I have an API that uses IdentityServer4 for token validation.
I want to unit test this API with an in-memory TestServer. I'd like to host the IdentityServer in the in-memory TestServer.
I have managed to create a token from the IdentityServer.
This is how far I've come, but I get an error "Unable to obtain configuration from http://localhost:54100/.well-known/openid-configuration"
The Api uses [Authorize]-attribute with different policies. This is what I want to test.
Can this be done, and what am I doing wrong?
I have tried to look at the source code for IdentityServer4, but have not come across a similar integration test scenario.
protected IntegrationTestBase()
{
var startupAssembly = typeof(Startup).GetTypeInfo().Assembly;
_contentRoot = SolutionPathUtility.GetProjectPath(#"<my project path>", startupAssembly);
Configure(_contentRoot);
var orderApiServerBuilder = new WebHostBuilder()
.UseContentRoot(_contentRoot)
.ConfigureServices(InitializeServices)
.UseStartup<Startup>();
orderApiServerBuilder.Configure(ConfigureApp);
OrderApiTestServer = new TestServer(orderApiServerBuilder);
HttpClient = OrderApiTestServer.CreateClient();
}
private void InitializeServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
var cert = new X509Certificate2(Path.Combine(_contentRoot, "idsvr3test.pfx"), "idsrv3test");
services.AddIdentityServer(options =>
{
options.IssuerUri = "http://localhost:54100";
})
.AddInMemoryClients(Clients.Get())
.AddInMemoryScopes(Scopes.Get())
.AddInMemoryUsers(Users.Get())
.SetSigningCredential(cert);
services.AddAuthorization(options =>
{
options.AddPolicy(OrderApiConstants.StoreIdPolicyName, policy => policy.Requirements.Add(new StoreIdRequirement("storeId")));
});
services.AddSingleton<IPersistedGrantStore, InMemoryPersistedGrantStore>();
services.AddSingleton(_orderManagerMock.Object);
services.AddMvc();
}
private void ConfigureApp(IApplicationBuilder app)
{
app.UseIdentityServer();
JwtSecurityTokenHandler.DefaultInboundClaimTypeMap.Clear();
var options = new IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions
{
Authority = _appsettings.IdentityServerAddress,
RequireHttpsMetadata = false,
ScopeName = _appsettings.IdentityServerScopeName,
AutomaticAuthenticate = false
};
app.UseIdentityServerAuthentication(options);
app.UseMvc();
}
And in my unit-test:
private HttpMessageHandler _handler;
const string TokenEndpoint = "http://localhost/connect/token";
public Test()
{
_handler = OrderApiTestServer.CreateHandler();
}
[Fact]
public async Task LeTest()
{
var accessToken = await GetToken();
HttpClient.SetBearerToken(accessToken);
var httpResponseMessage = await HttpClient.GetAsync("stores/11/orders/asdf"); // Fails on this line
}
private async Task<string> GetToken()
{
var client = new TokenClient(TokenEndpoint, "client", "secret", innerHttpMessageHandler: _handler);
var response = await client.RequestClientCredentialsAsync("TheMOON.OrderApi");
return response.AccessToken;
}
You were on the right track with the code posted in your initial question.
The IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions object has properties to override the default HttpMessageHandlers it uses for back channel communication.
Once you combine this with the CreateHandler() method on your TestServer object you get:
//build identity server here
var idBuilder = new WebBuilderHost();
idBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();
//...
TestServer identityTestServer = new TestServer(idBuilder);
var identityServerClient = identityTestServer.CreateClient();
var token = //use identityServerClient to get Token from IdentityServer
//build Api TestServer
var options = new IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions()
{
Authority = "http://localhost:5001",
// IMPORTANT PART HERE
JwtBackChannelHandler = identityTestServer.CreateHandler(),
IntrospectionDiscoveryHandler = identityTestServer.CreateHandler(),
IntrospectionBackChannelHandler = identityTestServer.CreateHandler()
};
var apiBuilder = new WebHostBuilder();
apiBuilder.ConfigureServices(c => c.AddSingleton(options));
//build api server here
var apiClient = new TestServer(apiBuilder).CreateClient();
apiClient.SetBearerToken(token);
//proceed with auth testing
This allows the AccessTokenValidation middleware in your Api project to communicate directly with your In-Memory IdentityServer without the need to jump through hoops.
