I need help to understand what is happening in this declaration:
#define LDA(m) (LDA_OP << 5 | ((m) & 0x001f))
Thank you
y << x is a left shift of y by x.
x & y is a bitwise and of x and y.
So, the left shift operator is like multiplying by 10 in base 10, but instead you multiply for 2 in base 2, for example:
In base 10
300 * 10 = 3000
In base 2:
0b0001 * 2 = 0b0010 = 0b0001 << 1
with a << b you "push" the number a, b places to the left.
and the or operator ( | )
you have to take two bits and if one or both of them are true (1) then the result is true.
For example:
0b0010 | 0b0001 = 0b0011
0b0010 | 0b0010 = 0b0010
If you have problems with this operators, just try to work the same numbers but in binary.
Related
This question already has answers here:
How do I set, clear, and toggle a single bit?
(27 answers)
Closed 5 years ago.
For example, if I want to set a bit in y at position n (in C)
y = y | (1 << n)
But if I want to delete a bit in y at position n I have to use the ~ operator after binary AND.
y = y & ~(1 << n);
My question: Why Must I use the ~ operator?
Is this because the result turns into negative area?
If you want to set a bit at third place from the right :
Y : 01001000
1 << 2 : 00000100
Y | (1 << 2) : 01001100 The | is OR, bits are set to 1 if any is 1.
If you want to remove the bit :
1 << 2 : 00000100
~(1 << 2) : 11111011 The ~ is NOT, bits are inversed
Y : 01001100
Y & ~(1 << 2) : 01001000 The & is AND, bits are set to 1 if both are 1.
I suggest you read more about Bitwise operators
No, ~ has nothing to do with interpreting the number as negative: tilde ~ operator interprets the number as a pattern of bits, which it then inverts (i.e. replaces zeros with ones and ones with zeros). In fact, if you apply ~ to an unsigned value, the result would remain positive.
Recall that 1 << k expression produces a pattern of all zeros and a single 1 at the position designated by k. This is a bit mask that can be used to force bit at position k to 1 by applying OR operation.
Now consider what happens when you apply ~ to it: all 0s would become 1s, and the only 1 would become zero. Hence, the result is a bit mask suitable for forcing a single bit to zero by applying AND operation.
The ~ operator turns all of the 0's to 1's and all of the 1's to 0's. In order to clear the bint in position n you want to and it will all ones and a zero in the nth position so shift a one to the nth position and ~ invert all the bits.
1 << n for n==3 (just an example) gives you a pattern 0000000...0001000. ~ negates the bit
pattern to 11111111....11110111. Using the bitwise AND operator (&) will
only set the required bit to 0, all other remain with the same value. It's using
the fact that for a bit b: b & 1 == b.
~ flips all bits, it has nothing to do with negative numbers.
A graphical representation for a sequence of k-bits
pos k-1 k-2 0
+---+---+-------------------+---+---+
1: | 0 | 0 | ··· | 0 | 1 |
+---+---+-------------------+---+---+
pos k-1 k-2 n n-1 0
+---+---+-----+---+---+---+-----+---+
1<<n | 0 | 0 | ··· | 1 | 0 | 0 | ··· | 0 |
+---+---+-----+---+---+---+-----+---+
pos k-1 k-2 n n-1 0
+---+---+-----+---+---+---+-----+---+
~(1<<n) | 1 | 1 | ··· | 0 | 1 | 1 | ··· | 1 |
+---+---+-----+---+---+---+-----+---+
I don't understand the exercise 2-9, in K&R C programming language,
chapter 2, 2.10:
Exercise 2-9. In a two's complement number system, x &= (x-1) deletes the rightmost 1-bit in x . Explain why. Use this observation to write a faster version of bitcount .
the bitcount function is:
/* bitcount: count 1 bits in x */
int bitcount(unsigned x)
{
int b;
for (b = 0; x != 0; x >>= 1)
if (x & 01)
b++;
return b;
}
The function deletes the rightmost bit after checking if it is bit-1 and then pops in the last bit .
I can't understand why x&(x-1) deletes the right most 1-bit?
For example, suppose x is 1010 and x-1 is 1001 in binary, and x&(x-1) would be 1011, so the rightmost bit would be there and would be one, where am I wrong?
Also, the exercise mentioned two's complement, does it have something to do with this question?
Thanks a lot!!!
First, you need to believe that K&R are correct.
Second, you may have some mis-understanding on the words.
Let me clarify it again for you. The rightmost 1-bit does not mean the right most bit, but the right most bit which is 1 in the binary form.
Let's arbitrary assume that x is xxxxxxx1000(x can be 0 or 1). Then from right to left, the fourth bit is the "rightmost 1-bit". On the basis of this understanding, let's continue on the problem.
Why x &=(x-1) can delete the rightmost 1-bit?
In a two's complement number system, -1 is represented with all 1 bit-pattern.
