Why is this not printing to standard output (stdout)? - c

I'm currently creating my own command line shell, and I'm having problems when trying to take in pipes. My program starts with the parent process. It checks to see if the user puts in exit or history. If so it uses those commands, but this is not important. If the user puts in anything other than exit or history, then it creates a child who executes the current task.
However, if the user puts in a command that has a single pipe, then we start at the parent and it creates a child process, call this child, child 1. child 1 see's that there is a pipe and uses fork to create another child, call this child 2. Child 1 creates another child, call it child 3 (Note: child 2 and 3 use shared memory). Now, child 2 executes the first command, and child 3 executes the command using child 2's output. But I'm not getting any output for some reason.
I'm not sure if this is the most efficient way of executing my task, but this is what my professor said to do.
If you want to see all of my code here it is: http://pastebin.com/YNTVf3XP
Otherwise here is my code starting at child 1:
//Otherwise if we have a single pipe, then do
else if (numPipes == 1) {
char *command1[CMD_MAX]; //string holding the first command
char *command2[CMD_MAX]; //string holding the second command
int fds[2]; //create file descriptors for the parent and child
pid_t new_pid; //create new pid_t obj
onePipeSplit(tokens, command1, command2, numTokens); //Getting each command for pipe
if (pipe(fds) < 0) { //use the pipe command. If < 0
perror("Pipe failure."); //we have an error, so exit
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
//Creating child 2
new_pid = fork();
//if pid < 0 then we have an error. Exit.
if (new_pid < 0) {
perror("Fork failure.");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
//Else we have the child (2) process
else if (new_pid == 0) {
close(fds[0]); //Close read
//sending stdin to the shared file descriptor
if (dup2(fds[1], STDOUT_FILENO)<0) {
perror("Can't dup");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
execvp(command1[0], command1); //Execute the next command
perror("Exec failure");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
//Else if we have the parent process
else {
pid_t child = fork(); //Creating child 3
if (new_pid < 0) { //if pid < 0, error, exit
perror("Fork failure.");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
//else if pid > 0 we have the parent wait until children execute
else if (new_pid > 0) {
wait(NULL);
}
//else we have the child (3)
else {
close(fds[1]); //Close write
//Sending stdout to the shared file descriptor
if (dup2(fds[0], STDIN_FILENO) < 0) {
perror("Can't dup");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
execvp(command2[0], command2); //Execute the command
perror("Exec failure");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
}
}
Here is an image that my professor gave me to show how it should work.

The problem is here:
pid_t child = fork(); //Creating child 3
if (new_pid < 0) {
... you keep checking `new_pid` here on down,
... but you should be checking `child` here on down...
Also in onePipeSplit you need to put a NULL at the end of both command lists because execvp needs that. After the first loop add:
command1[i] = NULL;
and after the second:
command2[i] = NULL;
OK, a few more fixes:
after each dup2() you need to close the original fd. One example:
if (dup2(fds[1], STDOUT_FILENO)<0) {
perror("Can't dup");
exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
}
close(fds[1]); /* ADD ME */
and in the parent process:
//else if pid > 0 we have the parent wait until children execute
else if (child > 0) {
close(fds[0]); /* we don't use */
close(fds[1]); /* the pipe */
wait(NULL);
exit(0); /* when 2 & 3 are done, we are too */
}

