If you add items in a listbox you do this with list_box.insert(); Now there is a item and you can select it. For my example its a entry (textbox). But now I want to press an Button and give me the value of the entry out. I found no function in the reference for the list_box or for the list_box_row to give back any compatible object.
I tried stuff like this:
gtk_entry_get_text(GTK_ENTRY(gtk_list_box_get_selected_row(GTK_LIST_BOX(listbox)))); //listbox is a variable of typ GtkWidget and contains the listbox in
But its not working. Anyone have a solution for it? I mean it would be a bit useless to consider a listbox if you cant work with the selected stuff.
GtkListBoxRow is a GtkContainer. Specifically a (single item) GtkBin:
https://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkListBox.html#GtkListBoxRow
You should be able to call:
gtk_bin_get_child(GTK_BIN(listboxrow));
Note that a GtkListBoxRow can have only one child, though a GtkListBox can have multiple GtkListBoxRows.
Related
I have a prefab object that has many children. I highlight any "One" of these children and change its color. I am selecting another child of the same prefab and highlight it by changing its color but at the same time I want the previous child to deselect or change back to its original color.
The highlight and change color are not the problem, I am struggling to see if I need to store the children in an array and then loop through the objects to see if they have been selected and if so then change back or... this is where I am stuck. Any ideas, tips, recommendations?
Here's a link!
This link helped, I had everything in the OnMouseDown checking but never updating. So, if anyone checks this out it could help with the same question I posted.
I have a ComboBox implemented with an auto-completion system. My ComboBox contains more than 100 items. When users are typing text in, the auto-completion system opens the dropdown list and highlights the most relevant item. Moreover, when the dropdown list is expanded, all items are available (no filters). But the most relevant item is always at the bottom of the dropdown list.
I would like it to be in the middle, if possible. One item can have the same reference but another type than another one, that's why I need to see most of them in my dropdown by placing them in the middle.
Any idea ? It's not really important but kind of useful for them. Thanks !
Update :
Here's my ComboBox with the open dropdown. Sorry about that, I had to blur its elements. As you can see, the user starts writting the reference in the ComboBox. The autocompletion works fine, but the corresponding item is found at the end of the dropdown list (in the red frame), almost out of bounds.
I wish it would be highlighted in the middle of my dropdown list instead of so far below.
Your item search may work well, but your list isn't visually filtered, which means it's size always remains the same.
It's scrolled into view, by the wpf system, but still displaying all other items around the relevant one. The reason why it's at the bottom is because wpf Scrollviewer just finished scrolling the item into view and sees no need to scroll it further into the middle.
You could use the CollectionViewSource class. Why ?
It's simple to use, will keep your viewmodel data as it is, and you would have your relevant completion item at the top. It can be obtained by GetDefaultView(..)
Let's say you have a viewmodel flag "IsHidden", stating that it's content does not match the user input:
ICollectionView cv= CollectionViewSource.GetDefaultView(myComboBox.ItemsSource);
// switch filter on
cv.Filter = obj => (obj as myViewModel).IsHidden == false;
// switch off
cv.Filter = null
I have a question to ask you.
I want to make a menu updatable using a value of a int variable (If the value of the variable changes are also modified the menu items). I know the possibility to update the string of a single menu item when its is clicked (by the creation of a function in signal connect() that update the single string of the menu item), but for the first case i don't have find nothing in internet for now!
Thank you!
Just do it.
You don't need to wrap a simple integer in all the GTK+ object and event machinery; if you know when the value changes, you can just compute a new label text for the menu item and set it (using gtk_menu_item_set_label()).
I have a Source ComboBox to populate source fields (25-30 items) shown below in first page
"A"
"B"
...
"Z"
I have selected last item from ComboBox as shown below
"Z"
and when traversing to the next page after saving, i need to make the source combo selection blank, so i have return the below code to reset the Source combobox to point to first item (to reset the display to start from top of dropdown list for user selection)
// my first value in source List is empty space - “”
sourceComboBox.setValue("");
even if you use below code snippets like
sourceComboBox.getSelectionModel().selectFirst();
sourceComboBox.getItems().clear();
sourceComboBox.getSelectionModel().clearAndSelect(0);
but when i click open the combobox dropdown it still shows dropdown display from bottom as shown below
...
