I've been gathering information using api calls from my jira. Information gathered is saved in a body file and it has the following content:
No tickets:
{"startAt":0,"maxResults":50,"total":0,"issues":[]}{"startAt":0,"maxResults":50,"total":0,"issues":[]}
One Ticket:
{"expand":"names,schema","startAt":0,"maxResults":50,"total":1,"issues":[{"expand":"operations,versionedRepresentations,editmeta,changelog,renderedFields","id":"456881","self":"https://myjira...com","key":"TICKET-1111","fields":{"summary":"[TICKET] New Test jira","created":"2018-12-17T01:47:09.000-0800"}}]}{"expand":"names,schema","startAt":0,"maxResults":50,"total":1,"issues":[{"expand":"operations,versionedRepresentations,editmeta,changelog,renderedFields","id":"456881","self":"https://myjira...com","key":"TICKET-1111","fields":{"summary":"[TICKET] New Test jira","created":"2018-12-17T01:47:09.000-0800"}}]}
Two Tickets:
{expand:schema,names,startAt:0,maxResults:50,total:2,issues:[{expand:operations,versionedRepresentations,editmeta,changelog,renderedFields,id:456881,self:https://myjira...com,key:TICKET-1111,fields:{summary:[TICKET] New Test jira,created:2018-12-17T01:47:09.000-0800}},{expand:operations,versionedRepresentations,editmeta,changelog,renderedFields,id:320281,self:https://myjira...com,key:TICKET-2222,fields:{summary:[TICKET] Test jira,created:2016-03-18T07:58:52.000-0700}}]}{expand:schema,names,startAt:0,maxResults:50,total:2,issues:[{expand:operations,versionedRepresentations,editmeta,changelog,renderedFields,id:456881,self:https://myjira...com,key:TICKET-1111,fields:{summary:[TICKET] New Test jira,created:2018-12-17T01:47:09.000-0800}},{expand:operations,versionedRepresentations,editmeta,changelog,renderedFields,id:320281,self:https://myjira...com,key:TICKET-2222,fields:{summary:[TICKET] Test jira,created:2016-03-18T07:58:52.000-0700}}]}
etc..
Using this code I've been able to gather total open tickets:
std::ifstream t("BodyOpenIssues.out");
std::string BodyString((std::istreambuf_iterator<char>(t)),
std::istreambuf_iterator<char>());
// Removing Quotes
BodyString.erase(std::remove(BodyString.begin(), BodyString.end(), '"'), BodyString.end());
int Result = 0;
unsigned first = BodyString.find("total:");
unsigned last = BodyString.find(",issues");
std::string TotalOpenIssues = BodyString.substr(first + 6, last - (first + 6));
Result = std::stoi(TotalOpenIssues);
return Result;
Using a second function I'm trying to get the keys based on total open tickets.
if (GetOpenIssuesNumber() > 0)
{
std::ifstream t("BodyOpenIssues.out");
std::string BodyString((std::istreambuf_iterator<char>(t)),
std::istreambuf_iterator<char>());
// Removing Quotes
BodyString.erase(std::remove(BodyString.begin(), BodyString.end(), '"'), BodyString.end());
unsigned first = BodyString.find("key:TICKET-");
unsigned last = BodyString.find(",fields");
std::string TotalOpenIssues = BodyString.substr(first + 11, last - (first + 11));
String^ Result = gcnew String(TotalOpenIssues.c_str());
return "TICKET-" + Result;
}
else
{
return "No open issues found";
}
What I mean is:
If Total is 1 to search from the beginning and find the first key TICKET-1111.
If Total is 2 to search from the beginning and get the first key TICKET-1111 then to continue from there and to find the next key TICKET-2222.
And based on that total to find that many keys in that string.
I got lost from all the casting between the types as ifstream reads the file and I save the result in std::string. After the find I save the result in System::String to use it in my Label.. I've been researching and found out that I can use char array but I can't make it dynamic based on BodyString.length().
If more information is required please let me know.
Any suggestions are really appreciated! Thank you in advance!
I went for nlohmann json library. It has everything I need. Thank you Walnut!
