1) Suppose i have a table like this:-
| id | color_code | fruit |
|:------|--------------|----------------:|
| 1 | 000001 | apple |
| 2 | 000001 | apple |
| 3 | 000001 | apple |
| 4 | 000002 | lemon |
| 5 | 000002 | lemon |
| 6 | 000003 | grapes |
| 7 | 000003 | grapes |
How can i group by the fruit column according to the color_code column in sql server?
like this i suppose:-
| id | color_code | fruit | group_concat(id) |
|:------|--------------|-----------------|---------------------|
| 1 | 000001 | apple | 1,2,3 |
| 4 | 000002 | lemon | 2,5 |
| 6 | 000003 | grapes | 6,7 |
2) What if i have 3 tables (like shown below) which require join, how can i achieve this?
series_no table:
| id | desc_seriesno |
|:------|----------------:|
| 7040 | AU1011 |
| 7041 | AU1022 |
| 7042 | AU1033 |
| 7043 | AU1044 |
| 7044 | AU1055 |
| 7045 | AU1066 |
brand table:
| id | desc_brand |
|:------|----------------:|
| 1020 | Audi |
| 1021 | Bentley |
| 1022 | Ford |
| 1023 | BMW |
| 1024 | Mazda |
| 1025 | Toyota |
car_info table:
| seriesno_id | brand_id | color |
|:---------------|------------|--------:|
| 7040 | 1020 | white |
| 7040 | 1020 | black |
| 7040 | 1020 | pink |
| 7041 | 1021 | yellow |
| 7041 | 1021 | brown |
| 7042 | 1022 | purple |
| 7042 | 1022 | black |
| 7042 | 1022 | green |
| 7043 | 1023 | blue |
| 7044 | 1024 | red |
| 7045 | 1025 | maroon |
| 7045 | 1025 | white |
this is my current query with sql server 2014:-
SELECT SN.id AS seriesid, B.id AS brandid, B.desc_brand
FROM [db1].[dbo].[series_no] SN
LEFT JOIN [db1].[dbo].[car_info] CI
ON CI.seriesno_id = SN.id
RIGHT JOIN [db1].[dbo].[brand] B
ON B.id = CI.brand_id
GROUP BY SN.id, B.id
ORDER BY SN.id ASC
but unfortunately it gave me an error since i cannot group by similar string this way.
i want it to be like this:-
| seriesid | brandid | desc_brand | count |
|:-----------|------------|---------------|-------|
| 7040 | 1020 | Audi | 3 |
| 7041 | 1021 | Bentley | 2 |
| 7042 | 1022 | Ford | 3 |
| 7043 | 1023 | BMW | 1 |
| 7044 | 1024 | Mazda | 1 |
| 7045 | 1025 | Toyota | 2 |
1 Fruit Color
Assuming the table name is FruitColor, you can get the desired output by the following query -
SELECT MIN(id) AS id
, color_code
, fruit
, group_concat_id = STUFF((SELECT ',' + CAST(id AS VARCHAR)
FROM FruitColor AS fci
WHERE fci.fruit = fc.fruit AND fci.color_code = fc.color_code
FOR XML PATH(''), TYPE).value('.', 'NVARCHAR(MAX)'), 1, 1, '')
FROM FruitColor AS fc
GROUP BY color_code, fruit
ORDER BY id;
The MIN() selects the first id of the group.
Since there is no default GROUP_CONCAT function like in MySql in SQL Server, you have to use the STUFF function and FOR XML PATH. To learn more about group concat you can visit this link https://sqlperformance.com/2014/08/t-sql-queries/sql-server-grouped-concatenation
You can customize the WHERE clause to match only by color_code.
2. You can have several options for this -
Option (a): Show counts for series with brands
SELECT seriesno_id AS seriesid, ci.brand_id AS bandid, desc_brand, COUNT(*) AS [count]
FROM db1.dbo.car_info AS ci
LEFT JOIN db1.dbo.brand AS b ON (b.id = ci.brand_id)
GROUP BY seriesno_id, ci.brand_id, desc_brand;
Here you don't need to use the series table if you want to show counts for cars having brand(s).
