Related
I have a ListView (on the 'master' side) whose selection drives a ContentControl's Content property (on the 'detail' side). The ContentControl's visual tree comes from either of two DataTemplate resources that use DataType to choose which detail view to render based on what is selected in the ListView.
That part works fine.
The part I'm struggling with is that there is a particular control inside (one of) the templates that I need to obtain a reference to whenever it changes (e.g. the template selected changes or the ListView selection changes such that the instance of the control is recreated.)
In my ListView.SelectionChanged event handler, I find the ContentControl has not yet been updated with its new visual tree, so initially it's empty on the first selection, and for subsequent selections its visual tree matches the old selection instead of the new one.
I've tried delaying my code by scheduling on the Dispatcher with a priority as low as DispatcherPriority.Loaded, which works for the first selection but on subsequent selections my code still runs before the visual tree is updated.
Is there a better event I should be hooking to run whenever the ContentControl's visual tree is changed to reflect a changed data-bound value to its Content property?
Extra info: the reason I need to reach into the expanded DataTemplate is that I need to effectively set my view model's IList SelectedItems property to a DataGrid control's SelectedItems property. Since DataGrid.SelectedItems is not a dependency property, I have to do this manually in code.
The fix required a combination of techniques. For the first selection that populates the visual tree, I needed to handle ContentControl.OnApplyTemplate() which is only a virtual method rather than an event. I derived from it and exposed it as an event:
public class ContentControlWithEvents : ContentControl
{
public event EventHandler? TemplateApplied;
public override void OnApplyTemplate()
{
base.OnApplyTemplate();
this.TemplateApplied?.Invoke(this, EventArgs.Empty);
}
}
In the XAML I used the above class rather than ContentControl:
<local:ContentControlWithEvents
Content="{Binding SelectedAccount}"
x:Name="BankingSelectedAccountPresenter"
TemplateApplied="BankingSelectedAccountPresenter_TemplateApplied" />
Then I handle the event like this:
void BankingSelectedAccountPresenter_TemplateApplied(object sender, EventArgs e) => this.UpdateSelectedTransactions();
private void UpdateSelectedTransactions()
{
if (this.MyListView.SelectedItem?.GetType() is Type type)
{
DataTemplateKey key = new(type);
var accountTemplate = (DataTemplate?)this.FindResource(key);
Assumes.NotNull(accountTemplate);
if (VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(this.BankingSelectedAccountPresenter) > 0)
{
ContentPresenter? presenter = VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(this.BankingSelectedAccountPresenter, 0) as ContentPresenter;
Assumes.NotNull(presenter);
presenter.ApplyTemplate();
var transactionDataGrid = (DataGrid?)accountTemplate.FindName("TransactionDataGrid", presenter);
this.ViewModel.Document.SelectedTransactions = transactionDataGrid?.SelectedItems;
}
}
}
Note the GetChildrenCount check that avoids an exception thrown from GetChild later if there are no children yet. We'll need that for later.
The TemplateApplied event is raised only once -- when the ContentControl is first given its ContentPresenter child. We still the UpdateSelectedTransactions method to run when the ListView in the 'master' part of the view changes selection:
void BankingPanelAccountList_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e) => this.UpdateSelectedTransactions();
On initial startup, SelectionChanged is raised first, and we skip this one with the GetChildrenCount check. Then TemplateApplied is raised and we use the current selection to find the right template and search for the control we need. Later when the selection changes, the first event is raised again and re-triggers our logic.
The last trick is we must call ContentPresenter.ApplyTemplate() to force the template selection to be updated before we search for the child control. Without that, this code may still run before the template is updated based on the type of item selected in the ListView.
A project I'm working on has some rather complex XAML that is noticeably affecting visual performance. Quite a few controls are collapsed for the initial state; however, since their XAML is parsed and visual /logical trees built, it's very slow to show what amounts to an almost blank object.
It looks like (and would like confirmation here) that using a ContentControl with an initial state of Collapsed and then embedding the desired control as a DataTemplate for that ContentControl, will defer loading of the desired control in the DataTemplate until the ContentControl is made visible.
I've built a generic DeferredContentControl that listens for the LayoutUpdated event of the main UI control (in general whatever element it is that I want to appear quickly), and when the first LayoutUpdated event of that UIElement fires, I used the Dispatcher to flip the visibility of the DeferredContentControl to true, which causes the control in the DeferredContentControl's DataTemplate to instantiate. By the time the user has reacted to the initial view of the screen (which is now fast), the "slow to load" (but still collapsed) control in the data template is ready.
