AngularJS directive doesn't update scope value even with apply - angularjs

I'm usin a directive to show a div on the screen only when the screen size is smaller than 600px. The problem is, the scope value isn't being updated, even using $apply() inside the directive.
This is the code:
function showBlock($window,$timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: true,
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
scope.isBlock = false;
checkScreen();
function checkScreen() {
var wid = $window.innerWidth;
if (wid <= 600) {
if(!scope.isBlock) {
$timeout(function() {
scope.isBlock = true;
scope.$apply();
}, 100);
};
} else if (wid > 600) {
if(scope.isBlock) {
$timeout(function() {
scope.isBlock = false;
scope.$apply();
}, 100);
};
};
};
angular.element($window).bind('resize', function(){
checkScreen();
});
}
};
}
html:
<div ng-if="isBlock" show-block>
//..conent to show
</div>
<div ng-if="!isBlock" show-block>
//..other conent to show
</div>
Note: If I don't use $timeout I'll get the error
$digest already in progress
I used console logs inside to check if it's updating the value, and inside the directive everything works fine. But the changes doesn't go to the view. The block doesn't show.

You should use do rule in such cases to get the advantage of Prototypal Inheritance of AngularJS.
Basically you need to create a object, that will will have various property. Like in your case you could have $scope.model = {} and then place isBlock property inside it. So that when you are inside your directive, you will get access to parent scope. The reason behind it is, you are having scope: true, which says that the which has been created in directive is prototypically inherited from parent scope. That means all the reference type objects are available in your child scope.
Markup
<div ng-if="model.isBlock" show-block>
//..conent to show
</div>
<div ng-if="!model.isBlock" show-block>
//..other conent to show
</div>
Controller
app.controller('myCtrl', function($scope){
//your controller code here
//here you can have object defined here so that it can have properties in it
//and child scope will get access to it.
$scope.model = {}; //this is must to use dot rule,
//instead of toggle property here you could do it from directive too
$scope.isBlock = false; //just for demonstration purpose
});
and then inside your directive you should use scope.model.isBlock instead of scope.isBlock
Update
As you are using controllerAs pattern inside your code, you need to use scope.ag.model.isBlock. which will provide you an access to get that scope variable value inside your directive.
Basically you can get the parent controller value(used controllerAs pattern) make available controller value inside the child one. You can find object with your controller alias inside the $scope. Like here you have created ag as controller alias, so you need to do scope.ag.model to get the model value inside directive link function.
NOTE
You don't need to use $apply with $timeout, which may throw an error $apply in progress, so $timeout will run digest for you, you don't need to worry about to run digest.
Demo Here

I suspect it has something to do with the fact that the show-block directive wouldn't be fired if ng-if="isBlock" is never true, so it would never register the resize event.

In my experience linear code never works well with dynamic DOM properties such as window sizing. With code that is looking for screens size you need to put that in some sort of event / DOM observer e.g. in angular I'd use a $watch to observe the the dimensions. So to fix this you need to place you code in a $watch e.g below. I have not tested this code, just directional. You can watch $window.innerWidth or you can watch $element e.g. body depending on your objective. I say this as screens will be all over the place but if you control a DOM element, such as, body you have better control. also I've not use $timeout for brevity sake.
// watch window width
showBlock.$inject = ['$window'];
function bodyOverflow($window) {
var isBlock = false;
return {
restrict: 'EA',
link: function ($scope, element, attrs) {
$scope.$watch($window.innerWidth, function (newWidth, oldWidth) {
if (newWidth !== oldWidth) {
return isBlock = newWidth <= 600;
}
})
}
};
}
// OR watch element width
showBlock.$inject = [];
function bodyOverflow() {
var isBlock = false;
return {
restrict: 'EA',
link: function ($scope, element, attrs) {
$scope.$watch($element, function (new, old) {
if (newWidth) {
return isBlock = newWidth[0].offsetWidth <= 600;
}
})
}
};
}

