I have the following setup:
componentDidMount() {
Dispatcher.on('app:update', _.throttle(this.postLoad, 1000));
}
componentWillUnmount() {
Dispatcher.removeListener('app:update', this.postLoad)
}
However, I'm receiving errors in the console in regards to trying to call setState on a Component that isn't mounted (happens inside postLoad). What are my best options to cancel the throttled functions in the componentWillUnmount?
.throttle is from Lodash.
You're likely seeing your throttled function being called on the trailing edge of the timeout. To illustrate, let's look at the default behavior of throttle():
var throttled = _.throttle(function() {
console.log('ran');
}, 1000);
for (var i = 0; i < 3; i ++) {
throttled();
}
// → ran
// → ran
This is strange, there's two calls made to throttled(). The loop actually makes three calls, but the expectation is that since it's been throttled to 1 second, there should only be one call.
By default, the trailing option for throttle() is set to true. This means that after the timeout has elapsed, the throttled function is called again - assuming it was called after the timeout starts and before it ends.
The simple solution in your case might be turning this option off, as follows:
var throttled = _.throttle(function() {
console.log('ran');
}, 1000, { trailing: false });
Related
In Node.js I can set the interval that a certain event should be triggered,
function intervalFunc() {
console.log('whelp, triggered again!');
}
setInterval(intervalFunc, 1500);
However the interface for Tokio's interval is a bit more complex. It seems to be a something to do with a much more literal definition of an interval, and rather than calling a function at an interval, it simply stalls the thread until the time passes (with .await).
Is there a primitive in Tokio that calls a function "every x seconds" or the like? If not, is there an idiom that has emerged to do this?
I only need to run one function on a recurring interval... I don't care about other threads either. It's just one function on Tokio's event loop.
Spawn a Tokio task to do something forever:
use std::time::Duration;
use tokio::{task, time}; // 1.3.0
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
let forever = task::spawn(async {
let mut interval = time::interval(Duration::from_millis(10));
loop {
interval.tick().await;
do_something().await;
}
});
forever.await;
}
You can also use tokio::time::interval to create a value that you can tick repeatedly. Perform the tick and call your function inside of the body of stream::unfold to create a stream:
use futures::{stream, StreamExt}; // 0.3.13
use std::time::{Duration, Instant};
use tokio::time; // 1.3.0
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
let interval = time::interval(Duration::from_millis(10));
let forever = stream::unfold(interval, |mut interval| async {
interval.tick().await;
do_something().await;
Some(((), interval))
});
let now = Instant::now();
forever.for_each(|_| async {}).await;
}
async fn do_something() {
eprintln!("do_something");
}
See also:
How can I run a set of functions concurrently on a recurring interval without running the same function at the same time using Tokio?
I am still a rust/tokio beginner, but I did find this solution helpful for myself:
use std::time::Duration;
use tokio::time;
use tokio_stream::wrappers::IntervalStream;
#[tokio::main]
async fn main() {
let mut stream = IntervalStream::new(time::interval(Duration::from_secs(1)));
while let Some(_ts) = stream.next().await {
println!("whelp, triggered again!");
}
}
Please note that _ts holds the execution timestamp.
I am trying to make a while loop loop a statement exactly for one second after which it stops. I have tried this in DartPad, but it crashes the browser window.
void main(){
var count = 0.0;
bool flag = true;
Future.delayed(Duration(seconds: 1), (){
flag = false;
});
while (flag){
count++;
}
print(count);
}
Am I doing something wrong?
I like how you are trying to figure Futures out. I was exactly where you were before I understood this stuff. It's kind of like threads, but quite different in some ways.
The Dart code that you wrote is single threaded. By writing Future.delayed, you did not start a job. Its execution won't happen unless you let go of the thread by returning from this main function.
Main does not have to return if it is marked with async.
Two actions have to run "concurrently" to be able to interact with each other like you are trying to do. The way to do it is to call Future.wait to get a future that depends on the two futures. Edit: Both of these actions have to let go of execution at every step so that the other can get control of the single thread. So, if you have a loop, you have to have some kind of await call in it to yield execution to other actions.
Here's a modified version of your code that counts up to about 215 for me:
Future main() async {
var count = 0.0;
bool flag = true;
var futureThatStopsIt = Future.delayed(Duration(seconds: 1), (){
flag = false;
});
var futureWithTheLoop = () async {
while (flag){
count++;
print("going on: $count");
await Future.delayed(Duration(seconds: 0));
}
}();
await Future.wait([futureThatStopsIt, futureWithTheLoop]);
print(count);
}
Note for the readers: this question is specific for Codename One only.
