I have an issue in my React.js app with the target id not being passed if a onClick event is attached on a div element.
This is how I add the component:
<MenuOption title="Users" onOptionClick={this.onOptionClick}/>
This is the jsx-part of my MenuOption component:
<div id={title} className="row menu-option" onClick={onOptionClick}>
<p>{title}</p>
</div>
As you can see I'm simply assigning the prop title as the id and the onClick event.
Back in the parent component, implementation of the onClick method:
onSidebarOptionClick(e) {
console.log(e.target.id);
}
This does not seem to work since it always logs undefined.
However, if I add the id and the onClick event to my p element instead...
<div className="row menu-option">
<p id={title} onClick={onOptionClick}>{title}</p>
</div>
...it works just as expected, the correct id logs at every click.
So why is not the id passed if the click event is attached to a div?
I`m using ES6 and babel.
I should clarify that I'm using "dumb" components, declaring them like this:
const MenuOption = ({title, onOptionClick})
...which is why don't need to use {this.props.title} when using it.
Not sure as your Question missing constructor but try one of the following--
Method 1 (JSX):
<MenuOption title="Users" onOptionClick={this.onOptionClick.bind(this)}/>
Method 2 (es6):
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.onOptionClick = this.onOptionClick.bind(this);
}
Method 3(es-next):
onSidebarOptionClick = (e) => {
console.log(e.target.id);
}
As you're passing onOptionClick as a prop to <MenuOption/>, it should be declared as this.porops.onOptionClick.
<MenuOption/> should look like this
<div id={title} className="row menu-option" onClick={thi.props.onOptionClick}>
<p>{title}</p>
</div>
Hope this helps!
Related
I am trying to display a div pop up on click of a span. Even though the code inside the function is executing, the div is not at all visible in the DOM.
Am not sure where I am going wrong.
<span id="test" onClick={()=>this.bindPopUpData("test")}>
Here I am calling the function to bind popup.
bindPopUpData=(dimension) =>{
return (
<div id="">
<div className="details_table">
<div className="close_popup">
<span className="icon-Close"></span>
</div>
</div>
</div>
);
}
-- Here I am trying to bind that popup
Can someone please tell where I am going wrong?
The issue is that your event handler is just returning a value, you're not telling the browser to put it anywhere.
Option 1: build the popup into the DOM with display:none and use your event handler to show/hide it.
Option 2: make your event handler inject the popup into the DOM with document.createElement and document.appendChild functionalities.
With React I'd recommend option 1 because you can make the popup a component and only render it if the parent component detects the event.
class myComponent extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props)
this.state = {
showpopup: false
}
this.myHandler = this.myHandler.bind(this)
}
myHandler () {
this.setState({showpopup: !showpopup})
}
render () {
return (
<section>
<span onClick={this.myHandler}></span>
{this.state.showpopup ? <Popup /> : ''}
</section>
)}
}
Let's say I have a Card that contains a login Form
<Card>
<LoginForm/>
</Card>
How do I access the nodes from the Form within the Card render function?
<Form >
<input type="text" name="email"/>
<input type="password" name="password"/>
<input type="submit"/>
</Form>
Because what i´d like to do is to render the submitbutton not within the props.children context but render it wrapped outside of the given child!
render () {
return (
<div className="card">
<div className="inner">
{/* render Children */}
{this.props.children != undefined ?
<div className="childrenWrapper">
{this.props.children}
</div>
: ""
}
</div>
{/* render submit from login form here, not above */
</div>)
There are some components which actually do what I want. For example the Tabs component from react-toolbox. They somehow manage to render what's within the Tab (children) somewhere else
Just for instance
<Tabs index={this.state.inverseIndex} onChange={this.handleInverseTabChange} inverse>
<Tab label='First'><small>First Content</small></Tab>
<Tab label='Second'><small>Second Content</small></Tab>
<Tab label='Third'><small>Third Content</small></Tab>
<Tab label='Disabled' disabled><small>Disabled Content</small></Tab>
</Tabs>
Which will lead to the following html
As you can see the children from the tab where rendered within their own section
I do not want to change anything on the Form to solve this problem, I would like to pass the Form into the Card and let the Card decide how the Form will be rendered within the card render function.
Since I'm trying to implement the Google Material Design Card component and just use it as a template there are more elements coming which will need to be split up and placed at the positions I want them to be. The thing is I could actually place the relevant HTML around the Form to get it as the Card I want it to be, but then I wouldn't need the component at all.
