"struct" before already-declared struct - c

I am still new in C. I know you can just use the already-declared struct as new data type such as int, double, etc. However, I encounter a struct written like this:
struct AdjListNode
{
int dest;
int weight;
struct AdjListNode* next;
};
In this struct, the data type of "next" pointer is struct AdjListNode*. What does struct have to do with the already-declared AdjListNode*? Thanks!

What does struct have to do with the already-declared AdjListNode*?
The answer is that the c syntax requires it.
You do not get a type AdjListNode by writing struct AdjListNode { ... };
AdjListNode is a struct tag and you always have to use struct AdjListNode when declaring variables.
See this simple example (without pointer inside the struct):
#include <stdio.h>
struct sSomeName
{
int x;
};
int main(void) {
struct sSomeName var; // OK, variable of type struct sSomeName
struct sSomeName* pVar; // OK, pointer to variable of type struct sSomeName
// sSomeName var2; // ERROR: unknown type name 'sSomeName'
var.x = 5;
pVar = &var;
printf("%d\n", pVar->x);
return 0;
}
So if you want to add a pointer inside the struct, you must write struct sSomeName just as you have to do inside main, i.e. like:
struct sSomeName
{
int x;
struct sSomeName* p;
};
Using typedef
If you want a type named AdjListNode you must use typedef.
A typedef example could look like:
#include <stdio.h>
typedef struct sSomeName sSomeName;
struct sSomeName
{
int x;
sSomeName* p;
};
int main(void) {
sSomeName var;
sSomeName* pVar;
var.x = 5;
var.p = NULL;
pVar = &var;
printf("%d\n", pVar->x);
printf("%p\n", (void*)pVar->p);
return 0;
}

Here with that declaration pointer to structure is declared. This is basically used for implementing linked list or for other data structures like tree.
It does'nt mean that struct is re-declared. It is similar to declare a struct variable.

The structure is created as follows: typedef struct AdjListNode. Example:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
typedef struct AdjListNode
{
int dest;
int weight;
struct AdjListNode* next;
}AdjListNode;
typedef struct Nodo{
char *nombre;
int *edad;
struct Nodo *siguiente;
}Nodo;
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
AdjListNode *nodo=malloc(sizeof(AdjListNode));
nodo->dest=1;
nodo->weight=2;
nodo->next=NULL;
printf("Nodo-->dest: %d", nodo->dest);
free(nodo);
}

Related

Difference between these 2 declarations of structures in C

I'm working on this project for college and they gave me a sample code to use while declaring a structure, the other one is how I declared it with the information on PowerPoints and other study material.
This is the code they gave me:
typedef struct sala local, *plocal;
struct sala {
int id;
int capacidade;
int liga[3];
};
This is the code for another structure i did:
typedef struct pessoa {
char id[15];
int idade;
char estado;
int dias;
} pessoa;
Can anyone explain the difference to me ?
In my code editor "local" and "*local" appear in blue. (I use Netbeans).
This typedef declaration
typedef struct sala local, *local;
struct sala {
int id;
int capacidade;
int liga[3];
};
is invalid because the name local is declared twice with different meanings: the first one as an alias for the type struct sala and the second one as an alias for the type struct sala *.
This is the difference between the first and the second typedef declarations.:)
As for the placement of typedef declaration then it may be placed either before a corresponding structure definition. together with structure definition or after structure definition.
For example
typedef struct A A;
struct A
{
int x;
};
or
typedef struct A
{
int x;
} A;
or
struct A
{
int x;
};
typedef struct A A;
An essence difference between these declarations is that if you want to refer to the defined structure inside its definition then in the second and third cases you have to use the type name struct A because the typedef name A was not yet declared.
For example
typedef struct Node Node;
struct Node
{
int x;
Node *next;
};
but for example
typedef struct Node
{
int x;
struct Node *next;
} Node;

