I'm building a control that can edit POCOs. There is a descriptor collection for the fields within the POCO that need to be edited and I'm binding a ListBox's ItemsSource to this collection. Amongst other things, the descriptor gives me the ability to select a suitable DataTemplate and the variable name in the POCO that this ListBox item should edit.
My ListBox is built like this:
<ListBox ItemsSource="{Binding ColumnCollection, ElementName=root}">
<ListBox.Resources>
<DataTemplate x:Key="TextTemplate">
<StackPanel>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding DisplayName}" />
<!-- !!! Question about following line !!! -->
<TextBox Text="{Binding ElementName=vm.CurentEditing, Path=PathName}" />
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
<!-- Details omitted for brevity -->
<DataTemplate x:Key="PickListTemplate" />
<DataTemplate x:Key="BooleanTemplate" />
</ListBox.Resources>
<ListBox.ItemTemplateSelector>
<local:DataTypeSelector
TextTemplate="{StaticResource TextTemplate}"
PickListTemplate="{StaticResource PickListTemplate}"
BooleanTemplate="{StaticResource BooleanTemplate}"
/>
</ListBox.ItemTemplateSelector>
</ListBox>
It is the TextBox binding expression in the "TextTemplate" that I am having problems with. The problem is that "PathName" should not be taken as a literal string, but is the name of a string property in the ColumnDescription class (the collection type of ColumnCollection used for ListBox.ItemsSource), which gives the name of the POCO property I want to bind to (the POCO is "vm.CurrentEditing").
Is there some way to use the value of a property in XAML as input to a binding expression, or will I have to resort to code behind?
(Incidentally, specifying the ElementName as "x.y" as I have done above also seems to be invalid. I assume the "y" part should be in Path but that's currently taken up with my property name...!)
So you want to bind TextBox.Text to Property X of Object Y, where X and Y both change at runtime.
It sounds like what you want to do is something analogous to ListBox.DisplayMemberPath: You can bind a string or PropertyPath property to DisplayMemberPath and it'll work. The way I've done stuff like that is to have a dependency property of type String or PropertyPath, and programatically create a binding from that to whatever property.
So, I wrote an attached property which creates a binding.
public class POCOWrangler
{
#region POCOWrangler.BindPropertyToText Attached Property
public static String GetBindPropertyToText(TextBox obj)
{
return (String)obj.GetValue(BindPropertyToTextProperty);
}
public static void SetBindPropertyToText(TextBox obj, PropertyPath value)
{
obj.SetValue(BindPropertyToTextProperty, value);
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty BindPropertyToTextProperty =
DependencyProperty.RegisterAttached("BindPropertyToText", typeof(String), typeof(POCOWrangler),
new PropertyMetadata(null, BindPropertyToText_PropertyChanged));
private static void BindPropertyToText_PropertyChanged(DependencyObject d, DependencyPropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (e.NewValue is String && d is TextBox)
{
var tb = d as TextBox;
var binding = new Binding((String)e.NewValue);
// The POCO object we're editing must be the DataContext of the TextBox,
// which is what you've got already -- but don't set Source explicitly
// here. Leave it alone and Binding.Source will be updated as
// TextBox.DataContext changes. If you set it explicitly here, it's
// carved in stone. That's especially a problem if this attached
// property gets initialized before DataContext.
//binding.Source = tb.DataContext;
binding.Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay;
BindingOperations.SetBinding(tb, TextBox.TextProperty, binding);
}
}
#endregion POCOWrangler.BindPropertyToText Attached Property
}
And I wrote a quick example thing: There's a little class named Foo that has a Name property, and a viewmodel with two properties, Foo Foo and String DisplayPathName. It works! Of course, this depends on default TextBox editing behavior for whatever type the property happens to be. I think that will get you the same results as if you'd bound explicitly in XAML, but it sitll won't always necessarily be just what you want. But you could very easily go a little nuts and add some triggers in the DataTemplate to swap in different editors, or write a DataTemplateSelector.
I stuffed ViewModel.Foo in a ContentControl just to get a DataTemplate into the act, so that the TextBox gets his DataContext in the same manner as yours.
Note also that I'm getting DisplayPathName by a relative source from something outside the DataContext object -- it's not a member of Foo, of course, it's a member of the viewmodel.