Does this seem like a sound approach? any pitfalls? It seems to work well in testing both for Silverlight and WPF, and while it doesn't make things any faster it gives the perception of being as much as 50% snappier in my specific scenario.
I had the same problem (in a Silverlight project), and solved it in nearly the same way. It proved to be working as expected, have not encountered any pitfalls yet.
When you need to control the point in time when xaml is parsed and view elements are instantiated you can always use DataTemplates (not necessarily in cunjuction with ContentControl). You can call DataTemplate.LoadContent() to instatiate it, you don't have to switch the visibility of a ContentControl (although internally this will result in such a LoadContent call).
Have a look at my implementation if you want, it can even display a static text message while the heavier VisualTree is build:
<DeferredContent HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" VerticalAlignment="Stretch">
<DeferredContent.DeferredContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<MyHeavyView/>
</DataTemplate>
</Controls:DeferredContent.DeferredContentTemplate>
<TextBlock Text="Loading content..."/>
</Controls:DeferredContent>
and the code
public class DeferredContent : ContentPresenter
{
public DataTemplate DeferredContentTemplate
{
get { return (DataTemplate)GetValue(DeferredContentTemplateProperty); }
set { SetValue(DeferredContentTemplateProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty DeferredContentTemplateProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("DeferredContentTemplate",
typeof(DataTemplate), typeof(DeferredContent), null);
public DeferredContent()
{
Loaded += HandleLoaded;
}
private void HandleLoaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
Loaded -= HandleLoaded;
Deployment.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(ShowDeferredContent);
}
public void ShowDeferredContent()
{
if (DeferredContentTemplate != null)
{
Content = DeferredContentTemplate.LoadContent();
RaiseDeferredContentLoaded();
}
}
private void RaiseDeferredContentLoaded()
{
var handlers = DeferredContentLoaded;
if (handlers != null)
{
handlers( this, new RoutedEventArgs() );
}
}
public event EventHandler<RoutedEventArgs> DeferredContentLoaded;
}
I'm using Caliburn.Micro and Modern-UI in a WPF application. On a "page" inside the modern-ui framework (which is a UserControl), I am trying to use a Conductor to switch the current view. Here is what I've got so far:
NOTE: Namespaces removed from source for brevity
XAML of "page" inside modern-ui window
<UserControl x:Class="ShellView">
<ContentControl x:Name="ActiveItem" />
</UserControl>
Source for ShellViewModel (the conductor)
[Export]
public class ShellViewModel : Conductor<IScreen>.Collection.OneActive
{
private readonly Test1ViewModel m_TestView1;
private readonly Test2ViewModel m_TestView2;
public ShellViewModel()
{
this.m_TestView1 = new Test1ViewModel();
this.m_TestView2 = new Test2ViewModel();
this.ActivateItem(this.m_TestView1);
}
}
The XAML for Test1View doesn't have anything in it right now, just normal UserControl stuff.
Source for Test1ViewModel
public class Test1ViewModel : Screen
{
protected override void OnActivate()
{
//This DOES NOT show or fire, I even put a breakpoint to double check
Debug.Print("This should show in output");
}
}
when ActivateItem is called, OnActivate does not fire at all. I even tried calling ConductWith(this) on the view model Test1ViewModel in the conductor but that didn't work. I am using Modern-UI which might be important because this same thing works in a different project that is not using Modern-UI. Oh and when ActivateItem is called, the appropriate view does show on the screen (I added some buttons for verification that the view does change).
Any ideas as to why the UserControl will show in the ContentControl after calling ActivateItem but OnActivate does not fire at all?
One more thing... This might also have something to do with it, but if it does I don't know why or how to fix it. I'm using this class to make the view first Modern-UI work well with Caliburn.Micro's model first approach.
internal class ModernContentLoader : DefaultContentLoader
{
protected override object LoadContent(Uri uri)
{
object content = base.LoadContent(uri);
if (content == null)
return null;
// Locate the right viewmodel for this view
object vm = ViewModelLocator.LocateForView(content);
if (vm == null)
return content;
// Bind it up with CM magic
if (content is DependencyObject)
ViewModelBinder.Bind(vm, content as DependencyObject, null);
return content;
}
}
I went and downloaded the source for Caliburn.Micro and debugged the whole thing like I should have done from the start.
