I'm after a way in SSMS of writing a query that will concatenate Table & Column to give me a much more readable Alias.
I'm actually using SSMS, right clicking on views in the object explorer, and selecting new view.
I select the tables I require from the list of available tables.
I then set the joins required in the SSMS diagram pane, and select all of the columns I want from the various tables.
In the criteria pane, I can see the Column, Alias, and Table columns.
It's fine all the time the value in the Column column is unique, for example:
Column = RequestedDeliveryDate
Alias = (blank)
Table = Stock Item
BUT!
As soon as the column value is NOT unique, SSMS assigns its own alias, for example:
Column = AddressLine1
Alias = Alias1
Table = Customer
Column = AddressLine1
Alias = Alias2
Table = Supplier
These are pretty hefty views that I'm dealing with, so SSMS assigns a lot of Aliases, which is not a problem in itself, but makes select statements in my Visual Studio project, much more unreadable:
SELECT RequestedDeliveryDate, Alias1, Alias2 FROM vwMyView
All that I'm after is some way in SSMS of writing a query that will concatenate Table & Column to give me a much more readable Alias:
Column = AddressLine1
Alias = CustomerAddressLine1
Table = Customer
Column = AddressLine1
Alias = SupplierAddressLine1
Table = Supplier
This would make my SELECT queries much more readable:
SELECT RequestedDeliveryDate,CustomerAddressLine1,SupplierAddressLine1 FROM vwMyView
I can manually assign an alias in the Criteria Pane, but it's very tedious across many views with many duplicate column names.
I hate the view designer. Just create the view with code only. Eg:
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[MyViewName]
AS
SELECT RequestedDeliveryDate,CustomerAddressLine1,SupplierAddressLine1 FROM vwMyView
GO
Copy the joins and filter from the view designer if you like, but then change the field aliasing in the SELECT section.
Related
If I do SELECT name, ISNULL(license, 0) FROM table; I get a resulting table with the license column having no name ("Column1" on my xml), how do I give it a name in the query so it makes my life easier when manipulating it on my application? I tried finding it but could only find how to rename the column on the table itself, instead of renaming the column on the table generated by the SELECT.
To simplify: ISNULL removes the name of the column in the generated by my SELECT and I want to bring it back.
Just use an alias:
SELECT name, ISNULL(license, 0) AS license FROM table;
I'm using Microsoft Query to pull data from MS SQL Server to Excel. Many of my tables have the same column names, for example:
[task].[active]
[user].[active]
[task].[name]
[user].[name]
When I pivot in Excel, only the column names are shown. A pivot filter might have multiple fields called "active" which is very confusing.
I'd like to alias every column with the table name it's from, so that in the filter it would say "task_active" and "user_active". My Excel SELECT statement would be:
SELECT active AS task_active, name AS task_name FROM task...
Is there a quick way to prepend the table name to an alias using a formatting tool? I have Apex SQL Refactor, and Notepad++ but I haven't found a way to do this without having to manually type all of the column names again.
If you populate resultset to datatable then datatable to excel then it will automatically change duplicate column name to col1,col2 etc.
This is not your requirement.you want it to be specific.
Method 1 . Create temp table with desire column name
Insert the result in #temp table
Return #temp table result set
Method 2 : Use dynamic query.
Wht your real query look like ?
I have two table "Container" and "Control". These are existing tables and there is no foreign key relationship between the two. These are also very old tables so are not normalized. And I cannot change the structure now.
Below is the structure of the two tables.
Container table :
Control Table :
The Name field in Control table contains CTableName+CPName from Container table.
I want to update the columnName field of Control table with the value of CID column of Container table. and also want to insert one more record (for ctable2 i.e the fourth row in final Control table below) in Control table.
The tablename and columnname columns have will always be have default values.
The final Control table should look like this:
How do I do this?
I hope you want to apply this fix because you want normalize your table structure.