I'm developing an app that needs some initial data from a server to run properly. The first shown Form doesn't need this data and there is also a splash screen on the first run, so if the Internet connection is good there is enought time to retrive the data... but the Internet connection can be slow or absent.
I have in the init a call to this method:
private void getStartData() {
Runnable getBootData = () -> {
if (serverAPI.getSomething() && serverAPI.getXXX() && ...) {
isAllDataFetched = true;
} else {
Log.p("Connection ERROR in fetching initial data");
}
};
EasyThread appInfo = EasyThread.start("APPINFO");
appInfo.run(getBootData);
}
Each serverAPI method in this example is a synchronous method that return true if success, false otherwise. My question is how to change this EasyThread to repeat again all the calls to (serverAPI.getSomething() && serverAPI.getXXX() && ...) after one second if the result is false, and again after another second and so on, until the result is true.
I don't want to shown an error or an alert to the user: I'll show an alert only if the static boolean isAllDataFetched is false when the requested data is strictly necessary.
I tried to read carefully the documentation of EasyThread and of Runnable, but I didn't understand how to handle this use case.
Since this is a thread you could easily use Thread.sleep(1000) or more simply Util.sleep(1000) which just swallows the InterruptedException. So something like this would work:
while(!isAllDataFetched) {
if (serverAPI.getSomething() && serverAPI.getXXX() && ...) {
isAllDataFetched = true;
} else {
Log.p("Connection ERROR in fetching initial data");
Util.sleep(1000);
}
}
How can I achieve a loop like this:
foobar.each(function (model, j) {
// asynchrounous call etc. {in here bool get set to true}
// outside all asynchronous calls
// wait till bool is true, without stopping anything else except the loop to the top of
the _.each
})
I asked a similar question yesterday. But it got marked as a duplicate when it wasn't the same case. Their solution did not achieve the same thing. Also generator functions were suggested which looked like it would work. But I can't use them with ecmascript 5
I've tried busy loops and set time out but they don't seem to work either
I've also tried this:
goto();
function goto() {
if (foo === true) {
//return true; /*I've tried with and without the return because the loops
doesn't need a return*/
} else {
goto();
}
}
What happens with the goto() method is it breaks. Giving me the right results for the first iterations then execution seems to stop altogether. 'foo' always gets set to true in normal execution though.
What you could do is implement a foreach yourself, where you execute your condition, and then on success callback go to the next item (but meanwhile the rest of the code will keep running.
var iteration = 0 //count the iteration of your asynchronous process
//start looping
loop(iteration)
function loop(iteration){
var model = foobar[iteration];
//exit your loop when all iterations have finished (assuming all foobar items are not undefined)
if (foobar[iteration] === undefined){
return;
}
//do what you want
//on success callback
iteration++;
loop(iteration);
//end success callback
}
I am facing a weird case, I am using google directionsService.route. but it doesn’t sync well. Here is my code:
angular.forEach(requestArray, function(v, i) {
directionsService.route(v, function(result, status) {
var googleLeg = result.routes[0].legs[0];
// sth else...
});
});
As you can see, I am looping the location Array into the route. every time I fire the function, it will go through the requestArray first, (if we make a breakpoint on the line (var googleLeg = result.routes[0].legs[0]), it doesn’t reach there until it goes through all the requestArray.(i from 0 - length); then it will have the second loop for directionsService.route( at this time, it will reach to line(var googleLeg = result.routes[0].legs[0]); Any idea about this?
Essentially your problem is that calling a google service is an asynchronous call, and you are not guaranteed when the callback will execute. If you need to process requestArray synchronously, here is what you can do:
function start() {
// create a copy of request array
var stuff = [].slice.call(requestArray);
function continueSync() {
// stop the recursion if we have nothing left to process
if (!stuff || stuff.length == 0) return;
// grab the first item off of the stuff queue
v = stuff[0];
stuff = stuff.slice(1);
// call to google
directionsService.route(v, function(result, status) {
var googleLeg = result.routes[0].legs[0];
// sth else...
// now continue processing the rest of the stuff queue through tail recursion
continueSync();
});
}
// kick off our recursive processing
continueSync();
}
your problem is that calling a google service is an asynchronous call, you could prove to generate threads