As you may know in the version 7 of ImageMagick, HDRi is enabled by default. How can I disable this functionality when I am using Magick.Net in C#.
Please do not answer the command line solution I need to do it in C#.
ImageMagick 7 has HDRI enabled by default but with Magick.NET this will only happen when you use the Q16-HDRI version of Magick.NET. When you use the Q8 or the Q16 version you will not have HDRI enabled.
Related
I am using Eclipse 2020-06 (I have made a fresh install of Eclipse instead of upgrading it from an earlier version of Eclipse) and JDK 8 (1.8.0_261). My OS is Windows 10.
JAVA_HOME is set to C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.8.0_261
When I download "Codename One" plugin from Eclipse Marketplace it shows the version as 6.0 and it says "Installed" at the end of the installation process.
However, when I go to "Help -> Eclipse IDE -> Installation Details" under Eclipse, CodenameOneFeature version is listed as: 1.0.0.201409151325
When I select CodenameOneFeature from this list and hit Update, it says "No updates found". So basically I cannot force it to update to 6.0.
I can confirm that I have the earlier version installed also from the setting of the Codename One projects I create: when I go to Properties -> Java Compiler, the compliance level is set to 1.5 (also 1.5 is used in build.xml file).
BTW, I have also tried installing Eclipse 2019-06 (instead of 2020-06) and/or installing JDK 10 (instead of JDK 8) and/or modifying the eclipse.ini (by adding -vm option) so that it uses the version of JDK I want (instead of setting JAVA_HOME). But no combination of those has solved the problem.
Updated answer:
I found the problem. I broke the update site with a commit a couple of weeks ago. This should be fixed in a couple of hours once server caches refresh.
Original answer:
With Eclipse at this time we only support JDK 8. We're experiencing issues in updating the eclipse plugin to the latest version. Once installed I think you can also use JDK 11 but it doesn't matter since we don't support JDK 11 features.
Once a reasonably new version of the plugin is installed you can press update in Codename One Settings and it will update our libraries to the latest version equivalent to the other IDEs.
I have failed to install Apache Zeppelin (v. 0.7.1) on my Windows 7 desktop.
I would like to proceed without having to install Docker, however.
I tried reinstalling the Java runtime etc. but Zeppelin does not start.
Any suggestions?
(I am aware of version 0.7.3 but don't feel like wasting even more time trying it on Windows 7).
Please share the errors your are getting. Confirm you have made all the settings (environmental or otherwise) as required.
Last week I finished development on a test app and ran it successfully in all simulators.
Today I decided to look at publishing the app and used "Sent Android Build". Build status "Successful".
Then tried running jar from command line and got:
peter#PeteSuse:~> java -jar "/home/peter/NetBeansProjects/mobile-apps/pGame/dist/pGame.jar"
java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: 0
at com.codename1.impl.javase.Executor$1.run(Executor.java:84)
at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:311)
So tried to run from GUI and got:
run:
Exception in thread "AWT-EventQueue-0" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javafx/embed/swing/JFXPanel
at com.codename1.impl.ImplementationFactory.createImplementation(ImplementationFactory.java:69)
at com.codename1.ui.Display.init(Display.java:566)
at com.codename1.impl.javase.Executor$1.run(Executor.java:112)
at java.awt.event.InvocationEvent.dispatch(InvocationEvent.java:311)
Java version:
peter#PeteSuse:~> java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_121"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 3.3.0) (suse-23.1-x86_64)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.121-b13, mixed mode)
I am using Netbeans (new to this) on Suse Linux 42.1 64b.
Have I lost a library somewhere? or something else?
Thanks guys. I fixed the problem by adding jfxrt.jar to the Libraries in NetBeans.
JFXPanel is in the JavaFX library.
See: JavaFX and OpenJDK for info on why JavaFX is not available by default in your OpenJDK distribution.
If your linux distribution makes an open JavaFX package available (like ubuntu does: Why is JavaFX is not included in OpenJDK 8 on Ubuntu Wily (15.10)?), then you can use that.
Otherwise you can build from source (for the adventurous yak shaver).
Or, easiest, is just to an Oracle Java distribution.
I don't know codenameone or have any idea how it works. Possibly whatever it is, you could ask the creators to package their thing as a self-contained application, so that it ships with a compatible Java runtime, which would (potentially) avoid issues such as you are encountering. Not knowing codenameone, I don't know if that would make sense or not.
I also don't know the cause of your original ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException as that looks internal to codenameone or your use of it.
With regards to NetBeans, you might need to set the Java platform to one with JavaFX installed (in case you have multiple Java platforms installed on your machine).
You can run a Codename One application in the simulator by pressing the play button in the IDE. It won't work for you from Command Line and shouldn't since the app shouldn't have a main() method.
You can execute the Codename One simulator from Command Line using:
java -jar JavaSE.jar:dist/MyApp.jar
Notice this assumes your project is the working directory.
I want to compare values from two different files.
In Notepad++ version 5.0.3 we had shortcut button Alt+d but in version 6.6.8 I cannot find any option to compare.