These are formatted as JSON. You should use a JSON library for C++ and parse the files with that. Using search/replace is unnecessary complicated and you will likely run into corner cases you haven't considered sooner or later (do you really want the code to randomly miss tickets, etc.?). Also String^ is not C++. Are you writing C++/CLI instead of C++? If so, please tag c++-cli instead of c++. – walnut
Alternative title: how does one "nicely" "update" the contents of text files with Kotlin?
I have seen how do i write to a file in kotlin.
Basically, the suggested solution there is based on creating a File object, to then write to it: File("somefile.txt").printWriter().use ...
But well: I already have code like this:
File(fname).bufferedReader().lineSequence().flatMap { transform(it) }
where transform() is my own method that either returns the original line, or some updates lines when some specific match matched. (its signature is transform(line : String) : Sequence<String>)
Sure: I could assign the result of flatMap() to some temporary variable, to then use that with printWriter().use.
But is there a nice, canonical way that works without a temporary variable?
Note that your reading code (File().bufferedReader().lineSequence()) can already be simplified to:
File(fname).useLines {
it.flatMap(::transform)
}
Now regarding writing without putting it in an intermediate variable...
File("writeTo").bufferedWriter().use { writer ->
File("readFrom").useLines { lines ->
lines.flatMap(::transform)
.forEach {
writer.appendln(it)
}
}
}
But I am not yet really convinced about it... I don't really like it ;-)
I rather like something like:
File("readFrom").useLines {
..
}.writeTo("writeTo")
but that is not going to work as long as I use useLines ;-)
But here is something similar:
File("readFrom").useLines {
it.flatMap(::transform)
.writeTo(File("writeTo"))
}
But this requires the following extension function then:
fun Sequence<String>.writeTo(file: File) {
file.bufferedWriter().use { writer -> forEach { writer.appendln(it) } }
}
On the other hand... I always wanted to have a sequence.toFile-writer ;-) adapted it already to use a delimiter as parameter...
I have details like below in an array. There will be plenty of testbed details in actual case. I want to grep a particular testbed(TESTBED = vApp_eprapot_icr) and an infomation like below should get copied to another array. How can I do it using perl ? End of Testbed info can be understood by a closing flower bracket }.
TESTBED = vApp_eprapot_icr {
DEVICE = vApp_eprapot_icr-ipos1
DEVICE = vApp_eprapot_icr-ipos2
DEVICE = vApp_eprapot_icr-ipos3
DEVICE = vApp_eprapot_icr-ipos5
CARDS=1GIGE,ETHFAST
CARDS=3GIGE,ETHFAST
CARDS=10PGIGE,ETHFAST
CARDS=20PGIGE,ETHFAST
CARDS=40PGIGE,ETHFAST
CARDS=ETHFAST,ETHFAST
CARDS=10GIGE,ETHFAST
CARDS=ETH,ETHFAST
CARDS=10P10GIGE,ETHFAST
CARDS=PPA2GIGE,ETHFAST
CARDS=ETH,ETHFAST,ETHGIGE
}
I will make it simpler, please see the below array
#array("
student=Amit {
Age=20
sex=male
rollno=201
}
student=Akshaya {
Age=24
phone:88665544
sex=female
rollno=407
}
student=Akash {
Age=23
sex=male
rollno=356
address=na
phone=88456789
}
");
Consider an array like this. Where such entries are plenty. I need to grep, for an example student=Akshaya's data. from the opening '{' to closing '}' all info should get copied to another array. This is what I'm looking for.
while (<>) {
print if /TESTBED = vApp_eprapot_icr/../\}/;
}
as a sidenote <> will capture the filename you use on cmdline. So if the data is stored in a file you will run from commandline
perl scriptname.pl filename.txt
Ok. We finally have enough information to come up with an answer. Or, at least, to produce two answers which will work on slightly different versions of your input file.
In a comment you say that you are creating your array like this:
#array = `cat $file`;
That's not a very good idea for a couple of reasons. Firstly, why run an external command like cat when Perl will read the file for you. And secondly, this gives you one element in your array for each line in your input file. Things become far easier if you arrange it so that each of your TESTBED = foo { ... } records is a single array element.