As a side note, for an Api project, I find it useful to add IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions to the services collection in Startup.cs using TryAddSingleton instead of creating it inline:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.TryAddSingleton(new IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions
{
Authority = Configuration.IdentityServerAuthority(),
ScopeName = "api1",
ScopeSecret = "secret",
//...,
});
}
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app)
{
var options = app.ApplicationServices.GetService<IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions>()
app.UseIdentityServerAuthentication(options);
//...
}
This allows you to register the IdentityServerAuthenticationOptions object in your tests without having to alter the code in the Api project.
I understand there is a need for a more complete answer than what #james-fera posted. I have learned from his answer and made a github project consisting of a test project and API project. The code should be self-explanatory and not hard to understand.
https://github.com/emedbo/identityserver-test-template
The IdentityServerSetup.cs class https://github.com/emedbo/identityserver-test-template/blob/master/tests/API.Tests/Config/IdentityServerSetup.cs can be abstracted away e.g. NuGetted away, leaving the base class IntegrationTestBase.cs
The essences is that can make the test IdentityServer work just like a normal IdentityServer, with users, clients, scopes, passwords etc. I have made the DELETE method [Authorize(Role="admin)] to prove this.
Instead of posting code here, I recommend read #james-fera's post to get the basics then pull my project and run tests.
IdentityServer is such a great tool, and with the ability to use the TestServer framework it gets even better.
I think you probably need to make a test double fake for your authorization middleware depending on how much functionality you want. So basically you want a middleware that does everything that the Authorization middleware does minus the back channel call to the discovery doc.
IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation is a wrapper around two middlewares. The JwtBearerAuthentication middleware, and the OAuth2IntrospectionAuthentication middleware. Both of these grab the discovery document over http to use for token validation. Which is a problem if you want to do an in-memory self-contained test.
If you want to go through the trouble you will probably need to make a fake version of app.UseIdentityServerAuthentication that doesnt do the external call that fetches the discovery document. It only populates the HttpContext principal so that your [Authorize] policies can be tested.
Check out how the meat of IdentityServer4.AccessTokenValidation looks here. And follow up with a look at how JwtBearer Middleware looks here
We stepped away from trying to host a mock IdentityServer and used dummy/mock authorizers as suggested by others here.
Here's how we did that in case it's useful:
Created a function which takes a type, creates a test Authentication Middleware and adds it to the DI engine using ConfigureTestServices (so that it's called after the call to Startup.)
internal HttpClient GetImpersonatedClient<T>() where T : AuthenticationHandler<AuthenticationSchemeOptions>
{
var _apiFactory = new WebApplicationFactory<Startup>();
var client = _apiFactory
.WithWebHostBuilder(builder =>
{
builder.ConfigureTestServices(services =>
{
services.AddAuthentication("Test")
.AddScheme<AuthenticationSchemeOptions, T>("Test", options => { });
});
})
.CreateClient(new WebApplicationFactoryClientOptions
{
AllowAutoRedirect = false,
});
client.DefaultRequestHeaders.Authorization = new AuthenticationHeaderValue("Test");
return client;
}
Then we create what we called 'Impersonators' (AuthenticationHandlers) with the desired roles to mimic users with roles (We actually used this as a base class, and create derived classes based on this to mock different users):
public abstract class FreeUserImpersonator : AuthenticationHandler<AuthenticationSchemeOptions>
{
public Impersonator(
IOptionsMonitor<AuthenticationSchemeOptions> options,
ILoggerFactory logger, UrlEncoder encoder, ISystemClock clock)
: base(options, logger, encoder, clock)
{
base.claims.Add(new Claim(ClaimTypes.Role, "FreeUser"));
}
protected List<Claim> claims = new List<Claim>();
protected override Task<AuthenticateResult> HandleAuthenticateAsync()
{
var identity = new ClaimsIdentity(claims, "Test");
var principal = new ClaimsPrincipal(identity);
var ticket = new AuthenticationTicket(principal, "Test");
var result = AuthenticateResult.Success(ticket);
return Task.FromResult(result);
}
}
Finally, we can perform our integration tests as follows:
// Arrange
HttpClient client = GetImpersonatedClient<FreeUserImpersonator>();
// Act
var response = await client.GetAsync("api/things");
// Assert
Assert.That.IsSuccessful(response);
Test API startup:
public class Startup
{
public static HttpMessageHandler BackChannelHandler { get; set; }
public void Configuration(IAppBuilder app)
{
//accept access tokens from identityserver and require a scope of 'Test'
app.UseIdentityServerBearerTokenAuthentication(new IdentityServerBearerTokenAuthenticationOptions
{
Authority = "https://localhost",
BackchannelHttpHandler = BackChannelHandler,
...
