I have the following data inside an index at Search API. The name and slug fields are TextFields.
Document Id name slug
5946158883012608 Configurations configurations
4820258976169984 Customers customers
6227633859723264 Sites sites
I'm trying a lot of options of querystrings and can't get the right row.
My last tries:
index.search('config')
index.search('~config')
index.search('name:~config')
index.search('slug:~config')
If I try: index.search('customers') I receive one row. But if a remove the last s, then I receive no row.
Can someone please explain me why?
Regards,
Armando
Related
This question is related to Neo4j databases. Suppose I have a relationship (employee)-[WORKS-IN]->(company).. Imagine an employee works in multiple companies. I should be able to find the companies that a specific employee is working using full text search in neo4j. I'll be searching from the users name and I should be able to return company nodes..how to do that??
Full text search must be used.
So you want to search for a Person by name with full text and then retrieve the companies he worked for.
Compare this easily with the default Movies graph in Neo4j, you want to search for a Person by name with full text and then retrieve the movies the person acted in .
CALL db.index.fulltext.queryNodes('Person', 'kea*')
YIELD node
MATCH (node)-[:ACTED_IN]->(movie)
RETURN node.name, movie.title
This is an example when I created this node:
CREATE (e:Employee {name: 'Nirmana Testing'})
Then create the full text index on Employee.name
CREATE FULLTEXT INDEX employeeNameIdx FOR (e:Employee) ON EACH [e.name]
Then run a query using this full text index. Noted that the keyword 'nirmana' can be upper case or any case.
CALL db.index.fulltext.queryNodes("employeeNameIdx", "nirmana") YIELD node as employee
MATCH (employee)-[:WORKS-IN]->(company:Company)
RETURN employee, company
reference:
https://neo4j.com/docs/cypher-manual/current/indexes-for-full-text-search/
Thank you very much. Sorted it out. And one more thing. Suppose for a particular worker there can be various relationships except [WORKS-IN] , such as [PART TIME WORKER] , [FREELANCER], [PROJECT MANAGER] and so on. So for a particular user, If we want to find the place or company that he is working, freelancing, managing projects by searching the relationship type how could it be done using full text search.
I am new to SalesForce and SOQL so sorry in advance if the question has already been answered, if yes link it to me.
The aim of my SOQL query is to get all the contract information to generate PDF.
There are tables: Contract, Contact and Account
In the Contract table there are fields: Maitre_d_apprentissage__c, MaitreApprentissageNom1__c, MaitreApprentissagePrenom1__c, Apprenti__c, ApprentiNom__c, ApprentiPrenom__c
There are relationships:
Apprenti__r which link Apprenti__c to Contact table
Maitre_d_apprentissage__r which link Maitre_d_apprentissage__c to Contact table
When I looked at table, I saw that MaitreApprentissageNom1__c was equal to Maitre_d_apprentissage__r.LastName and ApprentiNom__c was equal to Apprenti__r.LastName. So I conclude I could get other information of Apprenti__c and Maitre_d_apprentissage__c from the Contact Table following the same principle. So I added to my query Apprenti__r.Date_de_naissance__c and Maitre_d_apprentissage__r.Date_de_naissance__c to get the Date_de_naissance__c field which is in my Contact table.
I see in the results that the query succeeds in getting the information but some values have changed column (lines 6 and 7), you can see the difference between query 1 and query 2. In the first query I only return the Apprenti__r.Date_de_naissance__c and in the second query I return Apprenti__r.Date_de_naissance__c and Maitre_d_apprentissage__r.Date_de_naissance__c
Query 1:
SELECT ApprentiNom__c, ApprentiPrenom__c, Apprenti__r.Date_de_naissance__c, MaitreApprentissageNom1__c, MaitreApprentissagePrenom1__c
FROM Contract
Result 1:
Query 2:
SELECT ApprentiNom__c, ApprentiPrenom__c, Apprenti__r.Date_de_naissance__c, MaitreApprentissageNom1__c, MaitreApprentissagePrenom1__c, Maitre_d_apprentissage__r.Date_de_naissance__c
FROM Contract
Result 2:
I would like to understand from where is coming the problem and how to correct it. Thank you in advance.