So x-1 is actually x+(-1), which is xxxxxxx1000+11111111111. Here comes the tricky point.
before the righmost 1-bit, all 0 becomes 1 and the rightmost 1-bit becomes 0 and there is a carry 1 go to left side. And this 1 will continue to proceed to the left most and cause an overflow, meanwhile, all 'x' bit is still a because 'x'+'1'+'1'(carry) causes a 'x' bit.
Then x & (x-1) will delete the rightmost 1-bit.
Hope you can understand it now.
Thanks.
Here is a simple way to explain it. Let's arbitrarily assume that number Y is xxxxxxx1000 (x can be 0 or 1).
xxxxxxx1000 - 1 = xxxxxxx0111
xxxxxxx1000 & xxxxxxx0111 = xxxxxxx0000 (See, the "rightmost 1" is gone.)
So the number of repetitions of Y &= (Y-1) before Y becomes 0 will be the total number of 1's in Y.
Why do x & (x-1) delete the right most order bit? Just try and see:
If the righmost order bit is 1, x has a binary representation of a...b1 and x-1 is a...b0 so the bitwise and will give a...b1 because common bits are left unchanged by the and and 1 & 0 is 0
Else x has a binary representation of a...b10...0; x-1 is a...b01...1 and for same reason as above x & (x-1) will be a...b00...0 again clearing the rightmost order bit.
So instead of scanning all bits to find which one are 0 and which one are 1, you just iterate the operation x = x & (x-1) until x is 0: the number of steps will be the number of 1 bits. It is more efficient than the naive implementation because statistically you will use half number of steps.
Example of code:
int bitcount(unsigned int x) {
int nb = 0;
while (x != 0) {
x &= x-1;
nb++
}
return nb;
}
Ik I'm already very late (≈ 3.5yrs) but your example has mistake.
x = 1010 = 10
x - 1 = 1001 = 9
1010 & 1001 = 1000
So as you can see, it deleted the rightmost bit in 10.
7 = 111
6 = 110
5 = 101
4 = 100
3 = 011
2 = 010
1 = 001
0 = 000
Observe that the position of rightmost 1 in any number, the bit at that same position of that number minus one is 0. Thus ANDing x with x-1 will be reset (i.e. set to 0) the rightmost bit.
7 & 6 = 111 & 110 = 110 = 6
6 & 5 = 110 & 101 = 100 = 4
5 & 4 = 101 & 100 = 100 = 4
4 & 3 = 010 & 011 = 010 = 2
3 & 2 = 011 & 010 = 010 = 2
2 & 1 = 010 & 001 = 000 = 0
1 & 0 = 001 & 000 = 000 = 0
I am trying to combine three bit operations in one line of C. For a 8 bit char, I have to set bits 2, 4, 6; clear bits 1, 3, 7 and toggle bit 0 and 5 all in one line code of C. I could do these in three line but I cannot combine these. Below is what I have done so far:
x= x & 0xD5;
x = x | 0x51;
x = x ^ 0x84;
They give the right answer for a given value of x. But I tried
x = (x & 0xD5) | (x | 0x51) | (x ^ 0x84)
And
x = x & 0xD5 | 0x51 ^ 0x84
Those do not work. Any suggestion would be appreciated.
It's simply this
x = (((x & 0xD5) | 0x51) ^ 0x84)
Your first try is wrong, because the values of x are not updated so all the operations work on the same value, besides oring the values is not equivalent to assigning the result of the operation to x.
The second, is wrong because or operator precedence, so you just need parentheses.
Your second solution fails because of operator precedence. You can fix it this way:
x = ((x & 0xD5) | 0x51) ^ 0x84;
But there is a more efficient solution:
x = (x & (0xD5 & ~0x51)) ^ (0x84 | 0x51);
You clear the bits you want to clear and the bits you want to set and then toggle both the bits you want to toggle and the bits you want to set. It compiles to one less operation because the constant operations are folded at compile time.
Okay i know this is a pretty mean task from which i got nightmares but maybe ..i'll crack that code thanks to someone of you.
I want to compare if number is between 0 and 10 with bitwise operators. Thats the thing.. it is between 0 and 10 and not for example between 0 and 2, 0 and 4, 0 and 8 and so on..
Reference for number/binary representation with 0-4 bits. (little endian)
0 0
1 1
2 10
3 11
4 100
5 101
6 110
7 111
8 1000
9 1001
10 1010
11 1011
12 1100
13 1101
14 1110
15 1111
Trying to figure out something like
if(((var & 4) >> var) + (var & 10))
I attempt to solve it with bitwise operators only (no addition).
The expression below will evaulate to nonzero if the number (v) is out of the 0 - 10 inclusive range:
(v & (~0xFU)) |
( ((v >> 3) & 1U) & ((v >> 2) & 1U) ) |
( ((v >> 3) & 1U) & ((v >> 1) & 1U) & (v & 1U) )
The first line is nonzero if the number is above 15 (any higher bit than the first four is set). The second line is nonzero if in the low 4 bits it is between 12 and 15 inclusive. The third line is nonzero if in the low 4 bits the number is either 11 or 15.