struct in c with an attribute that is a pointer to the same struct

i need to create a struct with an attribute that is a pointer to the same struct.
i'm trying this solution but not work:
typedef struct
{
int number;
void *other;
}mystruct;
extern mystruct first[];
extern mystruct second[];
mystruct first[] = {{1,NULL},{2,second}};
mystruct second[] = {{3,NULL},{4,first}};
mystruct *wrap;
wrap = (mystruct *)first[1].other;
int main(void){
printf("%d\n",first[0].number);
printf("%d\n",second[0].number);
printf("%d\n",wrap[1].number);
}
can someone help me?
best regards and thankyou
In C, you can name the struct before using it and typdefing it:
typedef struct mystruct_
{
int number;
struct mystruct_ *other;
} mystruct
I'm not entirely sure but are you looking for some sort of linked-lists or precisely speak Self Referential structure
struct list {
int something;
struct list *use_this_to_point_to_similar_type;
};
Here is another good reference what-is-self-referencing-structure-in-c
just a little bit simplification, and moving few instructions here and there, below code is a loosely written example of possibly what you are looking forward to achieve
#include<stdio.h>
struct mystruct
{
int number;
struct mystruct *other;
};
struct mystruct first[] = {{1,NULL},{2,NULL}};
struct mystruct second[] = {{3,NULL},{4,NULL}};
struct mystruct *wrap;
int main(void)
{
first[1].other = second;
second[1].other = first;
wrap = first[1].other;
printf("%d\n",first[0].number);
printf("%d\n",second[0].number);
printf("%d\n",wrap[1].number);
return 0;
}
your first and second don't need to be extern as they are allocated within your program. you can declare and init. var prior to the main. but the rest you must move into the main function:
int main(void){
wrap = (first[1].other);
printf("%d\n",first[0].number);
printf("%d\n",first[1].number);
printf("%d\n",second[0].number);
printf("%d\n",wrap[1].number);
return 0;}

error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type

Looked through many other SO posts related to this, but none were able to help me. So, I have the following structs defined:
typedef struct
{
int created;
double data;
int timeLeft;
int destination;
}dataPacket;
typedef struct
{
dataPacket *array;
int currIndex;
int firstIndex;
int nextTick;
int maxLength;
int length;
int stime;
int total;
}packetBuffer;
typedef struct{
int mac;
struct wire *lconnection;
struct wire *rconnection;
int numRecieved;
struct packetBuffer *buffer;
int i;
int backoff;
}node;
typedef struct{
float length;
float speed;
int busy;
struct dataPacket *currPacket;
struct node *lnode;
struct node *rnode;
}wire;
And then I'm trying to use the following function:
int sendPacket(node *n, int tick)
{
if(n->buffer->length > 0)
{
if(n->backoff <= 0)
{
if (n->lconnection->busy != 0 || n->lconnection->busy != 0)
{
n->i++;
n->backoff = (512/W * genrand()*(pow(2,n->i)-1))/TICK_LENGTH;
}
else
{
n->lconnection->busy = 1;
n->rconnection->busy = 1;
n->lconnection->currPacket = n->buffer[n->buffer->currIndex];
n->rconnection->currPacket = n->buffer[n->buffer->currIndex];
}
}
else
{
n->backoff--;
}
}
}
I'm getting the error described in the title everytime I try to access a member of buffer, lconnection, or rconnection.
struct packetBuffer *buffer;
You've defined a type packetBuffer (a typedef for an otherwise anonymous struct).
You haven't defined struct packetBuffer.
In the absence of an existing type struct packetBuffer, the compiler treats it as an incomplete type, assuming that you'll complete it later. The declaration
struct packetBuffer *buffer;
is perfectly legal, but you can't dereference buffer unless the type struct packetBuffer is visible.
Just drop the struct keyword.
(My personal preference is to drop the typedef and consistently refer to struct types as struct whatever, but that's a matter of style and taste.)
The following:
typedef struct {
int x;
char *y;
...
} my_struct;
creates an identifier for an anonymous structure. In order, for a structure to refer to an instance of itself, it must not be "anonymous":
typedef struct my_struct {
int x;
char *y;
struct my_struct *link
....
} my_struct_t;
This means that my_struct_t is now the type struct my_struct and not just an anonymous struct. Also, note that struct my_struct can be used within its own structure definition. That is not possible with anonymous structs.
As a final complication, the my_struct in struct my_struct is in a differenct "namespace" than the my_struct_t. This is sometimes used to to simplify (or confuse) things in code like this:
typedef struct my_struct {
int x;
char *y;
struct my_struct *link
....
} my_struct;
Now I can use my_struct anywhere in my code instead of struct my_struct.
Finally, you could separate the typedef from the structure definition to achieve the same effect:
struct my_struct {
int x;
char *y;
struct my_struct *link;
....
};
typedef struct my_struct my_struct;
As noted in David R.Hanson's C Interfaces and Implementations, "This definition is legal because structure, union, and enumeration tags occupy a same name space that is separate from the space for variables, functions, and type names."