Related

Removing element from DOM via ng-if bound to attribute directive scope property

I assumed this would be straightforward, but it's seemingly not!
I'm trying to create a generic attribute directive that will call a method in one of my services and conditionally cause the element in which it is placed to not be added to the DOM if the service method returns false. Basically, ng-if, but an ng-if that internally calls a service method and acts on that
Link to Plunker
I have an element containing an attribute directive: e.g
<p ng-if="visible" my-directive>Hi</p>
I set visible to true in the myDirective directive. I was expecting the <p> element to be removed from the DOM when visible was falsy and added to the DOM when it's truthy. Instead, the ng-if never seems to spot that visible has been set to true in the directive's link function and, hence, the <p> element never displays.
I wasn't 100% sure it would work since the directive is removing the element on which it exists, bit of a catch 22 there.
I've spent far too long on this and have so far tried (unsucessfully):
Adding an ng-if attribute in the link function via these two methods
attr.ngIf = true;
element.attr('ng-if', true);
Changing the ng-if in the <p> to ng-show, thereby not removing the element (which I really want to do)
I'm wondering if it's something as simple as scope? Since the ng-if is bound to a property of the <p> element, is setting visible in the directive scope setting it on the same scope?
On the other hand, I may be drastically over-simplifying, I have a nasty feeling I may have to consider directive compilation and transclusion to get a solution for this.
Does anyone have any feel for where I might be going wrong?
tldr: apparently you want your directive to be self-contained and it should be able to remove and add itself to the DOM. This is possible and makes the most sense via isolated scope or manual manipulation of the DOM (see below).
General
When you do <p ng-if="visible" my-directive>Hi</p> angular looks for the visible on the current scope, which is the parent scope of the directive. When visible is defined, the directive is inserted in the DOM, e.g. taken from your plunker
<body ng-controller="MainCtrl">
<p my-directive="showMe" ng-if="visible">I should be shown</p>
</body>`<br>
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.visible = 3;
});
would make the directive being shown. As you defined an isolated scope on your directive
app.directive('myDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: {
myDirective: '='
},
link: function(scope, element, attr, ctrl) {
scope.visible = (scope.myDirective == 'showMe') ? true : false;
}
}
});
scope.visible in the directive does not affect the visible taken into account for ngIf.
Child Scope
You could define a child scope to get access to the parent scope. If you do that, you can actually affect the right visible property, but you have to put it on an object so that the directive can follow the scope prototype chain.
<body ng-controller="MainCtrl">
<p my-directive ng-if="visibleDirectives.directive1">I should be shown</p>
</body>
The $timeouts are there for demonstration purposes. Initially the ngIf has to evaluate to true else the directive is not being created at all.
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.visibleDirectives = { directive1 : true };
});
app.directive('myDirective', function($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope : true,
link: function(scope, element, attr, ctrl) {
console.log(scope);
$timeout(function() {
scope.visibleDirectives.directive1 = !scope.visibleDirectives.directive1;
$timeout(function() {
scope.visibleDirectives.directive1 = !scope.visibleDirectives.directive1;
}, 2000);
}, 2000);
}
}
});
Like this the directive has to know about the property that defines it's visibility beforehand (in this case scope.visibleDirectives.visible1), which is not very practical and prohibits several directives.
Isolated Scope
In your example you used an isolated scope. This allows reusing the directive. In order for the directive to be able to modify the appropriate property for ngIf you have to again give it the right reference.
<body ng-controller="MainCtrl">
<p my-directive="directive1" ng-if="directive1.visible">I should be shown</p>
</body>
Again you have to provide the property on an object so that the directive can follow the object reference to modify the right visible.
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) {
$scope.directive1 = {
visible : true
};
});
app.directive('myDirective', function($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope : {
myDirective : '='
},
link: function(scope, element, attr, ctrl) {
$timeout(function() {
scope.myDirective.visible = !scope.myDirective.visible;
$timeout(function() {
scope.myDirective.visible = !scope.myDirective.visible;
}, 2000);
}, 2000);
}
}
});
In these cases the directive gets recreated everytime ngIf evaluates to true.
Manual manipulation of the DOM
You can also just manually remove and append the node of the directive without consulting angular.
<body ng-controller="MainCtrl">
<p my-directive>I should be shown</p>
</body>
In this case you don't need the angular version of setTimeout and can even use a setInterval as the Interval is created only once, but you have to clear it.
app.controller('MainCtrl', function($scope) { });
app.directive('myDirective', function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope : { },
link: function(scope, element, attr, ctrl) {
var el = element[0];
var parent = el.parentNode;
var shouldBeShown = false;
var interval = setInterval(function() {
var children = parent.children;
var found = false;
for(var i = 0; i < children.length; i++) {
if(children[i] === el) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
if(shouldBeShown) {
if(!found)
parent.appendChild(el);
}
else {
if(found)
parent.removeChild(el);
}
shouldBeShown = !shouldBeShown;
}, 2000);
scope.$on('$destroy', function() {
clearInterval(interval);
});
}
};
});
If you want an element to be removed, use ng-show="visible" this will evaluate as a Boolean and show the element if it evaluates to true. Use "!visible" if you need to flip it.
Also, but adding the scope attribute to your directive you are adding an additional scope, think alternate timeline, that your controller scope that is tied to the page cannot see. That would explain why ng-show may not have worked for you before.