You may not need to use the RIGHT JOIN on the brand table because if brand table contains a record which
is not in car_info table, then seriesno_id would be null.
Option (b): Show counts for all the series with or without a brand
SELECT sn.id AS seriesid, ci.brand_id AS bandid, desc_brand, COUNT(*) AS [count]
FROM db1.dbo.series_no AS sn
LEFT JOIN db1.dbo.car_info AS ci ON (ci.seriesno_id = sn.id)
LEFT JOIN db1.dbo.brand AS b ON (b.id = ci.brand_id)
GROUP BY sn.id, ci.brand_id, desc_brand;
Option (c): The work around for selecting a column which is not in a GROUP BY
SELECT seriesno_id AS seriesid, ci.brand_id AS bandid, MAX(desc_brand) AS desc_brand, COUNT(*) AS [count]
FROM db1.dbo.car_info AS ci
LEFT JOIN db1.dbo.brand AS b ON (b.id = ci.brand_id)
GROUP BY seriesno_id, ci.brand_id;
Here, if we are certain that each brand contains only one desc_brand, we can use an aggregate on it.
This is bcause applying aggregate only one value returns that value. I used MAX here.
Personally I would go with option (a) as it makes more sense.
Update on GROUP BY exception for desc_brand being NTEXT...
Cast desc_brand to NVARCHAR to avoid the exception.
CAST(desc_brand AS NVARCHAR(200))
Also I highly recommend using VARCHAR / NVARCHAR instead of any TEXT, CHAR etc. because they usually occupy more memory.
SELECT
id = SUBSTRING(group_concat,1,1),
color_code,
fruit,
group_concat
FROM(
SELECT distinct
m.color_code,
m.fruit,
group_concat = STUFF((SELECT ',' + CONVERT(varchar(10),md.id)
FROM [Test_1].[dbo].[Stuff] md
WHERE m.fruit = md.fruit
AND m.color_code = md.color_code
FOR XML PATH(''), TYPE).value('.', 'NVARCHAR(MAX)'), 1, 1, '')
FROM [Test_1].[dbo].[Stuff] m)x
use below code ..
SELECT distinct
m.color_code
, m.fruit
, group_concat = STUFF((
SELECT ',' + CONVERT(varchar(10),md.id)
FROM dbo.tablename md
WHERE m.fruit = md.fruit and m.color_code = md.color_code
FOR XML PATH(''), TYPE).value('.', 'NVARCHAR(MAX)'), 1, 1, '')
FROM dbo.tablename m
for second :
SELECT SN.id AS seriesid, B.id AS brandid, B.desc_brand ,count(*)
FROM [db1].[dbo].[series_no] SN
LEFT JOIN [db1].[dbo].[car_info] CI
ON CI.seriesno_id = SN.id
RIGHT JOIN [db1].[dbo].[brand] B
ON B.id = CI.brand_id
GROUP BY SN.id, B.id ,B.desc_brand
ORDER BY 4 ASC
Related
I have 2 tables, with the same exact fields and fields names. i am trying to inner join them but im having some difficulty determining how i can get my results in my desired format.
I know i can do select a.customer, a.id, a.date, a.line, a.product, b.customer, b.id, b.date, b.line, b.product but instead of having my A data and B data on the same row, id like for them to be on seperate rows.
I have 2 tables, with the same exact fields and fields names, i am trying to inner join them so that unique line becomes a row.
Table A:
|customer| id | Date | line | Product|
|--------|-----|---------|------|--------|
| 445678 | 123 | 1/1/22 | 10 | 88975 |
| 853652 | 456 | 1/10/22 | 5 | 55876 |
| 845689 | 789 | 1/25/22 | 1 | 45587 |
TABLE B:
|customer| id | Date | line | Product|
|--------|-----|---------|------|--------|
| 445678 | 489 | 1/1/22 | 1 | 87574 |
| 853652 | 853 | 1/10/22 | 12 | 45678 |
| 587435 | 157 | 2/12/22 | 3 | 25896 |
DESIRED RESULTS:
|customer| id | Date | line | Product|
|--------|-----|---------|------|--------|
| 445678 | 123 | 1/1/22 | 10 | 88975 |
| 445678 | 489 | 1/1/22 | 1 | 87574 |
| 853652 | 456 | 1/10/22 | 5 | 55876 |
| 853652 | 853 | 1/10/22 | 12 | 45678 |
my query:
select a.customer, a.id, a.date, a.line, a.product
from data1 a
inner join data2 b
on a.date = b.date
and a.customer = b.customer
My goal is to add another column to an existing table, to see if the value/conditions exists in a group and appropriately labeling the entire group if it is present or not.