C#
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
DataContext = new ViewModel {
DisplayPathName = "Name",
Foo = new Foo { Name = "Aloysius" }
};
}
XAML
<ContentControl
Content="{Binding Foo}"
>
<ContentControl.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<TextBox
local:POCOWrangler.BindPropertyToText="{Binding
DataContext.DisplayPathName,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource AncestorType=ContentControl}}"
/>
</DataTemplate>
</ContentControl.ContentTemplate>
</ContentControl>
That was fun.
Related
DataContext and Source seem to be very similar to me.
What are the advantages and disadvantages?
When to use which one?
With Source:
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name, Source={StaticResource Person}}" />
Or the solution with DataContext:
public partial class DataContextSample : Window
{
public string Name {get; set;}
public DataContextSample()
{
InitializeComponent();
this.DataContext = this;
}
}
<TextBlock Text="{Binding Name}" />
A binding with out a specified Source binds to the DataContext property of the element.
The DataContext is a special property which, if not set, is redirected to the element's parent's DataContext. This prevents duplicate xaml (always setting the Source in every binding) and makes all bindings relative so it is easier to change the UI without having to adjust all Sources in the bindings.
I have a TabControl in an MVVM WPF application. It is defined as follows.
<TabControl Style="{StaticResource PortfolioSelectionTabControl}" SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedParameterTab}" >
<TabItem Header="Trades" Style="{StaticResource PortfolioSelectionTabItem}">
<ContentControl Margin="0,10,0,5" Name="NSDetailTradeRegion" cal:RegionManager.RegionName="NSDetailTradeRegion" />
</TabItem>
<TabItem Header="Ccy Rates" Style="{StaticResource PortfolioSelectionTabItem}">
<ContentControl Margin="0,10,0,5" Name="NSDetailCcyRegion" cal:RegionManager.RegionName="NSDetailCcyRegion" />
</TabItem>
<TabItem Header="Correlations / Shocks" Style="{StaticResource PortfolioSelectionTabItem}">
<ContentControl Name="NSDetailCorrelationRegion" cal:RegionManager.RegionName="NSDetailCorrelationRegion" />
</TabItem>
<TabItem Header="Facility Overrides" Style="{StaticResource PortfolioSelectionTabItem}" IsEnabled="False">
<ContentControl Name="NSDetailFacilityOverrides" cal:RegionManager.RegionName="NSDetailFacilityOverrides" />
</TabItem>
</TabControl>
So each tab item content has its own view associated with it. Each of those views has the MEF [Export] attribute and is associated with the relevant region through view discovery, so the above code is all I need to have the tab control load and switch between them. They all reference the same shared ViewModel object behind them and so all interact seamlessly.
My problem is that when the user navigates to the parent window, I want the tab control to default to the second tab item. That is easy enough to do when the window is first loaded, by specifying in XAML IsSelected="True" in TabItem number 2. It is less easy to do when the user navigates away from the screen and then comes back to it.
I thought about having a SelectedItem={Binding SelectedTabItem} property on the tab control, so I could programmatically set the selected tab in the ViewModel, but the problem is I have no knowledge of the TabItem objects in the ViewModel as they are declared above in the XAML only, so I have no TabItem object to pass to the setter property.
One idea I had was to make the child Views (that form the content of each of the tab items above) have a style on the UserControl level of their XAML, something along the following.
<Style TargetType={x:Type UserControl}>
<Style.Triggers>
<DataTrigger Property="IsSelected" Value="True">
<Setter Property="{ElementName={FindAncestor, Parent, typeof(TabItem)}, Path=IsSelected", Value="True" />
</DataTrigger>
</Style.Triggers>
</Style>
I know the findancestor bit isn't correct; I've just put it there to specify my intent, but I am not sure of the exact syntax. Basically for each UserControl to have a trigger that listens to a property on the ViewModel (not sure how I would distinguish each different UserControl as obviously they can't all listen to the same property or they would all select simultaneously when the property is set to True, but having a property for each usercontrol seems ugly) and then finds its parent TabItem container and sets the IsSelected value to true.
Am I on the right track with a solution here? Is it possible to do what I am pondering? Is there a tidier solution?
