors (2 at each side) but the problem is that I am using atmega32 which has limited resources only 3 external interrupts and 3 timers (and even if using interrupts somehow works I might run into risk to have two interrupts triggered at the same time).
I am using this sensor : http://ram-e-shop.com/oscmax/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=907
I've tried using digital I/O pins with polling procedure but it didn't work.
here is the code for polling procedure:
unsigned int read_sonar(){
int dist_in_cm = 0;
init_sonar(); // Setup pins and ports
trigger_sonar(); // send a 10us high pulse
while(!(ECHO_PIN & (1<<ECHO_BIT))){ // while echo pin is still low
USART_Message("echo pin low\r\n");
trig_counter++;
uint32_t max_response_time = SONAR_TIMEOUT;
if (trig_counter > max_response_time){ // SONAR_TIMEOUT
return TRIG_ERROR;
}
}
TCNT1=0; // reset timer
TCCR1B |= (1<<CS10); // start 16 bit timer with no prescaler
TIMSK |= (1<<TOIE1); // enable overflow interrupt on timer1
overFlowCounter=0; // reset overflow counter
sei(); // enable global interrupts
while((ECHO_PIN & (1<<ECHO_BIT))){ // while echo pin is still high
USART_Message("echo pin high\r\n");
if (((overFlowCounter*TIMER_MAX)+TCNT1) > SONAR_TIMEOUT){
USART_Message("timeout");
return ECHO_ERROR; // No echo within sonar range
}
};
TCCR1B = 0x00; // stop 16 bit timer with no prescaler
cli(); // disable global interrupts
no_of_ticks = ((overFlowCounter*TIMER_MAX)+TCNT1); // counter count
dist_in_cm = (no_of_ticks/(CONVERT_TO_CM*CYCLES_PER_US)); // distance in cm
return (dist_in_cm );}
This method doesn't work if I want to read all sensors at the same time, because it gets stuck in the loop for a while.
I also tried using freeRTOS to build a task that checks the state of pins like every 1msec but this won't be a time accurate.
any help?
Assuming that You use internal clock which is 8MHz I would try to handle this inside timer overflow interrupt and would use whole port to connect the sensors.
Use Timer in normal mode or CTC mode (which I find quite intuitive) to ensure periodical interrupts. Set the appropriate period. Remember that the clock has pretty low frequency so don't exaggerate (I think that 0,25 ms will fit).
Connect the sensors to one port, e.g. PORTB. This is a nice situation because ATmega32 has 4 ports with pins numbered from 0-7 and you use 8 sensors so the register for the specific port can cover all of the pins and You can use one read to get states of all of the pins.
Implement the logic:
volatile uint8_t sensors_states;
volatile uint8_t read_flag = 0;
ISR(TIMER0_OVF_vect)
{
sensors_states = PORTB;
read_flag = 1;
}
int main()
{
// Initialize peripherals ...
// You must assume on your own how much time could the pin be held
// in the same state. This is important because the number must not
// be bigger than max value for the type of the array
uint8_t states_time[8] = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0};
uint8_t prev_sensors_states = PORTB;
while(1)
{
// Wait until the flag will be set in the ISR
if(read_flag)
{
for(uint8_t i = 0, mask = 0x80 ; i < 8 ; i ++, mask >>= 1)
{
states_time[i]++;
// Compare the previous state and present state on each pin
uint8_t state = mask & sensors_states;
if((mask & prev_sensors_states) != state)
{
// Here you can use the state of the pin and the duration of that state.
// Remember that when 'state' is > 0 it means that previous state of the
// pin was '0' and if if 'state' is == 0 then the previous pin state
// was '1' (negation).
do_something_with_pin_change(states_time[i], state);
states_time[i] = 0;
}
}
// Save the previous states of the pins
prev_sensors_states = sensors_states;
// Clear the flag to await next data update
read_flag = 0;
}
}
}
If You will try to use FreeRTOS You could use ulTaskNotifyTake and vTaskNotifyGiveFromISR, instead of using read_flag, to implement a simple mechanism which will notify a task from the interrupt that the port has been read. The processor will go into idle state for a while and you could then invoke a sleep function to minimize power consumption.
