I have a enum to string converter
public class EnumToStringConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,
CultureInfo culture)
{
MailSettingsStateEnum enumValue = (MailSettingsStateEnum)value;
// extension method on the enum, to return a string based on enum.
return enumValue.Description();
}
// ConvertBack not relevant here.
}
I am using this in wpf xaml easily as follows to set the Content property of a label.
<Label Content="{Binding MailSettingState, Converter={StaticResource
EnumConverterString}}"
BorderBrush="{Binding MailSettingState, Converter={StaticResource
EnumConverterBorderBrush}}" />
Now as you can see, I have another property BorderBrush. I also have to set this based on the same enum. And so I had to write another converter EnumConverterBorderBrush
So is there a way by which I have only one converter, and it return an object which has two properties and i can use these properties in the xaml? I can create the converter, its easy, but I dont know how to use it in xaml. Say the converter returned an object and has tow property called MessageString(of type string), and another BorderBrush of the type Brush, how do I use it the xaml?
You can switch the output based on the targetType you receive in your converter.
So you could do something like this:
public class EnumToStringConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,
CultureInfo culture)
{
var enumValue = (MailSettingsStateEnum)value;
switch(targetType)
{
case typeof(string)
return enumValue.Description();
case typeof(Brush)
return enumValue.GetBrush();
default:
throw new NotSupportedException("Type not supported")
}
}
// ConvertBack not relevant here.
}
Now you'll have one converter to rule them all!
converter should return object which match requested targetType. converter can return different values for input enum value depending on parameter. I think it is more flexible than relying on targetType only.
public class SpecEnumConverter: IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
if (value is Enum)
{
if ((string) parameter == "brush")
return "Red"; // return brush here!
// if not pre-defined parameter (null or any other), return description
return (int) value; // return enum description here!
}
return value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
usage:
<Label Content="{Binding MailSettingState, Converter={StaticResource
EnumConverterSpec}}"
BorderBrush="{Binding MailSettingState, Converter={StaticResource
EnumConverterSpec}, ConverterParameter='brush'}" />
I already commented above, but here's the solution.
<Label DataContext="{Binding MailSettingState, Converter={converters:EnumConverter}}" Content="{Binding Label}" BorderBrush="{Binding BorderBrush}"/>
public class EnumConverter: MarkupExtension, IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
var enumValue = (MailSettingsStateEnum) value;
return new ConvertedEnum { Label = enumValue.Description(),
BorderBrush = new BorderBrush()};
}
// ConvertBack not relevant here.
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
return this;
}
}
public class ConvertedEnum
{
public string Label {get; set;}
public BorderBrush {get; set;}
}
Separate converters still look prettier to me.
Related
In WPF one has the possibility to use a converter in binding, so that one can bind for instance a Visibility property of a control to a Boolean property in the view model.
For this specific pairing (Visibility and Boolean) WPF does offer an out-of-the-box converter called BooleanToVisibilityConverter.
But let's say I'd like to bind a Boolean property of a control to a Visibility property in the view model. Is there any way to use the standard BooleanToVisibilityConverter and tell the binding to invert it (to use ConvertBack instead on Convert and vice versa)?
Or do I have to write another converter for that case?
So, there is no built-in way of inverting the converter. We can, however, work around that by introducing a "shim" converter like this one:
public class InverterConverter : IValueConverter
{
public IValueConverter Converter { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return Converter.ConvertBack(value, targetType, parameter, culture);
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return Converter.Convert(value, targetType, parameter, culture);
}
}
With the usage as follows:
<ContentControl>
<ContentControl.Content>
<Binding>
<Binding.Converter>
<InverterConverter Converter="{StaticResource YourConverter}" />
</Binding.Converter>
</Binding>
</ContentControl.Content>
</ContentControl>
This, obviously, is some heavy syntax but we can simplify it with this little markup extension:
public class InvertedExtension : MarkupExtension
{
public IValueConverter Converter { get; set; }
public InvertedExtension(IValueConverter converter)
{
Converter = new InverterConverter() { Converter = converter };
}
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
return Converter;
}
}
<ContentControl Content="{Binding Converter={Inverted {StaticResource MyConverter}}}" />
Is there any way to use the standard BooleanToVisibilityConverter and tell the binding to invert it (to use ConvertBack instead on Convert and vice versa)?
No.
Or do I have to write another converter for that case?
Yes.
You could implement a generic converter that accepts "true" and a "false" values of any type:
public class BooleanConverter<T> : IValueConverter
{
public T True { get; set; }
public T False { get; set; }
public virtual object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture) =>
value is bool && ((bool)value) ? True : False;
public virtual object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture) =>
value is T && EqualityComparer<T>.Default.Equals((T)value, True);
}
...and derive from this for each type that you want to handle:
public class BooleanToVisibilityNegationConverter : BooleanConverter<Visibility>
{
public BooleanToVisibilityNegationConverter()
: base()
{
True = Visibility.Hidden;
False = Visibility.Visible;
}
}
I have a property of an enum type. I bind the content of a wpf control to this property. This will display the name of the enum value. So the ToString Method of enum is called.