ng-style Variable Not Updating When Scope is Updated

I'm monitoring a CSS style and updating a variable in the scope that's based on that CSS style's value. It works the first time around but when the browser is resized, the scope gets updated but ng-style does not update with the new scope parameter.
JS:
.directive('monitorStyle', function() {
return {
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
scope[attrs.updateVariable] = $(element).css(attrs.monitorStyle);
angular.element(window).on('resize', function() {
scope[attrs.updateVariable] = $(element).css(attrs.monitorStyle);
});
}
}
})
HTML:
<p class="text" monitor-style="font-size" update-variable="textHeight">Press "<img class="mini up" src="img/select-arrow.png" src="Up" ng-style="{'height': textHeight}">
I'm trying to do this outside of the controller because that's what people recommend. Why is ng-style not updating when the scope gets updated?
The window event isn't an angular event, so angular don't know he have to update the model/scope. You have to add scope.$apply() to tell angular to refresh it :
angular.element(window).on('resize', function() {
scope[attrs.updateVariable] = $(element).css(attrs.monitorStyle);
scope.$apply();
});
Data bindig only works when your model is updated with angular event like $http, $timeout, ng-click, ...
A great article about it : http://jimhoskins.com/2012/12/17/angularjs-and-apply.html
Yo, I made this sick solution.
So if you want to watch styles (even an array of them on a particular element) and then send their values to the $scope you can use this JS:
.directive('monitorStyle', function($timeout) {
return {
link: function(scope, element, attrs) {
function addToScope() {
var updateVariable = attrs.updateVariable.split(',');
var monitorStyle = attrs.monitorStyle.split(',');
for (var i = 0; i < updateVariable.length; i++) {
scope[updateVariable[i]] = $(element).css(monitorStyle[i]);
}
}
addToScope();
angular.element(window).on('resize', function() {
addToScope();
scope.$apply();
});
}
}
})
And apply it like this:
<h2 monitor-style="font-size,line-height" update-variable="headerHeight,headerLineHeight">
This will update the $scope on initialization and on window resizes. You can of course modify it to your own purpose.
Each time the $scope changes you can update other styles like this:
<div ng-style="{'height': headerHeight, 'line-height': headerLineHeight}">

AngularJS: Parent scope is not updated in directive (with isolated scope) two way binding