Turns out, because of the way Modern-UI handles navigation the Conductor (unless it's the main shell view attached to the main window) doesn't get activated. In other words, it never knows that it's being shown and the source for Caliburn checks to make sure the Conductor is active before it will allow activating a new view. For some reason the view is displayed just fine but the View Model (Screen) never gets activated or instantiated. In my case it is instantiated because of the Modern-UI+Caliburn.Micro view binding hack.
I did get it to finally work, so if anyone is interested, this is how to get ActivateItem with a Conductor to work inside Modern-UI.
Add the following line of code to your Conductor's constructor or the Modern-UI method OnNavigatedTo
ScreenExtensions.TryActivate(this);
This is part of Caliburn-Micro and will allow your Conductor to activate items properly. If you're using it inside the OnNavigatedTo you might want to add this line to your OnNavigatedFrom method:
ScreenExtensions.TryDeactivate(this, true);
How do I cancel a user selection in a databound WPF ListBox? The source property is set correctly, but the ListBox selection is out of sync.
I have an MVVM app that needs to cancel a user selection in a WPF ListBox if certain validation conditions fail. Validation is triggered by a selection in the ListBox, rather than by a Submit button.
The ListBox.SelectedItem property is bound to a ViewModel.CurrentDocument property. If validation fails, the setter for the view model property exits without changing the property. So, the property to which ListBox.SelectedItem is bound doesn't get changed.
If that happens, the view model property setter does raise the PropertyChanged event before it exits, which I had assumed would be enough to reset the ListBox back to the old selection. But that's not working--the ListBox still shows the new user selection. I need to override that selection and get it back in sync with the source property.
Just in case that's not clear, here is an example: The ListBox has two items, Document1 and Document2; Document1 is selected. The user selects Document2, but Document1 fails to validate. The ViewModel.CurrentDocument property is still set to Document1, but the ListBox shows that Document2 is selected. I need to get the ListBox selection back to Document1.
Here is my ListBox Binding:
<ListBox
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=SearchResults, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
SelectedItem="{Binding Path=CurrentDocument, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
I did try using a callback from the ViewModel (as an event) to the View (which subscribes to the event), to force the SelectedItem property back to the old selection. I pass the old Document with the event, and it is the correct one (the old selection), but the ListBox selection doesn't change back.
So, how do I get the ListBox selection back in sync with the view model property to which its SelectedItem property is bound? Thanks for your help.
For future stumblers on this question, this page is what ultimately worked for me:
http://blog.alner.net/archive/2010/04/25/cancelling-selection-change-in-a-bound-wpf-combo-box.aspx
It's for a combobox, but works for a listbox just fine, since in MVVM you don't really care what type of control is calling the setter. The glorious secret, as the author mentions, is to actually change the underlying value and then change it back. It was also important to run this “undo” on a separate dispatcher operation.
private Person _CurrentPersonCancellable;
public Person CurrentPersonCancellable
{
get
{
Debug.WriteLine("Getting CurrentPersonCancellable.");
return _CurrentPersonCancellable;
}
set
{
// Store the current value so that we can
// change it back if needed.
var origValue = _CurrentPersonCancellable;
// If the value hasn't changed, don't do anything.
if (value == _CurrentPersonCancellable)
return;
// Note that we actually change the value for now.
// This is necessary because WPF seems to query the
// value after the change. The combo box
// likes to know that the value did change.
_CurrentPersonCancellable = value;
if (
MessageBox.Show(
"Allow change of selected item?",
"Continue",
MessageBoxButton.YesNo
) != MessageBoxResult.Yes
)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Selection Cancelled.");
// change the value back, but do so after the
// UI has finished it's current context operation.
Application.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(
new Action(() =>
{
Debug.WriteLine(
"Dispatcher BeginInvoke " +
"Setting CurrentPersonCancellable."
);
// Do this against the underlying value so
// that we don't invoke the cancellation question again.
_CurrentPersonCancellable = origValue;
OnPropertyChanged("CurrentPersonCancellable");
}),
DispatcherPriority.ContextIdle,
null
);
// Exit early.
return;
}
// Normal path. Selection applied.
// Raise PropertyChanged on the field.
Debug.WriteLine("Selection applied.");
OnPropertyChanged("CurrentPersonCancellable");
}
}
Note: The author uses ContextIdle for the DispatcherPriority for the action to undo the change. While fine, this is a lower priority than Render, which means that the change will show in the UI as the selected item momentarily changing and changing back. Using a dispatcher priority of Normal or even Send (the highest priority) preempts the display of the change. This is what I ended up doing. See here for details about the DispatcherPriority enumeration.