Related

Execution of UNIX command is being outputted after I exit the program

For some unknown reason, when I'm executing piped commands in my shell program, they're only outputting once I exit the program, anyone see why?
Code:
int execCmdsPiped(char **cmds, char **pipedCmds){
// 0 is read end, 1 is write end
int pipefd[2];
pid_t pid1, pid2;
if (pipe(pipefd) == -1) {
fprintf(stderr,"Pipe failed");
return 1;
}
pid1 = fork();
if (pid1 < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Fork Failure");
}
if (pid1 == 0) {
// Child 1 executing..
// It only needs to write at the write end
close(pipefd[0]);
dup2(pipefd[1], STDOUT_FILENO);
close(pipefd[1]);
if (execvp(pipedCmds[0], pipedCmds) < 0) {
printf("\nCouldn't execute command 1: %s\n", *pipedCmds);
exit(0);
}
} else {
// Parent executing
pid2 = fork();
if (pid2 < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "Fork Failure");
exit(0);
}
// Child 2 executing..
// It only needs to read at the read end
if (pid2 == 0) {
close(pipefd[1]);
dup2(pipefd[0], STDIN_FILENO);
close(pipefd[0]);
if (execvp(cmds[0], cmds) < 0) {
//printf("\nCouldn't execute command 2...");
printf("\nCouldn't execute command 2: %s\n", *cmds);
exit(0);
}
} else {
// parent executing, waiting for two children
wait(NULL);
}
}
}
Output:
In this example of the output, I have used "ls | sort -r" as the example, another important note is that my program is designed to only handle one pipe, I'm not supporting multi-piped commands. But with all that in mind, where am I going wrong, and what should I do to fix it so that it's outputting within the shell, not outside it. Many thanks in advance for any and all advice and help given.
The reason would be your parent process file descriptors are not closed yet. When you wait for the second command to terminate, it hangs because the writing end is not closed so it wait until either the writing end is closed, or new data is available to read.
Try closing both pipefd[0] and pipefd[1] before waiting for process to terminate.
Also note that wait(NULL); will immediately return when one process has terminated, you would need a second one as to not generate zombies if your process still runs after that.

C: execve: I have to implement pipes for a shell, however I cant seem to get the final result out of the second pipe

This is a homework assignment that has me stumped. I make two pipes, then two child processes to handle both sides of the pipe. The first child handles the first command and writes it to the first pipe, the second child handles the second command and writes it to the second pipe. However, when all is said and done, I read the contents from the second pipe and put it into a buffer and simply printf(buffer). Its at this step that my code is failing. I cannot read from the buffer. I have tested all my method calls such as getWordsBeforePipe() and I know they work. Do you guys see anything I am missing?
// Create the first pipe
pipeStatus = pipe(pfd1);
if (pipeStatus == -1) {
perror("pipe");
exit(1);
}
// create the first child
pid = fork();
if (pid == -1) {
printf("Bad first fork()...\n");
exit(1);
}
// Here we will run the first command inside of the first child.
if (pid == 0) {
printf("Im in the first child...\n");
getWordsBeforePipe(pipeLoc); // get the words before the pipe
close(pfd1[0]); // close read end because we arent reading anything
dup2(pfd1[1], 1); // copy to write-end of pfd instead of stdout
close(pfd1[1]); // close the write end
firstCommand = execve(pathFirst, beforePipeWords, environ);
perror("execve"); // we only get here if execve died
_exit(1);
}
// create the second pipe
pipeStatus = pipe(pfd2);
if (pipeStatus == -1) {
perror("pipe");
exit(1);
}
// create the second child
pid = fork();
if (pid == -1) {
printf("Bad second fork()...\n");
exit(1);
}
// Here we will run the second command and put its
// output into the second pipe
// first command business
if (pid == 0) {
printf("Im in the second child...\n");
getWordsAfterPipe(pipeLoc);
close(pfd1[1]); // close first child write end
dup2(pfd1[0], 0); // read from the pfd read end instead of stdin
close(pfd1[0]); // close the read end
// second command business
close(pfd2[0]); // close read end because we arent reading anything
dup2(pfd2[1], 1); // copy to write end of pfd instead of stdout
close(pfd2[1]);
secondCommand = execve(pathSecond, afterPipeWords, environ);
perror("execve"); // we only get here if execve died
_exit(1);
}
close(pfd1[0]);
close(pfd2[0]);
close(pfd2[1]);
// read from the second pipe and output the final value
readSuccess = read(pfd2[0], buffer, 256);
if (readSuccess < 0) {
printf("Failure reading the buffer...\n"); // I keep getting this error
exit(1);
}
if (readSuccess == 0) {
printf("Empty buffer...\n");
exit(1);
}
buffer[readSuccess] = '\0';
printf("%s", buffer);
The parent process is doing this:
close(pfd2[0]);
Followed by this:
readSuccess = read(pfd2[0], buffer, 256);
You can't read from a file descriptor after it's been closed.
You properly closed both ends of the pfd1 pair, since the two children read/write from them. The second child writes to pfd2[1], so the parent should be closing that instead of pfd2[0].
Check that the command specified by pathFirst writes to stdout, and that the command specified by pathSecond both reads from stdin and writes to stdout.