It's possible that it's just your query editor displaying stuff incorrectly. You can see it got confused with 2 lookups to Contact table, why there's even a column header "Contact.Date_de_naissance__c" (and why it's there twice). And they aren't shown in the order you requested...
What editor you're using? You could try built-in "Developer Console" or http://workbench.developerforce.com/
What do you need it for? In Apex order of fields won't matter, in REST API query the values fetched via lookup will come as JSON sub-objects so there will always be a way to figure out exactly which value is coming from which relation.
In Dev Console try to run this and check if it solves your fears:
System.debug(JSON.serializePretty([SELECT
ApprentiNom__c, ApprentiPrenom__c,
Apprenti__r.Date_de_naissance__c,
MaitreApprentissageNom1__c, MaitreApprentissagePrenom1__c,
Maitre_d_apprentissage__r.Date_de_naissance__c
FROM Contract]));
Then add Maitre_d_apprentissage__r.LastName to query and see what changed, what stayed as is.
I have 2 column in my table setting
with the following values
KEY VALUE
company ABC
phone 14344
address Somerset City
I need to display this like a single record or a flatten
array in the view/blade page
something like
{{$sett->company}}
{{$sett->phone}}
or an array with lookup
{{$myarray('company')}}
{{$myarray('phone')}}
The idea is if I add another settings like contact us email address
for my website I don't want to add another column.
I know this is achievable in controller by creating different variable
and executing different query but I'm kind of looking for some options here.
Thanks for the help really appreciated.
You can use $settings->pluck('value', 'key') to get your result. Read more here: https://laravel.com/docs/5.4/collections#method-pluck
I am newbie to solr. So please bear with me.
Use cases
User can share his photos to friends or publicly or make it private.
User can search for people or photos(he should view only public photos, shared with him).
I have denormalized my relational data to solr schema. I have merged the user object & photo object into solr schema
So,
If user jack (user 3) is searching for "picnic" He shouldn't see the photo_1 but see photo_2.
If user venu is searching for "picnic" He should see the photo_1 and photo_2.
How can I force solr to look into friends_ids, share_level field? can I do with facet.field? Is dynamic fields work for this case? I have read some tutorials but I am not getting clear picture.
Hope you guys shed some light on this. So that I can take forward. I hope this should be possible.
Thanks in advance!
You should have a string field for share_level, with possible value of private, public, friends.
You should also have a multiValued field for friends_ids,
and it should store each user id instead of the current CSV format
NOTE: you should revised this column type, NEVER use CSV in mysql, use a proper entity relationship
So, once you have the field ready, and complete the reindex,
to search for photo will be just:
+name:$search +(share_level:public (+share_level:friends +friends_ids:$uid))
$search = picnic
$uid = 3 (jack)
We have created a site for a client using Django CMS and are approaching the launch date. There are a number of links to files on their old site. Doing a search of the cmsplugin_text table, I find 12 entries that contain the URL. There is no simple mapping to the new file download URL from the old download URL, so I need to find the pages these 12 entries appear on and tell our client so they can edit the page.
But the database is not easy to follow. So how do I go from the value of the cmsplugin_ptr_id column of the cmsplugin_text column to the URL of the page? I'm fairly sure that the cmsplugin_ptr_id is meant to line up with the id of the cms_cmsplugin table. That table also has parent_id, tree_id and placeholder_id, but I've kind of got lost at this point.
I'm happy to use either the database commands directly, or to use manage.py shell to do this.
Should have tried a bit harder before answering.
The steps that worked were to look in cms_page_placeholder for lines with the placeholder_id and look up the corresponding page_id. I could then look up the page in the admin at http://mysite.com/en/admin/cms/page/page_id and that page has a "View on site link".
The SQL statement I used was:
SELECT cpp.page_id
FROM cmsplugin_text AS cpt
LEFT JOIN cms_cmsplugin AS ccp ON cpt.cmsplugin_ptr_id = ccp.id
LEFT JOIN cms_page_placeholders AS cpp ON ccp.placeholder_id = cpp.placeholder_id
WHERE cpt.body like '%userfiles%';
Where userfiles was part of the path to the files on the old site.