Related
Related to this question, but a different error: Other Question
I have tried both the Swift 3 as well as the Swift 4 code from this question:
Shuffle Link
I am using Swift 3.2, and when using the Swift 3 code it yelled at me for not using SwapAt, so I've included the Swift 4 code, but I tried both, with the same result.
When using the shuffle() method, I get the error Variable 'offerCardsShuffled' inferred to have type '()', which may be unexpected, and the obvious error afterwards, Value of tuple type '()' has no member 'enumerated'
I'm not sure what would be causing this, as other people using this code don't seem to be having that problem. Why are my shuffled arrays coming up as empty tuples?
Note I am fairly new to Swift development so a thorough explanation is definitely helpful.
func displayOfferCards() -> Void {
//let offerCardsr = allOfferCards().reversed()
var offerCards = allOfferCards()
var offerCardsShuffled = offerCards.shuffle()
for (index, offerCard) in offerCardsShuffled.enumerated() {
let delay = Double(index) * 0.2
offerCard.display(delay: delay)
}
}
}
func allOfferCards() -> [OfferCard]{
guard dataSource != nil else {
return []
}
let numberOfCards = self.dataSource!.kolodaNumberOfCards(self)
var offerCards = [OfferCard]()
for i in 0..<numberOfCards {
let offerCard = viewForCard(at: i)
if let offerCard = offerCard {
offerCards.append(offerCard as! OfferCard)
}
}
return offerCards
}
extension MutableCollection {
/// Shuffles the contents of this collection.
mutating func shuffle() {
let c = count
guard c > 1 else { return }
for (firstUnshuffled, unshuffledCount) in zip(indices, stride(from: c, to: 1, by: -1)) {
let d: IndexDistance = numericCast(arc4random_uniform(numericCast(unshuffledCount)))
let i = index(firstUnshuffled, offsetBy: d)
swapAt(firstUnshuffled, i)
}
}
}
extension Sequence {
/// Returns an array with the contents of this sequence, shuffled.
func shuffled() -> [Element] {
var result = Array(self)
result.shuffle()
return result
}
}
Your shuffle method modifies the original collection, it does not return a new collection.
Change:
var offerCardsShuffled = offerCards.shuffle()
to:
offerCards.shuffle()
and replace the use of offerCardsShuffled with offerCards in the remaining code.
What woudl be a simple way to reduce a string like AAA:111;BBB:222;333;444;CCC:555 to a dictionary in Swift. I have the following code:
var str = "AAA:111;BBB:222;333;444;CCC:555"
var astr = str.componentsSeparatedByString(";").map { (element) -> [String:String] in
var elements = element.componentsSeparatedByString(":")
if elements.count < 2 {
elements.insert("N/A", atIndex: 0)
}
return [elements[0]:elements[1]]
}
The code above produces an Array of Dictionaries:
[["A": "111"], ["BBB": "222"], ["UKW": "333"], ["UKW": "444"], ["CCC": "555"]]
I want it to produce
["A": "111", "BBB": "222", "UKW": "333", "UKW": "444", "CCC": "555"]
but no mater what I try, since i call the map function on an Array it seems impossible to convert the nature of the map function's result.
NOTE: The dictionary in string format is described as either having KEY:VALUE; format or VALUE; format, in which case the mapping function will add the "N/A" as being the key of the unnamed value.
Any help on this matter is greatly appreciated.
Your map produces an array of dictionaries. When you want to combine them into 1, that's a perfect job for reduce:
func + <K,V>(lhs: Dictionary<K,V>, rhs: Dictionary<K,V>) -> Dictionary<K,V> {
var result = Dictionary<K,V>()
for (key, value) in lhs {
result[key] = value
}
for (key, value) in rhs {
result[key] = value
}
return result
}
var str = "AAA:111;BBB:222;333;444;CCC:555"
var astr = str
.componentsSeparatedByString(";")
.reduce([String: String]()) {
aggregate, element in
var elements = element.componentsSeparatedByString(":")
if elements.count < 2 {
elements.insert("N/A", atIndex: 0)
}
return aggregate + [elements[0]:elements[1]]
}
print(astr)
Swift has no default operator to "combine" two Dictionaries so you have to define one. Note that the + here is not commutative: dictA + dictB != dictB + dictA. If a key exist in both dictionaries, the value from the second dictionary will be used.
