Unit test for directive with $interval.flush throw 'Possibly unhandled rejection' - angularjs

I have created directive that use $interval service:
directive('dir', ['$animate', '$interval', function($animate, $interval) {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
model:'='
},
controller: function($scope) {
$scope.elements = [];
this.register = function(element) {
$scope.elements.push(element);
}
$scope.animate = function() {
//do some animation
}
},
link: function(scope) {
scope.animation = $interval(function() {
scope.animate();
}, 500);
scope.$watch('model', function(value) {
if(value == false) {
if(scope.animation) {
$interval.cancel(scope.animation);
scope.animation = undefined;
}
}
});
}
};
When I write a unit test for animate method I receive:
Possibly unhandled rejection: {} thrown
beforeEach(inject(['$compile', '$rootScope', '$interval',
function($compile, $rootScope, $interval) {
var element = angular.element('<dir model="true"></dir>');
var directive = $compile(element)($rootScope.$new());
controller = directive.controller('loading');
scope = directive.isolateScope();
interval = $interval;
scope.$digest();
}]));
fit('trigger animation', function() {
interval.flush(500);
});
As I can understand this is because of not resolved Promise that was returned by $interval inside my link function. But can't figure out how to do it properly.
"angular": "~1.6.0",
"angular-mocks": "~1.6.0",

Related

AngularJS Directive data binding not happening from controller

I am facing the problem of data binding from controller to directive because of delay in response from the server.
To better understand just see a small program below.When I remove the timeout function, binding happens.
<msg track="{{customer}}"></msg>
angular.module('myApp').directive('msg', function() {
return {
scope: {
track :"#"
},
link : function(scope, element, attrs) {
},
template : "<a href>{{track}}</a>"
}
});
angular.module('myApp').controller('HomeCtrl', ['$scope', function($scope) {
setTimeout(function() {
$scope.customer = "shreyansh";
}, 5000);
// assume some service call inside controller
// service1.getData().then(function(data){$scope.customer = data})
}]);
How can i fix above problem so that above code should render as
<msg track="shreyansh" class="ng-isolate-scope">shreyansh</msg>.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks
var app = angular.module('plunker', []);
app.factory('myService', function($http) {
var promise;
var myService = {
getData: function() {
if (!promise) {
promise = $http.get('test.json').then(function(response) {
return response.data;
});
}
return promise;
}
};
return myService;
});
app.controller('MainCtrl', function(myService, $scope) {
myService.getData().then(function(d) {
$scope.data = d;
});
});
app.directive('msg', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
track: "#"
},
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
},
template: "<a href>{{track}}</a>"
}
});
<msg track="{{data.name}}"></msg>
test.json file
{
"name": "Pete"
}

I have a angular directive for kendo grid. My issue is ajax in my service fires only after the complete directive executes

My ajax fires after the complete directive executes. Is there any work around for this so that I can have my grid configuration loads before coming to the grid directive
gridApp.directive('grid', function () {
return {
restrict: "EA",
scope: {
gridName: "#"
},
template: '<h1>kendoDirective</h1><br/><div kendo-grid={{gridName}} options="gridOptions"></div>',
controller: function ($scope, $element, $attrs, widgetUtils) {
var gridConfig = widgetUtils.GetGridOption().then(onLoad);
var onLoad = function (data) {
$scope.gridOptions = data;
}
console.log('DirectiveScope: ' + $scope.gridOptions);
},
link: function ($scope, $element, $attrs) {
}
};
});
gridApp.service('widgetUtils', function ($http) {
var getGridOption = function () {
return $http.get('/Base/LoadGridConfiguration').then(function (response) {
return response.data;
});
}
return {
GetGridOption: getGridOption
};
});
You can handle it with ng-if in template. I created $scope.isReady and change it state after options loaded.
gridApp.directive('grid', function () {
return {
restrict: "EA",
scope: {
gridName: "#"
},
template: '<h1>kendoDirective</h1><br/><div data-ng-if="isReady" kendo-grid={{gridName}} options="gridOptions"></div>',
controller: function ($scope, $element, $attrs, widgetUtils) {
var gridConfig = widgetUtils.GetGridOption().then(onLoad);
$scope.isReady = false;
var onLoad = function (data) {
$scope.gridOptions = data;
$scope.isReady = true; // here we ready to init kendo component
$scope.$apply();
}
console.log('DirectiveScope: ' + $scope.gridOptions);
},
link: function ($scope, $element, $attrs) {
}
};
});

How to write unit test case for scope and timeout function inside directive

I am using isolate scope in custom directive. I have updated plunker link. http://plnkr.co/edit/NBQqjxW8xvqMgfW9AVek?p=preview
Can someone help me in writing unit test case for script.js file.
script.js
var app = angular.module('app', [])
app.directive('myDirective', function($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: {
content: '='
},
templateUrl: 'my-directive.html',
link: function(scope, element, attr) {
$timeout(function() {
element = element[0].querySelectorAll('div.outerDiv div.innerDiv3 p.myClass');
var height = element[0].offsetHeight;
if (height > 40) {
angular.element(element).addClass('expandable');
scope.isShowMore = true;
}
})
scope.showMore = function() {
angular.element(element).removeClass('expandable');
scope.isShowMore = false;
};
scope.showLess = function() {
angular.element(element).addClass('expandable');
scope.isShowMore = true;
};
}
}
})
(function() {
'use strict';
describe('Unit testing directive', function() {
var $compile, scope, element, compiledDirective, $rootScope, $timeout;
beforeEach(module("app"));
beforeEach(inject(function(_$compile_, _$rootScope_, _$timeout_) {
$compile = _$compile_;
scope = _$rootScope_.$new();
$timeout = _$timeout_;
element = angular.element(' <div my-directive content="content"></div>');
compiledDirective = $compile(element)(scope);
scope.$digest();
}));
it('should apply template', function() {
expect(compiledDirective.html()).toBe('');
});
it('check for timeout', function() {
$timeout.flush();
});
});
})();
Use $timeout.flush() function for writing testcase for $timeout
it('check for timeout', function() {
scope.digest();
// flush timeout(s) for all code under test.
$timeout.flush();
// this will throw an exception if there are any pending timeouts.
$timeout.verifyNoPendingTasks();
expect(scope.isShowMore).toBeTruthy();
});
Check this article for better understanding.

