I have a ListView with ListView.ItemTemplate like this
<ListView
x:Name="myList"
BorderBrush="Transparent"
ItemsSource="{Binding MyItems}"
SelectedIndex="0"
ScrollViewer.CanContentScroll="True"
ScrollViewer.VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto">
<ListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<Style TargetType="ListViewItem">
<Setter Property="HorizontalContentAlignment" Value="Stretch"/>
<Setter Property="Padding" Value="0" />
</Style>
</ListView.ItemContainerStyle>
<ListView.ItemTemplate>
<DataTemplate>
<Grid Margin="5,5,5,5">
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="200"/> <--THIS WILL FORCE WRAPPING
<ColumnDefinition Width="50"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding FilePath}"
Grid.Row="0" Margin="3,3,3,3"
Style="{StaticResource MyFilePathTextLabel}"
TextWrapping="WrapWithOverflow"/> <-- THIS WILL NOT WRAP TEXT
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Grid.Row="1" Margin="3,3,3,3">
<TextBlock Text="Lab location: "/>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding LabLocation}"
Style="{StaticResource MyLabLocationTextLabel}"/>
</StackPanel>
...
...
</DataTemplate>
</ListView.ItemTemplate>
...
...
</ListView>
This will show ListView items like this:
----------------------------------
C:/samples/folderA/myfile1.txt <-- NO WRAP AS IT FITS
Lab location: Chemistry Lab 301
----------------------------------
C:/samples/folderA/folderB/fold
erC/folderD/folderE/folderF/myf
ile2.txt <-- WRAP SINCE NOT FITTING
Lab location: Chemistry Lab 301
----------------------------------
C:/samples/folderA/folderB/myfi
le3.txt <-- WRAP SINCE NOT FITTING
Lab location: Chemistry Lab 301
----------------------------------
C:/samples/folderA/folderB/fold
erC/folderD/folderE/folderF/fol
derG/folderH/folderI/folderJ/fo
lderK/myfile4.txt <-- WRAP SINCE NOT FITTING
Lab location: Chemistry Lab 301
----------------------------------
C:/samples/myfile5.txt <-- NO WRAP AS IT FITS
Lab location: Chemistry Lab 301
----------------------------------
Above, each item show file location as wrapped if it does not fit the width of the ListView.
UPDATE:
Updated XAML
UPDATE 2:
Setting the column Width of grid container to hardcoded value of will force wrapping (see above commented line). But since form is resizable, the grid and ListView is also resizable. Therefore, I can not hardcode width. It needs to wrap according to the current size of the form.
Set the HorizontalContentAlignement="Stretch" on the ListView object itself to tell it to stretch it's Content horizontally to fit available space, and set the HorizontalScrollBarVisiblilty to Disabled to make sure horizontal scrolling is disabled.
<ListView x:Name="myList" ...
HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch"
ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled">
If you use a Grid and set <ColumnDefinition Width="*">, the GridColumn enlarges as much as possible to fill all the available space. Only and only after that, other operations like wrapping take place.
In this case, the GridColumn becomes large enough to contain all the text on a single line. And that's the reason why the text doesn't wrap: it doesn't need to wrap! It has all the space it needs to stay on a single line!
SOLUTION: Set a fixed column width, as 200, or 100, or anyway try a smaller width, and see the result. At some point the text MUST wrap, with a GridColumn thin enough.
SOLUTION FOR FLEXIBLE WIDTH:
You have to bind the Width of the inner Grid (the one with the RowDefinitions) to the ActualWidth of the outer Grid (the one with the ColumnDefinitions).
Create a converter like this:
public class OuterGridToInnerGridWidthConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return ((double)value) / 2;
}
}
In this example I suppose that the inner Grid has half the Width of the outer. If instead you have the column of the Grid with Width="*" and the second column with a fixed width of - for example - 50, the converter can be:
public class OuterGridToInnerGridWidthConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return ((double)value) - 50;
}
}
Made this, add this attribute to the inner Grid:
Width="{Binding ActualWidth,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType={x:Type Grid}},
Converter={StaticResource OuterGridToInnerGridWidthConverter}}"
Finally, set HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch" for the ListView.