This is a work for reduce:
let str = "AAA:111;BBB:222;333;444;CCC:555"
let keyValueStrings = str.componentsSeparatedByString(";")
let dictionary = keyValueStrings.reduce([String: String]()) {
aggregate, element in
var newAggregate = aggregate
let elements = element.componentsSeparatedByString(":")
let key = elements[0]
// replace nil with the value you want to use if there is no value
let value = (elements.count > 1) ? elements[1] : nil
newAggregate[key] = value
return newAggregate
}
print(dictionary)
You can also make aggregate mutable directly:
let dictionary = keyValueStrings.reduce([String: String]()) {
(var aggregate: [String: String], element: String) -> [String: String] in
let elements = element.componentsSeparatedByString(":")
let key = elements[0]
// replace nil with the value you want to use if there is no value
let value = (elements.count > 1) ? elements[1] : nil
aggregate[key] = value
return aggregate
}
This is a functional approach, but you can achieve the same using a for iteration.
The reason this is happening is because map can only return arrays. If you are using this method to parse your string, then you need to convert it to a dictionary after.
var newDict = [String:String]()
for x in astr {
for (i, j) in x {
newDict[i] = j
}
}
The current issue with your code is that map function iterates over array containing [["key:value"],["key:value"]..] and you separate it again. But it returns ["key":"value"] which you then add to your array.
Instead you can add elements[0]:elements[1] directly to a locally kept variable which will fix your problem. Something like
finalVariable[elements[0]] = elements[1]
Is there a function in Swift that checks whether all elements of an array have the same value? In my case, it's an array of type Int. I know I can iterate over it using a simple for loop I was just wondering if there is something that is built in and quicker.
With Swift 5, you can use one of the four following ways in order to tests if all elements of an array are equal.
#1. Using Array's allSatisfy(_:) method
allSatisfy(_:) returns a Boolean value indicating whether every element of a sequence satisfies a given predicate. You can set the predicate to test if all elements of the array are equal:
let array = [1, 1, 1]
let hasAllItemsEqual = array.dropFirst().allSatisfy({ $0 == array.first })
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: true
let array = [1, 1, 3]
let hasAllItemsEqual = array.dropFirst().allSatisfy({ $0 == array.first })
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: false
let array = [Int]()
let hasAllItemsEqual = array.dropFirst().allSatisfy({ $0 == array.first })
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: true
#2. Using Array's reduce(_:_:) method
As an alternative to allSatisfy(_:), you can use reduce(_:_:):
let array = [1, 1, 1]
let hasAllItemsEqual = array.dropFirst().reduce(true) { (partialResult, element) in
return partialResult && element == array.first
}
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: true
let array = [1, 1, 3]
let hasAllItemsEqual = array.dropFirst().reduce(true) { (partialResult, element) in
return partialResult && element == array.first
}
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: false
let array = [Int]()
let hasAllItemsEqual = array.dropFirst().reduce(true) { (partialResult, element) in
return partialResult && element == array.first
}
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: true
#3. Using elementsEqual(_:) method
elementsEqual(_:) returns a Boolean value indicating whether two sequences contain the same elements in the same order. Therefore you can create a new collection by repeating the first element of the initial array and compare the former with the latter:
let array = [1, 1, 1]
precondition(!array.isEmpty)
let repeated = repeatElement(array[0], count: array.count)
let hasAllItemsEqual = array.elementsEqual(repeated)
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: true
let array = [1, 1, 3]
precondition(!array.isEmpty)
let repeated = repeatElement(array[0], count: array.count)
let hasAllItemsEqual = array.elementsEqual(repeated)
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: false
#4. Using Set's init(_:) initalizer
If all elements of an array are equal, creating a set from this array should result in the set having only one element:
let array = [1, 1, 1]
let set = Set(array)
let hasAllItemsEqual = set.count <= 1
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: true
let array = [1, 1, 3]
let set = Set(array)
let hasAllItemsEqual = set.count <= 1
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: false
let array = [Int]()
let set = Set(array)
let hasAllItemsEqual = set.count <= 1
print(hasAllItemsEqual) // prints: true
Any method must iterate over all elements until a different element is found:
func allEqualUsingLoop<T : Equatable>(array : [T]) -> Bool {
if let firstElem = array.first {
for elem in array {
if elem != firstElem {
return false
}
}
}
return true
}
Instead of an explicit loop you can use the contains() function:
func allEqualUsingContains<T : Equatable>(array : [T]) -> Bool {
if let firstElem = array.first {
return !contains(array, { $0 != firstElem })
}
return true
}
If the array elements are Hashable (such as Int) then you can
create a Set (available since Swift 1.2) from the array elements and check if it has exactly one element.
