OK, so I'm using a typical Binding to my ViewModel. It works beautifully, to source or to target, or so it seems. The vm collection is an ObservableCollection which is initialized and never modified (no setter).
public ObservableCollection<Statement> StatementsList { get; } = new();
#region SelectedStatement
private Statement _selectedStatement;
public Statement SelectedStatement
{
get => _selectedStatement;
set => Set(ref _selectedStatement, value, nameof(SelectedStatement));
}
#endregion SelectedStatement
I can set SelectedStatement from the ViewModel, and the UI updates fine. I can watch the SelectionChanged event of the DataGrid and confirm the added items and removed items are exactly as expected.
Then, I select a different row USING THE MOUSE, and use my search function to select another row using SelectedItem = some statement, which visually selects the row perfectly (again), confirmed by the SelectionChanged event again. SelectedStatement in my view model has the correct value!
Then, the weirdness starts. I press the down arrow the keyboard.
You'd expect the next line after the selected statement to be selected, but instead the next line after the previously selected item (using the mouse) is selected. It's like the keyboard responding code in the DataGrid is not recognizing the prior new row selection via the VM.
Has anyone seen this behavior? I've done WPF development for many years, and I've seen many weird WPF bugs, but this one I've never noticed!
Note that IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem="True" on the DataGrid. I tried setting it to false just as a stab in the dark, but no change in behavior. I also tried changing my SelectedItem property to wrap a call to GetDefaultCollectionView() and getting/changing the selected item via the collection view instead of using a binding to SelectedItem. The behavior is identical.
Selecting an item is essentially setting IsSelected = true.
And setting this property does not affect the Focus transition to the selected element in any way.
And when controlling from the keyboard, the transition occurs from the element with Focus.
You can add the SelectionChanged processing to the Selector (ListBox, DataGrid,...) and in it perform the Focus transition to the selected item (by the index in the SelectedIndex).
An example of such a handler:
private void OnSelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (sender is Selector selector)
{
int index = selector.SelectedIndex;
if (index >=0)
{
var element = selector.ItemContainerGenerator.ContainerFromIndex(index);
if (element is UIElement uiElement)
uiElement.Focus();
}
}
}
I have a List bound to a (Telerik) GridView. The selected item is a separate variable of type T which is assigned the object of the selected row in the GridView when the user clicks on a row. T is derived from ObservableObject. This means I am using MVVM Light Toolkit.
I need to deselect the row from my ViewModel in certain situations. On the GridView control this works, if the selected item is set to NULL in the ViewModel. Whenever I do this, MVVM reports a crash (NPE). I debugged it and saw that it is failing in ObservableObject.cs. It calls a method
protected bool Set<T>(
Expression<Func<T>> propertyExpression,
ref T field,
T newValue)
and crashes one line before return when calling RaisePropertyChanged(propertyExpression)
I don't know if this is working as designed or not. My problem is, that I need to set the selected Object to NULL in the ViewModel to deselect a row of my GridView in the View. I CANNOT use CodeBehind for the deselection!
Code I have:
public ObservableCollection<ContractTypeDto> ContractTypes { get; private set; }
public ContractTypeDto SelectedContractType
{
get { return _selectedContractType; }
set
{
Set(() => SelectedContractType, ref _selectedContractType, value);
RaisePropertyChanged(() => SelectedContractType);
}
}
When you click on a row in the grid it opens a new UserControl containing lots of details of this record. This control has its own ViewModel. I store the calling view Model (where the selected item is stored). When the page (control) is closed (destroyed) I have to deselect the row in the grid. I call a method like so:
protected void DeselectCallersSelectedItem()
{
if (CallingObject == typeof(ContractTypeListViewModel))
{
var vm = SimpleIoc.Default.GetInstance<ContractTypeListViewModel>();
vm.SelectedContractType = null;
}
}
Any ideas?
To remove the collection you can either set the SelectedItem property to null or clear the SelectedItems.
gridViewName.SelectedItem = null;
gridViewName.SelectedItems.Clear();
Without showing the code, we cannot precisely help you. A solution I think you can do is to implement the INotifyPropertyChanged interface in your view model and bind the selected item to a property of that type. Also check the output window if there is any binding failure.