If you look at the TabControl Class page on MSDN, you'll find a property called SelectedIndex which is an int. Therefore, simply add an int property into your view model and Bind it to the TabControl.SelectedIndex property and then you can select whichever tab you like at any time from the view model:
<TabControl SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedIndex}">
...
</TabControl>
UPDATE >>>
Setting a 'startup' tab is even easier using this method:
In view model:
private int selectedIndex = 2; // Set the field to whichever tab you want to start on
public int SelectedIndex { get; set; } // Implement INotifyPropertyChanged here
Just FYI,
I gone through the same issue where I add tabs dynamically using ObservableCollection source but last added Tab do not get selected.
I have done same changes what Sheridan said to select Tab as per SelectedIndex. Now last added Tab gets selected but it was not getting focused.
So to focus the Tab we have to add set Binding IsAsync property True.
<TabControl ItemsSource="{Binding Workspaces}" Margin="5" SelectedIndex="{Binding TabIndex, Mode=OneWay,UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged, IsAsync=True}">
The below code sample will create a dynamic tab using MVVM.
XAML
<TabControl Margin="20" x:Name="tabCategory"
ItemsSource="{Binding tabCategory}"
SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedCategory}">
<TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<HeaderedContentControl Header="{Binding TabHeader}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ItemTemplate>
<TabControl.ContentTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<ContentControl Content="{Binding TabContent}" />
</DataTemplate>
</TabControl.ContentTemplate>
</TabControl>
Modal Class
TabCategoryItem represents each tab item. On two properties, TabHeader will display a tab caption and TabContent contains the content/control to fill in each tab.
Public Class TabCategoryItem
Public Property TabHeader As String
Public Property TabContent As UIElement
End Class
VM Class
Public Class vmClass
Public Property tabCategory As ObjectModel.ObservableCollection(Of TabCategoryItem)
Public Property SelectedCategory As TabCategoryItem
End Class
The below code will fill and bind the content. I am creating two tabs, tab1 and tab2. Both tabs will contain text boxes. You can use any UIelement instead of text boxes.
Dim vm As New vmClass
vm.tabCategory = New ObjectModel.ObservableCollection(Of TabCategoryItem)
'VM.tabCategory colection will create all tabs
vm.tabCategory.Add(New TabCategoryItem() With {.TabHeader = "Tab1", .TabContent = new TextBlock().Text = "My first Tab control1"})
vm.tabCategory.Add(New TabCategoryItem() With {.TabHeader = "Tab2", .TabContent = new TextBlock().Text = "My first Tab control2"})
mywindow.DataContent = vm
The accepted answer is not working with DependencyObject on your ViewModel .
I'm using MVVM with DependencyObject and Just setting the TabControl didn't work for me.The problem I had was the the property was not getting update on the View when I was setting the tab selectedIndex from the ViewModel.
I did set the Mode to be two ways but nothing was working.
<TabControl SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedTab,Mode=TwoWay}" >
...
</TabControl>
The ViewModel property "SelectedTab" was getting updated all the time when I navigated between tabs. This was confirming my binding was working properly. Each time I would navigate the tabs both the Get and Set would get called in my ViewModel. But if I try to set the SelectedIndex in the ViewModel it would not update the view.
ie: SelectedTab=0 or SelectedTab=1 etc...
When doing the set from the ViewModel the SelectedTab 'set' method would be called, but the view would never do the 'get'.
All I could find online was example using INotifyPropertyChanged but I do not wish to use that with my ViewModel.
I found the solutions in this page: http://blog.lexique-du-net.com/index.php?post/2010/02/24/DependencyProperties-or-INotifyPropertyChanged
With DependencyObject, you need to register the DependencyProperties. Not for all properties but I guess for a tabcontrol property you need to.
Below my code:
view.xaml
//Not sure below if I need to mention the TwoWay mode
<TabControl SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedTab,Mode=TwoWay}" >
...
</TabControl>
ViewModel.cs
public class ViewModel : DependencyObject
{
public static readonly DependencyProperty SelectedTabDP = DependencyProperty.Register("SelectedTab", typeof(int), typeof(ViewModel));
public int SelectedTab
{
get { return (int)GetValue(SelectedTabDP); }
set { SetValue(SelectedTabDP, value); }
}
}
Basically all I had to do was to actually register the dependency property (DependencyProperty) as you can see above.