func allEqualUsingSet<T : Hashable>(array : [T]) -> Bool {
let uniqueElements = Set(array)
return count(uniqueElements) <= 1
}
A quick benchmarking test revealed that the "contains" method is much faster than the "set" method
for an array of 1,000,000 integers, in particular if the elements are
not all equal. This make sense because contains() returns as soon
as a non-matching element is found, whereas Set(array) always
traverses the entire array.
Also the "contains" methods is equally fast or slightly faster than an explicit loop.
Here is some simple benchmarking code. Of course the results can vary
with the array size, the number of different elements and the elements data type.
func measureExecutionTime<T>(title: String, #noescape f : (() -> T) ) -> T {
let start = NSDate()
let result = f()
let end = NSDate()
let duration = end.timeIntervalSinceDate(start)
println("\(title) \(duration)")
return result
}
var array = [Int](count: 1_000_000, repeatedValue: 1)
array[500_000] = 2
let b1 = measureExecutionTime("using loop ") {
return allEqualUsingLoop(array)
}
let b2 = measureExecutionTime("using contains") {
allEqualUsingContains(array)
}
let b3 = measureExecutionTime("using set ") {
allEqualUsingSet(array)
}
Results (on a MacBook Pro, Release configuration):
using loop 0.000651001930236816
using contains 0.000567018985748291
using set 0.0344770550727844
With array[1_000] = 2 the results are
using loop 9.00030136108398e-06
using contains 2.02655792236328e-06
using set 0.0306439995765686
Update for Swift 2/Xcode 7: Due to various changes in the Swift
syntax, the function is now written as
func allEqual<T : Equatable>(array : [T]) -> Bool {
if let firstElem = array.first {
return !array.dropFirst().contains { $0 != firstElem }
}
return true
}
But you can now also define it as an extension method for arrays:
extension Array where Element : Equatable {
func allEqual() -> Bool {
if let firstElem = first {
return !dropFirst().contains { $0 != firstElem }
}
return true
}
}
print([1, 1, 1].allEqual()) // true
print([1, 2, 1].allEqual()) // false
Soliution for Swift 4.2/Xcode 10:
let arr = [1, 1, 1, 1]
let allItemsEqual = arr.dropLast().allSatisfy { $0 == arr.last }
print(allItemsEqual)
If your current version of Xcode is prior to 10.0 you can find the function allSatisfy of ArraySlice in Xcode9to10Preparation. You can install this library with CocoaPods.
let ints: [Int] = [1, 1, 1, 1]
print(ints.max() == ints.min())
If you have float buffers or if you already have an array of floats (or you think converting to floats beforehand is convenient):
import Accelerate
// [...]
// let floats = ints.map({ Double($0) })
print(vDSP.minimum(floats) == vDSP.maximum(floats))
Suppose I have an array and I want to pick one element at random.
What would be the simplest way to do this?
The obvious way would be array[random index]. But perhaps there is something like ruby's array.sample? Or if not could such a method be created by using an extension?
Swift 4.2 and above
The new recommended approach is a built-in method on the Collection protocol: randomElement(). It returns an optional to avoid the empty case I assumed against previously.
let array = ["Frodo", "Samwise", "Merry", "Pippin"]
print(array.randomElement()!) // Using ! knowing I have array.count > 0
If you don't create the array and aren't guaranteed count > 0, you should do something like:
if let randomElement = array.randomElement() {
print(randomElement)
}
Swift 4.1 and below
Just to answer your question, you can do this to achieve random array selection:
let array = ["Frodo", "Samwise", "Merry", "Pippin"]
let randomIndex = Int(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(array.count)))
print(array[randomIndex])
The castings are ugly, but I believe they're required unless someone else has another way.
