I'm writing an application that use Hibernate to query the database (SQL Server).
Now I'm querying a link table for all Items.
The query looks like:
"FROM UserRole ur join ur.platformUser join ur.role join ur.company"
I need all the UserRoles objects in a list but when I query the above query I got a arrao of objects with UserRole, Role, Company and PlatformUser objects in it.
I only need the UserRole objects with the other objects in the UserRole object.
How can I solve this in Hiernate that I can cast the result to for ex. Arraylist<UserRole>?
I tried following syntax:
Query query = session.createSQLQuery("select * FROM UserRole ur join PlatformUser pu ON pu.userId = ur.userId join [Role] r ON r.roleId = ur.roleId join [Company] c ON c.companyId = ur.companyId").addEntity(UserRole.class);
With this line I got a List of UserRoles but all the underlying objects are NULL.
It could be that you've mapped the fields in the UserRole as lazy loaded? (Or haven't specified, I believe lazy loading is the default)
Try writing something along the lines of
Object obj = userRoles.get(0).getName(); //Or any of the previously null valued fields you have in there
Make sure you're writing this still within session, preferably right after the query.list(); itself
That should lazy load the value, and if that was indeed the case, look into initializing hibernate objects.
edit:
If you're looking for a more proper way of doing this, there's actually a hibernate method that requests to initialize a proxy object, I'm unsure why it's better than just getting the thing you want to initialize from code, but it sure is prettier.
Hibernate.initialize(Object initializeMe)
But as far as I know, it's a shallow method, meaning it won't load entities inside of this one. To achieve that you'll need to either do it by hand, or make a generic method that'll load everything, think reflection & recursive.
Related
I have inherited a very old DB and I'm just starting out with .NET Core 3 (preview) to see if I can create a proof-of-concept WebApi that uses EF Core to query the DB.
So my problem is that in this DB, much of the data is untrimmed (so has lots of white space around values). There's a mix of varchar(n) and char(n) fields. And no, I'm not in a position to re-engineer this.
So my challenge is that the WebApi will receive a query which will contain a List<People>, and I need to return all relevant data about those people.
If I were doing this in SQL I guess I would do something like:
SELECT *
FROM Table1
INNER JOIN Table2
ON RTRIM(LTRIM(Table1.[P1])) = RTRIM(LTRIM(Table2.[P9]))
I need to be able to do something similar using Entity Framework where I would join the DB table with the .NET List<People>. However, I'm a) not sure how best to go about this with the necessary trims and b) the number of rows in this DB is very large and so it has to be a set-based operation performed on the SQL Server - I can't bring everything back to the DB and join in-memory.
[EDIT (24th June)]
To add some examples of what I've tried, and to re-focus the question onto the approach I should be employing:
1 - I attempted this using a JOIN
var y = from a in query
join b in request.Items
on new { a.Prop1, a.Prop2 } equals new { b.Prop1, b.Prop2 }
select new { a.Prop1, a.Prop2, a.Prop3 };
return await y.ToListAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
The compile error returned is:
The type of one of the expressions in the join clause is incorrect.
Type inference failed in the call to 'Join'.
Not sure why, but I suspect that this is because I'm trying to join strings to DB char fields.
Also tried:
var y = from a in query
from b in request.Items
where a.Prop1 == b.Prop1 && a.Prop2 == b.Prop2
select new {a.Prop1, a.Prop2, a.Prop3};
return await y.ToListAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
This compiles, but gives run-time error:
System.InvalidOperationException: 'collection selector was not
NavigationExpansionExpression'
So, yes, I do need to be able to ensure that I'm trimming the data when doing the "join", but I think the main problem is that this needs to be a server-side operation (because of the size of the data sets) but I'd doing a join with a DB table against an in-memory List on the Client.
Not sure what the best approach is here (with EF Core 3).
I am hitting a road block with preloading and associations
type Entity struct {
ID uint `gorm:"primary_key"`
Username string
Repositories []*Repository `gorm:"many2many:entity_repositories"`
}
type Repository struct {
ID uint `gorm:"primary_key"`
Name string
Entities []*Entity `gorm:"many2many:entity_repositories"`
}
With small users numbers the preloading is fine using the below
db.Preload("Repositories").Find(&list)
Also tried
db.Model(&User{}).Related(&Repository{}, "Repositories").Find(&list)
The preload seems to a select * entities and then a inner join using a SELECT * FROM "repositories" INNER JOIN "entity_repositories" ON "entity_repositories"."repository_id" = "repositories"."id" WHERE ("entity_repositories"."entity_id" IN ('1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9','10'))
As the number of user's increases this is no longer maintainable as it hits a sqlite limit (dev). I've tried numerous permutations! .. Realistically i guess i just want it to do something like
SELECT entities.*, repositories.*
FROM entities
JOIN entity_repositories ON entity_repositories.entity_id = entities.id
JOIN repositories ON repositories.id = entity_repositories.repository_id
ORDER BY entities.id
And fill in the model for me ..