Let's get rid of the cat first. The easiest way to read a single file into an array is to use the file input operator - <>. That will read data from the file whose name is given on the command line. So if you call your program filter_records, you can call it like this:
$ ./filter_records your_input_data.txt
And then read it into an array like this:
#array = <>;
That's good, but we still have each line of the input file in its own array element. How we fix that depends on the exact format of your input file. It's easiest if there's a blank line between each record in the input file, so it looks like this:
student=Amit {
Age=20
sex=male
rollno=201
}
student=Akshaya {
Age=24
phone:88665544
sex=female
rollno=407
}
student=Akash {
Age=23
sex=male
rollno=356
address=na
phone=88456789
}
Perl has a special variable called $/ which controls how it reads records from input files. If we set it to be an empty string then Perl goes into "paragraph" mode and it uses blank lines to delimit records. So we can write code like this:
{
local $/ = '';
#array = <>;
}
Note that it's always a good idea to localise changes to Perl's special variables, which is why I have enclosed the whole thing in a naked block.
If there are no blank lines, then things get slightly harder. We'll read the whole file in and then split it.
Here's our example file with no blank lines:
student=Amit {
Age=20
sex=male
rollno=201
}
student=Akshaya {
Age=24
phone:88665544
sex=female
rollno=407
}
student=Akash {
Age=23
sex=male
rollno=356
address=na
phone=88456789
}
And here's the code we use to read that data into an array.
{
local $/;
$data = <>;
}
#array = split /(?<=^})\n/m, $data;
This time, we've set $/ to undef which means that all of the data has been read from the file. We then split the data wherever we find a newline that is preceded by a } on a line by itself.
Whichever of the two solutions above that we use, we end up with an array which (for our sample data) has three elements - one for each of the records in our data file. It's then simple to use Perl's grep to filter that array in various ways:
# All students whose names start with 'Ak'
#filtered_array = grep { /student=Ak/ } #array;
If you use similar techniques on your original data file, then you can get the records that you are interested in with code like this:
#filtered_array = grep { /TESTBED = vApp_eprapot_icr/ } #array;
As we know, assert continues the execution but verify stops the execution the moment the script fails.
e.g suppose two string abc, abd xyz
i want to verify the two strings. How to verify them without using Assert.assertEquals(expected, actual);
Can anyone please guide me for the same?
You can verify the 2 strings by creating a method and using if else to compare them.
In your example instead of assert this can be done
public void compareMethod()
{
string expected = "abc";
string actual = "xyz";
if(expected == actual)
{
//do steps required
}
else
{
}
}
If you have already stored strings and want to verifyText using Selenium WebDriver then the following code will surely help..
if("expected String".equals("actual string"))
{
System.out.println("String matches ");
}
else
{
System.out.println("String does not match ");
}
Try this
The question pretty much sums it up. "dtrace 'print an associative array'" has exactly one google hit and the similar searches are equally useless.
EDIT:
If I were to use an aggregation, I'm not aware that I'd still be able to remove entries. My application requires that I be able to do things like:
file_descriptors[0] = "stdin"
file_descriptors[3] = "service.log"
...
...
file_descriptors[3] = 0
...
...
# should print only those entries that have not been cleared.
print_array(file_descriptors)
I know that you can clear an entire aggregation, but what about a single entry?
UPDATE:
Since I'm doing this in OS X and my application is to track all of the file descriptors that have been opened by a particular process, I was able to have an array of 256 pathnames, thusly:
syscall::open*:entry
/execname == $1/
{
self->path = copyinstr(arg0);
}
syscall::open*:return
/execname == $1/
{
opened[arg0] = self->path;
}
syscall::close*:entry
/execname == $1/
{
opened[arg0] = 0;
}
tick-10sec
{
printf(" 0: %s\n", opened[0]);
}
The above probe repeated 255 more times...
It sucks. I'd really like to have something better.
Is this the link Google found? Because the advice seems pretty sound:
I think the effect you're looking for should be achieved by using an
aggregation rather than an array. So you'd actually do something like:
#requests[remote_ip,request] = count();
... and then:
profile:::tick-10sec
{
/* print all of the requests */
printa(#requests);
/* Nuke the requests aggregation */
trunc(#requests);
}
Use an associative array and sum(1) and sum(-1) instead of count().