I have the following ObservableCollection that's bound to a DataGrid:
public ObservableCollection<Message> Messages = new ObservableCollection<Message>;
XAML:
<DataGrid ItemsSource="{Binding Path=Messages}">
I sort it on startup, using default view:
ICollectionView view = CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(Messages);
view.SortDescriptions.Add(new SortDescription("TimeSent", ListSortDirection.Descending));
It all works fine, but the problem is that whenever I add a new message to Messages collection, it simply gets appended to the bottom of the list, and not sorted automatically.
Messages.Add(message);
Am I doing something wrong? I'm sure I could work around the problem by refreshing the view each time I add an item, but that just seems like the wrong way of doing it (not to mention performance-wise).
So I did a bit more investigating, and it turns out my problem is due to limitation of WPF datagrid. It will not automatically re-sort the collection when underlying data changes. In other words, when you first add your item, it will be sorted and placed in the correct spot, but if you change a property of the item, it will not get re-sorted. INotifyPropertyChanged has no bearing on sorting updates. It only deals with updating displayed data, but doesn't trigger sorting it. It's the CollectionChanged event that forces re-sorting, but modifying an item that's already in the collection won't trigger this particular event, and hence no sorting will be performed.
Here's another similar issue:
C# WPF Datagrid doesn't dynamically sort on data update
That user's solution was to manually call OnCollectionChanged().
In the end, I combined the answers from these two threads:
ObservableCollection not noticing when Item in it changes (even with INotifyPropertyChanged)
ObservableCollection and Item PropertyChanged
I also added 'smart' sorting, that only Calls OnCollectionChanged() if the property changed is the value that's being currently used in SortDescription.
public class MessageCollection : ObservableCollection<Message>
{
ICollectionView _view;
public MessageCollection()
{
_view = CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(this);
}
public void Sort(string propertyName, ListSortDirection sortDirection)
{
_view.SortDescriptions.Clear();
_view.SortDescriptions.Add(new SortDescription(propertyName, sortDirection));
}
protected override void OnCollectionChanged(NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
switch (e.Action)
{
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add:
this.AddPropertyChanged(e.NewItems);
break;
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Remove:
this.RemovePropertyChanged(e.OldItems);
break;
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Replace:
case NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Reset:
this.RemovePropertyChanged(e.OldItems);
this.AddPropertyChanged(e.NewItems);
break;
}
base.OnCollectionChanged(e);
}
private void AddPropertyChanged(IEnumerable items)
{
if (items != null)
{
foreach (var obj in items.OfType<INotifyPropertyChanged>())
{
obj.PropertyChanged += OnItemPropertyChanged;
}
}
}
private void RemovePropertyChanged(IEnumerable items)
{
if (items != null)
{
foreach (var obj in items.OfType<INotifyPropertyChanged>())
{
obj.PropertyChanged -= OnItemPropertyChanged;
}
}
}
private void OnItemPropertyChanged(object sender, PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
bool sortedPropertyChanged = false;
foreach (SortDescription sortDescription in _view.SortDescriptions)
{
if (sortDescription.PropertyName == e.PropertyName)
sortedPropertyChanged = true;
}
if (sortedPropertyChanged)
{
NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs arg = new NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs(
NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Replace, sender, sender, this.Items.IndexOf((Message)sender));
OnCollectionChanged(arg);
}
}
My whole answer below is gibberish. As pointed out in the comments, if you bind to the collection itself, then you are implicitly binding to the default collection view. (However, as a comment at the link notes, Silverlight is an exception -- there no default collection view is created implicitly, unless the collection implements ICollectionViewFactory.)
The CollectionViewSource doesn't modify the underlying collection. To get the sorting, you'll need to bind to the view itself, eg:
<DataGrid ItemsSource="{Binding Path=CollectionViewSource.View}">
Note that, while the original collection (Messages) is untouched, your sorted view will get updated via the notification event:
If the source collection implements the INotifyCollectionChanged interface, the changes raised by the CollectionChanged event are propagated to the views.
I just found the problem, after trying to sort on another property and noticing that it happens to work. Turns out when my messages were being added to the collection the TimeSent property was being initialized to MinDate, and only then updated to actual date. So it was properly being placed at the bottom of the list. The issue is that the position wasn't getting updated when the TimeSent property was modified. Looks like I have an issue with propagation of INotifyPropertyChanged events (TimeSent resides in another object inside Message object).
I have a ListBox in my view, bound to a collection that is dynamically growing. I would like the scroll position to follow the last added item (which is appended to the bottom of the list). How can I achieve this with Caliburn.Micro?
An alternative could be to use the event aggregator to publish a message to the view.