What made this hard to figure out was that I have a bunch of other Properties on that view and I didn't need to register them like that to make it work two ways. For some reason on the TabControl I had to register the property like I did above.
Hope this help someone else.
Turns out my problem were because my components have names:
x:Name="xxxxxxxx"
Giving names to components at the same time of biding them with DependencyObject seems to be the main cause of all my issues.
In order to improve semantic of my viewmodel and to not work with an int when using code to check for the selected tab, I made some additions to the accepted answer so to use an Enum instead of an int.
These are the steps:
Define an Enum representing the different tabs:
public enum RulesVisibilityMode {
Active,
History
}
Expose the SelectedTab as a property using the enum instead of the int:
public RulesVisibilityMode SelectedTab { get; set; }
Create a converter to convert from an int to your enum (I don't need the ConvertBack because I never select the active tab from the code, but you can add it too):
internal class RulesVisibilityModeConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException("Conversion from visibility mode to selected index has not been implemented");
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
int selectedTabIndex;
if (int.TryParse(value.ToString(), out selectedTabIndex))
{
return (RulesVisibilityMode)selectedTabIndex;
}
return null;
}
}
Bind the tabcontrol to the SelectedTab property through the converter:
<TabControl SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedTab, Mode=OneWayToSource, Converter={StaticResource RulesVisibilityModeConverter}}" ...
Now every time you need to check for the selected tab in the code you deal with a readable enum:
if (this.SelectedTab != RulesVisibilityMode.Active) ...
I'm having some issues with binding some custom controls in a Windows Phone app right now. Usually this is never an issue but apparently my mind can't comprehend this today.
So I'm doing an MVVM style setup which is good. I have my page with a view and also a viewmodel. Now on a WebClient callback I assign the dataContext of my view to the list of models in my ViewModel, nice and simple thus far...now in my view I created a ListBox with a custom control in the datatemplate which is basically a cell in the list. I once again set my user controls dataContext to binding, and binding all the models values to the regular UI elements works no problem.
Here's a sample:
<Grid Grid.Column="0">
<Image Source="{Binding SmallPath}" VerticalAlignment="Top"/>
</Grid>
<Grid Grid.Column="1">
<StackPanel Margin="12,0,0,0">
<TextBlock x:Name="MemberId_TextBlock" Text="{Binding MemberId}" FontSize="28"
Margin="0,-8,0,0"
Foreground="{StaticResource PhoneForegroundBrush}"/>
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Margin="0,-11,0,0">
<TextBlock Text="{Binding DaysReported}" FontSize="42"
Margin="0,0,0,0"
Foreground="{StaticResource PhoneAccentBrush}"/>
<TextBlock Text="days" FontSize="24"
Margin="3,19,0,0"
Foreground="{StaticResource PhoneSubtleBrush}"/>
</StackPanel>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
That's in my user control, and here's the the view where the usercontrol is housed:
<Grid x:Name="LayoutRoot" Background="Transparent">
<ListBox Name="TopSpotter_ListBox" ItemsSource="{Binding}">
<ListBox.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<StackPanel>
<!--<TextBlock Text="{Binding MemberId}"/>-->
<controls:TopSpotterItemControl DataContext="{Binding}"/>
<Grid Height="18"/>
</StackPanel>
</DataTemplate>
</ListBox.ItemTemplate>
</ListBox>
</Grid>
Now this is good enough but what I want to do in my view is set data from my model like Booleans that determine whether or not I should show certain Grids etc. So if I try to set a dependency property explicitly in my control it fires and will run logic in the Getter/Setters for instance. HOWEVER if I try to set these custom objects from a binding source it won't actually set.
Here's what works:
<controls:TopSpotterItemControl ChampVisibility="True">
This way will trigger the ChampVisibility property and then in the code behind of the user control I can set visibilities.
Here's what fails but I want to work:
<controls:TopSpotterItemControl ChampVisibility="{Binding IsChamp">
In addition I can still set the DataContext to {Binding} and the result will be unchanged.
In this scenario IsChamp is part of my model that I would like to bind to this user control which I guess comes from the dataContext being set on the view from the viewModel. I'm not sure what I can do to get this so the bindings work etc. without having to set custom properties.