Riffing on what Lucas said, you could create an extension to the Array class like this:
extension Array {
func randomItem() -> Element? {
if isEmpty { return nil }
let index = Int(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(self.count)))
return self[index]
}
}
For example:
let myArray = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16]
let myItem = myArray.randomItem() // Note: myItem is an Optional<Int>
Swift 4 version:
extension Collection where Index == Int {
/**
Picks a random element of the collection.
- returns: A random element of the collection.
*/
func randomElement() -> Iterator.Element? {
return isEmpty ? nil : self[Int(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(endIndex)))]
}
}
In Swift 2.2 this can be generalised so that we have:
UInt.random
UInt8.random
UInt16.random
UInt32.random
UInt64.random
UIntMax.random
// closed intervals:
(-3...3).random
(Int.min...Int.max).random
// and collections, which return optionals since they can be empty:
(1..<4).sample
[1,2,3].sample
"abc".characters.sample
["a": 1, "b": 2, "c": 3].sample
First, implementing static random property for UnsignedIntegerTypes:
import Darwin
func sizeof <T> (_: () -> T) -> Int { // sizeof return type without calling
return sizeof(T.self)
}
let ARC4Foot: Int = sizeof(arc4random)
extension UnsignedIntegerType {
static var max: Self { // sadly `max` is not required by the protocol
return ~0
}
static var random: Self {
let foot = sizeof(Self)
guard foot > ARC4Foot else {
return numericCast(arc4random() & numericCast(max))
}
var r = UIntMax(arc4random())
for i in 1..<(foot / ARC4Foot) {
r |= UIntMax(arc4random()) << UIntMax(8 * ARC4Foot * i)
}
return numericCast(r)
}
}
Then, for ClosedIntervals with UnsignedIntegerType bounds:
extension ClosedInterval where Bound : UnsignedIntegerType {
var random: Bound {
guard start > 0 || end < Bound.max else { return Bound.random }
return start + (Bound.random % (end - start + 1))
}
}
Then (a little more involved), for ClosedIntervals with SignedIntegerType bounds (using helper methods described further below):
extension ClosedInterval where Bound : SignedIntegerType {
var random: Bound {
let foot = sizeof(Bound)
let distance = start.unsignedDistanceTo(end)
guard foot > 4 else { // optimisation: use UInt32.random if sufficient
let off: UInt32
if distance < numericCast(UInt32.max) {
off = UInt32.random % numericCast(distance + 1)
} else {
off = UInt32.random
}
return numericCast(start.toIntMax() + numericCast(off))
}
guard distance < UIntMax.max else {
return numericCast(IntMax(bitPattern: UIntMax.random))
}
let off = UIntMax.random % (distance + 1)
let x = (off + start.unsignedDistanceFromMin).plusMinIntMax
return numericCast(x)
}
}
... where unsignedDistanceTo, unsignedDistanceFromMin and plusMinIntMax helper methods can be implemented as follows:
extension SignedIntegerType {
func unsignedDistanceTo(other: Self) -> UIntMax {
let _self = self.toIntMax()
let other = other.toIntMax()
let (start, end) = _self < other ? (_self, other) : (other, _self)
if start == IntMax.min && end == IntMax.max {
return UIntMax.max
}
if start < 0 && end >= 0 {
let s = start == IntMax.min ? UIntMax(Int.max) + 1 : UIntMax(-start)
return s + UIntMax(end)
}
return UIntMax(end - start)
}
var unsignedDistanceFromMin: UIntMax {
return IntMax.min.unsignedDistanceTo(self.toIntMax())
}
}
extension UIntMax {
var plusMinIntMax: IntMax {
if self > UIntMax(IntMax.max) { return IntMax(self - UIntMax(IntMax.max) - 1) }
else { return IntMax.min + IntMax(self) }
}
}
Finally, for all collections where Index.Distance == Int:
extension CollectionType where Index.Distance == Int {
var sample: Generator.Element? {
if isEmpty { return nil }
let end = UInt(count) - 1
let add = (0...end).random
let idx = startIndex.advancedBy(Int(add))
return self[idx]
}
}
... which can be optimised a little for integer Ranges:
extension Range where Element : SignedIntegerType {
var sample: Element? {
guard startIndex < endIndex else { return nil }
let i: ClosedInterval = startIndex...endIndex.predecessor()
return i.random
}
}
extension Range where Element : UnsignedIntegerType {
var sample: Element? {
guard startIndex < endIndex else { return nil }
let i: ClosedInterval = startIndex...endIndex.predecessor()
return i.random
}
}
You can use Swift's built-in random() function as well for the extension:
extension Array {
func sample() -> Element {
let randomIndex = Int(rand()) % count
return self[randomIndex]
}
}
let array = [1, 2, 3, 4]
array.sample() // 2
array.sample() // 2
array.sample() // 3
array.sample() // 3
array.sample() // 1
array.sample() // 1
array.sample() // 3
array.sample() // 1
Another Swift 3 suggestion
private extension Array {
var randomElement: Element {
let index = Int(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(count)))
return self[index]
}
}
Following others answer but with Swift 2 support.
