I have a frontend JSP that does this:
<label>{{metadata[key].displayName}}:</label>
this works and displays the value
However, that value is really a "key" to an ApplicationResource defined in the Struts 1 framework. So, ultimately, I want to do something like this
<label><bean:message key="{{metadata[key].displayName}}"/>:</label>,
but this does not work, and the error I get (in logs) is
Missing message for key '{{metadata[key].displayName}}'.
This means, that all configurations were OK, and the only issue is getting that
{{metadata[key].displayName}} properly into the "key" attribute of a struts-bean tag.
How can it be done? The more complete code I have is here:
<div class="row" ng-repeat="(key, val) in item"
ng-if="metadata.hasOwnProperty(key)">
<div>
<%-- <label>{{metadata[key].displayName}}:</label> --%>
<label><bean:message key="<%={{key}}%>"/>:</label>
</div>
</div>
Angular works with the DOM, that already has been loaded by the browser. JSP is executed on the server side before the HTML is sent to the browser. If you can translate a message key at this stage then it will be rendered in resulting HTML where you can use its value to populate Angular model. And then bind its property to the view, which already should have translated value.
On the other hand if you can't map a key to the value on the server side, you still have a choice to get translated value for the key sent as parameter to another action. It's not recommended way to make much xhr requests to the server just for returning the translated value. However if your action will return JSON object, then it could be adopted with angular model.
Related
I hvae an angular view of a pdf preview that utilizes a controller to fill the view in. I am using pdflayer then to convert the html page into a pdf. The problem however is that no matter how I try and do this the scope variable values never make it into the pdf. I am basically trying to figure out a way to capture the angular view as an html string (data already injected) so that I can pass it to pdflayer. I have tried creating a directive and used replace within the directive then collecting the DOM as a string using .HTML().
For example:
I could like this
<div id="name">{{test.name}}</div>
to become this
<div id="name">Bob Smith</div>
It inevitably however turns into this when i use $('#name').html() and then console log it
<div id="name"></div>
or
<div id="name">{{test.name}}</div>
Any help would be appreciated even if the solution is to use a different method to create the pdf. Ultimately, I need to get a angular view into a formated pdf.
Please check if below library would work for you : https://www.npmjs.com/package/angular-save-html-to-pdf
I have a custom directive that loads .GSP template i.e.
In my directive I have
template: '/view/pages/dummy.gsp'
In dummy.gsp,
I have a checkbox like below:
<input type="checkbox" name="orangeFruit"> Orange </input>
Now here instead of using the hardcoded Orange I want to use something like this :
<div ng-repeat="thisfruit in fruits">
<input type="checkbox" name="{{thisfruit}}chkbox">
${message(code:'label.{{thisfruit}}')}
</input>
</div>
Above snippet is of my angular template where I am iterating through list of fruits and putting checkboxes for each one of them.
fruits:["orange","apple","banana"] is the angular JSON object.
where {{thisfruit}} is Javascript object and has the value orange.
Below is how my messages.properties file looks like:
label.orange=Orange
label.apple=Apple
label.banana=Banana
When I run the above message code it always gives me "label.orange" instead of "orange". I have this key in my messages.properties file so it should find it.
when I replace label.{{thisfruit}} with the label.orange it gives the correct value.
Any help is appreciated!
This is not possible at all and is a most common problem people used to get confused on. You are basically trying to fix a server side GSP or Groovy code with client side javascript or angular code.
GSP file gets compiled at server side not at browsers so it does no about any angular code like {{thisfruit}} which will never be compiled at server side.
Similarly when GSP's are compiled into HTML code it will get converted to HTML code which a browser understands how to render it and there your angular code gets executed.
So when it renders at client side there will be no code available like ${message(code:'label.{{thisfruit}}')} you are trying to execute since it has already got compiled at server side before rendering.
So you can not use server side (Grails) message code at client side (angular) code.
Well for that you can use a pretty awesome client side library for angular. http://angular-translate.github.io/
Check it out.