In .NET 4.5 they added the Delay field to the Binding. If you set the delay it will automatically wait to update so there is no need for the Dispatcher in the ViewModel. This works for validation of all Selector elements like the ListBox's and ComboBox's SelectedItem properties. The Delay is in milliseconds.
<ListBox
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=SearchResults, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
SelectedItem="{Binding Path=CurrentDocument, Mode=TwoWay, Delay=10}" />
-snip-
Well forget what I wrote above.
I just did an experiment, and indeed SelectedItem goes out of sync whenever you do anything more fancy in the setter. I guess you need to wait for the setter to return, and then change the property back in your ViewModel asynchronously.
Quick and dirty working solution (tested in my simple project) using MVVM Light helpers:
In your setter, to revert to previous value of CurrentDocument
var dp = DispatcherHelper.UIDispatcher;
if (dp != null)
dp.BeginInvoke(
(new Action(() => {
currentDocument = previousDocument;
RaisePropertyChanged("CurrentDocument");
})), DispatcherPriority.ContextIdle);
it basically queues the property change on the UI thread, ContextIdle priority will ensure it will wait for UI to be in consistent state. it Appears you cannot freely change dependency properties while inside event handlers in WPF.
Unfortunately it creates coupling between your view model and your view and it's an ugly hack.
To make DispatcherHelper.UIDispatcher work you need to do DispatcherHelper.Initialize() first.
Got it! I am going to accept majocha's answer, because his comment underneath his answer led me to the solution.
Here is wnat I did: I created a SelectionChanged event handler for the ListBox in code-behind. Yes, it's ugly, but it works. The code-behind also contains a module-level variable, m_OldSelectedIndex, which is initialized to -1. The SelectionChanged handler calls the ViewModel's Validate() method and gets a boolean back indicating whether the Document is valid. If the Document is valid, the handler sets m_OldSelectedIndex to the current ListBox.SelectedIndex and exits. If the document is invalid, the handler resets ListBox.SelectedIndex to m_OldSelectedIndex. Here is the code for the event handler:
private void OnSearchResultsBoxSelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
var viewModel = (MainViewModel) this.DataContext;
if (viewModel.Validate() == null)
{
m_OldSelectedIndex = SearchResultsBox.SelectedIndex;
}
else
{
SearchResultsBox.SelectedIndex = m_OldSelectedIndex;
}
}
Note that there is a trick to this solution: You have to use the SelectedIndex property; it doesn't work with the SelectedItem property.
Thanks for your help majocha, and hopefully this will help somebody else down the road. Like me, six months from now, when I have forgotten this solution...
If you are serious about following MVVM and don't want any code behind, and also don't like the use of the Dispatcher, which frankly is not elegant either, the following solution works for me and is by far more elegant than most of the solutions provided here.
It is based on the notion that in code behind you are able to stop the selection using the SelectionChanged event. Well now, if this is the case, why not create a behavior for it, and associate a command with the SelectionChanged event. In the viewmodel you can then easily remember the previous selected index and the current selected index. The trick is to have binding to your viewmodel on SelectedIndex and just let that one change whenever the selection changes. But immediately after the selection really has changed, the SelectionChanged event fires which now is notified via the command to your viewmodel. Because you remember the previously selected index, you can validate it and if not correct, you move the selected index back to the original value.