Swift 1.x
extension Array {
func sample() -> T {
let index = Int(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(self.count)))
return self[index]
}
}
Swift 2.x
extension Array {
func sample() -> Element {
let index = Int(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(self.count)))
return self[index]
}
}
E.g.:
let arr = [2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29, 31]
let randomSample = arr.sample()
An alternative functional implementation with check for empty array.
func randomArrayItem<T>(array: [T]) -> T? {
if array.isEmpty { return nil }
let randomIndex = Int(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(array.count)))
return array[randomIndex]
}
randomArrayItem([1,2,3])
Here's an extension on Arrays with an empty array check for more safety:
extension Array {
func sample() -> Element? {
if self.isEmpty { return nil }
let randomInt = Int(arc4random_uniform(UInt32(self.count)))
return self[randomInt]
}
}
You can use it as simple as this:
let digits = Array(0...9)
digits.sample() // => 6
If you prefer a Framework that also has some more handy features then checkout HandySwift. You can add it to your project via Carthage then use it exactly like in the example above:
import HandySwift
let digits = Array(0...9)
digits.sample() // => 8
Additionally it also includes an option to get multiple random elements at once:
digits.sample(size: 3) // => [8, 0, 7]
Swift 3
import GameKit
func getRandomMessage() -> String {
let messages = ["one", "two", "three"]
let randomNumber = GKRandomSource.sharedRandom().nextInt(upperBound: messages.count)
return messages[randomNumber].description
}
Swift 3 - simple easy to use.
Create Array
var arrayOfColors = [UIColor.red, UIColor.yellow, UIColor.orange, UIColor.green]
Create Random Color
let randomColor = arc4random() % UInt32(arrayOfColors.count)
Set that color to your object
your item = arrayOfColors[Int(randomColor)]
Here is an example from a SpriteKit project updating a SKLabelNode with a random String:
let array = ["one","two","three","four","five"]
let randomNumber = arc4random() % UInt32(array.count)
let labelNode = SKLabelNode(text: array[Int(randomNumber)])
If you want to be able to get more than one random element out of your array with no duplicates, GameplayKit has you covered:
import GameplayKit
let array = ["one", "two", "three", "four"]
let shuffled = GKMersenneTwisterRandomSource.sharedRandom().arrayByShufflingObjects(in: array)
let firstRandom = shuffled[0]
let secondRandom = shuffled[1]
You have a couple choices for randomness, see GKRandomSource:
The GKARC4RandomSource class uses an algorithm similar to that employed in arc4random family of C functions. (However, instances of this class are independent from calls to the arc4random functions.)
The GKLinearCongruentialRandomSource class uses an algorithm that is faster, but less random, than the GKARC4RandomSource class. (Specifically, the low bits of generated numbers repeat more often than the high bits.) Use this source when performance is more important than robust unpredictability.
The GKMersenneTwisterRandomSource class uses an algorithm that is slower, but more random, than the GKARC4RandomSource class. Use this source when it’s important that your use of random numbers not show repeating patterns and performance is of less concern.
I find using GameKit's GKRandomSource.sharedRandom() works best for me.
import GameKit
let array = ["random1", "random2", "random3"]
func getRandomIndex() -> Int {
let randomNumber = GKRandomSource.sharedRandom().nextIntWithUpperBound(array.count)
return randomNumber
or you could return the object at the random index selected. Make sure the function returns a String first, and then return the index of the array.
return array[randomNumber]
Short and to the point.