This works both when you make the window smaller or bigger: the TextBlock resizes and wraps correctly.
Can you try to have the first RowDefinition like :
<RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
instead of
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
?
If no success, try temporarily removing the
Style="{StaticResource MyFilePathTextLabel}"
also. You did not share its code, so I'm thinking it might break the wrapping.
Related
I am aligning the controls (Buttons) of my UI using a Grid.
It is important, that the size of of the buttons will fill the cell as much as possible AND the ratio is kept, so that my buttons remain a round circle.
I have chosen a Grid, as controlling the button size by the Grid cell on a window resize size seems like a good choice to avoid coding.
I am now struggling with keeping the buttons ratio though.
The only way that worked so far, was wrapping my Button in a Viewbox with Stretch="Uniform". This is not a viable way tho, as the buttons content will be stretched/zoomed too and thus making the text way too big, see screenshot
I guess another solution might be using an image or svg for the round button instead of a background with border radius, as these will be transformed in a way to keep their ratio automatically? If I did that, i'd have to find a way to add text on top though.
Another possibility might be to make sure table cells always have the same height/width? Seems like thats not easy to do tho.
My preferable solution, if possible, would be to keep using background with a border radius.
...
x:Key="RoundHoverButtonStyle"
BasedOn="{StaticResource StandardButtonStyle}"
TargetType="{x:Type Button}">
<Style.Resources>
<Style TargetType="Border">
<Setter Property="CornerRadius" Value="100" />
</Style>
</Style.Resources>
...
<Grid Grid.Column="0" ShowGridLines="True">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Viewbox Stretch="Uniform">
<Button
x:Name="Button0"
Grid.Row="1"
Grid.Column="0"
HorizontalAlignment="Center"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Background="Black"
Content="{Binding Path=ButtonConfigModel.ButtonDict[Button0].DisplayName}"
Foreground="White"
Style="{StaticResource RoundHoverButtonStyle}"
Tag="{Binding Path=ButtonConfigModel.ButtonDict[Button0].VirtualKey}"
Visibility="{Binding Path=ButtonConfigModel.ButtonDict[Button0].IsEnabled, Converter={StaticResource BoolToVis}}" />
</Viewbox>
...
I think what will work for you is working with a MultiValue converter that is then associated with the button's Height and Width. And the Button's Height and Width will be Multi-Bound to a surrounding DockPanel. This sounds confusing - and it is a bit. But I think the below will clarify. I am sure there is more than one way to do this but this works for me:
First, in your .cs file for your window, add this MultiValueConverter - I place mine at the end of the file.
[ValueConversion(typeof(double), typeof(double))]
public class HeightWidthConverter : IMultiValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object[] values, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
double width = (double) values[0];
double height = (double) values[1];
return height - width <= 0 ? height : width;
}
public object[] ConvertBack(object value, Type[] targetTypes, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return null;
}
}
Note that this value converter is simplified - you should add some checks to make sure the correct information is provided to prevent getting an Exception like InvalidCast or some other Exception.