Finally, here's my user control:
public partial class TopSpotterItemControl : UserControl
{
public string MemberId
{
get
{
return this.MemberId_TextBlock.Text;
}
set
{
this.MemberId_TextBlock.Text = value;
}
}
public bool ChampVisibility {
set
{
if (value)
{
this.Champ_Grid.Visibility = System.Windows.Visibility.Visible;
}
}
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty MemberNameProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("MemberId", typeof(string), typeof(TopSpotterItemControl), new PropertyMetadata(null));
public static readonly DependencyProperty ChampVisibilityProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ChampVisibility", typeof(bool), typeof(TopSpotterItemControl), new PropertyMetadata(null));
public TopSpotterItemControl()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
}
Bit long winded and I hope I made things on the issue clear. My one major hang up so far, and I'd like to abstract as much control as I can to the user control via dependency properties explicitly set in xaml, rather than setting up binding in its xaml that depend on the knowledge of a model. Thanks!
Your DependencyProperty is badly formed. (I also don't see Champ_Grid defined in your class or XAML, but I assume that is an ommission)
Setting ChampVisibility = true in code works because it is unrelated to the DependencyProperty.
You can tell easily because the default value for your DP is invalid. It will compile, but the instance constructor will through an exception if it is ever invoked.
new PropertyMetadata(null)
bool = null = exception
If you call GetValue(TopSpotterItemControl.ChampVisibilityProperty) from somewhere you can confirm all of the above.
You should make changes to instance fields in the property changed handler and declare the property like the following, it will work:
Note that the property has to change (not just be set) for the event to be raised.
public bool ChampVisibility
{
get { return (bool)GetValue(ChampVisibilityProperty); }
set { SetValue(ChampVisibilityProperty, value); }
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty ChampVisibilityProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("ChampVisibility ", typeof(bool), typeof(TopSpotterItemControl), new PropertyMetadata(true, (s, e) =>
{
TopSpotterItemControl instance = s as TopSpotterItemControl;
instance.Champ_Grid.Visibility = instance.ChampVisibility ? System.Windows.Visibility.Visible : System.Windows.Visibility.Collapsed;
}));
Incidentally, your MemberId DependencyProperty is also completely wrong and cannot work.
Note:
The Binding on your TextBox works, because it is binding to the DataContext (your model), so it probably shows the right value.
The Dependency property in your UserControl will never be set though.
Use the propdp code-snippet in Visual Studio so you dont have to concern yourself with the complexities of Dependency Property declaration.
Also check this out for more info about Dependency Properties
NARROWED DOWN SOLUTION
I'm much closer, but don't know how to apply XAML to change datacontext value. Please review context of original question below as may be needed.
My issue is that I have a ViewModel class as the datacontext to a window. On this view model, I have a "DataTable" object (with columns and just a single row for testing). When I try to set a Textbox "TEXT" binding to the column of the datatable, it doesn't work. What I've ultimately found is that no matter what "source" or "path" I give it, it just won't cooperate. HOWEVER, just by playing around with scenarios, I said the heck with it. Lets look. The Textbox control has its own "DataContext" property. So, in code, I just FORCED the textbox.DataContext = "MyViewModel.MyDataTableObject" and left the path to just the column it should represent "MyDataColumn", and it worked.
So, that said, how would I write the XAML for the textbox control so it's "DataContext" property is set to that of the datatable object of the view model the window but can't get that correct. Ex:
<TextBox Name="myTextBox"
Width="120"
DataContext="THIS IS WHAT I NEED" --- to represent
Text="{Binding Path=DataName,
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged }" />
DataContext for this textbox should reflect XAML details below and get
(ActualWindow) ( DDT = View Model) (oPerson = DataTable that exists ON the view model)
CurrentWindow.DDT.oPerson
I'm stuck on something with binding. I want to bind a column of a datatable to a textbox control. Sounds simple, but I'm missing something. Simple scenario first. If I have my window and set the data context to that of "MyDataTable", and have the textbox PATH=MyDataColumn, all works fine, no problems, including data validation (red border on errors).
Now, the problem. If I this have a same "MyDataTable" as a public on my Window Class directly (but same thing if I had it on an actual ViewModel object, but the window to simplify the level referencing), I can't get it to work from direct XAML source. I knew I had to set the "SOURCE=MyDataTable", but the path of just the column didn't work.