There are some decent answers here, but none of them directly answer your question. Therefore, even though you should refactor your code (as elucidated below), I am going to provide you a working solution:
class Card extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.state = {};
}
render() {
console.log(typeof this.props.children)
return (
<div>
{typeof this.props.children === 'object'
? React.cloneElement(this.props.children, { ref: (n) => this.form = n })
: null}
<button onClick={(e) => console.log(this.form.data)}>submit</button>
</div>
);
}
}
class Form extends React.Component {
constructor() {
super();
this.onChange = this.onChange.bind(this);
this.state = {};
}
onChange(e) {
this.data = e.target.value;
}
render() {
return (
<form>
<input type="text" onChange={this.onChange} />
</form>
);
}
}
ReactDOM.render(
<Card><Form /></Card>,
document.getElementById('container')
);
https://jsbin.com/fohehogozo/edit?js,console,output
By setting a property on the instance, you can then access that property from children by using a ref. I checked for typeof === object here, because there was only one child.
WARNING: this code is NOT PRODUCTION READY. Do not ever run this in production. The code I have demonstrated is a terrible hack, and you should never try this at home.
If you are trying to submit a form, maybe look at passing down an onChange event and storing the value (based on the name of the field) in the state of the Card. Then attach the onChange event on the inputs so as soon as they're updated, the data will be passed back up to the container for you to submit.
If you would like to split up the childrens passed, you can simply filter the children array to split up the children, however your childrens seem to be nested.
Why dont you let the cards children handle the separation between your inner container and other content?
I think restructuring in this case is more suitable than modifying the passed children property.
Also, pulling the submit button out of the actual form tags, would break your form as it would no longer submit without some custom connection between the button and the actual form.
Don't try to manipulate the DOM; it's generally an anti-pattern in React (though there are a few valid use cases). In your case, rather than literally trying to move the elements, I'd simply hide the button in the form and add it to the parent.
Assuming you have access to the internals of <LoginForm>, you can add a prop to hide the button:
const button =
<div class="flatbuttonWrapper">
<input type="submit"/>
</div>;
<Form>
<input type="text" name="email"/>
<input type="password" name="password"/>
{!this.props.hideButton && button}
</Form>
Add the button to the Card component:
render() {
return (
<div className="card">
<div className="inner">
{this.props.children != undefined ?
<div className="childrenWrapper">
{this.props.children}
</div>
: ""
}
</div>
<div class="flatbuttonWrapper">
<input type="submit"/>
</div>
</div>
);
}
Finally, in your parent:
<Card>
<LoginForm hideButton />
</Card>
All that said, it really feels like you need to structure your code better and break some of these components up into smaller, more reusable pieces. For example, the Card component probably shouldn't be affecting the button's style or conditionally rendering children; it should just add a frame around any children. Then you can create a more complex component that composes these simpler sub-components to to whatever you need.
I want to load my array element when an event is occurred by referencing the key i tried different variables for the key but it would not accept all the elements of the array are being displayed if i give index as the key.
I am new to Reactjs and not very familiar with all the syntax and concept can somebody help me with the logic to solve this.
The event I am triggering is onClick or onChange.
`var Qstn =['A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H','I','J'];
<div>
{Qstn.map(function(Q,index){
return <span className="col-md-4 txt" key={index}>{Q}</span>
})}
</div>`
Ok I made a codepen with an example
http://codepen.io/lucaskatayama/pen/QGGwKR
It's using ES6 classes components, but it's easy to translate.
You need to set initial state to an empty array like [].
On click button, it call onClick() method which uses this.setState({}) to change component state.
When React notice state changes, it re-render the component.
class Hello extends React.Component {
constructor(){
super();
//Initial State
this.state = {
Qstn : []
}
}
onClick(){
//Called on click button
// Set state to whatever you want
this.setState({Qstn : ['A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H','I','J']})
}
render(){
let Qstn = this.state.Qstn; // load state and render
return (
<div>
<button onClick={() => this.onClick()}>Click</button>
<div>
{Qstn.map(function(Q,index){
return <span className="col-md-4 txt" key={index}>{Q}</span>
})}
</div>
</div>
)
}
}
ReactDOM.render(<Hello />, document.getElementById('container'))
I'm trying to set the inner HTML of an alert div, but receiving the error message : Can only set one of 'children' or props.dangerouslySetInnerHTML'.