});
...
}
}
Assigning the AuthServer.Handler to TestApi BackChannelHandler in my unit test project:
protected TestServer AuthServer { get; set; }
protected TestServer MockApiServer { get; set; }
protected TestServer TestApiServer { get; set; }
[OneTimeSetUp]
public void Setup()
{
...
AuthServer = TestServer.Create<AuthenticationServer.Startup>();
TestApi.Startup.BackChannelHandler = AuthServer.CreateHandler();
TestApiServer = TestServer.Create<TestApi.Startup>();
}
The trick is to create a handler using the TestServer that is configured to use IdentityServer4. Samples can be found here.
I created a nuget-package available to install and test using the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Testing library and the latest version of IdentityServer4 for this purpose.
It encapsulates all the infrastructure code necessary to build an appropriate WebHostBuilder which is then used to create a TestServer by generating the HttpMessageHandler for the HttpClient used internally.
None of the other answers worked for me because they rely on 1) a static field to hold your HttpHandler and 2) the Startup class to have knowledge that it may be given a test handler. I've found the following to work, which I think is a lot cleaner.
First create an object that you can instantiate before your TestHost is created. This is because you won't have the HttpHandler until after the TestHost is created, so you need to use a wrapper.
public class TestHttpMessageHandler : DelegatingHandler
{
private ILogger _logger;
public TestHttpMessageHandler(ILogger logger)
{
_logger = logger;
}
protected override async Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
_logger.Information($"Sending HTTP message using TestHttpMessageHandler. Uri: '{request.RequestUri.ToString()}'");
if (WrappedMessageHandler == null) throw new Exception("You must set WrappedMessageHandler before TestHttpMessageHandler can be used.");
var method = typeof(HttpMessageHandler).GetMethod("SendAsync", BindingFlags.Instance | BindingFlags.NonPublic);
var result = method.Invoke(this.WrappedMessageHandler, new object[] { request, cancellationToken });
return await (Task<HttpResponseMessage>)result;
}
public HttpMessageHandler WrappedMessageHandler { get; set; }
}
Then
var testMessageHandler = new TestHttpMessageHandler(logger);
var webHostBuilder = new WebHostBuilder()
...
services.PostConfigureAll<JwtBearerOptions>(options =>
{
options.Audience = "http://localhost";
options.Authority = "http://localhost";
options.BackchannelHttpHandler = testMessageHandler;
});
...
var server = new TestServer(webHostBuilder);
var innerHttpMessageHandler = server.CreateHandler();
testMessageHandler.WrappedMessageHandler = innerHttpMessageHandler;
Related
I have a Language entity with all supported languages in my db, each language has a culture string attribute. I want to load supported cultures from DB.
In my service initializer I have it:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// ... previous configuration not shown
services.Configure<RequestLocalizationOptions>(
opts =>
{
var supportedCultures = new List<CultureInfo>
{
new CultureInfo("en-GB"),
new CultureInfo("en-US"),
new CultureInfo("en"),
new CultureInfo("fr-FR"),
new CultureInfo("fr"),
};
opts.DefaultRequestCulture = new RequestCulture("en-GB");
// Formatting numbers, dates, etc.
opts.SupportedCultures = supportedCultures;
// UI strings that we have localized.
opts.SupportedUICultures = supportedCultures;
});
}
How I can access my DB context inside it?
There is any other better way to do it?
I don't think there's an out of the box solution for this.
