Ok,. Here, I have a column of values, which are ascending order numbers. At certain points, sequence is broken and 0 's are replacing the values. Its like , 1,2,3,0,0,6,0,8,... in continuous cells of a column. Now, I want another column to be linked to this one, but instead of the zeros, the next non zero number appearing on the sequence should be shown. ie. a link to array which exclude a certain value and skips its place. I want it to be in realtime, either using formulas or using macros. Thank you in advance.
OK I got it now (hopefully)... what you are looking for is doable with a simple "SMALL"-function like:
D2: =IFERROR(SMALL(A:A,COUNTIF(A:A,0)+ROW()-1),"")
E2: =IFERROR(INDEX(B:B,MATCH(D2,A:A,0)),"")
The formulas then simply can be copied down. The -1 is the offset for not starting in row 1 (starting at row 25 would need -24). The COUNTIF is simply for skipping out the 0's.
Should be pretty much self explaining, but if you still have any questions, just ask :)
Starting with a blank or zero in C1, and assuming the list of numbers starts in A2 and numbers aren't repeated, you could look for the next number which is greater than the number above starting in C2:-
=IFERROR(INDEX(A$2:A$10,MATCH(TRUE,INDEX(A$2:A$10>C1,0),0)),"")
Is this what you meant?
Related
I’ve looked at similar questions and I think I’m close to a working solution, but it’s giving me the wrong answer. I have a spreadsheet in Google Sheets with data in all columns, but every other cell contains a dollar value and I need only the average of those cells. They start (in this version) on cell G3 and continue through most of row 3, then I intend to copy the formula to other rows with the same cells in those rows needing to be averaged as well, so if it’ll adjust as I copy that’ll be best. Here’s what I’ve worked up so far:
=AVERAGEIF(ArrayFormula(mod(column(G3:3),2)),”>0”)
It’s returning 1 as the result, when it should be about 1500. If I change the 2 to another number, the result increases with it, so I think something in mod or column is being done wrong, but I don’t have enough practice to know where I messed up.
avg of every 2nd column it's done like:
=AVERAGE(FILTER(G3:3, MOD(COLUMN(G3:3)-1, 2)=0))
TIL about the FILTER function. Thanks guys.
There is a way with ArrayFormula. I think you almost got it. I would prefer to add one more argument for AVERAGEIF to specify the range to average. I don't know if it defaults to the range in the condition.
And I would do the modulo on the difference between a column and the first column. I guess for your question it isn't needed as all column numbers are either odd or even. But using the difference is a general purpose way to apply the concept to say every nth column.
The modulo 2 of any column number with be 0 or 1. So instead of using an inequality just use 0 or 1. From your formula it looks like your dollar values must be in odd columns so the result of the modulo should be 1. But I think if you are starting at G3 then taking the column difference before applying Mod 2 changes the desired result to 0. But of course to switch to the other column change the 0 to a 1.
=AVERAGEIF(ArrayFormula(mod((COLUMN(G3:3)-COLUMN(G3)),2)),0,G3:3)
I have a spreadsheet that tracks where consumers are referred to. To record individual referrals, users select places from a drop down list. This list then populates a cell, with values separated by commas.
On a separate sheet, I need to count the number of referrals for each referral type. So I need to count the # of times DHHS shows up in the array, for example. I've attempted to do this using the following formula:
=SUM(LEN(range))-LEN(SUBSTITUTE(range,"string",""))/LEN("string")
This is working fine for single word strings, but is not working for multiple word strings like "CHIP Water Inquiry". Any ideas why, and what I can do about it?
You need to make two minor corrections, as you are breathtakingly close in your formula. Add a second SUM formula, tally the subtracted length and then house the two subtracted sections within parentheses as you see in the posted formula. As Boris said, Ctrl + Shift + Enter it, as you probably already know. F1 is assumed to hold your "string" that you wish to count.
=(SUM(LEN(range))-SUM(LEN(SUBSTITUTE(range,F1,""))))/LEN(F1)
I am trying to find the second lowest cost in this list. Clearly, it is $547, but when I put the formula in: =SMALL(F2:F31, 2) I get $488.00, and I am guessing this is because $488 repeats itself a number of times and so it is the second number in the list of numbers to be the smallest?
What formula should I put in to get the second smallest number, despite repeats?
What is the purpose of this? The end result? Do you seek automation or this is adhoc?
If this is adhoc, you can do:
1. copy column with numbers
2. Paste copied column into new sheet
3. Use Remove Duplicates functionality (Data tab) on this column to remove repetitions
4. Use your formula
Also, you can do this with one formula :
=SMALL(F2:F31, COUNTIF(F2:F31, MIN(F2:F31)) + 1)
As long as you only want the second smallest number, and you only have 2 digits of significant influence, you can do this fairly effectively without creating additional arrays of data, or using Array Formulas, as long as you can re-order from largest to smallest, instead of smallest to largest.