Am I doing something obviously wrong or?
Unfortunately that's just the way GORM handles preloading.
go-pg has slightly better queries, but doesn't have the same functionality as GORM. It still will do multiple queries in some cases.
I would honestly recommend just using query building with raw SQL, especially if you know what your models will look like at compile time. I ended up going with this approach in my project, despite the fact that I didn't know that my models were going to look like.
Can try the Joins(), which can perform JOIN syntax in SQL
I have some images stored in the default cluster in my OrientDB database. I stored them by implementing the code given by the documentation in the case of the use of multiple ORecordByte (for large content): http://orientdb.com/docs/2.1/Binary-Data.html
So, I have two types of object in my default cluster. Binary datas and ODocument whose field 'data' lists to the different record of binary datas.
Some of the ODocument records' RID are used in some other classes. But, the other records are orphanized and I would like to be able to retrieve them.
My idea was to use
select from cluster:default where #rid not in (select myField from MyClass)
But the problem is that I retrieve the other binary datas and I just want the record with the field 'data'.
In addition, I prefer to have a prettier request because I don't think the "not in" clause is really something that should be encouraged. Is there something like a JOIN which return records that are not joined to anything?
Can you help me please?
To resolve my problem, I did like that. However, I don't know if it is the right way (the more optimized one) to do it:
I used the following SQL request:
SELECT rid FROM (FIND REFERENCES (SELECT FROM CLUSTER:default)) WHERE referredBy = []
In Java, I execute it with the use of the couple OCommandSQL/OCommandRequest and I retrieve an OrientDynaElementIterable. I just iterate on this last one to retrieve an OrientVertex, contained in another OrientVertex, from where I retrieve the RID of the orpan.
Now, here is some code if it can help someone, assuming that you have an OrientGraphNoTx or an OrientGraph for the 'graph' variable :)
String cmd = "SELECT rid FROM (FIND REFERENCES (SELECT FROM CLUSTER:default)) WHERE referredBy = []";
List<String> orphanedRid = new ArrayList<String>();
OCommandRequest request = graph.command(new OCommandSQL(cmd));
OrientDynaElementIterable objects = request.execute();
Iterator<Object> iterator = objects.iterator();
while (iterator.hasNext()) {
OrientVertex obj = (OrientVertex) iterator.next();
OrientVertex orphan = obj.getProperty("rid");
orphanedRid.add(orphan.getIdentity().toString());
}
from f in CUSTOMERS
where depts.Contains(f.DEPT_ID)
select f.NAME
depts is a list (IEnumerable<int>) of department ids
This query works fine until you pass a large list (say around 3000 dept ids) .. then I get this error:
The incoming tabular data stream (TDS) remote procedure call (RPC) protocol stream is incorrect. Too many parameters were provided in this RPC request. The maximum is 2100.
I changed my query to:
var dept_ids = string.Join(" ", depts.ToStringArray());
from f in CUSTOMERS
where dept_ids.IndexOf(Convert.ToString(f.DEPT_id)) != -1
select f.NAME
using IndexOf() fixed the error but made the query slow. Is there any other way to solve this? thanks so much.
My solution (Guids is a list of ids you would like to filter by):
List<MyTestEntity> result = new List<MyTestEntity>();
for(int i = 0; i < Math.Ceiling((double)Guids.Count / 2000); i++)
{
var nextGuids = Guids.Skip(i * 2000).Take(2000);
result.AddRange(db.Tests.Where(x => nextGuids.Contains(x.Id)));
}
this.DataContext = result;
Why not write the query in sql and attach your entity?
It's been awhile since I worked in Linq, but here goes:
IQuery q = Session.CreateQuery(#"
select *
from customerTable f
where f.DEPT_id in (" + string.Join(",", depts.ToStringArray()) + ")");
q.AttachEntity(CUSTOMER);
Of course, you will need to protect against injection, but that shouldn't be too hard.