There is a built-in method on Collection now:
let foods = ["🍕", "🍔", "🍣", "🍝"]
let myDinner = foods.randomElement()
If you want to extract up to n random elements from a collection you can add an extension like this one:
extension Collection {
func randomElements(_ count: Int) -> [Element] {
var shuffledIterator = shuffled().makeIterator()
return (0..<count).compactMap { _ in shuffledIterator.next() }
}
}
And if you want them to be unique you can use a Set, but the elements of the collection must conform to the Hashable protocol:
extension Collection where Element: Hashable {
func randomUniqueElements(_ count: Int) -> [Element] {
var shuffledIterator = Set(shuffled()).makeIterator()
return (0..<count).compactMap { _ in shuffledIterator.next() }
}
}
Latest swift3 code try it its working fine
let imagesArray = ["image1.png","image2.png","image3.png","image4.png"]
var randomNum: UInt32 = 0
randomNum = arc4random_uniform(UInt32(imagesArray.count))
wheelBackgroundImageView.image = UIImage(named: imagesArray[Int(randomNum)])
I figured out a very different way to do so using the new features introduced in Swift 4.2.
// 👇🏼 - 1
public func shufflePrintArray(ArrayOfStrings: [String]) -> String {
// - 2
let strings = ArrayOfStrings
//- 3
var stringans = strings.shuffled()
// - 4
var countS = Int.random(in: 0..<strings.count)
// - 5
return stringans[countS]
}
we declared a function with parameters taking an array of Strings and returning a String.
Then we take the ArrayOfStrings in a variable.
Then we call the shuffled function and store that in a variable. (Only supported in 4.2)
Then we declare a variable which saves a shuffled value of total count of the String.
Lastly we return the shuffled string at the index value of countS.
It is basically shuffling the array of strings and then also have a random pick of number of the total number of count and then returning the random index of the shuffled array.
In Swift, how can I check if an element exists in an array? Xcode does not have any suggestions for contain, include, or has, and a quick search through the book turned up nothing. Any idea how to check for this? I know that there is a method find that returns the index number, but is there a method that returns a boolean like ruby's #include??
Example of what I need:
var elements = [1,2,3,4,5]
if elements.contains(5) {
//do something
}
Swift 2, 3, 4, 5:
let elements = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
if elements.contains(5) {
print("yes")
}
contains() is a protocol extension method of SequenceType (for sequences of Equatable elements) and not a global method as in
earlier releases.
Remarks:
This contains() method requires that the sequence elements
adopt the Equatable protocol, compare e.g. Andrews's answer.
If the sequence elements are instances of a NSObject subclass
then you have to override isEqual:, see NSObject subclass in Swift: hash vs hashValue, isEqual vs ==.
There is another – more general – contains() method which does not require the elements to be equatable and takes a predicate as an
argument, see e.g. Shorthand to test if an object exists in an array for Swift?.
Swift older versions:
let elements = [1,2,3,4,5]
if contains(elements, 5) {
println("yes")
}
For those who came here looking for a find and remove an object from an array:
Swift 1
if let index = find(itemList, item) {
itemList.removeAtIndex(index)
}
Swift 2
if let index = itemList.indexOf(item) {
itemList.removeAtIndex(index)
}
Swift 3, 4
if let index = itemList.index(of: item) {
itemList.remove(at: index)
}
Swift 5.2
if let index = itemList.firstIndex(of: item) {
itemList.remove(at: index)
}
Updated for Swift 2+
Note that as of Swift 3 (or even 2), the extension below is no longer necessary as the global contains function has been made into a pair of extension method on Array, which allow you to do either of:
let a = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
a.contains(2) // => true, only usable if Element : Equatable
a.contains { $0 < 1 } // => false
Historical Answer for Swift 1:
Use this extension: (updated to Swift 5.2)
extension Array {
func contains<T>(obj: T) -> Bool where T: Equatable {
return !self.filter({$0 as? T == obj}).isEmpty
}
}
Use as:
array.contains(1)
If you are checking if an instance of a custom class or struct is contained in an array, you'll need to implement the Equatable protocol before you can use .contains(myObject).
