Can GCC ignore static declaration of a function? - c

In my application I have a build config for pseudo unit testing (this is more a kind of manual debugging a dedicated function).
In those unit tests I'd like to access functions declared as static in their translation unit.
Is there an option of GCC that would allow me to call static functions from anywhere?
I'd like to avoid:
#if UNIT_TEST_MODE
void myfunction(void)
#else
static void myfunction(void)
#end
{
// body
}
Everywhere!
Thanks for your help :).

There is not need to be verbose. Use a prefix define for every static function:
#if UNIT_TEST_MODE
#define UNIT_TEST_STATIC
#else
#define UNIT_TEST_STATIC static
#end
UNIT_TEST_STATIC void myfunction(void)
{
// body
}
Another option is to move all static function from that .c file to a separate header. That header is included only in that .c file, but it can be included in the unit test .c file if needed. The functions will remain invisible in other files, unless the header is manually included.
(They will have to be defined as static inline. )

As applied to a function or file-scope variable, the static keyword means that the declared function or object has internal linkage. That means such a function or object can be directly referenced only from within the same translation unit. GCC has no option to alter this core provision of the C language, nor should it have.
Your alternatives, then, are either
to give the functions in question external linkage instead of internal linkage, perhaps conditionally, or
to make them available to the test code via an indirect mechanism, such as function pointers initialized and provided to the test code by some facility (another function, a global variable) inside the translation unit.
The first alternative is simpler, but using it means that the code under test is not wholly equivalent to code built for ordinary use. Additionally, this option is not viable if the names of any of the erstwhile-static functions collide with the names of other global objects. This option has been adequately demonstrated in other answers, so I won't go into further detail here.
The pros and cons of the second alternative are more or less the mirror image of those of the first. It is more complicated, but the functions can be tested in the same form that they have in the production build, and you can avoid name collisions by this route. There are many possible variations on this approach; here's one:
test_header.h
#ifndef TEST_HEADER_H
#define TEST_HEADER_H
struct test_pointers {
int (*function_to_test)(const char *);
};
void initialize_test_pointers(struct test_pointers *pointers);
#endif
module_under_test.c
static int function_to_test(const char *);
#ifdef ENABLE_TESTING
#include "test_header.h"
extern void initialize_test_pointers(struct test_pointers *pointers) {
pointers->function_to_test = function_to_test;
}
#endif
static int function_to_test(const char *s) {
// ... whatever
}
the_test.c
#include "test_header.h"
int test_it(void) {
struct test_pointers pointers;
char test_input[] = "test THIS!";
const int expected_result = 42;
int result;
initialize_test_pointers(&pointers);
result = pointers.function_to_test(test_input);
return result == expected_result;
}

No, it can not. This keyword specifies visibility of a function to be translation-unit only, as defined by launguage standard. Ignoring it by a compiler would render it non-conformant.
UPD. To solve your problem, you can indeed do the preprocessor directive trick, as mentioned in comments to your question.

This does not answer your question about GCC, but as a solution to your unit testing problem, you could conditionally compile a wrapper function in the same module,
static void myfunction(void)
{
// body
}
#if UNIT_TEST_MODE
void myfunction_test(void)
{
myfunction();
}
#endif
Or, you could #include the module from a unit test wrapper file,
// unit_test.c
#include "myfunction.c"
void unit_test()
{
myfunction();
}