If a Team has one project with a budget >= 20M or Actual_Spend >=2.5M I want to label the Team and all it's projects as Table 1 in the Category column. Irrespective if the other projects within the same Team fit this criteria.
I will provide a SQL fiddle link w/ my solution: http://sqlfiddle.com/#!18/3ddaf/12/0
I'm ending up with two extra columns of "Team" and "Category" and not sure how they're ending up there.
Below is the end result I'm looking for. I'm open to better solutions than the one I provided.
Thank you for your time
| Team | ProjectID | Budget | Actual_Spend | State | Category |
|------|-----------|----------|--------------|------------|----------|
| Cyan | 2 | NULL | NULL | Utah | Table 1 |
| Blue | 1 | NULL | 3000000 | California | Table 1 |
| Cyan | 1 | 20000000 | 1000000 | Utah | Table 1 |
| Blue | 2 | 22000000 | NULL | California | Table 1 |
| Red | 1 | 7000000 | 1000000 | Washington | Table 2 |
| Red | 2 | 19999000 | 2490000 | Oregon | Table 2 |
| Gray | 1 | 19000000 | 2500000 | Utah | Table 1 |
| Gray | 1 | 10000000 | 500000 | Utah | Table 1 |
Providing code to create the dataset:
Create Table Source_Data
(
Team varchar(50),
ProjectID INT,
BUDGET INT,
Actual_Spend INT,
State varchar(max),
)
INSERT INTO Source_Data
VALUES
('Blue',1,NULL,3000000,'California'),
('Green',1,20000000,1000000,'Utah'),
('Blue',2,22000000,NULL,'California'),
('Green',2,NULL,NULL,'Utah'),
('Red',1,7000000,1000000,'Washington'),
('Red',2,19999000,2490000,'Oregon'),
('Yellow',1,19000000,2500000,'Utah'),
('Yellow',1,10000000,500000,'Utah');
I think that you are looking for window functions:
select
s.*,
min(case when Budget>=20000000 or Actual_Spend>=2500000 then 'Table1' else 'Table2' end)
over(partition by team) Category
from Source_Data s
If any of the records having the same team satisfies condition Budget>=20000000 or Actual_Spend>=2500000, the new column yields Table1, else it produces Table2.
Demo on DB Fiddle:
Team | ProjectID | Budget | Actual_Spend | State | Category
:--- | --------: | -------: | -----------: | :--------- | :-------
Blue | 2 | 22000000 | null | California | Table1
Blue | 1 | null | 3000000 | California | Table1
Cyan | 1 | 20000000 | 1000000 | Utah | Table1
Cyan | 2 | null | null | Utah | Table1
Gray | 1 | 19000000 | 2500000 | Utah | Table1
Gray | 1 | 10000000 | 500000 | Utah | Table1
Red | 1 | 7000000 | 1000000 | Washington | Table2
Red | 2 | 19999000 | 2490000 | Oregon | Table2
I am trying to assign what amounts to a 'combinationid' to rows of my table, based on the values in the two columns below. Each product has a number of customers linked to it. For every combination of customers, I need to create a combination ID.
For example, the combination of customers for product 'a' is the same combination of customers for product 'c' (they both have customers 1, 2 and 3), so products a and c should have the same combination identifier ('customergroup'). However, products should not share the same customergroup if they only share some of the same customers - e.g. product b only has customers 1 and 2 (not 3), so should have a different customergroup to products 'a' and 'c'.