Then, in the Window.Resources section you will need to add a reference to this value converter:
<local:HeightWidthConverter x:Key="HeightWidthConverter"/>
This assumes that you have have a xmlns attribute called local that references your window's namespace. It would look similar to this:
xmlns:local="clr-namespace:MyApp"
lastly, each button would get wrapped by a DockPanel and the button's height and width will get multi-bound to the actual height and actual width of the DockPanel like this:
<Grid
Grid.Column="1"
Grid.Row="1"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch"
>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
<ColumnDefinition Width="*" />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
<RowDefinition Height="*"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<DockPanel x:Name="dp11"
Grid.Column="1"
Grid.Row="1"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch"
>
<Button x:Name="Button11"
Content="Hello"
Background="Black"
Foreground="White"
FontSize="10"
Style="{DynamicResource RoundHoverButtonStyle}">
<Button.Width>
<MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource HeightWidthConverter}">
<Binding ElementName="dp11" Path="ActualHeight" />
<Binding ElementName="dp11" Path="ActualWidth" />
</MultiBinding>
</Button.Width>
<Button.Height>
<MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource HeightWidthConverter}">
<Binding ElementName="dp11" Path="ActualHeight" />
<Binding ElementName="dp11" Path="ActualWidth" />
</MultiBinding>
</Button.Height>
</Button></DockPanel>
<Grid.Resources>
<Style x:Key="RoundHoverButtonStyle"
TargetType="Button"
>
<Style.Resources>
<Style TargetType="Border">
<Setter Property="CornerRadius" Value="100" />
</Style>
</Style.Resources>
</Style>
</Grid.Resources>
</Grid>
The trick here is that the MultiConverter gets both the actual width and actual height of the DockPanel. It then determines which is smaller and returns that value. And, since it does the same calculation for both the Button's height and width, the button will have equal height and width values. In addition, since the DockPanel re-sizes with the surrounding grid (assuming that ability is implemented), the Button will also automatically resize.
Using this technique, each button will have the same height & width (i.e. be round).
The reason to wrap the button in a DockPanel is this will get rendered / sized before the button and therefore the button will have size values to work with (this is a very large simplification by the way). Also, I have found that a DockPanel does a better job of filling itself within the available space than a StackPanel.
I have a tab sequence that I want to be able to split into two regions or recombine into a single tab sequence. The application will start off with one tab sequence
Allow the user to split into a second panel
And recombine into a single tab control.
At this stage, I should get the same display at the first image. But, instead, the ContentControl does not Collaspe and space is left in the main Grid. There is also a GridSplitter that devides the two areaa (white bar in image 2). That seems to Collapse as expected. Is there some trick to get it to get the ContentControl to Collapse?
Here's the XAML. There's a boolean property BottomTabDisplayed which indicates if there are any controls in the bottom area:
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<ContentControl x:Name="ControlContainerTopTab" Grid.Row="0">
<TabControl SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedIndex}"
>
<TabControl.ItemContainerStyle>
...
</TabControl.ItemContainerStyle>
</TabControl>
</ContentControl>
<GridSplitter x:Name="GridSplitterTabControls"
Grid.Row="1"
Height="5"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
VerticalAlignment="Center"
Visibility="{Binding BottomTabDisplayed,
Converter={StaticResource VisiblityToBoolConverter}}" />
<ContentControl Grid.Row="2" Visibility="{Binding BottomTabDisplayed, Converter={StaticResource VisiblityToBoolConverter}}">
<TabControl SelectedIndex="{Binding SelectedBottomIndex}"
Visibility="{Binding BottomTabDisplayed,
Converter={StaticResource VisiblityToBoolConverter}}"
>
<TabControl.ItemContainerStyle>
...
</TabControl.ItemContainerStyle>
</TabControl>
</ContentControl>
</Grid>
Edit 1:
And, here's the converter
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
bool isVisible = (bool)value;
return (isVisible ? Visibility.Visible : Visibility.Collapsed);
}
I just noticed something interesting, if the GridSplitter is unchanged, it works as expected. If I move the GridSplitter, then I get the empty space.
Edit 2:
Snoop changes when moving the GridSplitter
If you look at your code for VisiblityToBoolConverter, you will very likely see it is returning Hidden instead of Collapsed
I have learned that if the height of a grid row, where the ScrollViewer resides, is set as Auto, the vertical scroll bar will not take effect since the actual size of the ScrollViewer can be larger than the height in sight. So in order to make the scroll bar work, I should set the height to either a fixed number or star height
However, I now have this requirement, that I have two different views reside in two grid rows, and I have a toggle button to switch between these two views: when one view is shown, the other one is hidden/disappeared. So I have defined two rows, both heights are set as Auto. And I bind the visibility of the view in each row to a boolean property from my ViewModel (one is converted from True to Visible and the other from True to Collapsed. The idea is when one view's visibility is Collapsed, the height of the grid row/view will be changed to 0 automatically.