Related

Access global variable value in different .c files present in different paths

I have 2 files: Sod/iload/iload.c and
Item/itemrule/itemrule.c, and I want to access a variable defined in iload.c which is defined in itemrule.c.
To do this, I made and defined a global variable in iload.c, and I tried to access this variable in itemrule .c with the extern keyword, but it is always 0.
I'm worried that it might be because the files have different paths, does anyone know how I can access this variable?
The usual idiom is to use an extern declaration in a header file and include that wherever the global is needed.
// foo.h
// Make the global visible in any C file that includes this header.
extern int my_global_var;
// foo.c
#include "foo.h" // Not really needed here, but fine.
int my_global_var;
...
// bar.c
#include <stdio.h>
#include "foo.h" // This one makes the global visible in the rest of the file.
void do_something(void) {
printf("my global var's value is: %d\n", my_global_var);
}
Note that using globals like this in a program of any significant size or complexity can lead to messy, bug-prone, and hard-to-change code. Not a great pattern to follow.
I would like to offer an alternative to Gene's answer. In my experience there are two main ways to share variables across modules (compilation units):
1) "Getters and Setters".
2) Externs.
Depending on what kind of team you're working with, they'll have a preference for one or the other. C functions by default have external linkage; you need to force internal linkage via the static keyword in front of the function name if you don't want this.
1) Getters and Setters:
// foo.c
#include <stdio.h>
int my_global_var = 0;
...
Then you can follow it with externally-linked getters and setters. i.e.:
int get_my_global_var(void)
{
return my_global_var;
}
void set_my_global_var(int var)
{
my_global_var = var;
}
This is done within the c file (module). It will be the getters and setters will be able to be called from any other module and they will get and set the global variable my_global_var.
2) Externs:
// foo.c
#include <stdio.h>
int my_global_var = 0;
...
An alternative to getters and setters is to use externs. In this case you add nothing extra to the module that contains the global variable you wish to access/modify (my_global_var).
// bar.c
#include <stdio.h>
extern int my_global_var;
...
Notice the syntax here; when we use the extern keyword, we don't initialize it as anything. We are simply infoming the compiler that the global variable my_global_var has external linkage.

Functions declared and defined in a .c file

As I was going through a huge source code, I came across some files where there is only one function declared in, let's say, "code.h" but in "code.c" there are many functions declared and defined.
What is the exact use of declaring and defining functions in .c files ?
How can we access one of those functions in a source file from other source file ?
It would be helpful if anyone can provide an example. Thanks
Splitting a complex routine in multiple smaller routines might make the code easier to understand and also would allow you to follow the single responsibility principle (What is an example of the Single Responsibility Principle?). By declaring and defining them only in a .c file (and declaring them static), you can hide the internal details from users.
If you, for instance, create a library, then your header could only show the public functions you'd like your users to use.
So only put your functions in a header if you'd like those functions available to anyone who includes the header.
If you'd like to keep a function internal to your .c file, seriously consider adding the static keyword as well: what is the advantage of static function?
---edit---
How can we access one of those functions in a source file from other source file ?
If the function isn't static, you could technically declare it anywhere* you'd like and use it there as well. Though, by the above argument, this would be bad practice.
Example:
a.c
int secret_a(int x)
{
return x+1;
}
main.c
#include <stdio.h>
//access a secret function from a.c
int secret_a(int);
int main()
{
printf("secret_a(3) gives: %d\n", secret_a(3));
return 0;
}
(*) anywhere allowed by the C language
How can we access one of those functions in a source file from other source file ?
That is the whole idea with defining some functions in the header, and some only in the c-file.
The functions defined in the header, can be called by other source files.
The functions only defined in the source file, can be hidden - it is a usual practice to mark functions, only declared in a source file, as static.
That makes their visibility limited to the file-scope (only code inside the same file can 'see' the functions).
The reason why this is done is to split the code into a more cleaner and sorted format so that functions concerning a particular operation can be grouped together in to one file and then called from other file. NOTE: this is not mandatory to do but a good programming practice.
Now there are two ways to do it :
1. including the files
2. Declaring the function as extern and then linking them at linking time.
1.
Including the file is the method that you are probably seeing in your code at hand. Functions are defined in one file and that file is included using #include"filename.[h/c]" and then calling the function as it were declared in the given file.
file_to_include.c
void my_func()
{
printf("Hello!\n");
}
file_that_include.c
#include<stdio.h>
#include"file_to_include.c"
int main()
{
my_func();
return 0;
}
to compile you just do
gcc file_that_include.c
using extern you can do the same but with out using the #include directive
file_to_include.c
void my_func()
{
printf("Hello!\n");
}
file_that_include.c
#include<stdio.h>
extern void my_func();
int main()
{
my_func();
return 0;
}
In this case while compiling you need to provide both files to the compiler
gcc file_that_include.c file_to_include.c
I would suggest reading up on the "extern" keyword.
From what I can understand in your question you have two files - "code.h" and "code.c". However, "code.h" only declares certain functions in "code.c":
code.h
int func1();
int func2();
code.c
int func1()
{
return 1;
}
int func2()
{
return 2;
}
int func3()
{
return 3;
}
main.c
#include "stdio.h"
#include "code.h"
extern int func3();
int main()
{
printf("%d ", func1());
printf("%d ", func2());
printf("%d ", func3());
}
Compiling using gcc:
gcc main.c code.c
yields:
main.c: In function ‘main’:
main.c:10:17: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘func3’ [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
printf("%d ", func3());
and when executed:
1 2 3
The "extern" keyword basically tells the compiler "there is a definition for a function with this declaration" for compiling. During linking the linker will find the definition, and link to it.
This is however a clumsy way of doing it, since the caller ("main.c") needs to know what is going on in "code.c", and continually add more extern declaration, etc. etc.
So rather include functions you which to have global scope in "code.h". If there are functions in "code.c" which od not have global scope, consider making them "static".
Some more reading:
Effects of the extern keyword on C functions

