I wrote the following factory :
.factory('UserFact', function() {
var user = [];
return {
'setUser': function(user) {
this.user = user;
console.log('(1) User set: ' + this.user);
console.log('(2) User id is now: ' + this.user.uid);
},
'updateSport': function(sportid) {
console.log('(3)Update sport ' + sportid + 'for user id ' + this.user.uid);
}
}
Use it the following way in my controller :
function ($scope, $stateParams, DatabaseFact, UserFact) {
// variables
$scope.sports = [];
$scope.sports = DatabaseFact.getSports();
// functions
$scope.updateSport = UserFact.updateSport;
// execution
UserFact.setUser({uid: '123456', name: 'forrest'});
}
And trigger it from my view through a list of trigger button :
updateSport(sport.id)
My problem is that console logs print the following :
(1) User set: [Object] Object
(2) User id is now: 123456
(3) Update sport 1 for user id undefined
Do you know why my user id is undefined in log 3?
Thanks
That makes sense to me, due to the reason of its implementation. In your controller, you are actually copying the method reference to $scope.updateSport. So whenever the method gets executed, it executes in the context of the controller and this -> $scope instance but not one the service instance.
As your controller doenst have uid, it just returns undefined.
To fix this you need to have a method body for updateSort and call UserFact.updateSport
$scope.updateSport = function(){
UserFact.updateSport();
}
I don't know how familiar you are with JavaScript, but I suspect you're being caught out by the this reference being different in your two function calls.
To debug this try logging this to the console in both functions. You should observe that they differ, which explains the cause of your problem.
The fix could be to not use the this keyword, e.g. function setUser would become:
'setUser': function(_user) {
user = _user;
}
You can find more information on JS this on Google, try https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/this for a start.
It's undefined because your function uses this, but is copied from its original object (the user service) to the scope.
You can either stop to use this, and instead use the user variable that you declared and initialized to an empty array (why, BTW?), but never used anywhere else, or do
$scope.updateSport = function() {
UserFact.updateSport;
}
Note that you named your service "UserFact", but it's not a factry. It doesn't create anything. It only allows setting a user and updating its sport. That is not a factory. A factory is an object used to create things. The factory, here, is the function passed to module.factory(), and which is used to create and return the service instance, which should better be called UserService.
Related
I have been through all related topics on SO, namely these two:
$watch not detecting changes in service variable
$watch not detecting changes in service variable
are tackling the same issue, but i failed to make it working. Unlike in the above cases, I am using a controller from a component, hence maybe this is related to lacking binding in components, idk. Hope for some experinced assistance.
Have a service:
(function (angular) {
'use strict';
angular
.module('Test')
.service('ShareData', ShareData);
ShareData.$inject = [];
function ShareData() {
let vm = this;
vm.indexes = [];
vm.setIndexes = function(firstIndexParam, lastIndexParam, message) {
if (leaderIndexParam !== undefined || partnerIndexParam !== undefined) {
vm.indexes.mainIndex = firstIndexParam;
vm.indexes.secondaryIndex = lastIndexParam;
vm.indexes.message = message;
}
};
vm.getIndexes = function() {
return vm.indexes;
};
}
})(angular);
It is used in 3 components. Two of them are sending data into the service, the third one uses this data. Sending of data is accomplished in the following way, works:
ShareData.setIndexes(firstIndex, secondIndex, 'update_indexes');
Now here is my problem. In main parent controller i can comfortably access the data by
ShareData.getIndexes();
But my issue is that I need changes in indexes to trigger certain actions in parent controller, so I tried so do as stipulated by relevant questions here on SO:
$scope.$watch('ShareData.getIndexes()', function(newVal) {
console.log('New indexes arrived', newVal);
});
In main controller, I am injecting the service:
TabController.$inject = ['ShareData'];
and using it like:
let indexService = ShareData.getIndexes();
As i said, I can get the data when I am explicitly calling the function. The issue is that it needs to be triggered by the service itself.
It does not work regardless of shamanistic ceremonies a made :) Now, obviously, I am missing something. Should I somehow bind this service to the component, and if yes how is it done? Or maybe the solution is totally dysfunctional and impossible to achieve in my circumstances? An advise is appreciated!
UPDATE: I already have a functional solution with the same service working with $rootScope.$broadcast, however my aim is to get rid of it and not work with the $rootScope.
The problem is that you never actually change the value of vm.indexes - it always points to the same array. setIndexes only modifies properties of this array. That's why $watch, which by default checks for reference equality only, fails to spot the changes.