Input:
| productid | customerid |
|-----------|------------|
| a | 1 |
| a | 2 |
| a | 3 |
| b | 1 |
| b | 2 |
| c | 3 |
| c | 2 |
| c | 1 |
| d | 1 |
| d | 3 |
| e | 1 |
| e | 2 |
| f | 1 |
| g | 2 |
| h | 3 |
Desired output:
| productid | customerid | customergroup |
|-----------|------------|---------------|
| a | 1 | 1 |
| a | 2 | 1 |
| a | 3 | 1 |
| b | 1 | 2 |
| b | 2 | 2 |
| c | 3 | 1 |
| c | 2 | 1 |
| c | 1 | 1 |
| d | 1 | 3 |
| d | 3 | 3 |
| e | 1 | 2 |
| e | 2 | 2 |
| f | 1 | 4 |
| g | 2 | 5 |
| h | 3 | 6 |
or just
| productid | customergroupid |
|-----------|-----------------|
| a | 1 |
| b | 2 |
| c | 1 |
| d | 3 |
| e | 2 |
| f | 4 |
| g | 5 |
| h | 6 |
Edit: first version of this did include a description of my attempts. I currently have nested queries that basically give me a column for customer 1, 2, 3 etc and then uses dense rank to get the grouping. The problem is that is not dynamic for different numbers of customers and I did not know where to start for getting a dynamic result as above. Thanks for the replies.
Considering you haven't shown your efforts, or confirmed the version you're using, I've assumed you have the latest ("and greatest") version of SQL Server, which means you have access to STRING_AGG.
This doesn't give the groupings in the same order, but I'm going to also also that doesn't matter, and the grouping is just arbitrary. This gives you the following:
WITH VTE AS(
SELECT *
FROM (VALUES('a',1),
('a',2),
('a',3),
('b',1),
('b',2),
('c',3),
('c',2),
('c',1),
('d',1),
('d',3),
('e',1),
('e',2),
('f',1),
('g',2),
('h',3)) V(productid,customerid)),
Groups AS(
SELECT productid,
STRING_AGG(customerid,',') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY customerid) AS CustomerIDs
FROM VTE
GROUP BY productid),
Rankings AS(
SELECT productid,
CustomerIDs,
DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY CustomerIDs ASC) AS Grouping
FROM Groups)
SELECT V.productid,
V.customerid,
R.Grouping AS customergroupid
FROM VTE V
JOIN Rankings R ON V.productid = R.productid
ORDER BY V.productid,
V.customerid;
db<>fiddle.
If you aren't using SQL Server 2017, I suggest looking up the FOR XML PATH method for string aggregation.
Using Larnu's answer this is how I got the result for 2008:
WITH VTE AS(
SELECT *
FROM (VALUES('a','1'),
('a','2'),
('a','3'),
('b','1'),
('b','2'),
('c','3'),
('c','2'),
('c','1'),
('d','1'),
('d','3'),
('e','1'),
('e','2'),
('f','1'),
('g','2'),
('h','3')) V(productid,customerid)),
Groups AS(
SELECT productid, CustomerIDs = STUFF((SELECT N', ' + customerid
FROM VTE AS p2
WHERE p2.productid = p.productid
ORDER BY customerid
FOR XML PATH(N'')), 1, 2, N'')
FROM VTE AS p
GROUP BY productid),
Rankings AS(
SELECT productid,
CustomerIDs,
DENSE_RANK() OVER (ORDER BY CustomerIDs ASC) AS Grouping
FROM Groups)
SELECT V.productid,
V.customerid,
R.Grouping AS customergroupid
FROM VTE V
JOIN Rankings R ON V.productid = R.productid
ORDER BY V.productid,
V.customerid;
Thanks again for your assistance.
MASTER TABLE
x------x--------------------x
| Id | Name |
x------x--------------------x
| 1 | A |
| 2 | B |
| 3 | C |
x------x--------------------x
DETAILS TABLE
x------x--------------------x-------x
| Id | PERIOD | QTY |
x------x--------------------x-------x
| 1 | 2014-01-13 | 10 |
| 1 | 2014-01-11 | 15 |
| 1 | 2014-01-12 | 20 |
| 2 | 2014-01-06 | 30 |
| 2 | 2014-01-08 | 40 |
x------x--------------------x-------x
I am getting the same results when LEFT JOIN and OUTER APPLY is used.