Something like:
Aggregator.Publish(ItemAddedMessage<SomeItemType>(itemThatWasJustAdded));
and in the view:
public class SomeView : IHandle<ItemAddedMessage<SomeItemType>>
{
public void Handle(ItemAddedMessage<SomeItemType> message)
{
// Implement view specific behaviour here
}
}
It depends on what your requirements are but at least then the view is responsible for display concerns and you can still test the VM
Also you could just implement the code solely in the view - since it appears to be a view concern (e.g. using the events that listbox provides)
A behaviour would also be useful but maybe one that's a little less coupled to your types - e.g. a generic behaviour SeekAddedItemBehaviour which hooks listbox events to find the last item. Not sure if the listbox exposes the required events, but worth a look
EDIT:
Ok this may work full stop - you should be able to just attach this behaviour to the listbox and it should take care of the rest:
public class ListBoxSeekLastItemBehaviour : System.Windows.Interactivity.Behavior<ListBox>
{
private static readonly DependencyProperty ItemsSourceWatcherProperty = DependencyProperty.Register("ItemsSourceWatcher", typeof(object), typeof(ListBoxSeekLastItemBehaviour), new PropertyMetadata(null, OnItemsSourceWatcherPropertyChanged));
private ListBox _listBox = null;
private static void OnItemsSourceWatcherPropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
ListBoxSeekLastItemBehaviour source = d as ListBoxSeekLastItemBehaviour;
if (source != null)
source.OnItemsSourceWatcherPropertyChanged();
}
private void OnItemsSourceWatcherPropertyChanged()
{
// The itemssource has changed, check if it raises collection changed notifications
if (_listBox.ItemsSource is INotifyCollectionChanged)
{
// if it does, hook the CollectionChanged event so we can respond to items being added
(_listBox.ItemsSource as INotifyCollectionChanged).CollectionChanged += new NotifyCollectionChangedEventHandler(ListBoxSeekLastItemBehaviour_CollectionChanged);
}
}
void ListBoxSeekLastItemBehaviour_CollectionChanged(object sender, NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.Action == NotifyCollectionChangedAction.Add && e.NewItems.Count > 0)
{
// If an item was added seek it
ScrollIntoView(e.NewItems[0]);
}
}
protected override void OnAttached()
{
base.OnAttached();
// We've been attached - get the associated listbox
var box = this.AssociatedObject as ListBox;
if (box != null)
{
// Hold a ref
_listBox = box;
// Set a binding to watch for property changes
System.Windows.Data.Binding binding = new System.Windows.Data.Binding("ItemsSource") { Source = _listBox; }
// EDIT: Potential bugfix - you probably want to check the itemssource here just
// in case the behaviour is applied after the original ItemsSource binding has been evaluated - otherwise you might miss the change
OnItemsSourceWatcherPropertyChanged();
}
}
private void ScrollIntoView(object target)
{
// Set selected item and try and scroll it into view
_listBox.SelectedItem = target;
_listBox.ScrollIntoView(target);
}
}
You probably want to tidy it up a bit and also make sure that the event handler for CollectionChanged is removed when the ItemsSource changes.
Also you might want to call it SeekLastAddedItemBehaviour or SeekLastAddedItemBehavior - I tend to keep the US spelling since it matches Microsoft's spelling. I think SeekLastItem sounds like it will scroll to the last item in the list rather than the last added item
You could reference the view in the view model using GetView(). That also couples the view and view model.
var myView = GetView() as MyView;
myView.MyListBox.DoStuff
Another option is to create a behavior. This is an example of how to use a behavior to expand a TreeView from the view model. The same could be applied to a ListBox.
Actually, there is an easier way to achieve this, without any of the above.
Just extend your Listbox with the following:
namespace Extensions.Examples {
public class ScrollingListBox : ListBox
{
protected override void OnItemsChanged(System.Collections.Specialized.NotifyCollectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.NewItems != null)
{
int newItemCount = e.NewItems.Count;
if (newItemCount > 0)
this.ScrollIntoView(e.NewItems[newItemCount - 1]);
base.OnItemsChanged(e);
}
}
}
}
Then in Xaml, Declare the Location of your extension class as so:
xmlns:Extensions="clr-namespace:Extensions.Examples"
And when you create your listbox, instead of using
<Listbox></Listbox>
Just use your extended class
<Extensions:ScrollingListBox></Extensions:ScrollingListBox>
How do I cancel a user selection in a databound WPF ListBox? The source property is set correctly, but the ListBox selection is out of sync.