This tutorial demonstrates the use of the directive ngSrc instead of src :
<ul class="phones">
<li ng-repeat="phone in phones" class="thumbnail">
<img ng-src="{{phone.imageUrl}}">
</li>
</ul>
They ask to:
Replace the ng-src directive with a plain old src attribute.
Using tools such as Firebug, or Chrome's Web Inspector, or inspecting the
webserver access logs, confirm that the app is indeed making an
extraneous request to /app/%7B%7Bphone.imageUrl%7D%7D (or
/app/{{phone.imageUrl}}).
I did so and it gave me the correct result:
<li class="thumbnail ng-scope" ng-repeat="phone in phones">
<img src="img/phones/motorola-xoom.0.jpg">
</li>
Is there a reason why?
From Angular docs
The buggy way to write it:
<img src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/{{hash}}"/>
The correct way to write it:
<img ng-src="http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/{{hash}}"/>
Why? this is because on load of page, before angular bootstrapping and creation of controllers, browser will try to load image from http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/{{hash}} and it will fail. Then once angular is started, it understands that that {{hash}} has to be replaced with say logo.png, now src attribute changes to http://www.gravatar.com/avatar/logo.png and image correctly loads. Problem is that there are 2 requests going and first one failing.
TO solve this we should use ng-src which is an angular directive and angular will replace ng-src value into src attribute only after angular bootstrapping and controllers are fully loaded, and at that time {{hash}} would have already been replaced with correct scope value.
<img ng-src="{{phone.imageUrl}}">
This gives you expected result, because phone.imageUrl is evaluated and replaced by its value after angular is loaded.
<img src="{{phone.imageUrl}}">
But with this, the browser tries to load an image named {{phone.imageUrl}}, which results in a failed request.
You can check this in the console of your browser.
The src="{{phone.imageUrl}}" is unnecessary and creates an extra request by the browser. The browser will make at least 2 GET requests attempting to load that image:
before the expression is evaluated {{phone.imageUrl}}
after the expression is evaluated img/phones/motorola-xoom.0.jpg
You should always use ng-src directive when dealing with Angular expressions. <img ng-src="{{phone.imageUrl}}"> gives you the expected result of a single request.
On a side note, the same applies to ng-href so you don't get broken links till the first digest cycle kicks in.
Well actually it makes 100% sense because HTML gets processed sequentially and when this HTML page is being processed line by line, by the time it gets to this image, the line and processing the image, our phone.imageUrl is not yet defined yet.
And in fact, Angular JS has not yet processed this chunk of HTML, and hasn't yet looked for these placeholders and substitute these expressions with the values. So what ends up happening is that the browser gets this line and tries to fetch this image at this URL.
And of course this is a bogus URL, if it still has those mustache and curly braces in it, and therefore it gives you a 404, but once of course Angular takes care of this, it substitutes this URL for the proper one, and then we still see the image, but yet the 404 error message remains in our console.
So, how can we take care of this? Well, we can not take care of this using regular HTML tricks. But, we can take care of it using Angular. We need somehow to tell the browser not to try to fetch this URL but at the same time fetch it only when Angular is ready for interpretation of these placeholders.
Well, one way of doing it is to put an Angular attribute on here instead of the standard HTML one. And the Angular attribute is just ng-src. So if we say that now, go back, you'll see that there's no errors anymore because the image only got fetched once Angular got a hold of this HTML and translated all the expressions into their values.
I have an app that requires HTML to be pieced together from different APIs. Rather than getting into specifics there, let me just say that we have tried getting away from that many times but in the end the best answer always end up being what we currently have. Hopefully that changes someday but for now it's working great.
Currently, the HTML is parsed together as a string server-side using NodeJS and sent across the wire as complete HTML to be rendered. I'm in the process of adopting AngularJS, and while I'm loving it I am stuck on this issue-- how can I use Angular templating to insert invalid HTML at times?