LEFT JOIN
SELECT T1.ID,T1.NAME,T2.PERIOD,T2.QTY
FROM MASTER T1
LEFT JOIN DETAILS T2 ON T1.ID=T2.ID
OUTER APPLY
SELECT T1.ID,T1.NAME,TAB.PERIOD,TAB.QTY
FROM MASTER T1
OUTER APPLY
(
SELECT ID,PERIOD,QTY
FROM DETAILS T2
WHERE T1.ID=T2.ID
)TAB
Where should I use LEFT JOIN AND where should I use OUTER APPLY
A LEFT JOIN should be replaced with OUTER APPLY in the following situations.
1. If we want to join two tables based on TOP n results
Consider if we need to select Id and Name from Master and last two dates for each Id from Details table.
SELECT M.ID,M.NAME,D.PERIOD,D.QTY
FROM MASTER M
LEFT JOIN
(
SELECT TOP 2 ID, PERIOD,QTY
FROM DETAILS D
ORDER BY CAST(PERIOD AS DATE)DESC
)D
ON M.ID=D.ID
which forms the following result
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
| Id | Name | PERIOD | QTY |
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
| 1 | A | 2014-01-13 | 10 |
| 1 | A | 2014-01-12 | 20 |
| 2 | B | NULL | NULL |
| 3 | C | NULL | NULL |
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
This will bring wrong results ie, it will bring only latest two dates data from Details table irrespective of Id even though we join with Id. So the proper solution is using OUTER APPLY.
SELECT M.ID,M.NAME,D.PERIOD,D.QTY
FROM MASTER M
OUTER APPLY
(
SELECT TOP 2 ID, PERIOD,QTY
FROM DETAILS D
WHERE M.ID=D.ID
ORDER BY CAST(PERIOD AS DATE)DESC
)D
Here is the working : In LEFT JOIN , TOP 2 dates will be joined to the MASTER only after executing the query inside derived table D. In OUTER APPLY, it uses joining WHERE M.ID=D.ID inside the OUTER APPLY, so that each ID in Master will be joined with TOP 2 dates which will bring the following result.
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
| Id | Name | PERIOD | QTY |
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
| 1 | A | 2014-01-13 | 10 |
| 1 | A | 2014-01-12 | 20 |
| 2 | B | 2014-01-08 | 40 |
| 2 | B | 2014-01-06 | 30 |
| 3 | C | NULL | NULL |
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
2. When we need LEFT JOIN functionality using functions.
OUTER APPLY can be used as a replacement with LEFT JOIN when we need to get result from Master table and a function.
SELECT M.ID,M.NAME,C.PERIOD,C.QTY
FROM MASTER M
OUTER APPLY dbo.FnGetQty(M.ID) C
And the function goes here.
CREATE FUNCTION FnGetQty
(
#Id INT
)
RETURNS TABLE
AS
RETURN
(
SELECT ID,PERIOD,QTY
FROM DETAILS
WHERE ID=#Id
)
which generated the following result
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
| Id | Name | PERIOD | QTY |
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
| 1 | A | 2014-01-13 | 10 |
| 1 | A | 2014-01-11 | 15 |
| 1 | A | 2014-01-12 | 20 |
| 2 | B | 2014-01-06 | 30 |
| 2 | B | 2014-01-08 | 40 |
| 3 | C | NULL | NULL |
x------x---------x--------------x-------x
3. Retain NULL values when unpivoting
Consider you have the below table
x------x-------------x--------------x
| Id | FROMDATE | TODATE |
x------x-------------x--------------x
| 1 | 2014-01-11 | 2014-01-13 |
| 1 | 2014-02-23 | 2014-02-27 |
| 2 | 2014-05-06 | 2014-05-30 |
| 3 | NULL | NULL |
x------x-------------x--------------x
When you use UNPIVOT to bring FROMDATE AND TODATE to one column, it will eliminate NULL values by default.