However, you can implement your own middleware that achieves this by using ASP.Net's RequestLocalizationMiddleware:
public class CustomRequestLocalizationMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate next;
private readonly ILoggerFactory loggerFactory;
public CustomRequestLocalizationMiddleware(RequestDelegate next, ILoggerFactory loggerFactory)
{
this.next = next;
this.loggerFactory = loggerFactory;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context /* You can inject services here, such as DbContext or IDbConnection*/)
{
// You can search your database for your supported and/or default languages here
// This query will execute for all requests, so consider using caching
var cultures = await Task.FromResult(new[] { "en" });
var defaultCulture = await Task.FromResult("en");
// You can configure the options here as you would do by calling services.Configure<RequestLocalizationOptions>()
var options = new RequestLocalizationOptions()
.AddSupportedCultures(cultures)
.AddSupportedUICultures(cultures)
.SetDefaultCulture(defaultCulture);
// Finally, we instantiate ASP.Net's default RequestLocalizationMiddleware and call it
var defaultImplementation = new RequestLocalizationMiddleware(next, Options.Create(options), loggerFactory);
await defaultImplementation.Invoke(context);
}
}
Then, we inject the required services and use the custom middleware in Startup.cs or Program.cs as follows:
services.AddLocalization()
/* ... */
app.UseMiddleware<CustomRequestLocalizationMiddleware>()
Do not call app.UseRequestLocalization(), because this would call ASP.Net's RequestLocalizationMiddleware again with the default options, and override the culture that has been resolved previously.
Only authenticated users can access the application as expected. I need to be able to track users via signalr. For example, if I run a ChatHub type of service, I'd like people to be able to chat using their AzureAD username which should be set automatically and not let people set their own usernames.
The hub always shows Context.Identity.User.Name is null.
services.AddAuthentication(AzureADDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddAzureAD(options => Configuration.Bind("AzureAd", options));
services.AddTransient<HubConnectionBuilder>();
app.UseEndpoints(endpoints =>
{
endpoints.MapControllers();
endpoints.MapBlazorHub<App>(selector: "app");
endpoints.MapFallbackToPage("/_Host");
endpoints.MapHub<SomeHub>("/SomeHub");
});
Any idea if here is a way to preserve identity information and pass to SignalR?
Inspect your JWT token and check its claims. You can past it on http://jwt.ms/ to decode it. Then, look for the claims that are being returned that references the user name (in my case it is preferred_username).
Then you can change the default mapping of the Identity.Name using this code:
services.Configure<OpenIdConnectOptions>(AzureADDefaults.AuthenticationScheme, options =>
{
options.TokenValidationParameters.NameClaimType = "<claim_name_that_returns_username>";
});
My workaround at the moment will be to just pass the username when the connection is created to the hub.
In codebehind (SomePage.razor.cs)
public class SomePageBase : ComponentBase
{
[Inject]
private HubConnectionBuilder _hubConnectionBuilder { get; set; }
[Inject]
private AuthenticationStateProvider authProvider { get; set; }
protected async override Task OnInitializedAsync()
{
var user = (await authProvider.GetAuthenticationStateAsync()).User.Identity.Name;
// in Component Initialization code
var connection = _hubConnectionBuilder // the injected one from above.
.WithUrl("https://localhost:44331/SomeHub")
.Build(); // Build the HubConnection
await connection.StartAsync();
var stringResult =
await connection.InvokeAsync<string>("HubMethodName", user);
}
}
We are currently working on a identityserver4 implementation which will also have a few api calls.
Those api calls should only be available if a user is authorized(with the bearer token).
In the Startup.cs we have the services.AddIdentityServer() since this is the identityServer, and also added the AddAuthentication() call to make sure the authorized endpoints are only available for authorized connections.
Startup.cs => ConfigureServices():
services.AddIdentityServer();
services.AddAuthentication("Bearer")
.AddIdentityServerAuthentication(options =>
{
options.Authority = "http://localhost:9000";
options.RequireHttpsMetadata = false;
options.ApiName = "identityserver4";
});
Startup.cs => Configure():
app.UseAuthentication();
app.UseIdentityServer();
//app.UseAuthentication();
using the UseAuthentication() before or after UseIdentityServer() does not change anything.