The code for the behavior is as follows:
public class ListBoxSelectionChangedBehavior : Behavior<ListBox>
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty CommandProperty
= DependencyProperty.Register("Command",
typeof(ICommand),
typeof(ListBoxSelectionChangedBehavior),
new PropertyMetadata());
public static DependencyProperty CommandParameterProperty
= DependencyProperty.Register("CommandParameter",
typeof(object),
typeof(ListBoxSelectionChangedBehavior),
new PropertyMetadata(null));
public ICommand Command
{
get { return (ICommand)GetValue(CommandProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandProperty, value); }
}
public object CommandParameter
{
get { return GetValue(CommandParameterProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandParameterProperty, value); }
}
protected override void OnAttached()
{
AssociatedObject.SelectionChanged += ListBoxOnSelectionChanged;
}
protected override void OnDetaching()
{
AssociatedObject.SelectionChanged -= ListBoxOnSelectionChanged;
}
private void ListBoxOnSelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
Command.Execute(CommandParameter);
}
}
Using it in XAML:
<ListBox x:Name="ListBox"
Margin="2,0,2,2"
ItemsSource="{Binding Taken}"
ItemContainerStyle="{StaticResource ContainerStyle}"
ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled"
HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch"
SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedTaskIndex, Mode=TwoWay}">
<i:Interaction.Behaviors>
<b:ListBoxSelectionChangedBehavior Command="{Binding SelectionChangedCommand}"/>
</i:Interaction.Behaviors>
</ListBox>
The code that is appropriate in the viewmodel is as follows:
public int SelectedTaskIndex
{
get { return _SelectedTaskIndex; }
set { SetProperty(ref _SelectedTaskIndex, value); }
}
private void SelectionChanged()
{
if (_OldSelectedTaskIndex >= 0 && _SelectedTaskIndex != _OldSelectedTaskIndex)
{
if (Taken[_OldSelectedTaskIndex].IsDirty)
{
SelectedTaskIndex = _OldSelectedTaskIndex;
}
}
else
{
_OldSelectedTaskIndex = _SelectedTaskIndex;
}
}
public RelayCommand SelectionChangedCommand { get; private set; }
In the constructor of the viewmodel:
SelectionChangedCommand = new RelayCommand(SelectionChanged);
RelayCommand is part of MVVM light. Google it if you don't know it.
You need to refer to
xmlns:i="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/2010/interactivity"
and hence you need to reference System.Windows.Interactivity.
I came up against this recently, and came up with a solution that works well with my MVVM, without the need for and code behind.
I created a SelectedIndex property in my model and bound the listbox SelectedIndex to it.
On the View CurrentChanging event, I do my validation, if it fails, I simply use the code
e.cancel = true;
//UserView is my ICollectionView that's bound to the listbox, that is currently changing
SelectedIndex = UserView.CurrentPosition;
//Use whatever similar notification method you use
NotifyPropertyChanged("SelectedIndex");
It seems to work perfectly ATM. There may be edge cases where it doesnt, but for now, it does exactly what I want.
I had a very similar problem, the difference being that I am using ListView bound to an ICollectionView and was using IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem rather than binding the SelectedItem property of the ListView. This worked well for me until I wanted to cancel the CurrentItemChanged event of the underlying ICollectionView, which left the ListView.SelectedItem out of sync with the ICollectionView.CurrentItem.
The underlying problem here is keeping the view in sync with the view model. Obviously cancelling a selection change request in the view model is trivial. So we really just need a more responsive view as far as I'm concerned. I'd rather avoid putting kludges into my ViewModel to work around limitations of the ListView synchronization. On the other hand I'm more than happy to add some view-specific logic to my view code-behind.
So my solution was to wire my own synchronization for the ListView selection in the code-behind. Perfectly MVVM as far as I'm concerned and more robust than the default for ListView with IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem.
Here is my code behind ... this allows changing the current item from the ViewModel as well. If the user clicks the list view and changes the selection, it will immediately change, then change back if something down-stream cancels the change (this is my desired behavior). Note I have IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem set to false on the ListView. Also note that I am using async/await here which plays nicely, but requires a little double-checking that when the await returns, we are still in the same data context.
void DataContextChangedHandler(object sender, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
vm = DataContext as ViewModel;
if (vm != null)
vm.Items.CurrentChanged += Items_CurrentChanged;
}
private async void myListView_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
var vm = DataContext as ViewModel; //for closure before await
if (vm != null)
{
if (myListView.SelectedIndex != vm.Items.CurrentPosition)
{
var changed = await vm.TrySetCurrentItemAsync(myListView.SelectedIndex);
if (!changed && vm == DataContext)
{
myListView.SelectedIndex = vm.Items.CurrentPosition; //reset index
}
}
}
}
void Items_CurrentChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var vm = DataContext as ViewModel;
if (vm != null)
myListView.SelectedIndex = vm.Items.CurrentPosition;
}
Then in my ViewModel class I have ICollectionView named Items and this method (a simplified version is presented).
public async Task<bool> TrySetCurrentItemAsync(int newIndex)
{
DataModels.BatchItem newCurrentItem = null;
if (newIndex >= 0 && newIndex < Items.Count)
{
newCurrentItem = Items.GetItemAt(newIndex) as DataModels.BatchItem;
}
var closingItem = Items.CurrentItem as DataModels.BatchItem;
if (closingItem != null)
{
if (newCurrentItem != null && closingItem == newCurrentItem)
return true; //no-op change complete
var closed = await closingItem.TryCloseAsync();
if (!closed)
return false; //user said don't change
}
Items.MoveCurrentTo(newCurrentItem);
return true;
}
The implementation of TryCloseAsync could use some kind of dialog service to elicit a close confirmation from the user.