The server will return three JSON fields: leadingHTML, trailingHTML, and copy. The copy field is always valid HTML, but leadingHTML and trailingHTML can sometimes return invalid HTML. When all three are added together, valid HTML results.
Let me illustrate:
leadingHTML='<figure>';
copy = '<img src="img1.jpg"/><img src="im2.jpg"/><figcaption>I love AngularJS</figcaption>';
trailingHTML='</figure>';
As you can see, if you add those together you will get the valid HTML that is required to be displayed. It's pretty easy to make the fields trustworthy HTML in Angular:
for (i in data.results){
data.results[i].copy=$sce.trustAsHtml(data.results[i].copy);
data.results[i].leadingHTML =$sce.trustAsHtml(data.results[i].leadingHTML );
data.results[i].trailingHTML =$sce.trustAsHtml(data.results[i].trailingHTML );
}
And then render the copy in my view:
<div ng-repeat='i in data.result'>
<p ng-bind-html='i.copy'></p>
</div>
But I need a way that does what this looks like it would do, but the leadingHTML and trailingHTML scope variables get render as strings:
<div ng-repeat='i in data.result'>
{{ i.leadingHTML }}
<p ng-bind-html='i.copy'></p>
{{ i.trailingHTML }}
</div>
Is the best answer here to build the template via javascript? Would that even work?
Are you able to pre-process your data so that you do have valid HTML?
var item;
for (i in data.results){
item = data.results[i];
item.content = $sce.trustAsHtml(item.leadingHTML + item.copy + item.trailingHTML);
}
Then you can just bind to the combined content in the view:
<div ng-repeat='i in data.results'>
<div ng-bind-html='i.content'></div>
</div>
Edit:
Yes, this will allow you to embed expressions in your HTML content.
In fact, you will need to be careful that you aren't opening yourself up to security exploits in the trusted HTML content (see the example at the bottom of the page for the $sce service).
Using $sce.trustAsHtml in this way is roughly equivalent to loading a directive's templateUrl from your site, so the security considerations around that are probably the same. See the "How does it work?" and
"Impact on loading templates".
I have been working with routing and I have seen how I can update the ng-view using routing and a view template.. But the problem I have is that I am doing a REST call and depending what I get back from the response I wish to update part of the DOM with a view template but I don't want to involve routing.
Does anyone know how I can do this? Or any examples would be great
Thanks in advance
Another answer. Based on your description in the comment, it sounds like you wish to display part of the DOM conditionally.
When you want to display part of the DOM conditionally, you have the following choices:
Use an ng-show and ng-hide directive.
Based on what returns from the RESTful call, you can set up a model that will identify the DOM that needs to be displayed. An example:
<div ng-show="status">
This text will be shown only when the status is truthy
</div>
<div ng-hide="status">
This text will be shown only when the status is false.
</div>
Inside your controller, you could then set the status to true or false based on your RESTful calls and based on which part of the DOM you wish to display post RESTful call.
You can use ng-switch directive
While the ng-show and ng-hide directives will display the content of your DOM conditionally, that is anybody could simply open the source file and see the contents for both, ng-switch directive will load the contents only based on which case fulfills the swtich. An example:
<div ng-switch on="status">
<div ng-switch-when="true">
This text will be shown only when the status is truthy.
Else this is completely hidden and cannot be seen even
when looking at the source.
</div>
<div ng-switch-when="false">
This text will be shown only when the status is false.
Else this is completely hidden and cannot be seen even
when looking at the source.
</div>
</div>
The first child div is shown when the status is true else it is not shown at all. The advantage over ng-show or ng-hide is that the DOM will not contain the child elements if the case is not fulfilled.
$location.path() can be used here.
So, in your Parent Controller, you can make the REST call. Once you have the data with you, you can then decide which route to take. The route value goes into the path() function.
As an example, let us say that if your REST call returns with cherries, you need to take the /foo path (which, based on your $routeProvider will load the template associated with that route). You can then write the following:
$location.path('/foo');
and it will loads the /foo path - $routeProvider will then take care of loading the template associated with that path.
Reference: $location