I don't know what You want to do with this data so I've invoked do_something_with_pin_change function to indicate the point where You can use the data.
To sum up for this solution You would only use one interrupt and of course 8 pins.
I have a TIVA tm4c123G I have been trying to create a communication between it and my ADXL345 sensor using I2C protocol which I succeeded in writing and reading from the accelerometer the readings of the device address and the register values that I just wrote to which means everything is running fine. However I have tried this in step by step debugging in keil and it works fine but if I run the program it will give zeroes all the way and I have no idea why? Should I add delays between the write and read from registers or whats going wrong in my code?
Here is my code attached
I am using a clock of 80 MHZ for the system and I think this might be the problem however as the code goes too fast to the execution of a next send and there should be some delay? I am not sure I'm only guessing please help thanks !
also my connection for the adxl is
Vcc -> 3.3 volts
GND -> ground
CS -> 3.3 volts
SDO -> ground
SDA -> PB3
SCL -> PB2
#include "tm4c123gh6pm.h"
#include "stdint.h"
void EnableI2CModule0(void);
uint8_t ReadRegister(uint8_t RegisterAddress);
void PLL_Init(void);
void WriteRegister(uint8_t RegisterAddress,uint8_t Data);
volatile uint8_t X_Axis1,X_Axis2,Y_Axis1,Y_Axis2,Z_Axis1,Z_Axis2=0;
int main()
{
volatile long temp;
PLL_Init();
EnableI2CModule0();
temp=ReadRegister(0x00);
WriteRegister(0x2D,0x08);
temp=ReadRegister(0x2D);
WriteRegister(0x31,0x0B);
temp=ReadRegister(0x31);
while(1)
{
X_Axis1=ReadRegister(0x32);
X_Axis2=ReadRegister(0x33);
Y_Axis1=ReadRegister(0x34);
Y_Axis2=ReadRegister(0x35);
Z_Axis1=ReadRegister(0x36);
Z_Axis2=ReadRegister(0x37);
}
}
void PLL_Init(void){
// 0) Use RCC2
SYSCTL_RCC2_R |= 0x80000000; // USERCC2
// 1) bypass PLL while initializing
SYSCTL_RCC2_R |= 0x00000800; // BYPASS2, PLL bypass
// 2) select the crystal value and oscillator source
SYSCTL_RCC_R = (SYSCTL_RCC_R &~0x000007C0) // clear XTAL field, bits 10-6
+ 0x00000540; // 10101, configure for 16 MHz crystal
SYSCTL_RCC2_R &= ~0x00000070; // configure for main oscillator source
// 3) activate PLL by clearing PWRDN
SYSCTL_RCC2_R &= ~0x00002000;
// 4) set the desired system divider
SYSCTL_RCC2_R |= 0x40000000; // use 400 MHz PLL
SYSCTL_RCC2_R = (SYSCTL_RCC2_R&~ 0x1FC00000) // clear system clock divider
+ (4<<22); // configure for 80 MHz clock
// 5) wait for the PLL to lock by polling PLLLRIS
while((SYSCTL_RIS_R&0x00000040)==0){}; // wait for PLLRIS bit
// 6) enable use of PLL by clearing BYPASS
SYSCTL_RCC2_R &= ~0x00000800;
}
void EnableI2CModule0(void)
{
volatile int Delay=0;
SYSCTL_RCGCI2C_R|=0x00000001; //set i2c module 0 clock active
Delay=SYSCTL_RCGCI2C_R; //delay allow clock to stabilize
SYSCTL_RCGCGPIO_R |=0x00000002; //i2c module 0 is portB so activate clock for port B
Delay = SYSCTL_RCGCGPIO_R; //delay allow clock to stabilize
GPIO_PORTB_AFSEL_R|= 0x0000000C; //enable alternate functions for PB2 and PB3
GPIO_PORTB_ODR_R |= 0x00000008; //set PB3 (I2C SDA) for open drain
GPIO_PORTB_DEN_R |= 0xFF; //Enable digital on Port B
GPIO_PORTB_PCTL_R |=0x03;
I2C0_PP_R |= 0x01;
I2C0_MTPR_R |= 0x00000027; //set SCL clock
I2C0_MCR_R |= 0x00000010; //intialize mcr rigester with that value given in datasheet
}
uint8_t ReadRegister(uint8_t RegisterAddress)
{
volatile uint8_t result=0;
I2C0_MSA_R = 0x000000A6; //write operation
I2C0_MDR_R = RegisterAddress; //place data to send mdr register
I2C0_MCS_R = 0x00000007; //stop start run
while((I2C0_MCS_R &= 0x00000040)==1); //poll busy bit
I2C0_MSA_R = 0x000000A7; // read operation
I2C0_MCS_R = 0x00000007; // stop start run
while((I2C0_MCS_R &= 0x00000040)==1); //poll busy bit
result = I2C0_MDR_R;
return result;
}
void WriteRegister(uint8_t RegisterAddress,uint8_t Data)