Two versions of same function: inline and normal?

I'd like to inline some functions, however, they are shared across the team and I don't want to force people to use them.
What would be the best way to add inline versions?
// normal
int func1();
int func2();
// inline versions
inline int inl_func1() { ... }
inline int inl_func2() { ... }
Would something like that make sense?
Edit:
Ideally:
I wouldn't have to write the same function definitions (function body) twice.
It would all be handled with s single define.
Declare/define the inline version and declare the non-inline version in the header file with different names.
// "func.h"
// normal
int func1(void);
int func2(void);
// inline versions
static inline int func1_inline(void) { ... }
static inline int func2_inline(void) { ... }
This allows a user to use either form or both. There is little compelling reason to use the same name and only allow one form.
Both can be handy for code that needs speed vs. space on some calls and not others.
This has a benefit that the one .c file that defines/implements func1(), func2() can use simple code to insure equivalent functionality.
#include "func.h"
int func1(void) {
return func1_inline();
}
int func2(void) {
return func2_inline();
}
BTW, declaring a function like int func1(); does not mean the same as int func1(void);. int func1(); means func1 returns an int, but provids no information about what can be passed to it. It is more like pseudo-code int func1(...);
Perhaps you could tell the people who want the inline functions to define a specific macro before including your header file:
#define WANT_INLINE_FUNC1
#include "awesome_funcs.h"
People who want the to call the externally linked function should omit the macro:
#include "awesome_funcs.h"
Then, in "awesome_funcs.h":
#ifdef WANT_INLINE_FUNC1
inline int func1(int param)
{
/* function body here */
}
#else
extern int func1(int param);
#endif
You also need to define a copy of the function with external linkage in one of your library files, e.g. in "awesome_funcs.c":
#define WANT_INLINE_FUNC1
#include "awesome_funcs.h"
/*
* This will define func1 with external linkage,
* but the function body is copied from the inline definition
* in "awesome_funcs.h".
*/
extern int func1(int param);
EDIT 1
You could combine this with chux's answer and get the best of both worlds (unless that makes things too confusing for your users). Just replace func1 in "awesome_funcs.h" with the following:
static inline int inl_func1(int param)
{
/* function body here */
}
#ifdef WANT_INLINE_FUNC1
inline int func1(int param)
{
return inl_func1(param);
}
#else
extern int func1(int param);
#endif
Then inl_func1 will always be the inline version, and func1 may or may not be inline, depending on whether or not the WANT_INLINE_FUNC1 macro was defined before including "awesome_funcs.h".
What would be the best way to add inline versions?
Your easiest course of action would be to declare static inline versions of these functions:
static inline int func1() { ... }
static inline int func3() { ... }
The function names do not need to differ from those of the corresponding external functions. However, if you #include a header that has declarations of functions with those names, then they must be compatible, AND there must be prior static declarations. For example:
static inline int func1(/* params */);
static inline int func3(/* params */);
#include "our_functions.h"
// ...
static inline int func1(/* params */) {
// implementation ...
}
static inline int func3(/* params */) {
// implementation ...
}
This will allow you to add inline versions without modifying your existing code that calls the external versions of these functions, and without affecting any other translation units. There is at least one alternative, but I don't see anything to recommend it over the above for your particular circumstances.

