I prepared ar.po file with translations, compile it into translations.js (along with other languages), but when I try setCurrentLanguage("ar"); it doesn't appears, I see default string constants instead. However, other languages work perfect, for example setCurrentLanguage("fr");
Edit:
I also can see "[MISSING]" near every string when gettextCatalog.debug = true;. Seems like angular-gettext doesn't see arabian strings, however it exists in translations.js.
Is there some workaround?
Related
I'm trying to display some Unicode (Cyrillic, actually) using XmLabel and a server-side XLFD font (-monotype-arial-medium-r-normal--*-90-*-*-p-*-iso10646-1). Whenever I use XmStringCreate() or XmStringCreateLtoR() as an XmString factory, the result meets my expectations.
When I try to use XmStringGenerate() factory, however, passing in either XmMULTIBYTE_TEXT for a multi-byte Unicode string, or XmWIDECHAR_TEXT for a wide string, garbage is rendered onto the screen, regardless of the font used (I tried both UTF-8 and single-byte Cyrillic server-side fonts).
The result can be seen below (the 1st 2 lines are ok, 2nd through 6th labels were created with XmStringGenerate() and are obviously not ok):
The complete code (requires Motif 2.1+ and a C99-compliant compiler) is here.
Can anyone suggest a working XmStringGenerate() example suitable for displaying Unicode characters (not just ISO-8859-1)?
XmMULTIBYTE_TEXT is locale-dependent, as n.m suggested, and, aside from CJK (i. e. for Roman and Slavic languages), can only be used in UTF-8 locales. Core X11 fonts can be specified as either fonts (XmFONT_IS_FONT):
-monotype-arial-medium-r-normal--*-90-*-*-p-*-iso10646-1
or font sets (XmFONT_IS_FONTSET):
-monotype-arial-medium-r-normal--*-90-*-*-p-*-*-*:
Speaking of XmWIDECHAR_TEXT mode, it seems impossible to specify a proper font with an explicit encoding, but setting a font set instead works perfectly for Motif 2.1 through 2.3.
I want to generate empty implementations of procedures defined in a header file. Ideally they should return NULL for pointers, 0 for integers, etc, and, in an ideal world, also print to stderr which function was called.
The motivation for this is the need to implement a wrapper that adapts a subset of a complex, existing API (the header file) to another library. Only a small number of the procedures in the API need to be delegated, but it's not clear which ones. So I hope to use an iterative approach, where I run against this auto-generated wrapper, see what is called, implement that with delegation, and repeat.
I've see Automatically generate C++ file from header? but the answers appear to be C++ specific.
So, for people that need the question spelled out in simple terms, how can I automate the generation of such an implementation given the header file? I would prefer an existing tool - my current best guess at a simple solution is using pycparser.
update Thanks guys. Both good answers. Also posted my current hack.
so, i'm going to mark the ea suggestion as the "answer" because i think it's probably the best idea in general. although i think that the cmock suggestion would work very well in tdd approach where the library development was driven by test failures, and i may end up trying that. but for now, i need a quicker + dirtier approach that works in an interactive way (the library in question is a dynamically loaded plugin for another, interactive, program, and i am trying to reverse engineer the sequence of api calls...)
so what i ended up doing was writing a python script that calls pycparse. i'll include it here in case it helps others, but it is not at all general (assumes all functions return int, for example, and has a hack to avoid func defs inside typedefs).