My api call within the identityserver is still avaialble to all.
Currently using postman to test the calls.
Do i need to add something? Is there something i missed?
Kind regards,
Walter
edit 1: added controller and full startup.cs
UserController.cs:
namespace Identity.Controllers
{
[Authorize]
[Route("[controller]")]
public class UserController : ControllerBase
{
private readonly ILogger _logger;
private readonly IUserBusinessLogic _userBusinessLogic;
public UserController(ILogger<UserController> logger, IUserBusinessLogic userBusinessLogic)
: base()
{
_logger = logger;
_userBusinessLogic = userBusinessLogic;
}
[Route("")]
[HttpGet]
public async Task<ActionResult<IList<UserDto>>> GetAllUsers()
{
var users = await _userBusinessLogic.GetAll();
return users.ToList();
}
}
}
Startup.cs:
namespace Identity
{
public class Startup
{
private readonly IConfiguration _configuration;
private readonly ILogger _logger;
public Startup(IConfiguration configuration, ILogger<Startup> logger)
: base()
{
_configuration = configuration;
_logger = logger;
}
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to add services to the container.
// For more information on how to configure your application, visit https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkID=398940
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
services.AddMvcCore()
.AddJsonFormatters()
.SetCompatibilityVersion(CompatibilityVersion.Version_2_2)
.AddRazorViewEngine();
services.Configure<ApiBehaviorOptions>(options =>
{
options.InvalidModelStateResponseFactory = context => new ValidationProblemDetailsResult();
});
services.AddAuthentication(IdentityServerAuthenticationDefaults.AuthenticationScheme)
.AddIdentityServerAuthentication(options =>
{
options.Authority = "http://localhost:9000";
options.RequireHttpsMetadata = false;
options.ApiName = "identityserver4";
});
services.AddIdentityServer()
.AddDeveloperSigningCredential()
.AddPersistedGrantStore<PersistedGrantStoreBusinessLogic>()
.AddResourceStore<ResourceBusinessLogic>()
.AddClientStore<ClientBusinessLogic>()
.AddProfileService<ProfileBusinessLogic>()
.AddCorsPolicyService<CorsPolicyBusinessLogic>();
services.AddCors(options =>
{
options.AddPolicy("default",
builder => builder.AllowAnyOrigin()
.AllowAnyMethod()
.AllowAnyHeader().Build());
});
}
// This method gets called by the runtime. Use this method to configure the HTTP request pipeline.
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env)
{
app.UseAuthentication();
if (env.IsDevelopment())
{
app.UseDeveloperExceptionPage();
}
else
{
app.UseExceptionHandler("/Home/Error");
}
app.UseCors("default");
app.UseIdentityServer();
app.UseStaticFiles();
app.ConfigureExceptionHandler(_logger);
app.UseMvcWithDefaultRoute();
}
}
}
I just wrote some code for the exact same purpose, and I struggled with the same issues as you do.
According to the Identity Server Doc, do not forget to specify the authentication scheme in [Authorize] attribute.
Startup.cs:
services.AddAuthentication()
.AddIdentityServerAuthentication("Bearer", options =>
{
options.Authority = "http://localhost:9000";
options.RequireHttpsMetadata = false;
options.ApiName = "identityserver4";
});
Note that "Bearer" is given to AddIdentityServerAuthentication and not to AddAuthentication.
Controller.cs:
[Authorize(AuthenticationSchemes = "Bearer")]
public IActionResult YourControllerAction()
{
}
Hope it will works for you!
Found my problem!
in my startup i used services.AddMvcCore() when i should have used services.AddMvc() OR just add the services.AddAuthorization which is not added using services.AddMvcCore().
I came upon this solution after doing some research for something else. In my research i came upon this page: https://offering.solutions/blog/articles/2017/02/07/difference-between-addmvc-addmvcore/
It explains the differences between AddMvc() and AddMvcCore().
So after adding services.AddAuthorization() my problem was solved and the api within my identityserver where protected.