The view show/hidden is working fine. However, in one view I have a ScrollViewer, which as I mentioned doesn't work when the row height is set as Auto. Can anybody tell me how I can fulfill such requirement while still having the ScrollViewer working automatically`? I guess I can set the height in code-behind. But since I am using MVVM, it would require extra communication/notification. Is there a more straightforward way to do that?
In MVVM, the way that worked for me was to bind the height of the ScrollViewer to the ActualHeight of the parent control (which is always of type UIElement).
ActualHeight is a read-only property which is only set after the control has been drawn onto the screen. It may change if the window is resized.
<StackPanel>
<ScrollViewer Height="{Binding Path=ActualHeight,
RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=UIElement}}">
<TextBlock Text=Hello"/>
</ScrollViewer>
</StackPanel>
But what if the parent control has an infinite height?
If the parent control has an infinite height, then we have a bigger problem. We have to keep setting the height of all parents, until we hit a control with a non-infinite height.
Snoop is absolutely invaluable for this:
If the "Height" for any XAML element is 0 or NaN, you can set it to something using one of:
Height="{Binding Path=ActualHeight, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=UIElement}}"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch"
Height="Auto"
Hint: Use VerticalAlignment="Stretch" if you are a child of a Grid with a <RowDefinition Height="*">, and the Binding RelativeSource... elsewhere if that doesn't work.
If you're interested, here is all of my previous attempts to fix this issue:
Appendix A: Previous Attempt 1
Can also use this:
Height="{Binding Path=ActualHeight, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=StackPanel}}"
Appendix B: Previous Attempt 2
Useful info: see Auto Height in combination with MaxHeight.
If nothing seems to work, it's probably because the ActualHeight of the parent is either 0 (so nothing is visible) or huge (so the scrollviewer never needs to appear). This is more of a problem if there are deeply nested grids, with a scrollviewer right at the bottom.
Use Snoop to find the ActualHeight of the parent StackPanel. In properties, filter by the word "Actual", which brings back ActualHeight and ActualWidth.
If ActualHeight is zero, give it a minimum height using MinHeight, so we can at least see something.
If ActualHeight is so huge that it goes off the edge of the screen (i.e. 16,000), give it a reasonable maximum height using MaxHeight, so the scrollbars will appear.
Once the scrollbars are appearing, then we can clean it up further:
Bind the Height of the StackPanel or Grid to the ActualHeight of the parent.
Finally, put a ScrollViewer inside this StackPanel.
Appendix C: Previous Attempt 3
It turns out that this can sometimes fail:
Height="{Binding Path=ActualHeight, RelativeSource={RelativeSource Mode=FindAncestor, AncestorType=StackPanel}}"
The reason? It the binding fails, the height will be zero and nothing will be seen. The binding can fail if we are binding to an element which is not accessible. The binding will fail if we are going up the visual tree, then down to a leaf node (e.g. up to the parent grid, then down to the ActualHeight of a row attached to that grid). This is why binding to the ActualWidth of a RowDefinition simply won't work.
Appendix D: Previous Attempt 4
I ended up getting this working by making sure that Height=Auto for all of the parent elements from us to the first <Grid> element in the UserControl.
Change Height from Auto to *, if you can.
Example:
<Window x:Class="WpfApplication3.MainWindow"
xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml/presentation"
xmlns:x="http://schemas.microsoft.com/winfx/2006/xaml"
Title="MainWindow" Height="200" Width="525">
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal" Background="LightGray">
<Grid Width="100">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<ScrollViewer VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto" x:Name="_scroll1">
<Border Height="300" Background="Red" />
</ScrollViewer>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding ElementName=_scroll1, Path=ActualHeight}" Grid.Row="1"/>
</Grid>
<Grid Width="100">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="*" />
<RowDefinition Height="Auto" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<ScrollViewer VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto" x:Name="_scroll2">
<Border Height="300" Background="Green" />
</ScrollViewer>
<TextBlock Text="{Binding ElementName=_scroll2, Path=ActualHeight}" Grid.Row="1"/>
</Grid>
</StackPanel>
</Window>
I've had similar problem, taking me hours to figure out the solution. What solved it was using a Dockpanel as parent container instead of a StackPanel. Just specify all children to dock to top if the functionality should be similar to vertical stackpanel. Consider using LastChildFill="False" in the Dock XAML which is'n default.