First, find the smallest number, which is simply:
=MIN(F:F)
Then, subtract 1 penny from that amount. We can now use price-is-right-rules searching to find the closest number, utilizing the next-best feature of the MATCH function, as follows:
=INDEX(F:F,MATCH(MIN(F:F)+0.01,F:F,-1))
This will take the smallest number in column F, and add .01 to it. Using -1 as the 3rd argument in the MIN function forces MIN to accept the next best alternative if this amount is not matched exactly.
Only because I figure based on your last post we are headed this way. I would as I said in that post make a unique list of all your states and counties.
Then building on #Andrew formula, which should be the one marked as correct, with COUNTIFS() as the k value in the SMALL():
=SMALL(IF(A2=DATA!A:A,IF(B2=DATA!B:B,DATA!F:F)),COUNTIFS(DATA!A:A,A2,DATA!B:B,B2,DATA!F:F,MIN(IF(A2=DATA!A:A,IF(B2=DATA!B:B,DATA!F:F))))+1)
This will give you a clean list of the second value.
Then to find the Insurance company that goes with the quote use:
=INDEX(DATA!E:E,MATCH(SMALL(IF(A2=DATA!A:A,IF(B2=DATA!B:B,DATA!F:F)),COUNTIFS(DATA!A:A,A2,DATA!B:B,B2,DATA!F:F,MIN(IF(A2=DATA!A:A,IF(B2=DATA!B:B,DATA!F:F))))+1),IF(A2=DATA!A:A,IF(B2=DATA!B:B,DATA!F:F)),0))
Put them in the second row. These are both Array formulas and will need to be confirmed with ctrl-shift-enter. Then they can be copied down as far as needed.
I'm trying to setup a formula that will return the contents of an related cell (my related cell is on another sheet) from the smallest 2 results in an array. This is what I'm using right now.
=INDEX('Sheet1'!$A$40:'Sheet1'!$A$167,MATCH(SMALL(F1:F128,1),F1:F128,0),1)
And
=INDEX('Sheet1'!$A$40:'Sheet1:!$A$167,MATCH(SMALL(F1:F128,2),F1:F128,0),1)
The problem I've run into is twofold.
First, if there are multiple lowest results I get whichever one appears first in the array for both entries.
Second, if the second lowest result is duplicated but the first is not I get whichever one shows up on the list first, but any subsequent duplicates are ignored. I would like to be able to display the names associated with the duplicated scores.
You will have to adjust the k parameter of the SMALL function to raise the k according to duplicates. The COUNTIF function should be sufficient for this. Once all occurrences of the top two scores are retrieved, standard 'lookup multiple values' formulas can be applied. Retrieving successive row positions with the AGGREGATE¹ function and passing those into an INDEX of the names works well.
The formulas in H2:I2 are,
=IF(SMALL(F$40:F$167, ROW(1:1))<=SMALL(F$40:F$167, 1+COUNTIF(F$40:F$167, MIN(F$40:F$167))), SMALL(F$40:F$167, ROW(1:1)), "") '◄ H2
=IF(LEN(H40), INDEX(A$40:A$167, AGGREGATE(15, 6, ROW($1:$128)/(F$40:F$167=H40), COUNTIF(H$40:H40, H40))), "") '◄ I2
Fill down as necessary. The scores are designed to terminate after the last second place so it would be a good idea to fill down several rows more than is immediately necessary for future duplicates.
¹ The AGGREGATE function was introduced with Excel 2010². It is not available in earlier versions.
² Related article for pre-xl2010 functions - see Multiple Ranked Returns from INDEX().
The following formula will do what I think you want:
=IF(OR(ROW(1:1)=1,COUNTIF($E$1:$E1,INDEX(Sheet1!$A$40:$A$167,MATCH(SMALL($F$1:$F$128,ROW(1:1)),$F$1:$F$128,0)))>0,ROW(1:1)=2),INDEX(Sheet1!$A$40:$A$167,MATCH(1,INDEX(($F$1:$F$128=SMALL($F$1:$F$128,ROW(1:1)))*(COUNTIF($E$1:$E1,Sheet1!$A$40:$A$167)=0),),0)),"")
NOTE:
This is an array formula and must be confirmed with Ctrl-Shift-Enter.
There are two references $E$1:$E1. This formula assumes that it will be entered in E2 and copied down. If it is going in a different column Change these two references. It must go in the second row or it will through a circular reference.
What it will do
If there is a tie for first place it will only list those teams that are tied for first.
If there is only one first place but multiple tied for second places it will list all those in second.
So make sure you copy the formula down far enough to cover all possible ties. It will put "" in any that do not fill, so err on the high side.
To get the Scores use this simple formula, I put mine in Column F:
=IF(E2<>"",SMALL($F$1:$F$128,ROW(1:1)),"")
Again change the E reference to the column you use for the output.
I did a small test:
This question is about how Excel's COUNTIF function treats different data types when used as an array formula.