Why does this happen ?
function alertContent(alert) { return {__html: alert.text} }
const Alerts = ({ alerts=[{level: 'warning', text:'<p>Warning message!</p>'}], onDismiss }) => (
<div className="alerts">
{alerts.map(alert =>
<Alert
bsStyle={alert.level}
key={alert.id}
onDismiss={onDismiss}
dangerouslySetInnerHTML={alertContent(alert)}
></Alert>
)}
</div>
)
I had this error message in a react application.
My issue was I had code as below
<p dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{ __html:stringContainingHtml}}> </p>
My issue was the space in the <p> </p> tags - since html gets injected inside these tags the space was causing an issue as it wasn't empty.
Hope this might help some people.
This happens because dangerouslySetInnerHTML can only be applied to one element. In your case, <Alert/> is a complex element made up of multiple children. That being said, the BS Alert component does accept HTML:
<Alert bsStyle="warning">
<strong>Holy guacamole!</strong> Best check yo self, you're not looking too good.
</Alert>
or
<Alert bsStyle="warning">
<span dangerouslySetInnerHTML={alertContent(alert)} />
</Alert>
Solution, You have to make a separate component to render element in which you are using dangerously set.....
For Example:
const RenderHTML = (props) => (<span dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html:props.HTML}}></span>)
YourData.map((d,i) => {
return <RenderHTML HTML={d.YOUR_HTML} />
})
you have to close the html tag short hand if there aren't inner HTML
<Alert dang...={} />
instead <Alert></Alert>
I have solved this issue myself.
When you are recursively rendering a component, you must separate out the part of the component where dangerouslySetInnerHTML is being used into another component and then use that component in the one you are recursively rendering.
I have a popover inside OverlayTrigger.
I define it as
const myOverlayTrigger = <ReactBootstrap.OverlayTrigger
placement='bottom' overlay={<ReactBootstrap.Tooltip>...</ReactBootstrap.Tooltip>}>
{myContent}
</ReactBootstrap.OverlayTrigger>;
Then I render it inside one of my elements like that:
<li>{myOverlayTrigger}</li>
I want to render OverlayTrigger itself inside <li> but it renders inside body, as defined in documentation. I'm trying to use container attribute to render it inside parent <li>.
First, I tried to assign ID to <li> and pass this ID as a string to container=... (which isn't a best way).
Second, I tried to create additional element <span></span> and render it inside along with {myOverlayTrigger}. Also I pass it (assigned to variable) to container attribute
const c = <span></span>;
... container={c} ...
<li>{c} {myOverlayTrigger}</li>
Both approaches consistently gives an error not a dom element or react component.
Obviously assigning <li>...</li> itself as a container doesn't work either as it being defined after myOverlayTrigger is defined.
Question: how to use it right?
ReactBootstrap.Overlay is recommended for the reason listed in the document.
The OverlayTrigger component is great for most use cases, but as a
higher level abstraction it can lack the flexibility needed to build
more nuanced or custom behaviors into your Overlay components. For
these cases it can be helpful to forgo the trigger and use the Overlay
component directly.
For your case, the code below renders the ReactBootstrap.Overlay component into a list item with React ref attribute.
getInitialState() {
return (
show: false
);
},
render() {
return (
<ul>
<li ref="dest" onClick={ () => {
this.setState( { show: !this.state.show } );
}}>my contents</li>
<ReactBootstrap.Overlay placement="bottom"
show={ this.state.show } container={ this.refs.dest }>
<ReactBootstrap.Tooltip>tooltip</ReactBootstrap.Tooltip>
</ReactBootstrap.Overlay>
</ul>
);
}
When the tooltip is displayed by clicking, the resulting HTML would be
<ul data-reactid=".0.1.0.0.0.0.0.1.1.1.1:$3.1.1">
<li data-reactid=".0.1.0.0.0.0.0.1.1.1.1:$3.1.1.0">
contents
<div>
<div role="tooltip" class="fade in tooltip right" data-reactid=".3">
<div class="tooltip-arrow" data-reactid=".3.0"></div>
<div class="tooltip-inner" data-reactid=".3.1">My tooltip</div>
</div>
</div>
</li>
<span data-reactid=".0.1.0.0.0.0.0.1.1.1.1:$3.1.1.1">,</span>
<noscript data-reactid=".0.1.0.0.0.0.0.1.1.1.1:$3.1.1.2"></noscript>
</ul>