So instead of:
<StackPanel Orientation="Horizontal">
<Textbox>SomeTextBox</Textbox>
<Scrollviewer/>
</StackPanel>
Try:
<DockPanel LastChildFill="False">
<Textbox DockPanel.Dock="Top">SomeTextBox</Textbox>
<Scrollviewer DockPanel.Dock="Top"/>
</DockPanel>
You can either set a fix height on your ScrollViewer but then you have to consider that the second row of your grid will have that height too since row's first child will be the ScrollViewer and row's height is auto, or you bind the height of ScrollViewer to another control in your layout. We don't know how your layout looks alike.
At the end if you don't like neither of both just set the row's height to * as swiszcz suggested or hack wpf write your own custom panel that will be able to layout everything possible in every parallel universe or something like that. :)
What I discover is that you have to put your ScrollViewer within a container that has Height=Auto or you get his parent Heigh Actual Size and apply it to that container.
In my case I have UserControl like
<Grid Margin="0,0,0,0" Padding="0,2,0,0">
<ScrollViewer Height="Auto" ZoomMode="Disabled" IsVerticalScrollChainingEnabled="True" VerticalAlignment="Top"
HorizontalScrollMode="Enabled" HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled"
VerticalScrollMode="Enabled" VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Visible">
<ListView ItemsSource="{x:Bind PersonalDB.View, Mode=OneWay}" x:Name="DeviceList"
ScrollViewer.VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Hidden"
ItemTemplate="{StaticResource ContactListViewTemplate}"
SelectionMode="Single"
ShowsScrollingPlaceholders="False"
Grid.Row="1"
Grid.ColumnSpan="2"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch"
BorderThickness="0,0,0,0"
BorderBrush="DimGray">
<ListView.ItemsPanel>
<ItemsPanelTemplate>
<ItemsStackPanel AreStickyGroupHeadersEnabled="False" />
</ItemsPanelTemplate>
</ListView.ItemsPanel>
<ListView.GroupStyle>
<GroupStyle>
<GroupStyle.HeaderTemplate>
<DataTemplate x:DataType="local1:GroupInfoList">
<TextBlock Text="{x:Bind Key}"
Style="{ThemeResource TitleTextBlockStyle}"/>
</DataTemplate>
</GroupStyle.HeaderTemplate>
</GroupStyle>
</ListView.GroupStyle>
</ListView>
</ScrollViewer>
</Grid>
And I add it dinamically to ContentControl which is within a Page.
<Grid Background="{ThemeResource ApplicationPageBackgroundThemeBrush}" Margin="0,0,12,0">
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="70" />
<RowDefinition Height="*" MinHeight="200" />
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<Grid Grid.Row="1" VerticalAlignment="Stretch" HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" >
<ContentControl x:Name="UIControlContainer" />
</Grid>
</Grid>
Notice that Heigh of the Row is *
When I populate ContentControl I use this code in Loaded event
UIControlContainer.Content = new UIDeviceSelection() {
VerticalAlignment = VerticalAlignment.Stretch,
HorizontalAlignment = HorizontalAlignment.Stretch,
Height = UIControlContainer.ActualHeight,
Width = UIControlContainer.ActualWidth
};
And also when ContentControl changes its size you have to update size of the UserControl.
UIControlContainer.SizeChanged += UIControlContainer_SizeChanged;
private void UIControlContainer_SizeChanged(object sender, SizeChangedEventArgs e)
{
if (UIControlContainer.Content != null)
{
if (UIControlContainer.Content is UserControl)
{
(UIControlContainer.Content as UserControl).Height = UIControlContainer.ActualHeight;
(UIControlContainer.Content as UserControl).Width = UIControlContainer.ActualWidth;
}
}
}
Enjoy!
P.S. Acctually I did it for UWP.