There are lots of good posts out there detailing how to use COUNTIF for tasks such as extracting unique values from a list, for example this post. I've managed to use examples from this and other posts to solve specific problems, but I'm trying to get a deeper understanding of array formulas in order to adapt my formulas to new needs.
I came across a peculiar behavior of COUNTIF. In general, Excel seems to treat strings as "larger than" numbers, so that the following examples are valid:
Cell Formula Returns
=1<2 TRUE
="a"<"b" TRUE
="a">"b" FALSE
=1<"b" TRUE
Now, suppose range A1:A6 contains the following data set:
1
2
3
A
B
C
For each cell in this set, I want to check how many of all the cells in the set that are smaller than or equal to that cell (a useful technique in more complex formulas). I enter the following array formula in range B1:B6:
{=COUNTIF($A$1:$A$6,"<="&$A$1:$A$6)} (CTRL + SHIFT + ENTER)
Based on the examples above comparing numbers and strings (also illustrated in Column D below), I would expect the output shown below to look like Column C. However, the array formula returns the result shown in Column B, which suggests that strings and number elements are counted separately by arraywise COUNTIF.
Column A Column B Column C Column D
1 1 1 A1<"C" = TRUE
2 2 2 A2<"C" = TRUE
3 3 3 A3<"C" = TRUE
A 1 4 A4<"C" = TRUE
B 2 5 A5<"C" = TRUE
C 3 6 A6<"C" = FALSE
So the question is how to produce the output in Column C? (EDIT: Just to clarify, I'm specifically looking for solutions that make use of COUNTIF's array properties.)
Any insight into why arraywise COUNTIF apparently behaves differently than the single-cell examples would also be much appreciated.
NOTE: I've translated the examples from a non-English version of Excel, so I apologize in advance for any typos.
PS. For a background, I ran into this problem when I tried to build a formula that would both extract unique values from a list with possible duplicates, and sort the unique values in numerical/alphabetical order. My current solution is to do this in two steps. One solution for how to do it in one step is proposed here.
First of all, excellently laid-out question, and on an interesting topic to boot.
I also raised an eyebrow when I first came across this behaviour of the COUNTIF(S)/SUMIF(S) functions. In their defence, I suppose we could construct situations in which we actually want strings and numerics to be considered separately.
In order to construct your required in-formula array, you will need something like:
MMULT(0+(TRANSPOSE($A$1:$A$6)<=$A$1:$A$6),ROW($A$1:$A$6)^0)
though note that the necessary transposition will mean that any set-up which includes this construction will require committing with CSE.
Regards
The different behavior can easily shown if you compare
=COUNTIF($A$1:$A$6,"<=A")
with
{=COUNT(IF($A$1:$A$6<="A",1))}
The first will only get text values from $A$1:$A$6 because it is clearly text to compare and it is faster ignoring other values then. =COUNTIF($A$1:$A$6,"<=3") will only get numeric values from $A$1:$A$6 because of the same reasons. Even if the criterion would be a concatination with a cell reference, then the concatination would be the first process and would lead either to "<=A" or "<=3". So it is ever clear what to compare, text or numbers.
The second first needs an array of the comparisons, then performs the IF, gets so an array of 1 or FALSE and counts then. But the "A" could also be a cell reference. So it is not clear what to compare at the beginning and the first array has to compare all values in $A$1:$A$6.
So COUNTIF(S) and SUMIF(S) cant be used comparing mixed text and numeric data.
The solution is shown already by XOR LX.
Btw.: with your PS. For a background you should consider the following solution from an German Excel site: http://www.excelformeln.de/formeln.html?welcher=236.
In your linked example:
Formula in B2 downwards
{=INDEX($A$2:$A$99,MATCH(LARGE(COUNTIF(A$2:A$99,">="&A$2:A$99)+99*ISNUMBER(A$2:A$99),ROWS($1:1)),COUNTIF(A$2:A$99,">="&A$2:A$99)+99*ISNUMBER(A$2:A$99),0))&""}
In this solution the COUNTIF compares with >= so the biggest text or number will count lowest and so get the lowest position. All number positions are added with 99. So they are ever greater than all possible text positions. So we have a descended sorted array. Then, using LARGE, the list is created from the highest to the lowest position.
I doubt that countif is the right function for what you want to achieve here.
try this (ctrl+shift+enter):
={SUM(IF(A1>=$A$1:$A$6,1,0))}
You will get
1
2
3
4
5
6
PS: CountIf is an basically an array function internally. Using it in another array function results into multiple array functions and their behaviour becomes complex. Array functions are best used with clear logical path.
As tested in Excel 2013, you will only get 1 in all results instead of what was proposed in Column B.
Currently, in the function provided by you, countif cannot figure out which cell to compare to which cell. Array functions expand ranges and then perform the provided action. Therefore, it is comparing each cell to same cell and resulting into 1.
Try this FormulaArray in B1 then copy till B6:
=SUM(($A$1:$A$6<=$A1)*1)