But I need to display the value, not the string value. Does anyone know how to do this?
This is my C# code:
public enum Animal
{
cat = 0,
dog = 1,
mouse = 2
}
public Animal MyAnimal { get; set; }
void SomeMethod() { MyAnimal = dog; }
This is in my XAML:
<Label Content="{Binding MyAnimal}">
When you bind to a value of one type and want to display it in another format than the default ToString() method provides you should either use a DataTemplate or an IValueConverter. Since XAML is a markup language you cannot really cast the enumeration value to an int in your markup so you should use a converter:
public class EnumConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
animals enumValue = (animals)value;
return System.Convert.ToInt32(enumValue);
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}
<Window.Resources>
<local:EnumConverter x:Key="conv" />
</Window.Resources>
...
<ContentControl Content="{Binding TheEnumProperty, Converter={StaticResource conv}}" />
I have found a solution:
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
if (!(value is Enum)) return value;
return Enum.IsDefined(value.GetType(), value) ? value : System.Convert.ToInt32(value);
}
When you drag the slider, you get a ConvertBack (expected), but why do I then get a "Convert" straight after that? I'd only expect Convert to be called when its first initialized, or if it was raising a property change notification, but it doesn't.
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication10.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
xmlns:l="clr-namespace:WpfApplication10"
Title="MainWindow">
<Slider Value="{Binding Value, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged, Mode=TwoWay, Converter={l:Converter}}"/>
</Window>
public class Converter : MarkupExtension, IValueConverter
{
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
return this;
}
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
return value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
return value;
}
}
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public double Value { get; set; }
public MainWindow()
{
DataContext = this;
InitializeComponent();
}
}
This is likely occurring because you're using .NET 4, which changed the way bindings work a little bit : http://karlshifflett.wordpress.com/2009/05/27/wpf-4-0-data-binding-change-great-feature/
Whereas prior to 4 the binding wouldn't update back (assuming that it didn't need to), the new behavior is to do that by default. Rationale is explained in the linked blog.
Edit: I suppose I should ask if there is a reason you don't want it to convert back, or if it's just curiosity? If you need to prevent converting back, the clearest strategy is probably to keep track of your last converted value to parrot back :
public class Converter : MarkupExtension, IValueConverter
{
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
return this;
}
public object lastValue;
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
return lastValue;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
lastValue = value;
return value;
}
}
There's also the option of setting the binding to OneWayToSource, which would keep it from setting back to the slider value... assuming you don't need to push data back to the slider.
Does XAML allows modification of bound value?
Like Width="{Binding Elementname="lstMine", Path=Width}" -100 ? So that I can have a relative value.
You can use converters for this purpose, and my WPF Converters library includes an ExpressionConverter that allows you to do exactly that:
Width="{Binding Width, ElementName=lstMine, Converter={con:ExpressionConverter {}{0}-100}}"
use Converter for these purpose
You can use a converter, its simple to use, doesn't require any libraries and is easy to customize if you want for example add value or multiply.
I got this one from this post
Converter class:
public class SubtractConverter : MarkupExtension, IValueConverter
{
public double Value { get; set; }
public object Convert(object baseValue, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
double val = System.Convert.ToDouble(baseValue);
// Change here if you want other operations
return val - Value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object baseValue, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
return null;
}
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
return this;
}
}
Usage (remember to add the namespace and the converter to window resources):
Width="{Binding Width, ElementName=lstMine, Converter={converters:SubtractConverter Value=15}}"
I have a property of type boolean presented with checkbox.
I want to change that to two radiobuttons that bind on the same property presenting the value true/false.
How can that be done?
<RadioButton GroupName="Group1"
IsChecked="{Binding PropertyValue}" Content="Yes" />
<RadioButton GroupName="Group1" Content="No"
IsChecked="{Binding PropertyValue,
Converter={StaticResource BoolInverterConverter}}" />
public class BoolInverterConverter : IValueConverter
{
#region IValueConverter Members
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,
System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
if (value is bool)
{
return !(bool)value;
}
return value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,
System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
if (value is bool)
{
return !(bool)value;
}
return value;
}
#endregion
}
The standard binding approach has the unfortunate side effect of firing the binding setter as "unselected" whenever the UI is loaded. So if you've got code to handle the user's clicks in the setter for your bool, it will do some weird stuff like fire the setter to "false" even though you've bound it to a "true" bool.