There are (at least) two ways of solving this: either make $watch check the object equality instead, by adding a third param there:
$scope.$watch('ShareData.getIndexes()', function(newVal) {
console.log('New indexes arrived', newVal);
}, true);
... or (better, in my opinion) rewrite the set function so that it'll create a new instance of indexes instead when there's a change:
vm.setIndexes = function(firstIndexParam, lastIndexParam, message) {
if (leaderIndexParam === undefined && partnerIndexParam === undefined) {
return;
}
vm.indexes = vm.indexes.slice();
Object.assign(vm.indexes, {
mainIndex: firstIndexParam,
secondaryIndex: lastIndexParam,
message: message
});
};
As a sidenote, simply calling setIndexes() does not trigger the digest - and $watch listener only checks its expression when digest is triggered.
I am creating a web application on some courses in which I need to save a field (username) throughout the session of the user that is logged in, then in another part when the user finishes the course and clicks on the "Accept" button, the progress is saved in a field in the database.
If I ask the user previously to introduce the field and click on "Accept", I pick it up and I treat it in the function of the ModifyProgress controller, this does work for me, but I need not to ask that field from the user. That is, only by entering your name once in the login, you can already treat that variable throughout the application.
I tried a typical global variable at the beginning of the controller file, and I assign it to the field (GlobalUserName = $scope.username) but it is only stored in the Login function. When I try to use in other function I get a "undefined" alert in the chrome console (f12).
var app = angular.module('gestionUsuarioCurso');
app.controller('usuariosCursoController',
function($scope,$http,usuariosCursoService) {
gestionUsuarioCurso = this;
gestionUsuarioCurso.progresoUsuario;
gestionUsuarioCurso.usuario;
gestionUsuarioCurso.curso;
gestionUsuarioCurso.usuarios = [];
gestionUsuarioCurso.status;
GlobalUsername;
this.progresoUsuario = 0;
this.selectProgreso = function (){
return this.progresoUsuario;
};
$scope.LoginUsuario = function(){
usuariosCursoService.loginUser(
$scope.userName,$scope.password).then(function(usuario){
Globalusername = $scope.userName;
gestionUsuarioCurso.usuario = usuario;
console.log(GlobalUsername); //This shows it correctly
.......
With the $scope.userName I get the username and I can treat it in that function, but if I want to use it now in this other function of ModifyProgress, it appears to me by the debug console (f12 in chrome) undefined that field.
The showUser method (within ModifyProgress) tries to find a user in the bbdd with the username field, in this case the user passes it to them by hand.
$scope.ModifyProgress = function(FinishedCourse){
//console.log(GlobalUsername); //Undefined on console
usuariosCursoService.showUser(GlobalUsername).then(function(usuario) {
//console.log(GlobalUsername); //Undefined on console
gestionUsuarioCurso.usuario = usuario;
.........
I would like the variable GlobalUsername to "travel" with the value obtained on the LoginUser function to another functions with that value, and so that the value can go through webpages.
Use $rootScope instead of $scope for global variables!
$rootScope.GlobalUsername = 'Your name!!';
Read More about $rootScope
The proper way would be to create a new service.
Services are singletons and passed to your controller by reference.
So you could inject it int your first controller to store the value and inject in your other controller to retrieve this value.
https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/services
You could use $rootScope in order to have it available anywhere but it's not recommended.
See https://docs.angularjs.org/guide/scope for more details on what scopes are made for.
I'm using Angular to develop commenting functionality for a web app.
Currently there are two sections in the application were a user can comment:
Category
Product
About 90% of the commenting functionality is the same for both sections and as such I would like to make this reusable - i.e write some service or controller that I can reference/use as a base.
So far, my research seems to point to using a factory service but unfortunately this doesn't seem to work (I've spent the whole day running through various tutorials).
It is quite possible that I am over thinking this and making it far too complicated but I honestly don't know which way to turn anymore.
Herewith a quick and dirty overview of what I have so far:
HTML view for the category
Controller for the category (receives data from service and posts data to service in order to bind data to model)
Service for the category (retrieve and stores all the necessary
data)
The product uses the same logic and a lot of the code in the service and controller will be duplicated.
I've merged the two services into one service successfully but I'm having trouble doing the same for the controller.
Do I:
Write a base controller that will communicate with the above mentioned service and that will hookup with the two existing controllers
OR
Write a factory/provider service that hooks up to the two existing controllers as well as the above mentioned service.