Bind ListBox's property: IsEnabled="{Binding Path=Valid, Mode=OneWay}" where Valid is the view-model property with the validation algoritm. Other solutions look too far-fetched in my eyes.
When the disabled appearance is not allowed, a style could help out, but probably the disabled style is ok because changing the selection is not allowed.
Maybe in .NET version 4.5 INotifyDataErrorInfo helps, I dont'know.
In my WPF application, I have a number of databound TextBoxes. The UpdateSourceTrigger for these bindings is LostFocus. The object is saved using the File menu. The problem I have is that it is possible to enter a new value into a TextBox, select Save from the File menu, and never persist the new value (the one visible in the TextBox) because accessing the menu does not remove focus from the TextBox. How can I fix this? Is there some way to force all the controls in a page to databind?
#palehorse: Good point. Unfortunately, I need to use LostFocus as my UpdateSourceTrigger in order to support the type of validation I want.
#dmo: I had thought of that. It seems, however, like a really inelegant solution for a relatively simple problem. Also, it requires that there be some control on the page which is is always visible to receive the focus. My application is tabbed, however, so no such control readily presents itself.
#Nidonocu: The fact that using the menu did not move focus from the TextBox confused me as well. That is, however, the behavior I am seeing. The following simple example demonstrates my problem:
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication2.Window1"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="Window1" Height="300" Width="300">
<Window.Resources>
<ObjectDataProvider x:Key="MyItemProvider" />
</Window.Resources>
<DockPanel LastChildFill="True">
<Menu DockPanel.Dock="Top">
<MenuItem Header="File">
<MenuItem Header="Save" Click="MenuItem_Click" />
</MenuItem>
</Menu>
<StackPanel DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource MyItemProvider}}">
<Label Content="Enter some text and then File > Save:" />
<TextBox Text="{Binding ValueA}" />
<TextBox Text="{Binding ValueB}" />
</StackPanel>
</DockPanel>
</Window>
using System;
using System.Text;
using System.Windows;
using System.Windows.Data;
namespace WpfApplication2
{
public partial class Window1 : Window
{
public MyItem Item
{
get { return (FindResource("MyItemProvider") as ObjectDataProvider).ObjectInstance as MyItem; }
set { (FindResource("MyItemProvider") as ObjectDataProvider).ObjectInstance = value; }
}
public Window1()
{
InitializeComponent();
Item = new MyItem();
}
private void MenuItem_Click(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
MessageBox.Show(string.Format("At the time of saving, the values in the TextBoxes are:\n'{0}'\nand\n'{1}'", Item.ValueA, Item.ValueB));
}
}
public class MyItem
{
public string ValueA { get; set; }
public string ValueB { get; set; }
}
}
I found that removing the menu items that are scope depended from the FocusScope of the menu causes the textbox to lose focus correctly. I wouldn't think this applies to ALL items in Menu, but certainly for a save or validate action.
<Menu FocusManager.IsFocusScope="False" >
Assuming that there is more than one control in the tab sequence, the following solution appears to be complete and general (just cut-and-paste)...
Control currentControl = System.Windows.Input.Keyboard.FocusedElement as Control;
if (currentControl != null)
{
// Force focus away from the current control to update its binding source.
currentControl.MoveFocus(new TraversalRequest(FocusNavigationDirection.Next));
currentControl.Focus();
}
This is a UGLY hack but should also work
TextBox focusedTextBox = Keyboard.FocusedElement as TextBox;
if (focusedTextBox != null)
{
focusedTextBox.GetBindingExpression(TextBox.TextProperty).UpdateSource();
}
This code checks if a TextBox has focus... If 1 is found... update the binding source!
Suppose you have a TextBox in a window, and a ToolBar with a Save button in it. Assume the TextBox’s Text property is bound to a property on a business object, and the binding’s UpdateSourceTrigger property is set to the default value of LostFocus, meaning that the bound value is pushed back to the business object property when the TextBox loses input focus. Also, assume that the ToolBar’s Save button has its Command property set to ApplicationCommands.Save command.