Thank you to all who tried to help me!
this answer may comes late but comes late better than never , using IdentityServer to secure other APIs and do not secure the main token or access provider may seems silly somehow ,so in this case if you want to secure the Api That implement IdentityServer it self you can add the predefined IdentityServer scope IdentityServerApi in the allowed scopes and also for the client scopes , and then you have to configure the services to use the local authentication (provided by identityserver) by adding services.AddLocalApiAuthentication();
and the final part is to add the authorize attribute to the controller or the action method as you wish as follow [Authorize(Policy = LocalApi.PolicyName)]
and in the end you can add claims policy authorization side by side with the local authentication
I am trying to add a middleware to implement throttling in my Web API based on client id. This Web API is protected by Identity Server 4 and the JWT authentication handler.
The problem is that Context.User.Claims is always empty when my middleware runs.
I understand that the Jwt handler only gets called when the request hits the Authorize attribute.
Thus, my question is, how can I "force" the Jwt handler to run sooner in the pipeline so that my middleware gets the call after the token is validated and the client_id claim is available in the context principal?
Thanks for any help you can give me.
The code that setups the Web API is as follows:
public void ConfigureServices(IServiceCollection services)
{
// Validation
SmartGuard.NotNull(() => services, services);
// Log
this.Logger.LogTrace("Application services configuration starting.");
// Configuration
services
.AddOptions()
.Configure<ServiceConfiguration>(this.Configuration.GetSection(nameof(ServiceConfiguration)))
.Configure<TelemetryConfiguration>(this.Configuration.GetSection(nameof(TelemetryConfiguration)))
.Configure<TableStorageServiceConfiguration>(this.Configuration.GetSection(nameof(TableStorageServiceConfiguration)))
.UseConfigurationSecrets();
ServiceConfiguration serviceConfiguration = services.ResolveConfiguration<ServiceConfiguration>();
// Telemetry (Application Insights)
services.AddTelemetryForApplicationInsights();
// Memory cache
services.AddDistributedMemoryCache();
// MVC
services.AddMvc();
// Identity
services
.AddAuthorization(
(options) =>
{
options.AddPolicy(
Constants.Policies.Settings,
(policy) =>
{
policy.RequireClaim(Constants.ClaimTypes.Scope, Scopes.Settings);
});
});
// NOTE:
// We are using the JWT Bearer handler here instead of the IdentityServer handler
// because version 2.3.0 does not handle bearer challenges correctly.
// For more info: https://github.com/IdentityServer/IdentityServer4/issues/2047
// This is supposed to be fixed in version 2.4.0.
services
.AddAuthentication(Constants.AuthenticationSchemes.Bearer)
.AddJwtBearer(
(options) =>
{
options.Authority = serviceConfiguration.IdentityServerBaseUri;
options.Audience = Constants.ApiName;
options.RequireHttpsMetadata = false;
options.IncludeErrorDetails = true;
options.RefreshOnIssuerKeyNotFound = true;
options.SaveToken = true;
options.Events = new JwtBearerEvents()
{
OnChallenge = HandleChallenge
};
});
// Web API Versioning
services.AddApiVersioning(
(options) =>
{
options.DefaultApiVersion = new Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.ApiVersion(ApiVersions.DefaultVersion.Major, ApiVersions.DefaultVersion.Minor);
options.ReportApiVersions = true;
options.AssumeDefaultVersionWhenUnspecified = true;
});
// Setup Throttling
services
.AddThrottling()
.AddClientRateHandler(this.Configuration.GetSection(nameof(ClientRateThrottlingOptions)));
// Routes analyzer
// Creates the /routes route that lists all the routes configured
services.AddRouteAnalyzerInDevelopment(this.CurrentEnvironment);
// Add the managers
services.AddManagers();
// Background services
services.AddBackgroundService<StorageSetupService>();
// Log
this.Logger.LogTrace("Application services configuration completed.");
}
public void Configure(IApplicationBuilder app, IHostingEnvironment env)
{
// Validation
SmartGuard.NotNull(() => app, app);
SmartGuard.NotNull(() => env, env);
// Log
this.Logger.LogTrace("Application configuration starting.");
// Error handling (Telemetry)
app.UseTelemetryExceptionHandler();
// Authentication
app.UseAuthentication();
// Register the throttling middleware
app.UseThrottling();
// MVC
app.UseMvc(
(routes) =>
{
// Routes analyzer
routes.MapRouteAnalyzerInDevelopment(env);
});
// Log
this.Logger.LogTrace("Application configuration completed.");
}
The relevant middleware code is as follows:
internal class ClientRateMiddleware : IClientRateThrottlingMiddleware
{
public async Task InvokeAsync(HttpContext context, RequestDelegate next)
{
(...)