If you go the route of using a factory, you could put all the common functionality into its return object and reference that from your controllers.
Factory
angular.module('myModule').factory('CommonFunctions', function(){
return {
foo : foo,
bar : bar
}
function foo(){
console.log('foo');
};
function bar (){
console.log('bar');
};
}
Controller
angular.module('myModule')
.controller('myController', ['CommonFunctions', function(CommonFunctions) {
var vm = this;
vm.foo = CommonFunctions.foo();
vm.bar = CommonFunctions.bar();
}
angular's separation of service types ie:
for specific values
constant
value
(constant for specific values needed before other services are created)
for functions
factory
service
provider
(provider for specific instances when you need a services before other services are created, usually taking advantage of constants)
allow the ability to share data and ways to process that data between controllers and or directives, anything that can be a value can also be a constant, the only difference there being where they can be injected. Similarly any service can be rewritten to a factory or a provider, it is more your specific use case / what your more comfortable writing that would determine which to use, but really the best way to think about it is if you have a value that needs to be shared but is not needed inside angular.module.config then use value, otherwise use constant, now if you have a single function that you want to share, (maybe it processes that value in some way or maybe it just does something else) you should write it as a factory, then when you have a few of those factory's that deal with either that value, or anything else, you can combine them into a service or configure and combine them using a provider. here is a simple example (note i am using the recommended syntax for writing angular services):
'use strict';
var app = angular.module('test.app',[]);
app.constant('configureableValue',{defaultValue:55});
app.value('editableValue',{defaultValue:100,editedValue:null});
app.provider('configureValue',configureValueProvider);
configureValueProvider.$inject - ['configureableValue'];
function configureValueProvider(configureableValue){
var defaultVal = configureableValue.defaultValue,
originalVal = defaultVal;
return {
getValue:getValue,
setValue:setValue,
resetValue:resetValue,
'$get':providerFunc
};
function getValue(){
return defaultVal;
}
function setValue(val){
defaultVal = val;
}
function providerFunc(){
return {
get:function(){ return getValue(); },
reset:function(){ resetValue(); }
};
}
function resetValue(){
defaultVal = originalVal
}
}
// this factory is an example of a single function service, this should almost always be defined as a factory
app.factory('getEditableValue',getEditableValue);
getEditableValue.$inject = ['editableValue'];
function getEditableValue(editableValue){
return function(){
return editableValue.editedValue ? editableValue.editedValue : editableValue.defaultValue;
};
}
// same with this one
app.factory('setEditableValue',setEditableValue);
setEditableValue.$inject = ['editableValue'];
function setEditableValue(editableValue){
return function(val){
editableValue.editedValue = val;
}
}
// now this is an example of a service service collecting the factorys for an object with all the related behavior we need
app.service('editableService',editableService);
editableService.$inject = ['getEditableValue','setEditableValue'];
function editableService(getEditableValue,setEditableValue){
var self = this;
self.setVal = setEditableValue;
self.getVal = getEditableValue;
}
app.config(appConfig);
appConfig.$inject = ['configureValueProvider'];
function appConfig(configureValueProvider){
configureValueProvider.setValue('i changed '+ configureValueProvider.getValue() +' to this!!!!');
}
app.run(appRun);
appRun.$inject = ['configureValue','editableService'];
function appRun(configureValue,editableService){
console.log('before editing: ',editableService.getVal());
editableService.setVal('changed!!!');
console.log('after editing: ',editableService.getVal());
console.log('we changed this in the config func: ',configureValue.get());
configureValue.reset();
console.log('and now its back to the original value: ',configureValue.get());
}
i know thats a lot for a simple example, but there are a lot of features provided by angular, and many ways to use them, hopefully this helps.
I have a json endpoint that returns a list of objects. The first view is a list with just some basic info but if you select an item I want to show more details. Should I just construct and object in my factory and have another method to get the details? so
getItems() // returns list data
getItem(id)// goes through the object already retrieved and returns just the data?
I don't want to hit the server again for each item but I'm not sure of the best way to do this in Angular. It doesn't appear the Model is made for this in Angular.
Also, assuming Item has additional information that I may need to make another server request. What's the best way to store this locally so if I already fetches these details once I don't need to get it again?