Jasmine - unit testing a directive: Getting 'undefined' is not an object

I am taking baby steps in Jasmine, please bear with me for any blatant mistakes..I am writing test cases to check if a controller method - transformData gets called, the details below
My Directive
angular.module('myModule')
.directive('myDirective', [ function ()
{
'use strict';
return {
restrict: 'E',
templateUrl: '/static/quality/scripts/directives/hh-star-rating.html',
scope: {
varA:'#',
},
controller: [
'$scope', '$controller',
function ($scope, $controller) {
$controller('otherController', {$scope: $scope})
.columns(
$scope.x,
$scope.y,
$scope.series
);
$scope.transformData = function(data)
{
/// does something;
return data;
};
}
],
My Spec
describe('directive - hh-star-ratings', function() {
'use strict';
angular.module('myModule', [])
.directive('myContainer', function() {
return {
restrict: 'E',
priority: 100000,
terminal: true,
template: '<div></div>',
controller: function($scope) {
$scope.loadingData = true;
this.stopLoading = function() {
$scope.loadingData = false;
};
}
}
});
var result_set = {
//some data-transform-req
};
beforeEach(module('myModule'));
var element, scope, controller;
beforeEach(inject(function($rootScope, $compile) {
scope = $rootScope.$new();
element = angular.element(
'<my-container> <my-directive> </my-directive> </my-container>'
);
$compile(element)(scope);
scope.$digest();
controller = element.controller('myDirective');
}));
it('should call the transformData', function() {
controller.transformData(result_set);
scope.$apply();
scope.transformData.should.have.been.called;
});
})
Issue: When I run the test, I get the following error
TypeError: 'undefined' is not an object (evaluating 'controller.transformData')
What am I doing wrong? Thanks in advance for your time.
Your define the function transformData in the scope - NOT in the controller
controller: [
'$scope', '$controller',
function ($scope, $controller) {
$controller('otherController', {$scope: $scope})
.columns(
$scope.x,
$scope.y,
$scope.series
);
this.transformData = function(data) // <= change to this (controller)
{
/// does something;
return data;
};
}
],

Custom angular directive to load a route

Basically, what I need is an alternative to ngView that allows me to load a custom route inside an html element.
For example, this route:
$routeProvider.when('/some/path', {
templateUrl: 'some/template.html',
controller: someController,
controllerAs: 'ctrlAlias'
});
With this directive (with myRoute='/some/path'):
<div routeView="myRoute" />
Whould result in:
<div ng-controller="someController as ctrlAlias" ng-include src="some/template.html" />
Because of compatibility and legacy restrictions I can't use ui-router.
How do I implement this using a directive (or otherwise) ?
So, I adapted the code from ngView to do what i needed.
It is not very elegant since there is a lot of code duplication from angular-router module but it works perfectly.
Note that this only works with routes with templateUrl's and with routes without parameters.
Usage:
<div route-view="'/my/route'"></div>
<div route-view="myRoute"></div>
Code:
angular.module('app', [])
.directive('routeView', routeViewDirective)
.directive('routeView', routeViewFillContentDirective)
function routeViewDirective($animate, $parse, $q, $route, $sce, $templateRequest) {
return {
restrict: 'EA',
terminal: true,
priority: 400,
transclude: 'element',
link: routeViewDirectiveLink
};
function routeViewDirectiveLink(scope, $element, attributes, ctrl, $transclude) {
var model = $parse(attributes.routeView);
var currentScope;
var currentElement;
scope.$watch(model, update);
function cleanupLastView() {
if (currentScope) {
currentScope.$destroy();
currentScope = null;
}
if (currentElement) {
$animate.leave(currentElement);
currentElement = null;
}
}
function update(path) {
var route = $route.routes[path];
if (route && route.templateUrl) {
var newScope = scope.$new();
var clone = $transclude(newScope, function(clone) {
$animate.enter(clone, null, currentElement || $element);
cleanupLastView();
});
currentElement = clone;
currentScope = newScope;
} else {
cleanupLastView();
}
}
}
}
function routeViewFillContentDirective($compile, $controller, $parse, $q, $route, $sce, $templateRequest) {
return {
restrict: 'EA',
priority: -400,
link: routeViewFillContentDirectiveLink
};
function routeViewFillContentDirectiveLink(scope, $element, attributes) {
var path = $parse(attributes.routeView)(scope);
var route = $route.routes[path];
var templateUrl = route && $sce.getTrustedResourceUrl(route.templateUrl);
if (angular.isDefined(templateUrl)) {
$templateRequest(templateUrl).then(function(template) {
$element.html(template);
var link = $compile($element.contents());
if (route.controller) {
var controller = $controller(route.controller, { $scope: scope });
if (route.controllerAs) {
scope[route.controllerAs] = controller;
}
$element.data('$ngControllerController', controller);
$element.children().data('$ngControllerController', controller);
}
link(scope);
});
}
}
}

Resources