I have a WSO2IS 5.2 acting as a federation hub. The AuthnRequest that it sends to IdP (in this case PingFederate) includes this NameIDPolicy:
<saml2p:NameIDPolicy AllowCreate="true"
Format="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:unspecified"
SPNameQualifier="WSO2IS"
xmlns:saml2p="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
/>
After logging in at PingFederate it sends back SAML message including this:
<samlp:Status>
<samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:Requester">
<samlp:StatusCode Value="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:status:InvalidNameIDPolicy" />
</samlp:StatusCode>
<samlp:StatusMessage>Cannot provide requested name identifier qualified with WSO2IS</samlp:StatusMessage>
</samlp:Status>
I've tried uid and mail NameID values in PingFederate but I always get this response. I would like to try changing the NameIDPolicy format that wso2is sends but have not found a way to do it. I think it should be a SAML:2.0 format.
Only thing I found was "Include NameID Policy" check box in IdP settings but it stays checked even if I uncheck it and save.
How to change the NameIDPolicy format?
UPDATE: I solved the problem by enabling pseudonym identifier at PingFederate and sending username as attribute. Still it would be good to know the answer to my question.
Yes your understanding is correct. You could need to change the NameIDPolicy. You can found it in service provider (SP) creation page. Go to WSO2 IS management console, Home>service Provider>Add> .
After that need to enter the name for SP and click the register button.
Now you are in Service provider configuration page.
GO to Inbound Authentication Configuration>SAML2 Web SSO Configuration>configure.
This page you can configure SAML2 Web SSO configuration and page header show as
Register New Service Provider and go to NameID format change the urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:nameid-format:emailAddress instead of urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:1.1:nameid-format:emailAddress.
You can found more details from WSO2 documentation [1].
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/IS500/Configuring+Single+Sign-On+with+SAML+2.0
Related
I have tried using the sso url as mentioned "Single Signon Service"https://auth.pingone.asia/{env}/saml20/idp/sso , and issuer as https://auth.pingone.asia/{env}. but getting ErrorCode: INVALID_ISSUER - Unable to find application for spEntityId: 'https://auth.pingone.asia/{env}' in environment {env}.
Please help me to understand where exactly I have wrong configuration.
Check if you have created a SAML Application, if not, try creating it with https://apidocs.pingidentity.com/pingone/platform/v1/api/#post-create-application-saml-protocol
Note: acs url is the place where you want PingIdentity to redirect after login authentication is completed. You will get a SAMLRespose also posted there.
(OR) You can create SAML application directly from the PingIdentity console itself by selecting Add Application, Select SAML as type, and Set Manual Saml configuration by specifying entity id (something unique) and ACS url.
Go to ping console dashboard, and check the Entity ID of the application, it should match with your AuthnRequest saml:Issuer
Example if your dashboard is like this with Entity ID "test",
then your AuthnRequest should look like this:
<samlp:AuthnRequest
xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion"
ID="test"
Version="2.0"
IssueInstant="2022-09-19T16:46:59">
<saml:Issuer>test</saml:Issuer>
</samlp:AuthnRequest>
Note the line: <saml:Issuer>test</saml:Issuer>
I am trying to setup saml sso configuration for my application which is deployed in websphere.
Idp- Azure AD
SP - Websphere application server when my target application deployed
Done TAI configuration as per the Ibm document . But when I hit the test button from idp I could see the saml response in network tab. but i couldn't login to my application and also didn't get any trace related to saml in log files also however i have enabled logs for saml in Troubleshoot. My doubt is sometimes am getting trace which are related to TAI during server stop. For each request should i be getting TAI trace ? and why my saml response not getting intercepted in TAI. How exactly the interception happen with saml response and how do we get to know that saml response got validated.
[15/4/21 16:18:42:855 IST] 00000096 TrustAssociat A SECJ0121I: Trust Association Init class com.ibm.ws.security.web.saml.ACSTrustAssociationInterceptor loaded successfully
acs url -> https://localhost:/browserTest (which is my actual target application url)
metadata and signing certificates also imported correctly.
Thanks for your help.
The acs URL has format like this:
https://<hostname>:<sslport>/samlsps/<any URI pattern string>
if you want to use your application URL
https://localhost:/browserTest
as acs URL, this UR must be able to accept HTTP POST.
We are trying to implement SSO, using OneLogin as the IdP with our Cisco Call Manager cluster using a single agreement for all the servers in the cluster.
This just basically means that our metadata file contains a separate AssertionConsumerService tag for every server in the cluster.