In that situation, if you edit the TextBox and click the Save button with the mouse, there is a problem. When clicking on a Button in a ToolBar, the TextBox does not lose focus. Since the TextBox’s LostFocus event does not fire, the Text property binding does not update the source property of the business object.
Obviously you should not validate and save an object if the most recently edited value in the UI has not yet been pushed into the object. This is the exact problem Karl had worked around, by writing code in his window that manually looked for a TextBox with focus and updated the source of the data binding. His solution worked fine, but it got me thinking about a generic solution that would also be useful outside of this particular scenario. Enter CommandGroup…
Taken from Josh Smith’s CodeProject article about CommandGroup
Simple solution is update the Xaml code as shown below
<StackPanel DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource MyItemProvider}}">
<Label Content="Enter some text and then File > Save:" />
<TextBox Text="{Binding ValueA, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
<TextBox Text="{Binding ValueB, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
</StackPanel>
I've run into this issue and the best solution I've found was to change the focusable value of the button (or any other component such as MenuItem) to true:
<Button Focusable="True" Command="{Binding CustomSaveCommand}"/>
The reason it works, is because it forces the button to get focused before it invokes the command and therefore makes the TextBox or any other UIElement for that matter to loose their focus and raise lost focus event which invokes the binding to be changed.
In case you are using bounded command (as I was pointing to in my example), John Smith's great solution won't fit very well since you can't bind StaticExtension into bounded property (nor DP).
Have you tried setting the UpdateSourceTrigger to PropertyChanged? Alternatively, you could call the UpdateSOurce() method, but that seems like a bit overkill and defeats the purpose of TwoWay databinding.
Could you set the focus somewhere else just before saving?
You can do this by calling focus() on a UI element.
You could focus on whatever element invokes the "save". If your trigger is LostFocus then you have to move the focus somewhere. Save has the advantage that it isn't modified and would make sense to the user.
Since I noticed this issue is still a pain in the ass to solve on a very generic way, I tried various solutions.
Eventually one that worked out for me:
Whenever the need is there that UI changes must be validated and updated to its sources (Check for changes upon closeing a window, performing Save operations, ...), I call a validation function which does various things:
- make sure a focused element (like textbox, combobox, ...) loses its focus which will trigger default updatesource behavior
- validate any controls within the tree of the DependencyObject which is given to the validation function
- set focus back to the original focused element
The function itself returns true if everything is in order (validation is succesful) -> your original action (closeing with optional asking confirmation, saveing, ...) can continue. Otherwise the function will return false and your action cannot continue because there are validation errors on one or more elements (with the help of a generic ErrorTemplate on the elements).
The code (validation functionality is based on the article Detecting WPF Validation Errors):
public static class Validator
{
private static Dictionary<String, List<DependencyProperty>> gdicCachedDependencyProperties = new Dictionary<String, List<DependencyProperty>>();
public static Boolean IsValid(DependencyObject Parent)
{
// Move focus and reset it to update bindings which or otherwise not processed until losefocus
IInputElement lfocusedElement = Keyboard.FocusedElement;
if (lfocusedElement != null && lfocusedElement is UIElement)
{
// Move to previous AND to next InputElement (if your next InputElement is a menu, focus will not be lost -> therefor move in both directions)
(lfocusedElement as UIElement).MoveFocus(new TraversalRequest(FocusNavigationDirection.Previous));
(lfocusedElement as UIElement).MoveFocus(new TraversalRequest(FocusNavigationDirection.Next));
Keyboard.ClearFocus();
}
if (Parent as UIElement == null || (Parent as UIElement).Visibility != Visibility.Visible)
return true;
// Validate all the bindings on the parent
Boolean lblnIsValid = true;
foreach (DependencyProperty aDependencyProperty in GetAllDependencyProperties(Parent))
{
if (BindingOperations.IsDataBound(Parent, aDependencyProperty))
{
// Get the binding expression base. This way all kinds of bindings (MultiBinding, PropertyBinding, ...) can be updated