<TextBox Name="myTextBox"
Text="{Binding Source=DDT, Path=Rows[0][DataName],
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged }" />
However, from other testing, if I set the path (in code-behind) to
object txt = FindName("myTextBox");
Binding oBind = new Binding("DataName");
oBind.Source = DDT;
oBind.Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay;
oBind.ValidatesOnDataErrors = true;
oBind.UpdateSourceTrigger = UpdateSourceTrigger.PropertyChanged;
((TextBox)txt).SetBinding(TextBox.TextProperty, oBind);
It DOES work (when the datatable is available as public in the window (or view model))
What am I missing otherwise.
UPDATE: HERE IS A FULL POST of the sample code I'm applying here.
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
namespace WPFSample1
{
/// <summary>
/// Interaction logic for MainWindow.xaml
/// </summary>
public partial class MainWindow : Window
{
public DerivedDataTable DDT;
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
// hook up to a Data Table
DDT = new DerivedDataTable();
DataContext = this;
// with THIS part enabled, the binding works.
// DISABLE this IF test, and binding does NOT.
// but also note, I tried these same settings manually via XAML.
object txt = FindName("myTextBox");
if( txt is TextBox)
{
Binding oBind = new Binding("DataName");
oBind.Source = DDT;
oBind.Mode = BindingMode.TwoWay;
oBind.ValidatesOnDataErrors = true;
oBind.UpdateSourceTrigger = UpdateSourceTrigger.PropertyChanged;
((TextBox)txt).SetBinding(TextBox.TextProperty, oBind);
}
}
}
// Generic class with hooks to enable error trapping at the data table
// level via ColumnChanged event vs IDataErrorInfo of individual properties
public class MyDataTable : DataTable
{
public MyDataTable()
{
// hook to column changing
ColumnChanged += MyDataColumnChanged;
}
protected void MyDataColumnChanged(object sender, DataColumnChangeEventArgs e)
{ ValidationTest( e.Row, e.Column.ColumnName); }
// For any derived datatable to just need to define the validation method
protected virtual string ValidationTest(DataRow oDR, string ColumnName)
{ return ""; }
}
public class DerivedDataTable : MyDataTable
{
public DerivedDataTable()
{
// simple data table, one column, one row and defaulting the value to "X"
// so when the window starts, I KNOW its properly bound when the form shows
// "X" initial value when form starts
Columns.Add( new DataColumn("DataName", typeof(System.String)) );
Columns["DataName"].DefaultValue = "X";
// Add a new row to the table
Rows.Add(NewRow());
}
protected override string ValidationTest(DataRow oDR, string ColumnName)
{
string error = "";
switch (ColumnName.ToLower())
{
case "dataname" :
if ( string.IsNullOrEmpty(oDR[ColumnName].ToString() )
|| oDR[ColumnName].ToString().Length < 4 )
error = "Name Minimum 4 characters";
break;
}
// the datarow "SetColumnError" is what hooks the "HasErrors" validation
// in similar fashion as IDataErrorInfo.
oDR.SetColumnError(Columns[ColumnName], error);
return error;
}
}
}
AND here's the XAML. Any brand new form and this is the only control in the default "grid" of the window.
Tried following versions, just defining the Rows[0][Column]
<TextBox Name="myTextBox"
Width="120"
Text="{Binding Path=Rows[0][DataName],
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged }" />
Including the source of "DDT" since it is public to the window
<TextBox Name="myTextBox"
Width="120"
Text="{Binding Source=DDT, Path=Rows[0][DataName],
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged }" />
And even suggestions offered by grantnz
I think your xaml is setting the source to the string "DDT" when you're expecting it to be the property DDT on the current window.
Do you see an error in the output window of Visual Studio like:
System.Windows.Data Error: 40 : BindingExpression path error:
'Rows' property not found on 'object' ''String' (HashCode=1130459074)'.
BindingExpression:Path=Rows[0][DataName]; DataItem='String' (HashCode=1130459074);
target element is 'TextBox' (Name=''); target property is 'Text' (type 'String')
If you set the window DataContext to this (from code DataContext = this; or xaml), you can use:
Text="{Binding Path=DDT.Rows[0][DataName],
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged }" />
or you can leave the DataContext as null and use:
<TextBox Name="myTextBox"
Text="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor,
AncestorType={x:Type Window}},Path=DDT.Rows[0][DataName],
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged }" />
The above assumes that you are setting the DDT property before the binding is set-up. If DDT is set after the binding is configured, you'll need to implement INotifyPropertyChanged.