If you want to exchange data between 2 controllers, you can use a provider
App.provider('Data', function() {
//Properties declaration
this.info = '';
//Setters
this.setInfo = function(info) {
this.info = info;
};
//Getters
this.getInfo = function() {
return this.info;
};
controller 1
App.controller(
'controller1',
['$scope', 'Data',
function($scope, Data) { Data.setInfo('here you put what you want') }]);
controller which get back information
App.controller(
'controller2',
['$scope', 'Data',
function($scope, Data) { Data.getInfo() }]);
More likely, you'll want to use either a factory or a service:
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/auto/service/$provide#factory
https://docs.angularjs.org/api/auto/service/$provide#service
In both cases, you provide a function which Angular will call once and store the return reference, then provide that reference to any controller or other Angular-managed object that requests it. The difference between a factory and service is that a service function is expected to be a constructor function (it's called using the "new" keyword) whereas a factory is a just invoked as a regular function.
Please bear with me here. I know there are other answers such as:
AngularJS: Service vs provider vs factory
However I still can't figure out when you'd use service over factory.
From what I can tell factory is commonly used to create "common" functions that can be called by multiple Controllers: Creating common controller functions
The Angular docs seem to prefer factory over service. They even refer to "service" when they use factory which is even more confusing! http://docs.angularjs.org/guide/dev_guide.services.creating_services
So when would one use service?
Is there something that is only possible or much easier done with service?
Is there anything different that goes on behind the scenes? Performance/memory differences?
Here's an example. Other than the method of declaration, they seem identical and I can't figure out why I'd do one vs the other. http://jsfiddle.net/uEpkE/
Update: From Thomas' answer it seems to imply that service is for simpler logic and factory for more complex logic with private methods, so I updated the fiddle code below and it seems that both are able to support private functions?
myApp.factory('fooFactory', function() {
var fooVar;
var addHi = function(foo){ fooVar = 'Hi '+foo; }
return {
setFoobar: function(foo){
addHi(foo);
},
getFoobar:function(){
return fooVar;
}
};
});
myApp.service('fooService', function() {
var fooVar;
var addHi = function(foo){ fooVar = 'Hi '+foo;}
this.setFoobar = function(foo){
addHi(foo);
}
this.getFoobar = function(){
return fooVar;
}
});
function MyCtrl($scope, fooService, fooFactory) {
fooFactory.setFoobar("fooFactory");
fooService.setFoobar("fooService");
//foobars = "Hi fooFactory, Hi fooService"
$scope.foobars = [
fooFactory.getFoobar(),
fooService.getFoobar()
];
}
Explanation
You got different things here:
First:
If you use a service you will get the instance of a function ("this"
keyword).
If you use a factory you will get the value that is returned by
invoking the function reference (the return statement in factory).
ref: angular.service vs angular.factory
Second:
Keep in mind all providers in AngularJS (value, constant, services, factories) are singletons!
Third:
Using one or the other (service or factory) is about code style.
But, the common way in AngularJS is to use factory.
Why ?
Because "The factory method is the most common way of getting objects into AngularJS dependency injection system. It is very flexible and can contain sophisticated creation logic. Since factories are regular functions, we can also take advantage of a new lexical scope to simulate "private" variables. This is very useful as we can hide implementation details of a given service."
(ref: http://www.amazon.com/Mastering-Web-Application-Development-AngularJS/dp/1782161821).
Usage
Service : Could be useful for sharing utility functions that are useful to invoke by simply appending () to the injected function reference. Could also be run with injectedArg.call(this) or similar.
Factory : Could be useful for returning a ‘class’ function that can then be new`ed to create instances.
So, use a factory when you have complex logic in your service and you don't want expose this complexity.
In other cases if you want to return an instance of a service just use service.
But you'll see with time that you'll use factory in 80% of cases I think.
For more details: http://blog.manishchhabra.com/2013/09/angularjs-service-vs-factory-with-example/
UPDATE :
Excellent post here :
http://iffycan.blogspot.com.ar/2013/05/angular-service-or-factory.html
"If you want your function to be called like a normal function, use
factory. If you want your function to be instantiated with the new
operator, use service. If you don't know the difference, use factory."
UPDATE :
AngularJS team does his work and give an explanation:
http://docs.angularjs.org/guide/providers
And from this page :
"Factory and Service are the most commonly used recipes. The only difference between them is that Service recipe works better for objects of custom type, while Factory can produce JavaScript primitives and functions."
allernhwkim originally posted an answer on this question linking to his blog, however a moderator deleted it. It's the only post I've found which doesn't just tell you how to do the same thing with service, provider and factory, but also tells you what you can do with a provider that you can't with a factory, and with a factory that you can't with a service.