BindingExpressionBase lbindingExpressionBase = BindingOperations.GetBindingExpressionBase(Parent, aDependencyProperty);
if (lbindingExpressionBase != null)
{
lbindingExpressionBase.ValidateWithoutUpdate();
if (lbindingExpressionBase.HasError)
lblnIsValid = false;
}
}
}
if (Parent is Visual || Parent is Visual3D)
{
// Fetch the visual children (in case of templated content, the LogicalTreeHelper will return no childs)
Int32 lintVisualChildCount = VisualTreeHelper.GetChildrenCount(Parent);
for (Int32 lintVisualChildIndex = 0; lintVisualChildIndex < lintVisualChildCount; lintVisualChildIndex++)
if (!IsValid(VisualTreeHelper.GetChild(Parent, lintVisualChildIndex)))
lblnIsValid = false;
}
if (lfocusedElement != null)
lfocusedElement.Focus();
return lblnIsValid;
}
public static List<DependencyProperty> GetAllDependencyProperties(DependencyObject DependencyObject)
{
Type ltype = DependencyObject.GetType();
if (gdicCachedDependencyProperties.ContainsKey(ltype.FullName))
return gdicCachedDependencyProperties[ltype.FullName];
List<DependencyProperty> llstDependencyProperties = new List<DependencyProperty>();
List<FieldInfo> llstFieldInfos = ltype.GetFields(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.FlattenHierarchy | BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.Static).Where(Field => Field.FieldType == typeof(DependencyProperty)).ToList();
foreach (FieldInfo aFieldInfo in llstFieldInfos)
llstDependencyProperties.Add(aFieldInfo.GetValue(null) as DependencyProperty);
gdicCachedDependencyProperties.Add(ltype.FullName, llstDependencyProperties);
return llstDependencyProperties;
}
}
The easiest way is to set the focus somewhere.
You can set the focus back immediately, but setting the focus anywhere will trigger the LostFocus-Event on any type of control and make it update its stuff:
IInputElement x = System.Windows.Input.Keyboard.FocusedElement;
DummyField.Focus();
x.Focus();
Another way would be to get the focused element, get the binding element from the focused element, and trigger the update manually. An example for TextBox and ComboBox (you would need to add any control type you need to support):
TextBox t = Keyboard.FocusedElement as TextBox;
if ((t != null) && (t.GetBindingExpression(TextBox.TextProperty) != null))
t.GetBindingExpression(TextBox.TextProperty).UpdateSource();
ComboBox c = Keyboard.FocusedElement as ComboBox;
if ((c != null) && (c.GetBindingExpression(ComboBox.TextProperty) != null))
c.GetBindingExpression(ComboBox.TextProperty).UpdateSource();
What do you think about this? I believe I've figured out a way to make it a bit more generic using reflection. I really didn't like the idea of maintaining a list like some of the other examples.
var currentControl = System.Windows.Input.Keyboard.FocusedElement;
if (currentControl != null)
{
Type type = currentControl.GetType();
if (type.GetMethod("MoveFocus") != null && type.GetMethod("Focus") != null)
{
try
{
type.GetMethod("MoveFocus").Invoke(currentControl, new object[] { new TraversalRequest(FocusNavigationDirection.Next) });
type.GetMethod("Focus").Invoke(currentControl, null);
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw new Exception("Unable to handle unknown type: " + type.Name, ex);
}
}
}
See any problems with that?
Using BindingGroup will help to understand and mitigate this kind of problem.
Sometimes we consider to apply MVVM model against WPF data bindings.
For example, we consider about mail's subject property:
<TextBox x:Name="SubjectTextBox" Text="{Binding Subject}" />
TextBox SubjectTextBox is on side of View.
The bound property like ViewModel.Subject will belong to ViewModel.
The problem is that changes remain to View in this case.
When we close the WPF window, WPF TextBox won't loose focus on window close.
It means data binding won't perform writing back, and then changes are lost silently.
Introducing of BindingGroup helps to control whether we should apply changes: from View to ViewModel.
BindingGroup.CommitEdit(); will ensure apply changes of direction View → ViewModel
BindingGroup.CancelEdit(); will ensure to discard changes on View.
If you don't call neither, changes are lost silently!
In the following sample, we attach RibbonWindow_Closing event handler so that we can deal with this case of problem.
XAML:
<R:RibbonWindow Closing="RibbonWindow_Closing" ...>
<FrameworkElement.BindingGroup>
<BindingGroup />
</FrameworkElement.BindingGroup>
...
</R:RibbonWindow>
C#
private void RibbonWindow_Closing(object sender, CancelEventArgs e) {
e.Cancel = !NeedSave();
}
bool NeedSave() {
if (!BindingGroup.CommitEdit()) {
// There may be validation error.
return false; // changes this to true to allow closing.
}
// Insert your business code to check modifications.
// return true; if Saved/DontSave/NotChanged
// return false; if Cancel
}
It should work.