I have an MVVM app that needs to cancel a user selection in a WPF ListBox if certain validation conditions fail. Validation is triggered by a selection in the ListBox, rather than by a Submit button.
The ListBox.SelectedItem property is bound to a ViewModel.CurrentDocument property. If validation fails, the setter for the view model property exits without changing the property. So, the property to which ListBox.SelectedItem is bound doesn't get changed.
If that happens, the view model property setter does raise the PropertyChanged event before it exits, which I had assumed would be enough to reset the ListBox back to the old selection. But that's not working--the ListBox still shows the new user selection. I need to override that selection and get it back in sync with the source property.
Just in case that's not clear, here is an example: The ListBox has two items, Document1 and Document2; Document1 is selected. The user selects Document2, but Document1 fails to validate. The ViewModel.CurrentDocument property is still set to Document1, but the ListBox shows that Document2 is selected. I need to get the ListBox selection back to Document1.
Here is my ListBox Binding:
<ListBox
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=SearchResults, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
SelectedItem="{Binding Path=CurrentDocument, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" />
I did try using a callback from the ViewModel (as an event) to the View (which subscribes to the event), to force the SelectedItem property back to the old selection. I pass the old Document with the event, and it is the correct one (the old selection), but the ListBox selection doesn't change back.
So, how do I get the ListBox selection back in sync with the view model property to which its SelectedItem property is bound? Thanks for your help.
For future stumblers on this question, this page is what ultimately worked for me:
http://blog.alner.net/archive/2010/04/25/cancelling-selection-change-in-a-bound-wpf-combo-box.aspx
It's for a combobox, but works for a listbox just fine, since in MVVM you don't really care what type of control is calling the setter. The glorious secret, as the author mentions, is to actually change the underlying value and then change it back. It was also important to run this “undo” on a separate dispatcher operation.
private Person _CurrentPersonCancellable;
public Person CurrentPersonCancellable
{
get
{
Debug.WriteLine("Getting CurrentPersonCancellable.");
return _CurrentPersonCancellable;
}
set
{
// Store the current value so that we can
// change it back if needed.
var origValue = _CurrentPersonCancellable;
// If the value hasn't changed, don't do anything.
if (value == _CurrentPersonCancellable)
return;
// Note that we actually change the value for now.
// This is necessary because WPF seems to query the
// value after the change. The combo box
// likes to know that the value did change.
_CurrentPersonCancellable = value;
if (
MessageBox.Show(
"Allow change of selected item?",
"Continue",
MessageBoxButton.YesNo
) != MessageBoxResult.Yes
)
{
Debug.WriteLine("Selection Cancelled.");
// change the value back, but do so after the
// UI has finished it's current context operation.
Application.Current.Dispatcher.BeginInvoke(
new Action(() =>
{
Debug.WriteLine(
"Dispatcher BeginInvoke " +
"Setting CurrentPersonCancellable."
);
// Do this against the underlying value so
// that we don't invoke the cancellation question again.
_CurrentPersonCancellable = origValue;
OnPropertyChanged("CurrentPersonCancellable");
}),
DispatcherPriority.ContextIdle,
null
);
// Exit early.
return;
}
// Normal path. Selection applied.
// Raise PropertyChanged on the field.
Debug.WriteLine("Selection applied.");
OnPropertyChanged("CurrentPersonCancellable");
}
}
Note: The author uses ContextIdle for the DispatcherPriority for the action to undo the change. While fine, this is a lower priority than Render, which means that the change will show in the UI as the selected item momentarily changing and changing back. Using a dispatcher priority of Normal or even Send (the highest priority) preempts the display of the change. This is what I ended up doing. See here for details about the DispatcherPriority enumeration.
In .NET 4.5 they added the Delay field to the Binding. If you set the delay it will automatically wait to update so there is no need for the Dispatcher in the ViewModel. This works for validation of all Selector elements like the ListBox's and ComboBox's SelectedItem properties. The Delay is in milliseconds.
<ListBox
ItemsSource="{Binding Path=SearchResults, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}"
SelectedItem="{Binding Path=CurrentDocument, Mode=TwoWay, Delay=10}" />
-snip-
Well forget what I wrote above.
I just did an experiment, and indeed SelectedItem goes out of sync whenever you do anything more fancy in the setter. I guess you need to wait for the setter to return, and then change the property back in your ViewModel asynchronously.