SELECT ID,DATES
FROM MYTABLE
UNPIVOT (DATES FOR COLS IN (FROMDATE,TODATE)) P
which generates the below result. Note that we have missed the record of Id number 3
x------x-------------x
| Id | DATES |
x------x-------------x
| 1 | 2014-01-11 |
| 1 | 2014-01-13 |
| 1 | 2014-02-23 |
| 1 | 2014-02-27 |
| 2 | 2014-05-06 |
| 2 | 2014-05-30 |
x------x-------------x
In such cases an APPLY can be used(either CROSS APPLY or OUTER APPLY, which is interchangeable).
SELECT DISTINCT ID,DATES
FROM MYTABLE
OUTER APPLY(VALUES (FROMDATE),(TODATE))
COLUMNNAMES(DATES)
which forms the following result and retains Id where its value is 3
x------x-------------x
| Id | DATES |
x------x-------------x
| 1 | 2014-01-11 |
| 1 | 2014-01-13 |
| 1 | 2014-02-23 |
| 1 | 2014-02-27 |
| 2 | 2014-05-06 |
| 2 | 2014-05-30 |
| 3 | NULL |
x------x-------------x
In your example queries the results are indeed the same.
But OUTER APPLY can do more: For each outer row you can produce an arbitrary inner result set. For example you can join the TOP 1 ORDER BY ... row. A LEFT JOIN can't do that.
The computation of the inner result set can reference outer columns (like your example did).
OUTER APPLY is strictly more powerful than LEFT JOIN. This is easy to see because each LEFT JOIN can be rewritten to an OUTER APPLY just like you did. It's syntax is more verbose, though.
Hi friends i have small doubt in sql server
here i want data based on condition
same id and status is equal to s then that date value be
how to write query in sql server
Table :emp
id |status |date(mm-dd-yy) |fdate(mm-dd-yy) |tdate(mm-dd-yy)
1 | S |03-16-11 | |
1 | b | | 03-15-11 |03-18-11
1 | s |03-17-11 | |
1 | b | | 04-20-12 |04-30-12
1 | S |04-20-12 | |
1 | s |04-10-12 | |
1 | s |10-01-14 | |
1 | b | |10-02-14 |10-25-14
2 | s |01-18-12 | |
2 | b | |01-18-12 |01-28-12
2 | b | |03-10-13 |03-24-13
2 | s |03-16-13 | |
2 | s |03-10-13 | |
2 | s |03-23-13 | |
2 | b | |04-20-13 |04-27-13
2 | s |07-01-14 | |
the table (status = s, id, date) compare it with status = b, same id number and date ( Date value from status s) with the date range of fdate and tdate .
if that data with in range then Billing yes other wise billing no
output like
id |status |date(mm-dd-yy) |fdate(mm-dd-yy) |tdate(mm-dd-yy) |Billing
1 | S |03-16-11 | | |yes
1 | s |03-17-11 | | |yes
1 | S |04-20-12 | | |yes
1 | s |04-10-12 | | |no
1 | s |10-01-14 | | |no
2 | s |01-18-12 | | |yes
2 | s |03-16-13 | | |yes
2 | s |03-10-13 | | |yes
2 | s |03-23-13 | | |yes
2 | s |07-01-14 | | |no
i tried query like below
select *
from ( select * from emp a where status ='s') a
inner join (select * from emp b where status='b') b
on a.pn=b.pn
where a.date<=b.date1 and a.date>=b.date2
its not give exactely result.
please tell me how to write query in sql server .
Try
select a.Id,
a.status,
a.date,
a.fdate,
a.tdate,
max(IsNull(case when a.date between b.fDate and b.tDate
then 'yes'
else 'no'
end, 'no')) Billing
from emp a
left join emp b
on a.Id=b.Id
where a.status ='s'
and b.status = 'b'
group by a.Id,
a.status,
a.date,
a.fdate,
a.tdate
Some questions/comments:
What are the fields: pn, date1 and date2?
date1 in your query is, I guess, bigger than date2