Here's the source of a working version (with DataContext set from XAML and INotifyPropertyChanged implemented). It doesn't work if you comment out the line
OnPropertyChanged(new PropertyChangedEventArgs("DDT"));
and the second TextBox is bound if you leave out the following out of the XAML
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}"
CODE
public partial class MainWindow : Window, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
public DataTable DDT { get; set; }
public String SP { get; set; }
public MainWindow()
{
InitializeComponent();
DDT = new DerivedDataTable();
OnPropertyChanged(new PropertyChangedEventArgs("DDT"));
SP = "String prop";
}
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
public void OnPropertyChanged(PropertyChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (PropertyChanged != null)
PropertyChanged(this, e);
}
}
XAML
<Window x:Class="BindingTest.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="350" Width="525"
DataContext="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}}">
<StackPanel>
<TextBox
Text="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type Window}},Path=DDT.Rows[0][DataName],
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged }" />
<TextBox
Text="{Binding Path=DDT.Rows[0][DataName],
ValidatesOnDataErrors=True,
UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged }" />
<TextBox
Text="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type Window}},Path=SP}" />
</StackPanel>
</Window>
SOLVED, but what a PITA... Most things within the samples of doing MVVM patterns will have properties on the view model exposing whatever you want to hook into. When dealing with binding to a DATATABLE (or similar view, etc), you are binding to COLUMNs of said table (or view).
When a table is queried from whatever back-end, the schema populating the data columns will always force the column names to UPPER CASE.
So, if you have a column "InvoiceTotal" in your table, when queried, the column name will have it as "INVOICETOTAL".
If you try to bind to the
Path="InvoiceTotal" ... it will fail
Path="INVOICETOTAL" ... it WILL WORK
However, if you are working directly in .Net (I use C#), the following will BOTH get a value back from the row
double SomeValue = (double)MyTable.Rows[0]["InvoiceTotal"];
or
double SomeValue = (double)MyTable.Rows[0]["INVOICETotal"];
or
double SomeValue = (double)MyTable.Rows[0]["invoicetotal"];
all regardless of the case-sensitivity of the column name.
So, now the rest of the bindings, Error triggers available at the table, row or column levels can properly be reflected in the GUI to the user.
I SURE HOPE this saves someone else the headaches and research I have gone through on this....
I've created two UserControls, the first of which displays a list of objects, the second of which displays details about an object that is selected from the first. I've created a dependency property on the first control and am binding each UserControl to an object declared in my Resources collection. I've seen blog posts describing this, but cannot seem to get it to work. I am getting a XamlParseException. The funny thing is the exception only occurs when I set the binding Mode=TwoWay on my first UserControls. Here's the code...
Page.xaml
<UserControl.Resources>
<local:Item x:Key="SelectedItem" />
</UserControl.Resources>
...
<controls:ItemList
SelectedItem="{Binding Mode=TwoWay, Source={StaticResource SelectedItem}}">
</controls:ItemList >
...
<controls:ItemDetails
DataContext="{Binding Source={StaticResource SelectedItem}}">
</controls:ItemDetails>
ItemList.xaml.cs
public partial class ItemList: UserControl
{
public ItemList()
{
InitializeComponent();
}
public static readonly DependencyProperty SelectedItemProperty =
DependencyProperty.Register("SelectedItem", typeof(Item), typeof(ItemList), new PropertyMetadata(new Item()));
public Item SelectedItem
{
get { return (Item )GetValue(SelectedItemProperty ); }
set { SetValue(SelectedItemProperty , value); }
}
Any suggestions are welcome!
Your Xaml is incorrect, from the looks of it. You are missing a property that you need to bind to for two-way. You are saying that you want to bind to object defined in source, but you don't specify a property of that resource to bind to. In this case, the SelectedItem resource is an object of type Item ... you need to bind to property of Item. So if item has a property named value, your Xaml could look like this:
SelectedItem="{Binding Value, Source={StaticResource SelectedItem}, Mode=TwoWay}"
Try this instead:
SelectedItem="{Binding SelectedItem, Mode=TwoWay}"
ib.