{
I2C0_MSA_R = 0x000000A6; //write operation
I2C0_MDR_R = RegisterAddress; //place register address to set in mdr register
I2C0_MCS_R = 0x00000003; //burst send ( multiple bytes send )
while((I2C0_MCS_R &= 0x00000040)==1); //poll busy bit
I2C0_MDR_R = Data; //place data to be sent in mdr register
I2C0_MCS_R = 0x00000005; // transmit followed by stop state
while((I2C0_MCS_R &= 0x00000040)==1); //poll busy bit
}
Your WriteRegister and ReadRegister functions do not follow the flowcharts defined in the TM4C123G data sheet. Apart from not checking or handling the MCS ERROR flag, Figure 16-10 Master TRANSMIT of Multiple Data Bytes shows that when writing the MCS register, you should assert specific bits, while you are writing to all bits, You should instead perform a read-modify-write:
I2C0_MCS_R = 0x00000003; //burst send ( multiple bytes send )
should be:
// I2CMCS = ---0-011
uint32_t mcs = I2C0_MCS_R ;
msc &= ~0x00000014; // ---0-0--
mcs |= 0x00000003; // ------11
I2C0_MCS_R = mcs ;
And similarly:
I2C0_MCS_R = 0x00000005; // transmit followed by stop state
should be
// I2CMCS = ---0-101
mcs = I2C0_MCS_R ;
mcs &= ~0x00000012; // ---0--0-
mcs |= 0x00000005; // -----1-1
I2C0_MCS_R = mcs ;
ReadRegister() has a similar issue (although it is unlikely to be an issue in this case):
I2C0_MCS_R = 0x00000007; //stop start run
should strictly be:
// I2CMCS = ---00111
uint32_t mcs = I2C0_MCS_R ;
mcs &= ~0x00000018; // ---00---
mcs |= 0x00000007; // -----111
I2C0_MCS_R = mcs ;
The datasheet recommends for bits 31:5:
Software should not rely on the value of a reserved bit. To provide
compatibility with future products, the value of a reserved bit should
be preserved across a read-modify-write operation.
The above code does that, but in practice should not be necessary on this specific product, but is good practice in any case.
In any event you should add the recommended error handling code. It may be that no error flag is being set, but we don't know that unless you check for it, and doing so will at least assist debugging - rather then stepping the code, you can simply set a break-point on the error handling and then run at full-speed. This will narrow down the number of possibilities.
as #Clifford had explained that i should follow the flow charts and although his answer is completely correct it didn't give me any results (previously gave values in case of stepping into the function gave zeroes afterwards) but , i noticed something in the flow charts that i hadn't noticed before which contradicts with the initialization and configuration section in the data sheet
now as it says in step 11 that you should be polling the bus busy bit in the MCS register but this is wrong and contradicts with the flow charts , the flow charts are more correct as u should check if the bus is busy before sending anything and then check for the master busy bit before reading from the MDR register or moving on to execute and further steps
basically the correct steps in the initialization and configuration should be :
before step 10 poll the bus busy bit in case any other master is sending which can be omitted in case of a single master
after step 10 poll the busy bit before reading or going to any further step to conclude whether the sending has been completed and the master is idle or not
i'm sorry i feel like a complete idiot now for not reading the flow charts carefully but i followed another part which is the initialization and configuration part accepting a fact which wasn't there that both should imply the same thing .
i also found that it works correctly in the tivaware API following the flow charts and not that other section in the datasheet however i didn't want to use the Tivaware API as i am looking forward for problems like this which lead to a better understanding of how things work
thanks again for your help #Clifford cheers!