Quick and dirty working solution (tested in my simple project) using MVVM Light helpers:
In your setter, to revert to previous value of CurrentDocument
var dp = DispatcherHelper.UIDispatcher;
if (dp != null)
dp.BeginInvoke(
(new Action(() => {
currentDocument = previousDocument;
RaisePropertyChanged("CurrentDocument");
})), DispatcherPriority.ContextIdle);
it basically queues the property change on the UI thread, ContextIdle priority will ensure it will wait for UI to be in consistent state. it Appears you cannot freely change dependency properties while inside event handlers in WPF.
Unfortunately it creates coupling between your view model and your view and it's an ugly hack.
To make DispatcherHelper.UIDispatcher work you need to do DispatcherHelper.Initialize() first.
Got it! I am going to accept majocha's answer, because his comment underneath his answer led me to the solution.
Here is wnat I did: I created a SelectionChanged event handler for the ListBox in code-behind. Yes, it's ugly, but it works. The code-behind also contains a module-level variable, m_OldSelectedIndex, which is initialized to -1. The SelectionChanged handler calls the ViewModel's Validate() method and gets a boolean back indicating whether the Document is valid. If the Document is valid, the handler sets m_OldSelectedIndex to the current ListBox.SelectedIndex and exits. If the document is invalid, the handler resets ListBox.SelectedIndex to m_OldSelectedIndex. Here is the code for the event handler:
private void OnSearchResultsBoxSelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
var viewModel = (MainViewModel) this.DataContext;
if (viewModel.Validate() == null)
{
m_OldSelectedIndex = SearchResultsBox.SelectedIndex;
}
else
{
SearchResultsBox.SelectedIndex = m_OldSelectedIndex;
}
}
Note that there is a trick to this solution: You have to use the SelectedIndex property; it doesn't work with the SelectedItem property.
Thanks for your help majocha, and hopefully this will help somebody else down the road. Like me, six months from now, when I have forgotten this solution...
If you are serious about following MVVM and don't want any code behind, and also don't like the use of the Dispatcher, which frankly is not elegant either, the following solution works for me and is by far more elegant than most of the solutions provided here.
It is based on the notion that in code behind you are able to stop the selection using the SelectionChanged event. Well now, if this is the case, why not create a behavior for it, and associate a command with the SelectionChanged event. In the viewmodel you can then easily remember the previous selected index and the current selected index. The trick is to have binding to your viewmodel on SelectedIndex and just let that one change whenever the selection changes. But immediately after the selection really has changed, the SelectionChanged event fires which now is notified via the command to your viewmodel. Because you remember the previously selected index, you can validate it and if not correct, you move the selected index back to the original value.
The code for the behavior is as follows:
public class ListBoxSelectionChangedBehavior : Behavior<ListBox>
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty CommandProperty
= DependencyProperty.Register("Command",
typeof(ICommand),
typeof(ListBoxSelectionChangedBehavior),
new PropertyMetadata());
public static DependencyProperty CommandParameterProperty
= DependencyProperty.Register("CommandParameter",
typeof(object),
typeof(ListBoxSelectionChangedBehavior),
new PropertyMetadata(null));
public ICommand Command
{
get { return (ICommand)GetValue(CommandProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandProperty, value); }
}
public object CommandParameter
{
get { return GetValue(CommandParameterProperty); }
set { SetValue(CommandParameterProperty, value); }
}
protected override void OnAttached()
{
AssociatedObject.SelectionChanged += ListBoxOnSelectionChanged;
}
protected override void OnDetaching()
{
AssociatedObject.SelectionChanged -= ListBoxOnSelectionChanged;
}
private void ListBoxOnSelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
Command.Execute(CommandParameter);
}
}
Using it in XAML:
<ListBox x:Name="ListBox"
Margin="2,0,2,2"
ItemsSource="{Binding Taken}"
ItemContainerStyle="{StaticResource ContainerStyle}"
ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled"
HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch"
SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedTaskIndex, Mode=TwoWay}">
<i:Interaction.Behaviors>
<b:ListBoxSelectionChangedBehavior Command="{Binding SelectionChangedCommand}"/>
</i:Interaction.Behaviors>
</ListBox>
The code that is appropriate in the viewmodel is as follows:
public int SelectedTaskIndex
{
get { return _SelectedTaskIndex; }
set { SetProperty(ref _SelectedTaskIndex, value); }
}
private void SelectionChanged()
{
if (_OldSelectedTaskIndex >= 0 && _SelectedTaskIndex != _OldSelectedTaskIndex)
{
if (Taken[_OldSelectedTaskIndex].IsDirty)
{
SelectedTaskIndex = _OldSelectedTaskIndex;
}
}
else
{
_OldSelectedTaskIndex = _SelectedTaskIndex;
}
}
public RelayCommand SelectionChangedCommand { get; private set; }
In the constructor of the viewmodel:
SelectionChangedCommand = new RelayCommand(SelectionChanged);
RelayCommand is part of MVVM light. Google it if you don't know it.