I have the following style defined in my App.xaml
<Style x:Key="textBoxMultiline" TargetType="{x:Type TextBox}" >
<Setter Property="VerticalScrollBarVisibility" Value="Auto" />
<Setter Property="HorizontalScrollBarVisibility" Value="Hidden" />
<Setter Property="MinHeight" Value="50" />
<Setter Property="TextWrapping" Value="Wrap" />
</Style>
And throughout the solution we're using it on every text box that needs a brief text.
<TextBox x:Name="textBoxDescription" Grid.Row="2" Grid.Column="1" Style="{DynamicResource textBoxMultiline}" />
Everything works great, but then the client complains about some fields were corped on older monitors with lower resolutions, so I placed a ScrollViewer on one of the higher visual tree nodes to prevent the corping.
<ScrollViewer Height="Auto" VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto" HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Auto">
...
</ScrollViewer>
Strangely, the TextBoxes with the above style start expanding to the right instead of wrapping the text.
Is there a way to prevent this without removing the ScrollViewer?
If you don't want to hard code the width then you can go for element binding the width of the parent item.
Here I am binding TextBox MaxWidth with ScrollViewer actual width. You also have to make sure that the ColumnDefinition width should be set to "*" not to "Auto". If you set it to Auto it will neglect the ScrollViewer width and keep on expanding the width of ScrollViewer and TextBox. I think you fall in this case...
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"></ColumnDefinition>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"></ColumnDefinition>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ScrollViewer HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Auto" Name="scv">
<TextBox Height="30" TextWrapping="Wrap" MaxWidth="{Binding ElementName=scv, Path=ActualWidth}"></TextBox>
</ScrollViewer>
</Grid>
You must define a MaxWidth for the TextBox, otherwise there's no limit because the ScrollViewer.
The solution provided from #bathineni helped me solve my problem. Here is what worked for me:
<Grid >
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition Width="50"/>
<ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<Button Grid.Column="0" Width="30" Height="23" Margin="10,5" Content="..."/>
<ScrollViewer Grid.Column="1" HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled" verticalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled" Name="scv">
<TextBox Height="25" Text="Insert here long text" MaxWidth="{Binding ElementName=scv, Path=ActualWidth}" HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" />
</ScrollViewer>
</Grid>
I tried the aforementioned examples and they didn't work so, I solved the problem myself. There are two ways of solving this issue:
The first solution is implemented in XAML using data bindings. I advice you not to bind the control by itself. The XAML solution is implemented by binding a control with the desired ActualWidth and ActualHeight proprieties to the textbox MaxHeight and MaxWidth proprieties.
<TextBlock x:Name="PasswordText" Margin="0,0,0,20" FontFamily="Bahnschrift SemiBold Condensed" Text="PASSWORD" FontSize="20">
<TextBox x:Name="PasswordTextBox" MaxWidth="{Binding ElementName=PasswordText, Path=ActualWidth}" MaxHeight="{Binding ElementName=PasswordText, Path=ActualHeight}">
The next solution is implemented by generating a Loaded event in XAML, creating it in the C# code and then setting within the Loaded event the MaxWidth and MaxHeight proprieties of the textbox as the textbox ActualWidth and ActualHeight proprieties.
// It doesn't have a problem like in XAML if you pass the textbox its own
// ActualWidth and ActualHeight to the MaxWidth and MaxHeight proprieties.
private void Log_In_Page_Loaded(object sender, RoutedEventArgs e)
{
UsernameTextBox.MaxHeight = UsernameTextBox.ActualHeight;
UsernameTextBox.MaxWidth = UsernameTextBox.ActualWidth;
}
Choose the one that suits your design better, but I think, in my opinion, that this is the most effective, simple, stable and effective way of solving this problem.