Directly from his blog:
app.service('CarService', function() {
this.dealer="Bad";
this.numCylinder = 4;
});
app.factory('CarFactory', function() {
return function(numCylinder) {
this.dealer="Bad";
this.numCylinder = numCylinder
};
});
app.provider('CarProvider', function() {
this.dealerName = 'Bad';
this.$get = function() {
return function(numCylinder) {
this.numCylinder = numCylinder;
this.dealer = this.dealerName;
}
};
this.setDealerName = function(str) {
this.dealerName = str;
}
});
This shows how the CarService will always a produce a car with 4 cylinders, you can't change it for individual cars. Whereas CarFactory returns a function so you can do new CarFactory in your controller, passing in a number of cylinders specific to that car. You can't do new CarService because CarService is an object not a function.
The reason factories don't work like this:
app.factory('CarFactory', function(numCylinder) {
this.dealer="Bad";
this.numCylinder = numCylinder
});
And automatically return a function for you to instantiate, is because then you can't do this (add things to the prototype/etc):
app.factory('CarFactory', function() {
function Car(numCylinder) {
this.dealer="Bad";
this.numCylinder = numCylinder
};
Car.prototype.breakCylinder = function() {
this.numCylinder -= 1;
};
return Car;
});
See how it is literally a factory producing a car.
The conclusion from his blog is pretty good:
In conclusion,
---------------------------------------------------
| Provider| Singleton| Instantiable | Configurable|
---------------------------------------------------
| Factory | Yes | Yes | No |
---------------------------------------------------
| Service | Yes | No | No |
---------------------------------------------------
| Provider| Yes | Yes | Yes |
---------------------------------------------------
Use Service when you need just a simple object such as a Hash, for
example {foo;1, bar:2} It’s easy to code, but you cannot instantiate
it.
Use Factory when you need to instantiate an object, i.e new
Customer(), new Comment(), etc.
Use Provider when you need to configure it. i.e. test url, QA url,
production url.
If you find you're just returning an object in factory you should probably use service.
Don't do this:
app.factory('CarFactory', function() {
return {
numCylinder: 4
};
});
Use service instead:
app.service('CarService', function() {
this.numCylinder = 4;
});
The concept for all these providers is much simpler than it initially appears. If you dissect a provider you and pull out the different parts it becomes very clear.
To put it simply each one of these providers is a specialized version of the other, in this order: provider > factory > value / constant / service.
So long the provider does what you can you can use the provider further down the chain which would result in writing less code. If it doesn't accomplish what you want you can go up the chain and you'll just have to write more code.
This image illustrates what I mean, in this image you will see the code for a provider, with the portions highlighted showing you which portions of the provider could be used to create a factory, value, etc instead.
(source: simplygoodcode.com)
For more details and examples from the blog post where I got the image from go to: http://www.simplygoodcode.com/2015/11/the-difference-between-service-provider-and-factory-in-angularjs/
Both the factory and the service result in singleton objects which are able to be configured by providers and injected into controllers and run blocks. From the point of view of the injectee, there is absolutely no difference whether the object came from a factory or a service.
So, when to use a factory, and when to use a service? It boils down to your coding preference, and nothing else. If you like the modular JS pattern then go for the factory. If you like the constructor function ("class") style then go for the service. Note that both styles support private members.
The advantage of the service might be that it's more intuitive from the OOP point of view: create a "class", and, in conjunction with a provider, reuse the same code across modules, and vary the behavior of the instantiated objects simply by supplying different parameters to the constructor in a config block.
There is nothing a Factory cannot do or does better in comparison with a Service. And vice verse. Factory just seems to be more popular. The reason for that is its convenience in handling private/public members. Service would be more clumsy in this regard.
When coding a Service you tend to make your object members public via “this” keyword and may suddenly find out that those public members are not visible to private methods (ie inner functions).
var Service = function(){
//public
this.age = 13;
//private
function getAge(){
return this.age; //private does not see public
}
console.log("age: " + getAge());
};
var s = new Service(); //prints 'age: undefined'
Angular uses the “new” keyword to create a service for you, so the instance Angular passes to the controller will have the same drawback.
Of course you may overcome the problem by using this/that:
var Service = function(){
var that = this;
//public
this.age = 13;
//private
function getAge(){
return that.age;
}
console.log("age: " + getAge());
};
var s = new Service();// prints 'age: 13'
But with a large Service constant this\that-ing would make the code poorly readable.