C - extern, static, include

Scoping in C is confusing as hell. I have a variable: "int qwe". This var should be visible in one or more files - f1.c in this case, but not the another f2.c .
Say i have: main.c, f1.c, f2.c, header.h
main:
call f1();
call f2();
header:
#ifndef HEADER_INCLUDED
#define HEADER_INCLUDED
int qwe = 1;
void f1();
void f2();
#endif // HEADER_INCLUDED
f1.c:
#include <stdio.h>
extern int qwe;
void f1(){
printf("In f1: %d\n", qwe);
}
f2.c:
#include <stdio.h>
static int qwe = 2;
void f2(){
printf("In f2: %d\n", qwe);
}
Now this gets confusing. There is definition and declaration. I have defined qwe in the header, declared it in f1.c. Is that correct? Should definition happen in header and declaration in f1.c instead? I tried the latter case, but got an error - "multiple definition of qwe". When i removed the #include directive from f1.c, it worked... It also works when i remove the extern keyword. Is extern redundant?
f2.c i guess it's ok and behaves as expected, or is it? But if i put an #include with header, it breaks. Why is that?
When should i use #include in source files? If i don't include it f1.c or f2.c it works...
Also, if i define a variable as static inside a function, like static int i = 0; This variable will not be destroyed when function exist, it will keep it's memory and data. And next time that same function gets called, will have access to it, right? But the var won't be reinitialized to 0, i.e. the line where is defines won't execute. Correct?
Life stomps me :(
In the header, declare the variable. In e.g f1.c, define the variable, e.g. int qwe = 1; // at global scope.
In all files that want to see/change qwe, include the header that declares the variable. Easy-peasy.
You need to declare the variable in the header, and define it in one and only one C file.
In C, you cannot have a variable that doesn't "belong" to a given translation unit (source file). So it must be defined by exactly one translation unit in the whole program.
When you declare a variable as extern, you're telling the compiler the symbol is (possibly) external to your translation unit (c file).
It's probably also worth noting that when you try to declare a variable without extern, the variable is also defined, e.g.:
/* Declares, but does not defines external symbol 'foo' */
extern int foo;
/* Both declares AND defines bar */
int bar;
This is also different from how functions work to where the "default" syntax for declaration does NOT define a function:
/* Declare, but don't define spam */
void spam(void);
/* Declare, but don't define eggs */
extern void eggs(void);
/* Declare & define 'cheese' */
void cheese(void){ return; }
So your example should look more like this:
qwe.h:
#ifndef QWE_H
#define QWE_H
/* Declare qwe here */
extern int qwe;
#endif
f1.c:
/* DEFINE qwe here */
int qwe = 1;
f2.c:
#include "qwe.h" /*header includes the `extern int qwe` declaration */
void my_function(void)
{
/* use external symbol here! */
qwe = 10;
}
The scoping system isn't that confusing. The rule is this:
if you define something in a .c file EVERY other .c file in your program can access it (it is put in the global namespace).
if you specify static in front of its definition then only things in the SAME file can see it. This should be your default position for all functions and variables you don't want other .c files to be able to access.
It is very important to remember that extern only tells the compiler that the variable/function in question is not defined in the current file. This prevents the compiler for otherwise issuing an error because it can't find the symbol, but it has nothing to do with scoping - your .c file sees everything in the global namespace and if you have not followed the second part of the rule you will quickly find out about this at link time.
Header files similarly have nothing to do with scoping. They are just convenient places to put a bunch of extern statements and macros.
In C, you should use the header file in general to declare the data but not define the data. You don't want to define global data in a header because it will then be redundantly defined in multiple modules. The header indicates to multiple modules the existence of some data or function somewhere and what its type is, as well as common constants and macros (#defines). Outside of that, things in C are very simple. Just about anything is, technically, global unless you declare it static, keeping it scoped to the module it's defined in. The extern declarations for data in the headers and the function prototypes help the compiler know that these items are being accessed by a particular module and what the data types are for access so that the correct code can be generated.
You have:
Two functions f1 and f2 that are defined in separate modules but used in main. So these need to be declared in a header file.
A global data item qwe being used in more than one module.
A static qwe used in one module.
Assuming you want this done with one header file (you might need separate ones for f1, f2, and global data - see below), you could set up
your header as:
#ifndef MY_HEADER_H
#define MY_HEADER_H
extern int qwe;
void f1(void);
void f2(void);
#endif // MY_HEADER_H
Then in your main.c:
...
#include "my_header.h"
int qwe; // This is global and can be accessed from other modules
void main(...)
{
// call f1
// call f2
...
I just defined the global variable, qwe, in main.c arbitrarily. If you have a few globals, you can define them in their own glob_data.c module, for example, and have it's own header, glob_data.h, to declare them. Any other module that needs to access them would include the glob_data.h header so that compilation can properly be done on that module to access that data. Keeping the global data in separate headers helps with cases like you have where you have a static instance of the data versus the global, which are in conflict. You can avoid including the data header file for that global item when you want to compile with the static item.
Then in your C file, f1.c:
...system headers included...
#include "my_header.h"
void f1() {
printf("In f1: %d\n", qwe);
}
And in f2.c:
...system headers included...
#include "my_header.h" // Only if it doesn't contain `extern int qwe;`
static int qwe = 2; // This hides the global qwe and is known only
// to f2.c
void f2(){
printf("In f2: %d\n", qwe);
}
As I mentioned above, you might want to separate your function prototypes and your global data declaration in separate headers. That way, you can include only what's needed in each module and avoid conflicts, such as when you have a static int qwe; versus the global int qwe;.
I have defined qwe in the header, declared it in f1.c. Is that correct?
No, it should be the other way around. You are supposed to have a definition of a global variable in a single translation unit (that's geek speak for a .C file) but you may declare it in as many translation units as you wish. Since headers potentially get included from many translation units, declarations go in the headers.
When should i use #include in source files?
You do it when the header has anything that is needed for your translation unit to compile, with very few exceptions. Note that in some situations it may be necessary or desirable to make a forward declaration manually without including the header.
Also, if I define a variable as static inside a function, like static int i = 0; This variable will not be destroyed when function exist, it will keep it's memory and data.
That is correct, the static variable inside the function will be assigned the initial value only once, and retain the value that you assign to it for as long as your program continues to run.