How to run a command using pipe?

I am trying to run ls|wc using execvp. So I create a pipe and then fork to create a child. I close the appropriate(read./write) end in parent/child and then map the other end to stdout/stdin. Then I run the ls in parent using execvp and wc in child. When I run the program it says
wc:standard input:bad file descriptor.
0 0 0
wc: -:Bad file descriptor
Here is my code:
int main()
{
//int nbBytes = 0; //stream length
int pfd_1[2]; //file descriptor
//char buffer[MAX_FILE_LENGTH];
char* arg[MAX_FILE_LENGTH];
pid_t processPid;
//Create a pipe
if(pipe(pfd_1) == -1)
{
printf("Error in creating pipe");
return 0;
}
//Create a child
processPid = fork();
if(processPid == -1)
{
printf("Erro in fork");
exit(1);
}
else if(processPid == 0) //Child
{
//redirect read end file descriptor to standard input
dup2(pfd_1[0],0);
//Close the write end
if(close(pfd_1[1] == -1))
{
printf("Error in closing the write end file descriptor");
exit(1);
}
arg[0] = "wc";
//arg[1] = "-l";
arg[1] = '\0';
if(execvp(arg[0],arg) == -1)
{
printf("Error in executing ls");
}
}
else //Parent
{
//redirect standard output to the file descriptor
dup2(pfd_1[1],1);
//Close the read end
if(close(pfd_1[0] == -1))
{
printf("Error in closing the read end from parent");
exit(1);
}
//Command
arg[0] = "ls";
arg[1] = "/proc/1/status";
arg[2] = '\0';
if(execvp(arg[0],arg) == -1)
{
printf("Error in executing ls");
}
}
}
Any idea what might be wrong? Why would it consider standard input as bad file descriptor? My understanding was since the stdin and read end file descriptor are aliases so the wc -l would read whatever the output is from the parent process. Do I need to do scanf to read from the stdin?
The problem is in this line:
if(close(pfd_1[1] == -1))
You are closing the result of pfd_1[1] == -1, which is by necessity equal to 0 (as they will never be equal). The correct line would probably be:
if (close(pfd_1[1]) == -1)
Note that you do this again later in attempting to close the read end in the parent process.
If you're going to fork children, you have to call wait() in the parent process in order to avoid "zombie" child processes. So you don't want to overlay the parent process that did the original process forking with another executable via exec.
One quick way to setup a series of pipes in the way you want would be to fork a child for each executable you want to run, and read that data back into a buffer in the parent. Then feed that data from the first child into a new child process that the parent forks off. So each child is fed data from the parent, processes the data, and writes the data back to the parent process, which stores the transformed data in a buffer. That buffer is then fed to the next child, etc., etc. The final results of the data in the buffer are the final output of the pipe.
Here's a little pseudo-code:
//allocate buffer
unsigned char buffer[SIZE];
for (each executable to run in pipeline)
{
pipes[2];
pipe(pipes);
pid_t pid = fork();
if (pid == 0)
{
//setup the pipe in the child process
//call exec
}
else
{
//setup the pipe in the parent process
if (child executable is not the first in the pipeline)
{
//write contents of buffer to child process
}
//read from the pipe until the child exits
//store the results in buffer
//call wait, and maybe also check the return value to make sure the
//child returned successfully
wait(NULL);
//clean up the pipe
}
}