Also let me know which version is most stable.
There is the "Compare" plugin. You can install it via Plugins > Plugin Manager.
Alternatively you can install a specialized file compare software like WinMerge.
Update:
for Notepad++ 7.5 and above use Compare v2.0.0
for Notepad++ 7.7 and above use Compare v2.0.0 for Notepad++ 7.7, if you need to install manually follow the description below, otherwise use "Plugin Admin".
I use Compare plugin 2 for notepad++ 7.5 and newer versions. Notepad++ 7.5 and newer versions does not have plugin manager. You have to download and install plugins manually. And YES it matters if you use 64bit or 32bit (86x).
So Keep in mind, if you use 64 bit version of Notepad++, you should also use 64 bit version of plugin, and the same valid for 32bit.
I wrote a guideline how to install it:
Start your Notepad++ as administrator mode.
Press F1 to find out if your Notepad++ is 64bit or 32bit (86x), hence you need to download the correct plugin version. Download Compare-plugin 2.
Unzip Compare-plugin in temporary folder.
Import plugin from the temporary folder.
The plugin should appear under Plugins menu.
Note:
It is also possible to drag and drop the plugin .dll file
directly in plugin folder.
64bit: %programfiles%\Notepad++\plugins
32bit: %programfiles(x86)%\Notepad++\plugins
Update
Thanks to #TylerH with this update: Notepad++ Now has "Plugin Admin" as a replacement for the old Plugin Manager. But this method (answer) is still valid for adding plugins manually for almost any Notepad++ plugins.
Disclaimer: the link of this guideline refer to my personal web site.
I give the answer because I need to compare 2 files in notepad++ and there is no option available.
So first enable the plugin manager as asked by question here, Then follow this step to compare 2 files which is free in this software.
1.open notepad++, go to
Plugin -> Plugin Manager -> Show Plugin Manager
2.Show the available plugin list, choose Compare and Install
3.Restart Notepad++.
http://www.technicaloverload.com/compare-two-files-using-notepad/
Alternatively, you can install "SourceForge Notepad++ Compare Plugin 1.5.6".
It provides compare functionality between two files and show the differences between two files.
Link to refer : https://sourceforge.net/projects/npp-compare/files/1.5.6/
Update (2022-09-22): use the ComparePlus plug-in, and not the outdated Compare plug-in.
Demo:
Open 2 files side-by-side
Plug-ins -> ComparePlus -> Compare:
Features:
The Compare plug-in is no longer maintained:
Compare plugin will not be supported anymore (at least by me) because I consider it obsolete and because (as Peter Jones said) I am working on another plugin - ComparePlus that is Compare plugin’s successor.
For example, the Compare plug-in doesn't show the compared text clearly with dark mode:
2018 10 25. Update.
Notepad++ 7.5.8 does not have plugin manager by default. You have to download plugins manually.
Keep in mind, if you use 64 bit version of Notepad++, you should also use 64 bit version of plugin. I had a similar issue here.
If you installed Notepad++ with the Plugin Manager then its easy: open notepad++, go to
Plugin -> Plugin Manager -> Show Plugin Manager and then search/install the Plugin „compare“. Restart Notepad++
Tutorial:
https://youtu.be/8ESbIZbXI7I
If you do not have installed the Plugin Manager:
download the plugin manually :
https://github.com/pnedev/compare-plugin/releases/tag/v2.0.0_npp7.7
-Copy the contents of the zip file into Notepad++'s plugins installation folder (%Notepad++_program_folder%\Plugins). use the correct archive version based on your Notepad++ architecture - x86 or x64.
restart Notepad++
If you are looking for the latest release of Compare, here it is:
https://github.com/pnedev/compare-plugin/releases/latest
I just installed (or copied) the Flex SDK 4.1 on my Mac to:
/Developer/SDKs/Flex/4/1/
For now I'll only be using a plain text-editor to use it. No fancy IDE.
However, it only seems to support flashplayers version 10 and 10.1. At least that's what it looks like from the folders:
./frameworks/libs/players/10.0/
./frameworks/libs/players/10.1/
I thought I was being smart and copied the version 9 swc from the SDK 3.4 to:
./frameworks/libs/players/9/
I also copied the flex-config.xml from the SDK 3.4 and renamed it.
When I tried to compile it with the SDK 4.1 by using the -load-config options however, it still complained about certain dependencies that were not found:
// Error: Type not found or no constant at compilation. Matrix3D.
Fout: Type niet gevonden of geen constante bij compilatie. Matrix3D.
/Developer/SDKs/Flex/4/1/frameworks/libs/flash-integration.swc(mx.utils:MatrixUtil)
So, I thought about copying flash-integration.swc also. But then I thought: before I go any further with tweaking the contents of the SDK 4.1 let's ask SO whether what I intend to do is even possible. Is it? Is it possible to target player 9 for instance with SDK 4.1?
Flex 4 and above requires Flash Player 10 or highr. It makes use of some 10 specific features, such as the new text engine. If you want to target 9 you'll have to use Flex 3.5 or lower.