from pycparser import parse_file
from pycparser.c_ast import NodeVisitor
class AncestorVisitor(NodeVisitor):
def __init__(self):
self.current = None
self.ancestors = []
def visit(self, node):
if self.current:
self.ancestors.append(self.current)
self.current = node
try:
return super(AncestorVisitor, self).visit(node)
finally:
if self.ancestors:
self.ancestors.pop(-1)
class FunctionVisitor(AncestorVisitor):
def visit_FuncDecl(self, node):
if len(self.ancestors) < 3: # avoid typedefs
print node.type.type.names[0], node.type.declname, '(',
first = True
for param in node.args.params:
if first: first = False
else: print ',',
print param.type.type.names[0], param.type.declname,
print ')'
print '{fprintf(stderr, "%s\\n"); return 0;}' % node.type.declname
print '#include "myheader.h"'
print '#include <stdio.h>'
ast = parse_file('myheader.h', use_cpp=True)
FunctionVisitor().visit(ast)
UML modeling tools are capable of generating default implementation in the language of choice. Generally there is also a support for importing source code (including C headers). You can try to import your headers and generate source code from them. I personally have experience with Enterprise Architect and it supports both of these operations.
Caveat: this is an unresearched answer as I haven't had any experience with it myself.
I think you might have some luck with a mocking framework designed for unit testing. An example of such a framework is: cmock
The project page suggests it will generate code from a header. You could then take the code and tweak it.
Viewing/Searching java arrays and collections in the Eclipse Java debugger is tedious and time-consuming.
I tried this promising plugin (in alpha as of Aug 2012)
http://www.cvast.tuwien.ac.at/projects/visualdebugging/ArrayExplorer
But it freezes Eclipse for simple arrays beyond a few hundred elements.
I do use Detail formatters, but that still needs clicking on each element to see the values.
Are there any better ways to view this array/collection data?
Use the 'Expressions' tab.
There you can type in any number of expressions and have them evaluated in the current scope.
ie: collection.size(), collection.getValueAt(i), ect...
Eclipse > Preferences > Java > Debug >Detail Formatter
This may be close to what you are looking for. It is another tedious work to setup but once done you can see the value of objects in Expressions window.
Here is link to start
override toString method of your class and you will be able to see what you want to see. i'm attaching example to show you exactly that.
Even though i could not find a way to see them in nice table/array, i found a halfway workaround.
The solution is to define a static method in a throwaway class that takes the array as input and returns a string of concatenated values that one wants to quickly glance at. it could include the array index and newlines to view results formatted nicely. It can be fine tuned to print out only certain array indices to reduce clutter.
This static method can then be used in the watch area.
I have country list with two letter code like 'US' and and three letter code like 'USA'.
I just want to assign all 239 countries have the locale code like en-US (not es-US).
I tried the iterate on:
CultureInfo[] cultures = CultureInfo.GetCultures(CultureTypes.SpecificCultures);
then:
var country = countries.Where(c => c.CodeIso3 == region.ThreeLetterISORegionName).FirstOrDefault();
it doesnt work, to much override.
how to assign the 239 countries code to with is major(or default) language?
Thanks
There is no way to do that. That is because there is no such thing as default language for many of the countries you have in mind.
For example, US does not have an official language. Although English is used by majority of its citizens, it is not default. The other interesting example would be Switzerland. Its citizens use French, German, Italian and Romansh. None of these is default.
That is the reason why there is no such API.
Edit:
As I said before, in many countries there is no such think as default language. I even gave an example of the country which has more than one major language (German and French). To all of you that still can't understand that this really does not make sense, I will give you a clue on how to guess the most probable language:
Common Locale Data Repository Territory-Language Information
If you still cannot understand why restricting to one language per country is probably not the best of ideas, I give up.
Something I see ppl define the variable like this:
b2World *_world;
b2Body *_body;
CCSprite *_ball;
instead of
b2World *world;
b2Body *body;
CCSprite *ball;
I familiar with the second one, but not the first one. So, I checked the Wikipedia about naming convention:
Names beginning with double underscore
or an underscore and a capital letter
are reserved for implementation
(compiler, standard library) and
should not be used (e.g. __reserved or
_Reserved).
So, is that any special meaning which is start with "_"?
The code I saw which using "_" to begin is here:
http://www.raywenderlich.com/457/intro-to-box2d-with-cocos2d-tutorial-bouncing-balls
The wiki page.