"X"
"Y"
"Z"
I am unable to post images for representing combobox values, so has put in above examples.
This looks like a graphics bug to me or am I doing something wrong?
I have seen similar issue reported in below question but no work around suggested so far
Combobox clearing value issue
If you want to simply "reset" the combo box, I think all you have to do is set the value to null, like so:
sourceComboBox.setValue(null);
I ran into nearly the exact same situation and came across your question while looking for a solution. Fortunately, I came up with a workaround that forces the ComboBoxes to reset. When you reset the data on your pane, instead of doing something like:
sourceComboBox.getSelectionModel().clearSelection();
sourceComboBox.getItems.clear();
do something like this...
parentNode.getChildren().remove(sourceComboBox);
sourceComboBox= new ComboBox(); // do whatever else you need to format your ComboBox
parentNode.add(sourceComboBox);
You'll also need to do a setItems() again on your ComboBox so the new one will be populated. This is not an ideal solution but it seems to be working as I expect the provided clearSelection() method would.
Below is the code you're looking for. It will reset it to whatever index you give in within the parenthesis.
sourceComboBox.setSelectedIndex(0);
Goodluck
Most of the things were giving me an error when I tried them. What worked best for me was to use this
comboBox.getSelectionModel.clearSelection();
This will essentially set the value of your ComboBox to null. Because of this, if you are referring to the value of the ComboBox in another place, it becomes important to check for whether the value of the ComboBox is null using this
if(comboBox.getValue() != null)
//Code segment here
The ComboBox control has not a method like scrollTo(index) of the ListView. So it seems hard to workaround that behavior. You can issue a feature request at JavaFX Jira.
This is a bit of a strange one, but I've been struggling for a few hours now and I can't understand what is happening.
I was wondering if anyone else has experienced this problem, and can perhaps explain it. I'm building a simple Winforms app and trying to use many of the built in controls.
Basically, I've got a form with a user control and some data capture fields. 3 of the fields are dropdown lists and on the user control I have a bindingSource control that binds directly to a Product class.
At run time I provide an instance of the Product class to the BindingSource and the class contains a property of ProductType. For simplicity I also added a List<ProductType> ProductTypes to the Product Class which loads itself when queried, which means I can just use the same bindingSource and choose the ProductTypes Data Member as the Datasource for the dropdownlist.
Upon running the form, the list binds perfectly and I can see all the product types listed, and I can select one and tab or click to the next field. But obviously the selected value won't bind because I've not chosen any bindings-SelectedValue for the dropdown, only a datasource. As soon as I make sure that the drop down modifies the instance of the Product by binding to the Bindings-SelectedValue, and then run the form, the list still gets populated perfectly and I can tab through the controls as long as I don't make a selection from the dropdown. If I make a selection from the dropdown then the dropdown holds focus. I cannot tab out for love or money and can't even click cancel button on the form, the close button top right is the only button I can click which works and I can't click any other field or dropdown. This affects all three dropdowns as soon as a selection is made.
Anyone have any ideas what I'm missing?
I have tried changing a few things and had some success by feeding the dropdown values a string[] instead of a member of an object. That seems to work, but defeats the object of using databinding doesn't it?
Any help appreciated!
Just guessing here, because I don't have time to set up a test and confirm right now, but are you doing any validating? I seem to remember that data-bound controls won't let you leave if the contents don't validate. Even if you aren't explicitly, try setting CausesValidation to False to see if there's any sort of validation going on behind the scenes, that might at least give you a hint.
Thanks for the input on this, helped me wrap my head around this.
In my case, it turns out that an exception was being thrown in one of the EventHadlers for my ComboBox.Validating event. It was hard to track down, because the IDE didn't show me that exception. I was able to modify the Exception behavior (in the debug menu) and have it show me any InvalidOperationException that was being thrown, and then I was able to track it down.
As Tom suggested, turning off CuasesValidation was the ticket to figuring it out.
For Infragisticst Dropdowns (may not be true for other winform dropdowns): If you have "LimitToList" set to true you can be stuck in a dropdown that you can't get out of without realizing it. Use the ItemNotInList even to trigger a warning message.