I'm trying to figure out why an WPF-app won't exit imediately on closing it. Using Process Explorer I hade found out that WerFault.exe is started while exiting which seem to indicate that something crashes during the teardown, perhaps some destructor or dispose that fails. This started happening when I recently switched to VS2015. I am running Windows 8.
My question is: How can I find out what the real problem is? Any way of finding a crash log for WerFault.exe? I have hundreds of destructors and dispose-methods so it's a bit hard to put breakpoints in all of them. Any other way of capturing these kinds of errors in VS?
The exit code is -1073740791 which "indicate a bug in the executed software that causes stack overflow, leading to abnormal termination of the software". But where?
Some more info from the event log:
Faulting module name: ucrtbase.DLL, version: 10.0.10240.16390, time stamp: 0x55a5b718
Exception code: 0xc0000409
Fault offset: 0x0000000000065a4e
You could try enabling user mode dumps:
Create the registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting\LocalDumps
Within LocalDumps, create a key that is the name of your executable
Within the key you just created, set the values of DumpFolder, DumpCount, DumpType, and CustomDumpFlags as needed (you should definitely set DumpType to 2 for full dumps, otherwise I don't think that enough information will be captured to debug a managed dump).
Once you have done this, whenever your executable crashes a dump file will be created in the folder specified by DumpFolder (or %LOCALAPPDATA%\CrashDumps by default).
Related
I working on a version bump on the cc65 and encountered a problem with the linuxdoc-tools. Since I can't fix the linuxdoc-tools and there is a simple workaround possible I decided to add an if statement to inform the user together with the workaround:
if {! [file exists ${prefix}/bin/perl] } {
ui_error "
«${prefix}/bin/perl» is missing but the linuxdoc-tools depends on it.
Please create an appropriate symbolic link for linuxdoc-tools to work.
"
exit 1
}
Crude but the best I can do since I'm neither the perl5 nor the linuxdoc-tools maintainer and I don't want to spend to much time on a version bump.
However, the MacPorts doesn't understand exit 1 and ui_error won't stop execution on its own.
How do I stop the execution so not to waste the users time on a build which will otherwise fail right at the end.
Use return -code error "error message", or the shorthand for the same thing, error "error message".
Note that you should use ui_error before that to print a human-readable message for the user – while the error message is also being printed, it can sometimes get lost in the output.
Additionally, note that $prefix/bin/perl is a build dependency of linuxdoc-tools. If it is also needed at runtime, you should submit a pull request that adds depends_run path:bin/perl:perl5 to the port rather than attempting to fix this bug in your port.
I'm on a VirtualBox with Ubuntu 18.10 installed on, and I'm new using it. My code creates 100 forked child that works on a shared memory. SOMETIME I get this message
Sender(Pid = (childPID)) terminated with status 0x008B.
Searching in the web I found that could be a SIGSEGV error. Is it true?
Finally, is there any way to find WHERE the code fails in over 1000 lines? I tryed using this Guide: http://www.unknownroad.com/rtfm/gdbtut/gdbsegfault.html to find the error with gdb but my terminal says me that I have "No Stack". I'm totally new with this kind of problems, any hint will be appreciated.
Sender(Pid = (childPID)) terminated with status 0x008B.
Searching in the web I found that could be a SIGSEGV error. Is it true?
Yes, that indicates termination by signal 11 (0xB).
Finally, is there any way to find WHERE the code fails in over 1000 lines?
I'd run the program with valgrind.
I had a program that was segfaulting.
When I went to investigate and ran dmesg I could see lines like this:
[955.915050] traps: foo_bar[123] general protection ip:7f5fcc2d4306 sp:7ffd9e5868b8 ...
Now the program has been fixed and I'm trying to write some analysis scripts across different systems to find similar messages and was hoping to induce a line in the dmesg log to get a baseline for what to look for and see if there's a difference between, say, a sigbus(10) and a sigill(4)
I tried to do it via kill -11 on the command line . No entry in dmesg
I tried to do it via signal(getpid(), 11) in the code. No entry in dmesg
I tried to do it via signal 11 after attaching in gdb . No entry in dmesg
I tried to do it via writing bad code and it worked for SEGV, but I can't figure out how to trigger a SIGBUS (for example)
I'm guessing that there is more than one path for handling the signal depending on how it occurs and my attempts above just aren't doing it the right way.
How can I trigger/send a signal to my program that'll get a line in dmesg? Is there some kernel or log configuration I can twiddle to get those lines?
Update:
" __builtin_trap: when to use it? " shows how to get a SIGILL but alas doesn't have a signal-agnostic solution)
It appears that fork fails under Mac OS 10.6.8. The algorithm is coded in R and I have mainly be using the foreach package for parallel processing. The code works perfectly well when run sequentially (foreach and %do%) but not when run in parallel (foreach and %dopar%) even though the processes run in parallel do NOT communicate.