You will want to check out the LINQKit project since within there somewhere is a technique for batching up such statements to solve this issue. I believe the idea is to use the PredicateBuilder to break the local collection into smaller chuncks but I haven't reviewed the solution in detail because I've instead been looking for a more natural way to handle this.
Unfortunately it appears from Microsoft's response to my suggestion to fix this behavior that there are no plans set to have this addressed for .NET Framework 4.0 or even subsequent service packs.
https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/ViewFeedback.aspx?FeedbackID=475984
UPDATE:
I've opened up some discussion regarding whether this was going to be fixed for LINQ to SQL or the ADO.NET Entity Framework on the MSDN forums. Please see these posts for more information regarding these topics and to see the temporary workaround that I've come up with using XML and a SQL UDF.
I had similar problem, and I got two ways to fix it.
Intersect method
join on IDs
To get values that are NOT in list, I used Except method OR left join.
Update
EntityFramework 6.2 runs the following query successfully:
var employeeIDs = Enumerable.Range(3, 5000);
var orders =
from order in Orders
where employeeIDs.Contains((int)order.EmployeeID)
select order;
Your post was from a while ago, but perhaps someone will benefit from this. Entity Framework does a lot of query caching, every time you send in a different parameter count, that gets added to the cache. Using a "Contains" call will cause SQL to generate a clause like "WHERE x IN (#p1, #p2.... #pn)", and bloat the EF cache.
Recently I looked for a new way to handle this, and I found that you can create an entire table of data as a parameter. Here's how to do it:
First, you'll need to create a custom table type, so run this in SQL Server (in my case I called the custom type "TableId"):
CREATE TYPE [dbo].[TableId] AS TABLE(
Id[int] PRIMARY KEY
)
Then, in C#, you can create a DataTable and load it into a structured parameter that matches the type. You can add as many data rows as you want:
DataTable dt = new DataTable();
dt.Columns.Add("id", typeof(int));
This is an arbitrary list of IDs to search on. You can make the list as large as you want:
dt.Rows.Add(24262);
dt.Rows.Add(24267);
dt.Rows.Add(24264);
Create an SqlParameter using the custom table type and your data table:
SqlParameter tableParameter = new SqlParameter("#id", SqlDbType.Structured);
tableParameter.TypeName = "dbo.TableId";
tableParameter.Value = dt;
Then you can call a bit of SQL from your context that joins your existing table to the values from your table parameter. This will give you all records that match your ID list:
var items = context.Dailies.FromSqlRaw<Dailies>("SELECT * FROM dbo.Dailies d INNER JOIN #id id ON d.Daily_ID = id.id", tableParameter).AsNoTracking().ToList();
You could always partition your list of depts into smaller sets before you pass them as parameters to the IN statement generated by Linq. See here:
Divide a large IEnumerable into smaller IEnumerable of a fix amount of item
I have a basic "property bag" table that stores attributes about my primary table "Card." So when I want to start doing some advanced searching for cards, I can do something like this:
SELECT dbo.Card.Id, dbo.Card.Name
FROM dbo.Card
INNER JOIN dbo.CardProperty ON dbo.CardProperty.IdCrd = dbo.Card.Id
WHERE dbo.CardProperty.IdPrp = 3 AND dbo.CardProperty.Value = 'Fiend'
INTERSECT
SELECT dbo.Card.Id, dbo.Card.Name
FROM dbo.Card
INNER JOIN dbo.CardProperty ON dbo.CardProperty.IdCrd = dbo.Card.Id
WHERE (dbo.CardProperty.IdPrp = 10 AND (dbo.CardProperty.Value = 'Wind' OR dbo.CardProperty.Value = 'Fire'))
What I need to do is to extract this idea into some kind of stored procedure, so that ideally I can pass in a list of property/value combinations and get the results of the search.
Initially this is going to be a "strict" search meaning that the results must match all elements in the query, but I'd also like to have a "loose" query so that it would match any of the results in the query.
I can't quite seem to wrap my head around this one. My previous version of this was to do generate some massive SQL query to execute with a lot of AND/OR clauses in it, but I'm hoping to do something a little more elegant this time. How do I go about doing this?
it seems to me that you have an EAV model here.
if you're using sql server 2005 and up i'd suggest you use XML datatype for this:
http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/mladenp/archive/2006/10/14/14032.aspx
makes searching and stuff much easier with built in xml querying capabilities.
if you can't change your model then look at this:
http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/davidm/articles/12117.aspx