For example:
struct Cup: Equatable {
let filled:Bool
}
static func ==(lhs:Cup, rhs:Cup) -> Bool { // Implement Equatable
return lhs.filled == rhs.filled
}
then you can do:
cupArray.contains(myCup)
Tip: The == override should be at the global level, not within your class/struct
I used filter.
let results = elements.filter { el in el == 5 }
if results.count > 0 {
// any matching items are in results
} else {
// not found
}
If you want, you can compress that to
if elements.filter({ el in el == 5 }).count > 0 {
}
Hope that helps.
Update for Swift 2
Hurray for default implementations!
if elements.contains(5) {
// any matching items are in results
} else {
// not found
}
(Swift 3)
Check if an element exists in an array (fulfilling some criteria), and if so, proceed working with the first such element
If the intent is:
To check whether an element exist in an array (/fulfils some boolean criteria, not necessarily equality testing),
And if so, proceed and work with the first such element,
Then an alternative to contains(_:) as blueprinted Sequence is to first(where:) of Sequence:
let elements = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
if let firstSuchElement = elements.first(where: { $0 == 4 }) {
print(firstSuchElement) // 4
// ...
}
In this contrived example, its usage might seem silly, but it's very useful if querying arrays of non-fundamental element types for existence of any elements fulfilling some condition. E.g.
struct Person {
let age: Int
let name: String
init(_ age: Int, _ name: String) {
self.age = age
self.name = name
}
}
let persons = [Person(17, "Fred"), Person(16, "Susan"),
Person(19, "Hannah"), Person(18, "Sarah"),
Person(23, "Sam"), Person(18, "Jane")]
if let eligableDriver = persons.first(where: { $0.age >= 18 }) {
print("\(eligableDriver.name) can possibly drive the rental car in Sweden.")
// ...
} // Hannah can possibly drive the rental car in Sweden.
let daniel = Person(18, "Daniel")
if let sameAgeAsDaniel = persons.first(where: { $0.age == daniel.age }) {
print("\(sameAgeAsDaniel.name) is the same age as \(daniel.name).")
// ...
} // Sarah is the same age as Daniel.
Any chained operations using .filter { ... some condition }.first can favourably be replaced with first(where:). The latter shows intent better, and have performance advantages over possible non-lazy appliances of .filter, as these will pass the full array prior to extracting the (possible) first element passing the filter.
Check if an element exists in an array (fulfilling some criteria), and if so, remove the first such element
A comment below queries:
How can I remove the firstSuchElement from the array?
A similar use case to the one above is to remove the first element that fulfils a given predicate. To do so, the index(where:) method of Collection (which is readily available to array collection) may be used to find the index of the first element fulfilling the predicate, whereafter the index can be used with the remove(at:) method of Array to (possible; given that it exists) remove that element.
var elements = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "a", "b", "c"]
if let indexOfFirstSuchElement = elements.index(where: { $0 == "c" }) {
elements.remove(at: indexOfFirstSuchElement)
print(elements) // ["a", "b", "d", "e", "a", "b", "c"]
}
Or, if you'd like to remove the element from the array and work with, apply Optional:s map(_:) method to conditionally (for .some(...) return from index(where:)) use the result from index(where:) to remove and capture the removed element from the array (within an optional binding clause).
var elements = ["a", "b", "c", "d", "e", "a", "b", "c"]
if let firstSuchElement = elements.index(where: { $0 == "c" })
.map({ elements.remove(at: $0) }) {
// if we enter here, the first such element have now been
// remove from the array
print(elements) // ["a", "b", "d", "e", "a", "b", "c"]
// and we may work with it
print(firstSuchElement) // c
}
Note that in the contrived example above the array members are simple value types (String instances), so using a predicate to find a given member is somewhat over-kill, as we might simply test for equality using the simpler index(of:) method as shown in #DogCoffee's answer. If applying the find-and-remove approach above to the Person example, however, using index(where:) with a predicate is appropriate (since we no longer test for equality but for fulfilling a supplied predicate).
An array that contains a property that equals to
yourArray.contains(where: {$0.propertyToCheck == value })
Returns boolean.