Works for me. If you want scrollbars to appear in the textbox, you may add
HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Auto" VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto"
to the TextBox
You must set MaxWidth of the Container Control
<Grid x:Name="RootGrid" Margin="6,6,8,8" Width="500" MaxWidth="500">
<ScrollViewer ScrollViewer.HorizontalScrollBarVisibility="Disabled" ScrollViewer.VerticalScrollBarVisibility="Auto">
<Grid>
<Grid.RowDefinitions>
<RowDefinition Height="Auto"/>
</Grid.RowDefinitions>
<GroupBox Name="contentGroup" Header="Content" Grid.Row="0">
<TextBox Name="content"/>
</GroupBox>
</Grid>
</ScrollViewer>
I ran into this problem when I needed my TextBox to stretch along with its auto-sized Grid column when it got resized, meaning MaxWidth wouldn't work, but still needed to prevent the TextBox from stretching along with its contents.
What I ended up doing was linking this event handler to SizeChanged:
private void TextBox_SizeChanged(object sender, SizeChangedEventArgs e) {
TextBox textBox = (TextBox)sender;
if (textBox.CanUndo && e.NewSize.Width > e.PreviousSize.Width) {
textBox.Width = e.PreviousSize.Width;
}
}
Writing text to a textbox is something that the user can Undo, whereas other actions that can cause resizing (initial drawing of the element, stretching of parent container, etc) aren't Undoable from within the textbox. Thus, by checking CanUndo we can determine whether SizeChanged was triggered by writing text or something else.
The e.NewSize.Width > e.PreviousSize.Width check is necessary because without it the SizeChanged event will infinitely be called from within itself, because to revert the stretching we need to change the size back to the original, which would itself trigger the event.
It's a little hacky but I haven't run into any issues yet.
I am not sure why but I could not get the ScrollViewer solution to work. I needed to have a TextBox with a fixed initial width to implement a numeric up/down control - in this control the TextBox was shrinking and growing independent of the input which looks very annoying if the UI changes as you type.
So, I found the below solution using 2 textboxes to work for me. The first textbox is the textbox displayed for the user to type their input and the 2nd textbox is initialized through a dependency property (DisplayLength) and the converter shown further below.
Binding the MaxWidth property of the 1st TextBox to the Width property of the 2nd TextBox fixes the size such that users can type what they want but the displayed width of the textbox will not change even if there is more UI space available.
<TextBox x:Name="PART_TextBox"
Text="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}, Path=Value}"
Margin="0,0,1,0"
TextAlignment="Right"
AcceptsReturn="False"
SpellCheck.IsEnabled="False"
HorizontalContentAlignment="Stretch"
VerticalContentAlignment="Center"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch"
MaxWidth="{Binding ElementName=TBMeasure, Path=ActualWidth}"
/>
<!-- Hidden measuring textbox ensures reservation of enough UI space
according to DisplayLength dependency property
-->
<TextBox x:Name="TBMeasure"
Text="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource TemplatedParent}, Path=DisplayLength, Converter={StaticResource ByteToPlaceHolderStringConverter}}"
Margin="0,0,1,0"
TextAlignment="Right"
AcceptsReturn="False"
SpellCheck.IsEnabled="False"
HorizontalContentAlignment="Right"
VerticalContentAlignment="Center"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch"
VerticalAlignment="Stretch"
Visibility="Hidden"/>
// Converter
[ValueConversion(typeof(byte), typeof(string))]
public sealed class ByteToPlaceHolderStringConverter : IValueConverter
{
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
if ((value is byte) == false)
return Binding.DoNothing;
byte byteVal = (byte)value;
string retString = string.Empty;
for (int i = 0; i < byteVal; i++)
retString = retString + "X";
return retString;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, CultureInfo culture)
{
return Binding.DoNothing;
}
}
I have the following layout in my window:
Grid with two columns
GridSplitter which resizes grid columns
Second grid column is filled with StackPanel
StackPanel is oriented vertically and has 2 children: TextBlock and a WrapPanel
WrapPanel has two Grids as children
First Grid child contains one Image
Second Grid contains a StackPanel with 3 TextBlocks oriented vertically.