Claim claim = context.User.FindFirst("client_id");
// Claim is always null here because the Jwt handler has not run
(...)
}
}
OK, so I think I have kind of cracked this one. I think #Hugo Quintela Ribeiro is right about the authorization only occurring when the [Authorize] filter is hit, or when a controller that does not [Allow Anonymous] is hit in the case that authorization is set for the whole app. This of course happens at the controllers, and not in the middleware.
It turns out you can actually force authentication to occur in the middleware. I tried a couple of things like the following with no success.
await context.AuthenticateAsync();
await context.AuthenticateAsync("Custom"); //name of my jwt auth
In the end, I had to inject IAuthorizationPolicyProvider and IPolicyEvaluator to get the default policy and authenticate it.
using cpDataORM;
using cpDataServices.Services;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Authorization.Policy;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;
using System.Globalization;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace cpDataASP.Middleware
{
public class LocalizationAndCurrencyMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
public LocalizationAndCurrencyMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
_next = next;
}
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context, IUserService _userService, ILoginContextAccessor loginContext, IAuthorizationPolicyProvider policyProvider, IPolicyEvaluator policyEvaluator)
{
var policy = await policyProvider.GetDefaultPolicyAsync();
await policyEvaluator.AuthenticateAsync(policy, context);
var localizationResources = await _userService.GetLocalizationResources();
loginContext.Timezone = localizationResources.Timezone;
CultureInfo.CurrentCulture = localizationResources.Culture;
await _next.Invoke(context);
}
}
}
I have create a Mobile App service with Azure. I have created a new custom controller as seen below.
[MobileAppController]
public class NewsController : ApiController
{
public ApiServices Services { get; set; }
// GET api/News
public async Task<IEnumerable<NewsItem>> Get()
{//returns some data}
}
Within Azure I have enabled authentication and set the options to Active Directory as seen below.
I'm trying to consume the API within a Xamarin iOS application.
I create a access token via Active Directory as seen below and this works and generates the token correctly.
public static class ServicePrincipal
{
static string authority = "https://login.microsoftonline.com/xxx";
static string clientId = "xxx";
static string clientSecret = "xx";
static string resource = "xx";
public static async Task<AuthenticationResult> GetS2SAccessTokenForProdMSA()
{
return await GetS2SAccessToken();
}
static async Task<AuthenticationResult> GetS2SAccessToken()
{
try
{
AdalInitializer.Initialize();
var clientCredential = new ClientCredential(clientId, clientSecret);
var context = new AuthenticationContext(authority, false);
var authenticationResult = await context.AcquireTokenAsync(
resource,
clientCredential);
return authenticationResult;
}
catch (Exception ex)
{
throw;
}
}
}
However when trying to consume the API i always get an unauthorized exception.
I have tried authenticating by passing the token to the custom API like this. This throws an unauthorized exception
var client = new MobileServiceClient("THE URL");
var authenticationResult = await ServicePrincipal.GetS2SAccessTokenForProdMSA();
var authHeader = new Dictionary<string, string> { { "Bearer", authenticationResult.AccessToken } };
var orderResult = await client.InvokeApiAsync("News", HttpMethod.Get, authHeader);
I also tried the following, which doesn't work either.
CurrentPlatform.Init();
var client = new MobileServiceClient("THE URL");
var authenticationResult = await ServicePrincipal.GetS2SAccessTokenForProdMSA();
JObject payload = new JObject();
payload["access_token"] = authenticationResult.AccessToken;
await client.LoginAsync(MobileServiceAuthenticationProvider.WindowsAzureActiveDirectory, payload);
Can you see any issues here, how do i pass though the authorization token?
I suggest enabling application logging in the Azure portal and then looking to see what the authentication error is.