It was not clear in the question, but if the number to test is limited between the 0 - 15 inclusive range (only low 4 bits), then something nicer is possible here:
((~(v >> 3)) & 1U) |
( ((~(v >> 2)) & 1U) & (( ~v ) & 1U) ) |
( ((~(v >> 2)) & 1U) & ((~(v >> 1)) & 1U) )
First line is 1 if the number is between 0 and 7 inclusive. Second line is 1 if the number is one of 0, 2, 8 or 10. Third line is 1 if the number is one of 0, 1, 8 or 9. So OR combined the expression is 1 if the number is between 0 and 10 inclusive. Relating this solution, you may also check out the Karnaugh map, which can assist in generating these (and can also be used to prove there is no simpler solution here).
I don't think I could get any closer stricly using only bitwise operators in a reasonable manner. However if you can use addition it becomes a lot simpler as Pat's solution shows it.
Assuming that addition is allowed, then:
(v & ~0xf) | ((v+5) & ~0xf)
is non-zero if v is out-of-range. The first term tests if v is outside the range 0..15, and the second shifts the unwanted 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 outside the 0..15 range.
When addition is allowed and the range is 0..15, a simple solution is
(v - 11) & ~7
which is nonzero when v is in the range 0..10. Using shifts instead, you can use
(1<<10) >> v
which is also nonzero if the input is in the range 0..10. If the input range is unrestricted and the shift count is modulo 32, like on most CPUs, you can use
((1<<11) << ~v) | (v & ~15)
which is nonzero if the input is not in the range (the opposite is difficult since already v == 0 is difficult with only bitops). If other arithmetic operations are allowed, then
v / 11
can be used, which is also nonzero if the input is not in the range.
bool b1 = CheckCycleStateWithinRange(cycleState, 0b0, 0b1010); // Note *: 0b0 = 0 and 1010 = 10
bool CheckCycleStateWithinRange(int cycleState, int minRange, int maxRange) const
{
return ((IsGreaterThanEqual(cycleState, minRange) && IsLessThanEqual(cycleState, maxRange)) ? true : false );
}
int IsGreaterThanEqual(int cycleState, int limit) const
{
return ((limit + (~cycleState + 1)) >> 31 & 1) | (!(cycleState ^ limit));
}
int IsLessThanEqual(int cycleState, int limit) const
{
return !((limit + (~cycleState + 1)) >> 31 & 1) | (!(cycleState ^ limit));
}
~ & ^ | + << >> are the only operations I can use
Before I continue, this is a homework question, I've been stuck on this for a really long time.
My original approach: I thought that !x could be done with two's complement and doing something with it's additive inverse. I know that an xor is probably in here but I'm really at a loss how to approach this.
For the record: I also cannot use conditionals, loops, ==, etc, only the functions (bitwise) I mentioned above.
For example:
!0 = 1
!1 = 0
!anything besides 0 = 0
Assuming a 32 bit unsigned int:
(((x>>1) | (x&1)) + ~0U) >> 31
should do the trick
Assuming x is signed, need to return 0 for any number not zero, and 1 for zero.
A right shift on a signed integer usually is an arithmetical shift in most implementations (e.g. the sign bit is copied over). Therefore right shift x by 31 and its negation by 31. One of those two will be a negative number and so right shifted by 31 will be 0xFFFFFFFF (of course if x = 0 then the right shift will produce 0x0 which is what you want). You don't know if x or its negation is the negative number so just 'or' them together and you will get what you want. Next add 1 and your good.
implementation:
int bang(int x) {
return ((x >> 31) | ((~x + 1) >> 31)) + 1;
}
The following code copies any 1 bit to all positions. This maps all non-zeroes to 0xFFFFFFFF == -1, while leaving 0 at 0. Then it adds 1, mapping -1 to 0 and 0 to 1.
x = x | x << 1 | x >> 1
x = x | x << 2 | x >> 2
x = x | x << 4 | x >> 4
x = x | x << 8 | x >> 8
x = x | x << 16 | x >> 16
x = x + 1
For 32 bit signed integer x
// Set the bottom bit if any bit set.
x |= x >> 1;
x |= x >> 2;
x |= x >> 4;
x |= x >> 8;
x |= x >> 16;
x ^= 1; // Toggle the bottom bit - now 0 if any bit set.
x &= 1; // Clear the unwanted bits to leave 0 or 1.
Assuming e.g. an 8-bit unsigned type:
~(((x >> 0) & 1)
| ((x >> 1) & 1)
| ((x >> 2) & 1)
...
| ((x >> 7) & 1)) & 1
You can just do ~x & 1 because it yields 1 for 0 and 0 for everything else