Why doesn't ANSI C have namespaces?

Having namespaces seems like no-brainer for most languages. But as far as I can tell, ANSI C doesn't support it. Why not? Any plans to include it in a future standard?
For completeness there are several ways to achieve the "benefits" you might get from namespaces, in C.
One of my favorite methods is using a structure to house a bunch of method pointers which are the interface to your library/etc..
You then use an extern instance of this structure which you initialize inside your library pointing to all your functions. This allows you to keep your names simple in your library without stepping on the clients namespace (other than the extern variable at global scope, 1 variable vs possibly hundreds of methods..)
There is some additional maintenance involved but I feel that it is minimal.
Here is an example:
/* interface.h */
struct library {
const int some_value;
void (*method1)(void);
void (*method2)(int);
/* ... */
};
extern const struct library Library;
/* end interface.h */
/* interface.c */
#include "interface.h"
void method1(void)
{
...
}
void method2(int arg)
{
...
}
const struct library Library = {
.method1 = method1,
.method2 = method2,
.some_value = 36
};
/* end interface.c */
/* client code */
#include "interface.h"
int main(void)
{
Library.method1();
Library.method2(5);
printf("%d\n", Library.some_value);
return 0;
}
/* end client code */
The use of . syntax creates a strong association over the classic Library_function(), Library_some_value method. There are some limitations however, for one you can't use macros as functions.
C does have namespaces. One for structure tags, and one for other types. Consider the following definition:
struct foo
{
int a;
};
typedef struct bar
{
int a;
} foo;
The first one has tag foo, and the later is made into type foo with a typedef. Still no name-clashing happens. This is because structure tags and types (built-in types and typedef'ed types) live in separate namespaces.
What C doesn't allow is to create new namespace by will. C was standardized before this was deemed important in a language, and adding namespaces would also threaten backwards-compatibility, because it requires name mangling to work right. I think this can be attributed due to technicalities, not philosophy.
EDIT:
JeremyP fortunately corrected me and mentioned the namespaces I missed. There are namespaces for labels and for struct/union members as well.
C has namespaces. The syntax is namespace_name. You can even nest them as in general_specific_name. And if you want to be able to access names without writing out the namespace name every time, include the relevant preprocessor macros in a header file, e.g.
#define myfunction mylib_myfunction
This is a lot cleaner than name mangling and the other atrocities certain languages commit to deliver namespaces.
Historically, C compilers don't mangle names (they do on Windows, but the mangling for the cdecl calling convention consists of only adding an underscore prefix).
This makes it easy to use C libraries from other languages (including assembler) and is one of the reasons why you often see extern "C" wrappers for C++ APIs.
just historical reasons. nobody thought of having something like a namespace at that time. Also they were really trying to keep the language simple. They may have it in the future
Not an answer, but not a comment. C doesn't provide a way to define namespace explicitly. It has variable scope. For example:
int i=10;
struct ex {
int i;
}
void foo() {
int i=0;
}
void bar() {
int i=5;
foo();