Dereferencing pointer to incomplete type error in C

I bumped into this error when I was trying to access a field in my defined struct:
struct linkNode{
struct linkNode *next;
char *value;
};
In the header file I defined a type called linkNode_t:
typedef struct linkNode linkNode_t;
When I tried to use this struct in the main of another file, everything else was fine except when I tried to do
linkNode_t* currentpath = /*a pointer to a struct of type linkNode_t*/
int something = strlen(currentpath->value);/****ERROR*****/
Compiler gave me the incomplete type error. Am I declaring the struct properly?
Struct has to be declared in header, before you do typedef. You can combine both:
typedef struct linkNode {
struct linkNode *next;
char *value;
} linkNode_t;
As the others pointed out, it's generally better to put your "typedef" and your struct definition all in the same place.
But that isn't required, and that's not the problem.
This test case compiles and runs correctly:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#define NULL 0
struct linkNode{
struct linkNode *next;
char *value;
};
typedef struct linkNode linkNode_t;
linkNode_t rec = {
NULL,
"abcdef"
};
int
main (int argc, char *argv[])
{
linkNode_t* currentpath = &rec;
int something = strlen(currentpath->value);
printf ("sizeof (rec)= %d, currentpath->value= %s, something= %d...\n",
sizeof (rec), currentpath->value, something);
return 0;
}
ACTUAL PROBLEM AND SOLUTION:
1) You're doing all the right stuff.
2) Just make sure you put your "typedef" AFTER (or, at least, as part of) your struct definition:
struct linkNode{
...
};
typedef struct linkNode linkNode_t;
struct linkNode{
struct linkNode *next;
char *value;
};
This is incomplete because you cannot use struct directly inside the structure.
You should use
typedef struct linkNode{
struct linkNode *next;
char *value;
}new_name;

c programming, linked list error

When i try to compile the following code, i get the error
test.c: In function 'main':
test.c:16: error: incompatible types in assignment
and the code is..
#include <stdio.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <string.h>
typedef struct {
char name[20];
struct planet* next;
} planet;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
planet *p, *start, *first, *second, *third;
strcpy(start->name, "Suthan");
start->next = *first;
}
1) Allocate some memory to your pointers.
planet *start, *first; these are uninitialized pointers.
start->next // that's dereferencing an uninitialized pointer.
2) You're setting start->next (a pointer to a planet) to a deferenced pointer first. That's the root of your error.
start->next = *first; // should be = first;
3) Move the typedef name to get rid of the warning you were seeing.
typedef struct planet{
char name[20];
struct planet* next;
};
Since are trying to assign an instance of planet (*first) to a pointer to planet (start->next).
Try this instead:
start->next = first;
However, I'm also wondering about your declaration of planet. Does this help?
typedef struct _planet {
char name[20];
struct _planet* next;
} planet;
I think you did your struct incorrectly
typedef struct _planet {
char name[20];
struct _planet* next;
} planet;
Should be:
typedef struct planet {
char name[20];
struct planet* next;
}
I remember tripping over this aspect of self-referential structs.
typedef struct {
char name[20];
struct planet* next; /* <-- the trouble is here */
} planet;
In the middle of the struct definition, which is in the middle of a typedef definition, the compiler doesn't know what a struct planet looks like, but is happy to let you define a pointer to it. The compiler doesn't really need to know what it looks like until you dereference *next. By the time you get to the body of main() you still haven't told the compiler what a struct planet is, only a type called planet which happens to be an unnamed struct.
Consider the following approach.
struct foo {
int bar;
};
typedef struct foo foo_type;
struct foo bar;
foo_type baz;
This shows that the name of the struct is foo and the name of the defined type is foo_type. I could combine them like this:
typedef struct foo {
int bar;
} foo_type;
You can resolve the compiler warning by adding a dummy name to your inline struct definition.
typedef struct planet_struct {
char name[20];
struct planet_struct* next;
} planet;
You will also need to address the memory allocation issue that others have pointed out, but this answers the question you didn't actually ask.

Resources