However we are hitting an issue where in the SAML response the Destination is not recognized as valid.
My question would be, in the case of multiple ACS' used, what would the destination field need to look like in the SAML response? Does the IdP need to recognize which consumer the request came from and dynamically change the destination in the response to be the correct one for the specific consumer?
Right now the SAML response looks something like this:
<samlp:Response
xmlns:samlp="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:protocol"
xmlns:saml="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:assertion" Destination="https://<CUCM_2>:8443/ssosp/saml/SSO/alias/<CUCM_2>https://<CUCM_2>:8443/ssosp/saml/SSO/alias/<CUCM_2>https://<IMP_1>:8443/ssosp/saml/SSO/alias/<IMP_1>https://<IMP_1>:8443/ssosp/saml/SSO/alias/<IMP_1>https://<CUCM_1>:8443/ssosp/saml/SSO/alias/<CUCM_1>https://<CUCM_1>:8443/ssosp/saml/SSO/alias/<CUCM_1>" ID="pfx117d2cec-f554-1fba-ff86-8db77b497e35" InResponseTo="s2ded98fb1a7423ea7bb1fcc95cf5c57ae3bf19684" IssueInstant="2019-02-18T16:06:06Z" Version="2.0">
and we get the same jumble for Recipient attribute in SubjectConfirmationData
With a proper cluster, you'd have a single ACS URL and the cluster would manage the user session between cluster members outside of SAML. I've not heard of multiple ACS URLs being used for a single SAML supporting SP. The IdP ( Onelogin ) needs to know specifically where to send the SAML response. I think you'll need to look at your cluster configuration and see whether it can be configured as a endpoint regardless of the cluster instance that initiates the SAML request.
Ah, but Cisco is special, don't you know? :)
I managed to get it working in the meantime and whoever is reading this thread in the future, I can confirm that OneLogin can now support Cisco clusters using a single cluster-wide metadata. But for any other IdP the setup is:
IdP requirements
CUCM only supports NameIDFormat as transient
HTTP-POST and HTTP-Redirect SAML bindings need to be enabled
SAML specification that allows for the definition of multiple AssertionConsumerService tags needs to be supported
Operation
When setting up SSO, within the metadata generated by CUCM if using cluster wide SSO mode, multiple AssertionConsumerService tags are defined. Two for each server in the cluster, one using the POST method and one using Redirect. Each ACS also has an Index tag, that starts at 0. This is sent to the IdP
When trying to authenticate a SAML request is sent to the IdP, within the request the AssertionConsumerServiceIndex field is set to the Index of the server from which the request was generated, as defined in the metadata originally provided to the IdP
The IdP then sends back a SAML response, in which the Destination and Recipient tags are set to match the Location tag from the metadata corresponding to the requesting server
Using WSO2 5.1.0. Needs to send SAML assertion like firstName, lastName from WSO2 as IDP to SP. Refer Configuration. User profile do have first name and last name values.
Restarted WSO2, no error in logs. But I don't receive these values in SAML response sent from WSO2 to my Service porvider.
For this, in your Service Provider's SAML Configuration, you need to make sure following two checkboxes are selected.
Enable Attribute Profile
Include Attributes in the Response Always
Then, inside the Claim Configuration section of the Service Provider configuration, you need to add the particular claims you need to receive as Requested Claims. Then these claims will be included in SAML response.
If you want the claims to have a different key name, you can define a custom claim dialect there and provide your own key names for claims.
We have an OpenSSO (OpenAM) instance set up at our end to work as a Service Provider (SP). It's been working well so far in an SP Initiated SSO scenario, however, I recently had to set it up for an IDP initiated scenario and am unable to get it to work successfully. To explain, in this scenario, the IDP would like to send the SAMLResponse directly to the Assertion consumer service at my end and our OpenAM instance should be able successfully digest the response and send the user to our underlying application. My questions are:
Is there any other configuration required in this scenario except for exchanging/uploading the metadata between the IDP and us (SP)?
Can I upload the metadata of the iDP in the same COT as the other IDPs that are currently working in the SP Initiate Scenario? Or should there be a new COT for each IDP provider?
What URL should I provide to the IDP to send the SAMLResponse to? Is it the AssertionConsumerService index="1" isDefault="true" Binding="urn:oasis:names:tc:SAML:2.0:bindings:HTTP-POST" from our metadata? I tried this a few days back and OpenAM reported an error - "this is not the right consumer service for this request" or something.
I got an answer for this on an OpenAM forum -
http://lists.forgerock.org/pipermail/openam/2012-August/007872.html