The simplest way to accomplish this is to use filter on the array.
let result = elements.filter { $0==5 }
result will have the found element if it exists and will be empty if the element does not exist. So simply checking if result is empty will tell you whether the element exists in the array. I would use the following:
if result.isEmpty {
// element does not exist in array
} else {
// element exists
}
Swift 4/5
Another way to achieve this is with the filter function
var elements = [1,2,3,4,5]
if let object = elements.filter({ $0 == 5 }).first {
print("found")
} else {
print("not found")
}
As of Swift 2.1 NSArrays have containsObjectthat can be used like so:
if myArray.containsObject(objectImCheckingFor){
//myArray has the objectImCheckingFor
}
Array
let elements = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5]
Check elements presence
elements.contains(5) // true
Get elements index
elements.firstIndex(of: 5) // 4
elements.firstIndex(of: 10) // nil
Get element count
let results = elements.filter { element in element == 5 }
results.count // 2
Just in case anybody is trying to find if an indexPath is among the selected ones (like in a UICollectionView or UITableView cellForItemAtIndexPath functions):
var isSelectedItem = false
if let selectedIndexPaths = collectionView.indexPathsForSelectedItems() as? [NSIndexPath]{
if contains(selectedIndexPaths, indexPath) {
isSelectedItem = true
}
}
if user find particular array elements then use below code same as integer value.
var arrelemnts = ["sachin", "test", "test1", "test3"]
if arrelemnts.contains("test"){
print("found") }else{
print("not found") }
Here is my little extension I just wrote to check if my delegate array contains a delegate object or not (Swift 2). :) It Also works with value types like a charm.
extension Array
{
func containsObject(object: Any) -> Bool
{
if let anObject: AnyObject = object as? AnyObject
{
for obj in self
{
if let anObj: AnyObject = obj as? AnyObject
{
if anObj === anObject { return true }
}
}
}
return false
}
}
If you have an idea how to optimize this code, than just let me know.
Swift
If you are not using object then you can user this code for contains.
let elements = [ 10, 20, 30, 40, 50]
if elements.contains(50) {
print("true")
}
If you are using NSObject Class in swift. This variables is according to my requirement. you can modify for your requirement.
var cliectScreenList = [ATModelLeadInfo]()
var cliectScreenSelectedObject: ATModelLeadInfo!
This is for a same data type.
{ $0.user_id == cliectScreenSelectedObject.user_id }
If you want to AnyObject type.
{ "\($0.user_id)" == "\(cliectScreenSelectedObject.user_id)" }
Full condition
if cliectScreenSelected.contains( { $0.user_id == cliectScreenSelectedObject.user_id } ) == false {
cliectScreenSelected.append(cliectScreenSelectedObject)
print("Object Added")
} else {
print("Object already exists")
}
what about using a hash table for the job, like this?
first, creating a "hash map" generic function, extending the Sequence protocol.
extension Sequence where Element: Hashable {
func hashMap() -> [Element: Int] {
var dict: [Element: Int] = [:]
for (i, value) in self.enumerated() {
dict[value] = i
}
return dict
}
}
This extension will work as long as the items in the array conform to Hashable, like integers or strings, here is the usage...
let numbers = Array(0...50)
let hashMappedNumbers = numbers.hashMap()
let numToDetect = 35
let indexOfnumToDetect = hashMappedNumbers[numToDetect] // returns the index of the item and if all the elements in the array are different, it will work to get the index of the object!
print(indexOfnumToDetect) // prints 35
But for now, let's just focus in check if the element is in the array.
let numExists = indexOfnumToDetect != nil // if the key does not exist
means the number is not contained in the collection.
print(numExists) // prints true
Swift 4.2 +
You can easily verify your instance is an array or not by the following function.
func verifyIsObjectOfAnArray<T>(_ object: T) -> Bool {
if let _ = object as? [T] {
return true
}
return false
}
Even you can access it as follows. You will receive nil if the object wouldn't be an array.
func verifyIsObjectOfAnArray<T>(_ object: T) -> [T]? {
if let array = object as? [T] {
return array
}
return nil
}
You can add an extension for Array as such:
extension Array {
func contains<T>(_ object: T) -> Bool where T: Equatable {
!self.filter {$0 as? T == object }.isEmpty
}
}
This can be used as:
if myArray.contains(myItem) {
// code here
}