You need to refer to
xmlns:i="http://schemas.microsoft.com/expression/2010/interactivity"
and hence you need to reference System.Windows.Interactivity.
I came up against this recently, and came up with a solution that works well with my MVVM, without the need for and code behind.
I created a SelectedIndex property in my model and bound the listbox SelectedIndex to it.
On the View CurrentChanging event, I do my validation, if it fails, I simply use the code
e.cancel = true;
//UserView is my ICollectionView that's bound to the listbox, that is currently changing
SelectedIndex = UserView.CurrentPosition;
//Use whatever similar notification method you use
NotifyPropertyChanged("SelectedIndex");
It seems to work perfectly ATM. There may be edge cases where it doesnt, but for now, it does exactly what I want.
I had a very similar problem, the difference being that I am using ListView bound to an ICollectionView and was using IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem rather than binding the SelectedItem property of the ListView. This worked well for me until I wanted to cancel the CurrentItemChanged event of the underlying ICollectionView, which left the ListView.SelectedItem out of sync with the ICollectionView.CurrentItem.
The underlying problem here is keeping the view in sync with the view model. Obviously cancelling a selection change request in the view model is trivial. So we really just need a more responsive view as far as I'm concerned. I'd rather avoid putting kludges into my ViewModel to work around limitations of the ListView synchronization. On the other hand I'm more than happy to add some view-specific logic to my view code-behind.
So my solution was to wire my own synchronization for the ListView selection in the code-behind. Perfectly MVVM as far as I'm concerned and more robust than the default for ListView with IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem.
Here is my code behind ... this allows changing the current item from the ViewModel as well. If the user clicks the list view and changes the selection, it will immediately change, then change back if something down-stream cancels the change (this is my desired behavior). Note I have IsSynchronizedWithCurrentItem set to false on the ListView. Also note that I am using async/await here which plays nicely, but requires a little double-checking that when the await returns, we are still in the same data context.
void DataContextChangedHandler(object sender, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
vm = DataContext as ViewModel;
if (vm != null)
vm.Items.CurrentChanged += Items_CurrentChanged;
}
private async void myListView_SelectionChanged(object sender, SelectionChangedEventArgs e)
{
var vm = DataContext as ViewModel; //for closure before await
if (vm != null)
{
if (myListView.SelectedIndex != vm.Items.CurrentPosition)
{
var changed = await vm.TrySetCurrentItemAsync(myListView.SelectedIndex);
if (!changed && vm == DataContext)
{
myListView.SelectedIndex = vm.Items.CurrentPosition; //reset index
}
}
}
}
void Items_CurrentChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var vm = DataContext as ViewModel;
if (vm != null)
myListView.SelectedIndex = vm.Items.CurrentPosition;
}
Then in my ViewModel class I have ICollectionView named Items and this method (a simplified version is presented).
public async Task<bool> TrySetCurrentItemAsync(int newIndex)
{
DataModels.BatchItem newCurrentItem = null;
if (newIndex >= 0 && newIndex < Items.Count)
{
newCurrentItem = Items.GetItemAt(newIndex) as DataModels.BatchItem;
}
var closingItem = Items.CurrentItem as DataModels.BatchItem;
if (closingItem != null)
{
if (newCurrentItem != null && closingItem == newCurrentItem)
return true; //no-op change complete
var closed = await closingItem.TryCloseAsync();
if (!closed)
return false; //user said don't change
}
Items.MoveCurrentTo(newCurrentItem);
return true;
}
The implementation of TryCloseAsync could use some kind of dialog service to elicit a close confirmation from the user.
Bind ListBox's property: IsEnabled="{Binding Path=Valid, Mode=OneWay}" where Valid is the view-model property with the validation algoritm. Other solutions look too far-fetched in my eyes.
When the disabled appearance is not allowed, a style could help out, but probably the disabled style is ok because changing the selection is not allowed.
Maybe in .NET version 4.5 INotifyDataErrorInfo helps, I dont'know.