Moreover, the Service prototypes will not see private members – only public will be available to them:
var Service = function(){
var name = "George";
};
Service.prototype.getName = function(){
return this.name; //will not see a private member
};
var s = new Service();
console.log("name: " + s.getName());//prints 'name: undefined'
Summing it up, using Factory is more convenient. As Factory does not have these drawbacks. I would recommend using it by default.
Even when they say that all services and factories are singleton, I don't agree 100 percent with that. I would say that factories are not singletons and this is the point of my answer. I would really think about the name that defines every component(Service/Factory), I mean:
A factory because is not a singleton, you can create as many as you want when you inject, so it works like a factory of objects. You can create a factory of an entity of your domain and work more comfortably with this objects which could be like an object of your model. When you retrieve several objects you can map them in this objects and it can act kind of another layer between the DDBB and the AngularJs model.You can add methods to the objects so you oriented to objects a little bit more your AngularJs App.
Meanwhile a service is a singleton, so we can only create 1 of a kind, maybe not create but we have only 1 instance when we inject in a controller, so a service provides more like a common service(rest calls,functionality.. ) to the controllers.
Conceptually you can think like services provide a service, factories can create multiple instances(objects) of a class
Services
Syntax: module.service( 'serviceName', function );
Result: When declaring serviceName as an injectable argument you will be provided the actual function reference passed to module.service.
Usage: Could be useful for sharing utility functions that are useful to invoke by simply appending () to the injected function reference. Could also be run with injectedArg.call( this ) or similar.
Factories
Syntax: module.factory( 'factoryName', function );
Result: When declaring factoryName as an injectable argument you will be provided the value that is returned by invoking the function reference passed to module.factory.
Usage: Could be useful for returning a 'class' function that can then be new'ed to create instances.
Providers
Syntax: module.provider( 'providerName', function );
Result: When declaring providerName as an injectable argument you will be provided the value that is returned by invoking the $get method of the function reference passed to module.provider.
Usage: Could be useful for returning a 'class' function that can then be new'ed to create instances but that requires some sort of configuration before being injected. Perhaps useful for classes that are reusable across projects? Still kind of hazy on this one.
Can use both the way you want : whether create object or just to access functions from both
You can create new object from service
app.service('carservice', function() {
this.model = function(){
this.name = Math.random(22222);
this.price = 1000;
this.colour = 'green';
this.manufacturer = 'bmw';
}
});
.controller('carcontroller', function ($scope,carservice) {
$scope = new carservice.model();
})
Note :
service by default returns object and not constructor function .
So that's why constructor function is set to this.model property.
Due to this service will return object,but but but inside that object will be constructor function which will be use to create new object;
You can create new object from factory
app.factory('carfactory', function() {
var model = function(){
this.name = Math.random(22222);
this.price = 1000;
this.colour = 'green';
this.manufacturer = 'bmw';
}
return model;
});
.controller('carcontroller', function ($scope,carfactory) {
$scope = new carfactory();
})
Note :
factory by default returns constructor function and not object .
So that's why new object can be created with constructor function.
Create service for just accessing simple functions
app.service('carservice', function () {
this.createCar = function () {
console.log('createCar');
};
this.deleteCar = function () {
console.log('deleteCar');
};
});
.controller('MyService', function ($scope,carservice) {
carservice.createCar()
})
Create factory for just accessing simple functions
app.factory('carfactory', function () {
var obj = {}
obj.createCar = function () {
console.log('createCar');
};
obj.deleteCar = function () {
console.log('deleteCar');
};
});
.controller('MyService', function ($scope,carfactory) {
carfactory.createCar()
})
Conclusion :
you can use both the way you want whether to create new object or
just to access simple functions
There won't be any performance hit , using one over the other
Both are singleton objects and only one instance is created per app.
Being only one instance every where their reference is passed.
In angular documentation factory is called service and also service is called service.
Factory and Service are the most commonly used method. The only difference between them is that the Service method works better for objects that need inheritance hierarchy, while the Factory can produce JavaScript primitives and functions.
The Provider function is the core method and all the other ones are just syntactic sugar on it. You need it only if you are building a reusable piece of code that needs global configuration.
There are five methods to create services: Value, Factory, Service, Provider and Constant. You can learn more about this here angular service, this article explain all this methods with practical demo examples.
.