There's a long-standing convention among some Objective-C developers to prefix instance variables with an underscore. It can be helpful in several ways: one, it makes it easier to spot instance variables in a .m file; two, it relieves developers of having to come up with creative names for method parameters to avoid colliding with instance variable names; and three, as others have noted, it indicates that the instance variables are private, and therefore shouldn't be accessed willy nilly throughout the code.
In fact, I'd argue for avoiding accessing instance variables directly in methods other than accessors (getters and setters), -dealloc, and -init.... Not that you should never, ever use them anywhere else, but you should at least give it some thought before using an instance variable directly in other methods.
It's really really helpful, but most people don't know why, and that's a shame.
Apple uses underscores to separate the way other objects access a particular object's variables, and the way a particular object access its own variables.
Now this may sound a little bit strange, but imagine the following: You probably all recognize the following compiler warning
.h
#property (nonatomic, retain, readonly) UITableView *tableView;
.m
- (NSInteger)numberOfSectionsInTableView:(UITableView *)tableView {
return [self loadSomethingElseForTableView:tableView];
}
This will result in a compiler warning, because it does not know wether you reference to the local variable "tableView", or the instance variable.
Therefore, Apple recommends you to add the following to the top of your #implementation.
#synthesize tableView = _tableView;
Now, when you reference to _tableView, the compiler knows that you mean the instance variable, and not the local one.
Also, this makes it a lot easier to understand the Garbage Collection in Obj-C, and to prevent making common mistakes.
For example, when doing the following:
#property (nonatomic, retain, readonly) NSString *title;
- (id)initWithTitle:(NSString *)title {
if ((self = [super init])) {
self.title = title; // Is not possible, since it's read only.
title = title; // Is not possible, since it's the same (local) variable.
// Changing the method to initWithTitle:(NSString *)aTitle;
title = aTitle;
}
return self;
}
Now, since you do not use the default setter (actually, you can't, because it's read-only) you need to retain the variable yourself.
This is a lot easier to remember when you give every instance variable a prefix (so you know you need to retain it yourself).
So, basically, it's important to understand the difference between self.variable and (_)variable. (that is: self.variable maps to [self setVariable:...] and variable maps directly to your pointer.
Furthermore, when you add it as a private variable, like this:
#interface TSSomeObject : NSObject {
#private
NSString *_privateTitle;
}
#end
The underscore prefix isn't really necessary, unless you may encounter local variables that have the same name. Besides that, again, it's also an easy way to remind you that it's a local pointer and that you need to retain (and release) the variable when you assign it to your object.
What is wrong is to create a property with a underscore prefix, like this:
#property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *_title;
That's really wrong, and I'm not even gonna explain why ;)
So yes! You should really use underscore prefixes, it makes your code a lot easier to read, and to interpret by the compiler! In Xcode 4, Apple even added these #synthesizes to the default templates.
Usually they're used for variables that shouldn't be accessed outside the current file/module/namespace/whatever, in languages that don't support restricting access with something like a private keyword
https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CodingGuidelines/Articles/NamingIvarsAndTypes.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/20001284-1001757
Both by convention and recommendation in the above document, you should prefix ivars with an underscore.
Admittedly, it is in reference to explicitly set ivars for properties.
But the usage is the same, to indicate the usage of an ivar wherever it is seen.
I am however open to the possibility, that in that context, the use of an underscore prefixed ivar could signal to the user that they are doing something wrong. Meanwhile a postfixed underscore could be used for pure ivars that are meant to be accessed directly.
This blog has some good thoughts from an experienced practitioner and it recommends using prefixed underscores.
http://blog.bignerdranch.com/463-a-motivation-for-ivar-decorations/
Wether you choose to use prefixed underscores to decorate your own ivars, there is at least some evidence that some kind of decoration will help you avoid bugs. And prefix'd underscores are the most common decoration.
Apple reserves names beginning with underscore for its own private ivars and methods. In Objective-C on any Apple platform, it is recommended that you do not prefix your identifiers with an underscore.
http://developer.apple.com/mac/library/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/CodingGuidelines/Articles/NamingMethods.html