I got around this with a converter used specifically for radio buttons:
public class BoolRadioConverter : IValueConverter
{
public bool Inverse { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool boolValue = (bool) value;
return this.Inverse ? !boolValue : boolValue;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool boolValue = (bool)value;
if (!boolValue)
{
// We only care when the user clicks a radio button to select it.
return null;
}
return !this.Inverse;
}
}
In your resources:
<converters:BoolRadioConverter x:Key="BoolRadioConverter" />
<converters:BoolRadioConverter x:Key="InverseBoolRadioConverter" Inverse="True" />
In your xaml:
<RadioButton
Content="True option"
GroupName="radioGroup1"
IsChecked="{Binding MyProperty,
Converter={StaticResource BoolRadioConverter}}" />
<RadioButton
Content="False option"
GroupName="radioGroup2"
IsChecked="{Binding MyProperty,
Converter={StaticResource InverseBoolRadioConverter}}" />
You can use a value-converter that reverts the boolean value:
With that converter, bind one Checkbox.IsChecked-property to the boolean value without the converter and one CheckBox.IsChecked-property with the converter. This should do the trick.
Here the code for such a converter. I have copied it from here and added some lines of code. There you will find more information about.
public class BoolToOppositeBoolConverter : IValueConverter {
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) {
if (targetType != typeof(bool)) {
throw new InvalidOperationException("The target must be a boolean");
}
if (null == value) {
return null;
}
return !(bool)value;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter,System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) {
if (targetType != typeof(bool)) {
throw new InvalidOperationException("The target must be a boolean");
}
if (null == value) {
return null;
}
return !(bool)value;
}
}
To use it, declare it in the resource-section.
<local:BoolToOppositeBoolConverter x:Key="BoolToOppositeBoolConverter_ValueConverter"/>
And the use it in the binding as a static resource:
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding YourProperty}" />
<CheckBox IsChecked="{Binding YourProperty,Converter={StaticResource BoolToOppositeBoolConverter_ValueConverter}}" />
Please note, the converter is only a simple example. Implement it neatly if you want to use it in productive code. I have not tested it. Make a comment if its not working.
You can achieve this without a converter if you set the GroupName property of two radio button to the same value (so only one can be checked at the time). Then, set IsChecked of one radio button to "True", and bind IsChecked of another to your Boolean. Switching radio buttons will change the Boolean value, however, changing the Boolean value to False will not check the other radio button.
Thanks,
Vlad
Here is the solution on how to bind radio buttons to any type (enumeration, Boolean, string, integer, etc.) with the sample code:
http://www.codeproject.com/Tips/720497/Binding-Radio-Buttons-to-a-Single-Property
When using MVVMLight and DataContext is set in XAML as:
DataContext="{Binding <Your ViewModel property name>, Source={StaticResource Locator}}"
BoolInverterConverter causes Stack Overflow second time the window gets opened.
The work around is to remove DataContext from XAML and do it in code in window constructor after InitializeComponent():
DataContext = ServiceLocator.Current.GetInstance<Your View Model class>();
After some testing it was not enough - Stack Overflow error could pop up randomly when clicking on radio button. The solution which worked for me - instead of the converter use another property for other radio button in a group:
public bool Is9to1 { get; set; }
public bool Is1to9 { get { return !Is9to1; } set { Is9to1 = !value; } }
in XAML:
<RadioButton GroupName="Is9to1" IsChecked="{Binding Is1to9}"/>
<RadioButton GroupName="Is9to1" IsChecked="{Binding Is9to1}"/>
Simplified version of ragunathan's answer.
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) =>
Convert(value);
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture) =>
Convert(value);
private object Convert(object value) =>
value is bool ? !(bool)value : value;
Little upgrade of RandomEngy's answer if you want your bool nullable (for no default value/Checked Radiobutton)
public class BoolRadioConverter : IValueConverter
{
public bool Inverse { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool? boolValue = (bool?)value;
return this.Inverse ? !boolValue : boolValue;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool? boolValue = (bool?)value;
if (boolValue != null && (bool)!boolValue)
{
// We only care when the user clicks a radio button to select it.
return null;
}
return !this.Inverse;
}
}
and the rest is the same as his answer.
From The answer of Mr-RandomQC everything works fine. But when I click another radio in the same group. Then the opposite radio will show a Red box around the radio button.
I changed the code a little bit from his answer to return Binding.DoNothing instead of return null like this.
public class BoolRadioConverter : IValueConverter
{
public bool Inverse { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool boolValue = (bool)value;
return this.Inverse ? !boolValue : boolValue;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool boolValue = (bool)value;
if (!boolValue)
{
// Return Binding.DoNothing instead of Return null
return Binding.DoNothing;
}
return !this.Inverse;
}
}