I used foreach on this same machine a month ago and it worked fine. An update of the OS has been performed in the meantime.
Error Messages
I received several kinds of error messages that seems to come almost stochastically. Also the errors differ depending on whether the code is run from the terminal (either by copy-pasting in the R environment or with R CMD BATCH) or from the R console.
When run on the Terminal, I get
Error in { : task 1 failed - "object 'dp' not found"
When run on the R console I get either
The process has forked and you cannot use this CoreFoundation functionality safely. You MUST exec().
Break on __THE_PROCESS_HAS_FORKED_AND_YOU_CANNOT_USE_THIS_COREFOUNDATION_FUNCTIONALITY___YOU_MUST_EXEC__() to debug.
....
<repeated many times when run on the R console>
or
Error in { : task 1 failed - "object 'dp' not found"
with the exact same code! Note that although this second error message is the same than the one received on the Terminal, the number of things that are printed (through the print() function) on the screen vastly differ!
What I've tried
I updated the package foreach and I also restarting my computer but it did not quite help.
I tried to print pretty much anything I could but it ended up being quite hard to keep track of what this algorithm is doing. For example, it often through the error about the missing object dp without executing the print statement at the line that precedes the call of the object dp.
I tried to use %dopar% but registering only 1 CPU. The output did not change on the Terminal, but it changed on the Console. Now the console gives the exact same error, at the same time than the terminal.
I made sure that several CPUs were in used when I ask for several CPUs.
I tried to use mclapply instead of foreach and registerDoMC() instead of registerDoParallel() to register the number of cores.
Extra-Info
My version of R is 3.0.2 GUI 1.62 Snow Leopard build. My machine has 16 cores.
We have a C program (a client that connects to our server). The program uses Win32 API:s to create controls etc. It is a single-threaded application. Lately the application has started to hang at random in Windows 7.
Thanks to Application Verifier, I could detect problematic APIs and rectified them.
Now there are still some customers reporting a "non-responsive" situation.
A crash dump from their side reveals the following API:
SendMessage(HWND_BROADCAST, WM_DDE_INITIATE, (WPARAM)hClient, MAKELONG(aAppl,aTopic));
Yes its sending a DDE command to WinWord.exe. Task Manager shows Winword in non-responsive state.
Evtx reveals the following:
Fault bucket , type 0
Event Name: AppHangXProcB1
Response: Not available
Cab Id: 0
Problem signature:
P1: OurApplication.exe
P2: 14.14.1.50
P3: 537337f4
P4: b6f1
P5: 32
P6: WINWORD.EXE
P7: 15.0.4615.1000
P8:
P9:
P10:
Attached files:
C:\Users\diane-do\AppData\Local\Temp\WER91C7.tmp.appcompat.txt
C:\Users\diane-do\AppData\Local\Temp\WER958F.tmp.WERInternalMetadata.xml
C:\Users\diane-do\AppData\Local\Temp\WER968B.tmp.xml
C:\Users\diane-do\AppData\Local\Temp\WER969C.tmp.hdmp
C:\Users\diane-do\AppData\Local\Temp\WER9777.tmp.mdmp
These files may be available here:
C:\Users\diane-do\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\WER\ReportQueue\AppHang_OurApplication.exe_e9b582fc22d416b8787c1184f6fe7fa19d63_cab_0fde97a1
Analysis symbol:
Rechecking for solution: 0
Report Id: 9e84daa9-eff8-11e3-a2fb-90b11c841d1a
Report Status: 36
Any help would be appreciated.
Please note the above is Win 7 64-bit, while our application is 32 bit. Don't know what build their Office 2013 is (32 or 64 bit)
I am aware of the following:
- DDE is old technology, but changing it is out of question now.
- For the above case, I cant use SendMessageTimeout APIs as our client has to wait until commands complete.
ONCE AGAIN, The hang (non-responsive state) happens at random, not always at DDE but various instances. While computing something, even while doing a simple operation as below. Customers launch our CHM file from our menu, then Alt+Tab to another application and then Alt+Tab back to our application, our application becomes non-responsive.
P.S: I also didn't find any document online as to how to interpret those evtx application logs , what P1 P2 stand for. What signatures meant or what fault bucket type are, or any meaning of AppHangXProcB1 or AppHangB1 etc. Please pass the link if you have for the same.
sendmessage is a blocking call it will return only after the receiver application processes the message. Here, it got blocked & it as well blocked your application from dispatching the message. Since your application can't process any further window messages, it hanged the GUI.
Check again all the processing done on processing a window message for any blocking calls like waitforsingleobject, recv, connect in it.