So I'm having a problem getting a TI microcontroller to communicate with the Raspberry Pi B+. The exact microcontroller I'm using is the TI cc430f5137. The issue I'm having is that I just can't seem to get the Raspberry Pi to correctly receive the data I'm sending from the MSP430. For those who don't know, the 430 has 2 buffers for this purpose, a RX and TX, which allows the use of the UART module while code is still executing. I've enabled an interrupt for when I receive a byte, and I simply set a flag and send the same byte right back. It works up until I attempt to transmit.
The code sits and waits in an infinite loop until it receives it's first byte. At that point it simply saves the byte and flashes the LED if it's a 'T' (for testing). Upon returning to the loop, it detects that the saved byte has changed, and puts it in the buffer to send it back. Until this point, everything works perfectly. It receives the correct byte every time, letting me know my clocks are perfect, my interrupt is working, and my UART initialization is correct. Where it goes wrong is after sending the byte, it seems like there is some kind of internal loopback (this is an option but I made sure this is not the case) that is causing the interrupt to re-trigger, resulting in an infinite loop of transmitting and again receiving the same byte, but upon invoking this via the Pi I don't get back a loop of the same character, but instead a byte of random garbage that has no consistency or logic behind it. I analyzed the bits to see if the timing is just off and that doesn't seem to be the case. For reference, my Baud is a measly 1200, the voltage of both devices is definitely 3.3v, and I'm sure the Pi is working because when I short the RX and TX, I get back the byte without an issue. I switched to UART because SPI was giving me similar problems, and I can't think of any other protocol besides I2C that would help here. I am using an external 32768hz crystal. Also, I've tried this on two different microcontrollers, so its definitely the code that's the issue.
#include <msp430.h>
char temp;
char in;
int main(void) {
WDTCTL = WDTPW | WDTHOLD; // Stop watchdog timer
P1OUT = 0x00; // Make sure pins are tturned off
P1DIR = 0x01; // Led out
P1SEL |= BIT5 + BIT6; // UART as pin mode
UCSCTL6 &= ~BIT0; // Turn on XT1
P5SEL |= BIT0 + BIT1; // Select XT1 as pin function
UCA0CTL1 |= BIT0; // Set UART to reset mode
UCA0CTL1 |= BIT6; // Choose ACLK as source
UCA0BR0 = 27; // Set speed to 1200 Baud
UCA0MCTL = 0x02 << 1; // Set speed to 1200 Baud
UCA0CTL1 &= ~BIT0; // Turn UART on
UCA0IE = BIT0; // Enable RX interrupt
__enable_interrupt();
while(1)
{
if(in != 0)
{
UCA0TXBUF = in;
temp = in;
in = 0;
}
}
}
#pragma vector=USCI_A0_VECTOR
__interrupt void UCSIA0(void)
{
in = UCA0RXBUF;
if(in == 0x54)
P1OUT ^= BIT0;
}
Output from running minicom at 1200 on Pi, Sending 'T' one at a time:
UÔÿÿïÕuU_þýÿÿÿÿÿÿÕԯÿÿôÕüÿÝUõï\þþÿÿÕ¿ÿÿýýTÿýUÿÿÿïÿÿÿõÿýýÿõûÿ
assuming Pi is working currectly...
1.verify msp430 TX is woring: send every 1 sec known value and see if PI getting it currectly.
2.verify MSP430 RX working: send from Pi known value every 1 sec.
3.interrupt section:
your code dosent verfiy that RX interrupt is off.
you should filter interrupts generated only for the RX .
also, your code dont handle overrun/frame errors.
sharing "in" variable both for TX and RX (and both at interrupt and main loop section)-not good idea..
4.your output example suggests that you have baud rate mismatch issue.
if you send character 'T' and shoud get back 'T'. i expect to see 'TTTTTT...'
BTW this garbage may suggests that you forgot to connecting GND line between two MCUs...