Try this:
First step:
In this way you'll UPDATE all Control rows with the value of Container table where the couple fields CTableName and CPName are the same of Name (excluding the rows of Container with the same couple fields)
UPDATE Control
SET ColumnValue = (
SELECT c.CID
FROM Container c
WHERE c.CTableName + '+' + c.CPName = Control.Name
AND NOT EXISTS(
SELECT 'PREVIOUS'
FROM Container c2
WHERE c.CTableName = c2.CTableName
AND c.CPName = c2.CPName
AND c.CID < c2.CID
)
),
TableName = 'default', ColumnName = 'default'
WHERE ColumnValue IS NULL
Second step:
Adding elements don't present in Control table
INSERT INTO Control (field list)
SELECT field list
FROM Container co
WHERE NOT EXISTS(
SELECT 'in_control'
FROM Control ct
WHERE co.CID = ct.ColumnValue
)
After these two steps you can drop column Name in Control table
I am an Oracle plsql programmer and worked with Sql-server as well.
First you should describe the relationship between the 2 tables, in the end i could figger it out but it's better you explain it yourself.
To update a table with information from another table you should ask yourself:
- when should the update take place?
- what are the conditions to start the update?
- how should the update be done?
In Oracle there is a database object called a trigger. It's quite a handy object and probably just what you need. I believe that sql-server has it too.
Pls fee free to ask any questions but do read the sql-server appropriate manual as well.
Good luck, Edward.
I am very new to SQL and SQL server, would appreciate any help with the following problem.
I am trying to update a share price table with new prices.
The table has three columns: share code, date, price.
The share code + date = PK
As you can imagine, if you have thousands of share codes and 10 years' data for each, the table can get very big. So I have created a separate table called a share ID table, and use a share ID instead in the first table (I was reliably informed this would speed up the query, as searching by integer is faster than string).
So, to summarise, I have two tables as follows:
Table 1 = Share_code_ID (int), Date, Price
Table 2 = Share_code_ID (int), Share_name (string)
So let's say I want to update the table/s with today's price for share ZZZ. I need to:
Look for the Share_code_ID corresponding to 'ZZZ' in table 2
If it is found, update table 1 with the new price for that date, using the Share_code_ID I just found
If the Share_code_ID is not found, update both tables
Let's ignore for now how the Share_code_ID is generated for a new code, I'll worry about that later.
I'm trying to use a merge query loosely based on the following structure, but have no idea what I am doing:
MERGE INTO [Table 1]
USING (VALUES (1,23-May-2013,1000)) AS SOURCE (Share_code_ID,Date,Price)
{ SEEMS LIKE THERE SHOULD BE AN INNER JOIN HERE OR SOMETHING }
ON Table 2 = 'ZZZ'
WHEN MATCHED THEN UPDATE SET Table 1.Price = 1000
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN INSERT { TO BOTH TABLES }
Any help would be appreciated.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/bb510625(v=sql.100).aspx
You use Table1 for target table and Table2 for source table
You want to do action, when given ID is not found in Table2 - in the source table
In the documentation, that you had read already, that corresponds to the clause
WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE ... THEN <merge_matched>
and the latter corresponds to
<merge_matched>::=
{ UPDATE SET <set_clause> | DELETE }
Ergo, you cannot insert into source-table there.
You could use triggers for auto-insertion, when you insert something in Table1, but that will not be able to insert proper Shared_Name - trigger just won't know it.
So you have two options i guess.
1) make T-SQL code block - look for Stored Procedures. I think there also is a construct to execute anonymous code block in MS SQ, like EXECUTE BLOCK command in Firebird SQL Server, but i don't know it for sure.
2) create updatable SQL VIEW, joining Table1 and Table2 to show last most current date, so that when you insert a row in this view the view's on-insert trigger would actually insert rows to both tables. And when you would update the data in the view, the on-update trigger would modify the data.
I need to create a new table called “customer” that include some of columns from the “user table”, and also “project table”. I built my suppliers table with specific column names and I need to fill its column by using data of the other tables. Finally I am trying to finish; when user create a new account and project, the customer table automatically fill with some of other two tables varieties with different column names.
INFO: I have three different user types such as “suppliers”, “costumers”, “managers”. I am holding their information(include user types) in one table called users.
Use the following query as an example and write a query to insert the rows to destination table from source table.
Ex:-
INSERT INTO TestTable (FirstName, LastName)
SELECT FirstName, LastName
FROM Person.Contact
WHERE EmailPromotion = 2
Note: Use Join in the select query to join two tables
The 1st step would be to couple the data from the different tables using a table join command. If you can create a search result that matched your new table, then creating the table is simple a call to the below.
Create table CUSTOMER as (Select ...)
"when user create a new account and project.." this is something you plan on doing at run time in your application and not something you need to collate using sql at this point?