Angular controller load() - angularjs

Question

This is a trivia for many, but I never worked with angular before and I need help to achieve a simple task, cause I'm stucked.
My ng-controller processctrl has a load() method declared.
My view has two calls to ng-controller="processoctrl", causing load() method to run twice. processctrl also has a property currentPhase that starts null and load() set its value. I could just write ($scope.currentPhase || load()) to prevent double load(), but the bind to currentPhase occurs atop (in DOM) of the repeater.
I could place an object property into the $rootScope and update it from processoctrl.scope.load(), but it would turn into a madness.
I could simply $($(".headerCurrentPhase")[0]).html($scope.currentPhase) into my load() method, but it's insanity too.
I could rewrite load() to getProcesses = function(){} and $rootScope.$emit('getProcesses',{}) elsewhere and into the controller $rootScope.$on('getProcesses',getProcesses) to prevent this double load(), but I think this is redundate, so how to simply call a controller function instead of load()? Or how to achieve this simple task? Use a directive?
view:
<div ng-include src="'includes/overview-header.html'"></div>
<div ng-include src="'includes/process-info.html'"></div>
excerpt of includes/overview-header.html :
<div class="col-md-12">
....
<h4><strong>currentPhase</strong></h4>
<p ng-controller="processoctrl">
<span class="label label-primary headerCurrentPhase" ng-bind="currentPhase"></span>
</p>
</div>
excerpt of includes/process-info.html :
<tbody ng-controller="processctrl">
<tr ng-repeat="Process in Processes|orderBy:'ID'">
<td>{{Process.isCurrent}}</td>
<td>{{Process.isCurrent}}</td>
<td>{{Process.ID}}</td>
<td>{{Process.Title}}</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
processoctrl
(function (app) {
app.controller('processctrl', function ($scope, $rootScope, $routeParams, factorysvc) {
$scope.Processes = [];
$scope.currentPhase = null;
load();
//($scope.currentPhase || load())
function load() {
var promiseGet = factorysvc.getPsby($routeParams.itemId);
promiseGet.then(function (data) {
$scope.Processes = data;
$rootScope.root.empreendimento.currentPhase = $scope.currentPhase = data[0].currentPhase.Title;
}, function (err) {
$scope.Message = "Error " + err.status;
});
}
})}(angular.module('sgaapp')));

Answer 1

Man, I didn't catch what are you want to do, but I want to take you few advise:
Your logic it's really complicated, you should re-think it, cause now it's sucks;
Includes in angular sucks too. Really. You shouldn't use it at all. How to avoid it? Well, there is two option.
First is to use client-side routing (for pages); Instead of using built-in routing, better to use ui-router. You will be able to use nested states and routes;
Second is to use directives instead of includes. Really, just imagine - header or footer, both can be directives, which you just include in pages when it's needed.
What for me - I use first and second solution in same time.
You should avoid to put anything in $rootScope. Perhaps it's couldn't kill you, and from time to time it's the only solution, but, u know, it's a bad practice.
If you need to store data and share it between controllers, the better option is to us factories (or other services, but factories most universal).
Example:
app.factory('MyFactory', function () {
return {
myData: 'some default value',
someCommonFuction: function (a, b) {
return a + b;
}
};
});
As well as data-store, you can use factory as utility-class, with common functions

Answer 2

Is there any real need to have 2 includes?
If overview-header is shared across views, then we can have currentPhase at $rootScope level or having a parent level controller and have it.
If overview-header is only for this view, then we can combine both htmls into one and have processctrl at wrapped tag.