The XAML code looks like this:
<Window>
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition />
<ColumnDefinition />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<GridSplitter Grid.Column="1" Width="5" HorizontalAlignment="Left" />
<StackPanel Grid.Column="1" Margin="5,0,0,0" Orientation="Vertical"
HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" VerticalAlignment="Stretch">
<TextBlock Text="Now here's a silly poem for you." />
<WrapPanel>
<Grid Name="GridForImage">
<Image Width="200" Height="200" Source="Image.jpg" />
</Grid>
<Grid Name="GridForText">
<StackPanel Orientation="Vertical">
<TextBlock TextWrapping="WrapWithOverflow" Text="Roses are red." />
<TextBlock TextWrapping="WrapWithOverflow" Text="Violets are blue." />
<TextBlock TextWrapping="WrapWithOverflow" Text="You belong in a zoo." />
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</WrapPanel>
</StackPanel>
</Grid>
</Window>
Once the window opens, the second column is wide enough to allow grids GridForImage and GirdForText to be placed next to each other horizontally. If I shrink the width of the second column using the grid splitter, the GridForText grid gets placed underneath the GridForImage at one point, which is quite expected.
Here's what I would like to achieve:
I want GridForText to shrink its width to a certain size and to remain positioned to the right of the GridForImage, as I move the grid splitter to the right side of the window. Then, when the width shrinks to a certain value, say 200px, it should get placed underneath the GridForImage, i.e. WrapPanel should do its magic. Right now, the GridForText doesn't resize at all, it just gets placed underneath when it's current width becomes too large for the width of the WrapPanel.
When the GridForText does get placed underneath the GridForImage, I want GridForImage to fill the entire width of the WrapPanel's width.
Is all this possible and what should I do? Thank you all.
You're essentially trying to use two distinct layout modes so you just need to set up the two distinct states in your layout and then add bindings or triggers to switch between them at the point when you want to switch modes (i.e. width = 200). Using a Grid is the most flexible and gives you a lot more control over the relative sizes but requires more settings and would work best in a ControlTemplate or DataTemplate where you can use Triggers to set a bunch of things at once based on a condition.
Here's a more compact example using UniformGrid with some Bindings and a converter. I removed the fixed sizing on the Image - try Stretch="Fill" if you care more about filling width than aspect ratio. I also changed one StackPanel to a DockPanel to maintain vertical stretching for its children and added a Background to one of the TextBlocks just to show how much Width it's really getting:
<Grid>
<Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<ColumnDefinition />
<ColumnDefinition />
</Grid.ColumnDefinitions>
<GridSplitter Grid.Column="1" Width="5" HorizontalAlignment="Left" />
<DockPanel Grid.Column="1" Margin="5,0,0,0" HorizontalAlignment="Stretch" VerticalAlignment="Stretch">
<TextBlock Text="Now here's a silly poem for you." DockPanel.Dock="Top"/>
<UniformGrid Rows="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path=ActualWidth, Converter={x:Static local:LayoutModeConverter.Row}, ConverterParameter=200}"
Columns="{Binding RelativeSource={RelativeSource Self}, Path=ActualWidth, Converter={x:Static local:LayoutModeConverter.Column}, ConverterParameter=200}">
<Image Source="Image.jpg" />
<StackPanel Orientation="Vertical">
<TextBlock TextWrapping="WrapWithOverflow" Text="Roses are red." Background="Red" />
<TextBlock TextWrapping="WrapWithOverflow" Text="Violets are blue." />
<TextBlock TextWrapping="WrapWithOverflow" Text="You belong in a zoo." />
</StackPanel>
</UniformGrid>
</DockPanel>
</Grid>
And the converter:
public class LayoutModeConverter : IValueConverter
{
public static readonly LayoutModeConverter Row = new LayoutModeConverter { RowMode = true };
public static readonly LayoutModeConverter Column = new LayoutModeConverter { RowMode = false };
public bool RowMode { get; set; }
public object Convert(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
double width = System.Convert.ToDouble(value);
double targetWidth = System.Convert.ToDouble(parameter);
if (RowMode)
return width > targetWidth ? 1 : 2;
else
return width > targetWidth ? 2 : 1;
}
public object ConvertBack(object value, Type targetType, object parameter, System.Globalization.CultureInfo culture)
{
throw new NotImplementedException();
}
}