printf("my i=%d\n", i);
}
void foobar() {
foo();
bar();
printf("my i=%d\n", i);
}
You can use qualified names for variables and functions:
mylib.h
void mylib_init();
void mylib_sayhello();
The only difference from namespaces it that you cannot be using and cannot import from mylib.
ANSI C was invented before namespaces were.
Because people who want to add this capability to C have not gotten together and organized to put some pressure on compiler author teams and on ISO bodies.
C doesn't support namespaces like C++. The implementation of C++ namespaces mangle the names. The approach outlined below allows you to get the benefit of namespaces in C++ while having names that are not mangled. I realize that the nature of the question is why doesn't C support namespaces (and a trivial answer would be that it doesn't because it wasn't implemented :)). I just thought that it might help someone to see how I've implemented the functionality of templates and namespaces.
I wrote up a tutorial on how to get the advantage of namespaces and/or templates using C.
Namespaces and templates in C
Namespaces and templates in C (using Linked Lists)
For the basic namespace, one can simply prefix the namespace name as a convention.
namespace MY_OBJECT {
struct HANDLE;
HANDLE *init();
void destroy(HANDLE * & h);
void do_something(HANDLE *h, ... );
}
can be written as
struct MY_OBJECT_HANDLE;
struct MY_OBJECT_HANDLE *my_object_init();
void my_object_destroy( MY_OBJECT_HANDLE * & h );
void my_object_do_something(MY_OBJECT_HANDLE *h, ... );
A second approach that I have needed that uses the concept of namespacing and templates is to use the macro concatenation and include. For example, I can create a
template<T> T multiply<T>( T x, T y ) { return x*y }
using template files as follows
multiply-template.h
_multiply_type_ _multiply_(multiply)( _multiply_type_ x, _multiply_type_ y);
multiply-template.c
_multiply_type_ _multiply_(multiply)( _multiply_type_ x, _multiply_type_ y) {
return x*y;
}
We can now define int_multiply as follows. In this example, I'll create a int_multiply.h/.c file.
int_multiply.h
#ifndef _INT_MULTIPLY_H
#define _INT_MULTIPLY_H
#ifdef _multiply_
#undef _multiply_
#endif
#define _multiply_(NAME) int ## _ ## NAME
#ifdef _multiply_type_
#undef _multiply_type_
#endif
#define _multiply_type_ int
#include "multiply-template.h"
#endif
int_multiply.c
#include "int_multiply.h"
#include "multiply-template.c"
At the end of all of this, you will have a function and header file for.
int int_multiply( int x, int y ) { return x * y }
I created a much more detailed tutorial on the links provided which show how it works with linked lists. Hopefully this helps someone!
You can. Like other's answer, define function pointers in a struct.
However, declare it in your header file, mark it static const and initialize it with the corresponding functions.
With -O1 or higher it will be optimized as normal function calls
eg:
void myfunc(void);
static const struct {
void(*myfunc)(void);
} mylib = {
.myfunc = myfunc
};
Take advantage of the #include statement so you do not need to define all functions in one single header.
Do not add header guards as you are including it more than once.
eg:
header1.h
#ifdef LIB_FUNC_DECL
void func1(void);
#elif defined(LIB_STRUCT_DECL)
struct {
void(*func)(void);
} submodule1;
#else
.submodule1.func = func1,
#endif
mylib.h
#define LIB_FUNC_DECL
#include "header1.h"
#undef LIB_FUNC_DECL
#define LIB_STRUCT_DECL
static const struct {
#include "header1.h"
#undef LIB_STRUCT_DECL
} mylib = {
#include "header1.h"
};

Resources