Redirecting forked process output to parent process in C

What I am implementing is a (simpler) version of bash. One of the tasks is to accept the command :
$ bg <command> <arguments>
This will then fork a new process and then run execvp() in the new process using <command> and <arguments> as parameters. The problem is that when I capture the output from the child process, I use pipe(), and after getting the output from the child process and outputting it when I want, I can't seem to switch back to STDIN for my parent (shell) process, which results in a segfault the next time I need to accept input.
Here is part of my "bg" function.
ChildPID = fork();
if (ChildPID < 0) {
/* There is an error */
printf("Error forking the process.\n");
exit(1);
}
if (ChildPID >= 0) {
if (ChildPID == 0) { /* Child Process */
close(m_pipefd[0]);
dup2(m_pipefd[1], STDOUT_FILENO);
close(m_pipefd[1]);
//sleep(5);
err = execvp(optionsPTR[0], optionsPTR);
switch (errno) {
case ENOENT:
printf("RSI: %s: command not found\n", optionsPTR[0]);
break;
case EACCES:
printf("RSI: %s: Permission denied\n", optionsPTR[0]);
break;
}
exit(1);
}
else { /* Parent Process */
WaitErr = waitpid(ChildPID, &status, WNOHANG | WUNTRACED);
return(0); /* to main */
}
}
return 0;
And the code for when I get the output from the pipe after the process finishes.
close(m_pipefd[1]);
dup2(m_pipefd[0], STDIN_FILENO);
while(fgets(buffer, sizeof(buffer), stdin)) {
buf = buffer;
printf("%s\n", buf);
}
close(m_pipefd[0]);
So the tl;dr version is that I need to reset back to stdin for the parent process after capturing the child processes output.
Thanks,
Braden
There is usually no need to mess with stdin and stdout in your parent. After you connect your pipes in the child to stdin and stdout, the other ends of the pipes should be able to send data or get data from the child.
Just read from m_pipefd[1] in your parent.

How does one use the wait() function when forking multiple processes?

Learning to use the fork() command and how to pipe data between a parent and it's children. I am currently trying to write a simple program to test how the fork and pipe functions work. My problem seems to be the correct use/placement of the wait function. I want the parent to wait for both of its children to finish processing. Here is the code I have so far:
int main(void)
{
int n, fd1[2], fd2[2];
pid_t pid;
char line[100];
if (pipe(fd1) < 0 || pipe(fd2) < 0)
{
printf("Pipe error\n");
return 1;
}
// create the first child
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0)
printf("Fork Error\n");
else if (pid == 0) // child segment
{
close(fd1[1]); // close write end
read(fd1[0], line, 17); // read from pipe
printf("Child reads the message: %s", line);
return 0;
}
else // parent segment
{
close(fd1[0]); // close read end
write(fd1[1], "\nHello 1st World\n", 17); // write to pipe
// fork a second child
pid = fork();
if (pid < 0 )
printf("Fork Error\n");
else if (pid == 0) // child gets return value 0 and executes this block
// this code is processed by the child process only
{
close(fd2[1]); // close write end
read(fd2[0], line, 17); // read from pipe
printf("\nChild reads the message: %s", line);
}
else
{
close(fd2[0]); // close read end
write(fd2[1], "\nHello 2nd World\n", 17); // write to pipe
if (wait(0) != pid)
printf("Wait error\n");
}
if (wait(0) != pid)
printf("Wait error\n");
}
// code executed by both parent and child
return 0;
} // end main
Currently my output looks something along the lines of:
./fork2
Child reads the message: Hello 1st World
Wait error
Child reads the message: Hello 2nd World
Wait error
Where is the appropriate place to make the parent wait?
Thanks,
Tomek
That seems mostly ok (I didn't run it, mind you). Your logic error is in assuming that the children will end in some particular order; don't check the results of wait(0) against a particular pid unless you're sure you know which one you're going to get back!
Edit:
I ran your program; you do have at least one bug, your second child process calls wait(), which you probably didn't want to do. I recommend breaking some of your code out into functions, so you can more clearly see the order of operations you're performing without all the clutter.
i think its better to use something like this, in order to wait for all the childrens.
int stat;
while (wait(&stat) > 0)
{}

Resources