I have a directive with isolated scope with a value with two way binding to the parent scope. I am calling a method that changes the value in the parent scope, but the change is not applied in my directive.(two way binding is not triggered). This question is very similar:
AngularJS: Parent scope not updated in directive (with isolated scope) two way binding
but I am not changing the value from the directive, but changing it only in the parent scope. I read the solution and in point five it is said:
The watch() created by the isolated scope checks whether it's value for the bi-directional binding is in sync with the parent's value. If it isn't the parent's value is copied to the isolated scope.
Which means that when my parent value is changed to 2, a watch is triggered. It checks whether parent value and directive value are the same - and if not it copies to directive value. Ok but my directive value is still 1 ... What am I missing ?
html :
<div data-ng-app="testApp">
<div data-ng-controller="testCtrl">
<strong>{{myValue}}</strong>
<span data-test-directive data-parent-item="myValue"
data-parent-update="update()"></span>
</div>
</div>
js:
var testApp = angular.module('testApp', []);
testApp.directive('testDirective', function ($timeout) {
return {
scope: {
key: '=parentItem',
parentUpdate: '&'
},
replace: true,
template:
'<button data-ng-click="lock()">Lock</button>' +
'</div>',
controller: function ($scope, $element, $attrs) {
$scope.lock = function () {
console.log('directive :', $scope.key);
$scope.parentUpdate();
//$timeout($scope.parentUpdate); // would work.
// expecting the value to be 2, but it is 1
console.log('directive :', $scope.key);
};
}
};
});
testApp.controller('testCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.myValue = '1';
$scope.update = function () {
// Expecting local variable k, or $scope.pkey to have been
// updated by calls in the directive's scope.
console.log('CTRL:', $scope.myValue);
$scope.myValue = "2";
console.log('CTRL:', $scope.myValue);
};
});
Fiddle
Use $scope.$apply() after changing the $scope.myValue in your controller like:
testApp.controller('testCtrl', function ($scope) {
$scope.myValue = '1';
$scope.update = function () {
// Expecting local variable k, or $scope.pkey to have been
// updated by calls in the directive's scope.
console.log('CTRL:', $scope.myValue);
$scope.myValue = "2";
$scope.$apply();
console.log('CTRL:', $scope.myValue);
};
});
The answer Use $scope.$apply() is completely incorrect.
The only way that I have seen to update the scope in your directive is like this:
angular.module('app')
.directive('navbar', function () {
return {
templateUrl: '../../views/navbar.html',
replace: 'true',
restrict: 'E',
scope: {
email: '='
},
link: function (scope, elem, attrs) {
scope.$on('userLoggedIn', function (event, args) {
scope.email = args.email;
});
scope.$on('userLoggedOut', function (event) {
scope.email = false;
console.log(newValue);
});
}
}
});
and emitting your events in the controller like this:
$rootScope.$broadcast('userLoggedIn', user);
This feels like such a hack I hope the angular gurus can see this post and provide a better answer, but as it is the accepted answer does not even work and just gives the error $digest already in progress
Using $apply() like the accepted answer can cause all sorts of bugs and potential performance hits as well. Settings up broadcasts and whatnot is a lot of work for this. I found the simple workaround just to use the standard timeout to trigger the event in the next cycle (which will be immediately because of the timeout). Surround the parentUpdate() call like so:
$timeout(function() {
$scope.parentUpdate();
});
Works perfectly for me. (note: 0ms is the default timeout time when not specified)
One thing most people forget is that you can't just declare an isolated scope with the object notation and expect parent scope properties to be bound. These bindings only work if attributes have been declared through which the binding 'magic' works. See for more information:
https://umur.io/angularjs-directives-using-isolated-scope-with-attributes/
Instead of using $scope.$apply(), try using $scope.$applyAsync();

Angular ng-blur not working with ng-hide

Using a directive focus-me="inTextModeInput" in a text input
app.directive('focusMe', function($timeout) {
/*focuses on input
<input type="text" focus-me="focusInput">
*/
return {
scope: { trigger: '=focusMe' },
link: function(scope, element) {
scope.$watch('trigger', function(value) {
if(value === true) {
$timeout(function() {
element[0].focus();
scope.trigger = false;
});
}
});
}
};
});
Actually having 2 inputs, both uses focus-me
When i programatically set the value to focus on an input the ng-blur of other is not called.
NOTE : i am also using this in an ng-repeat.
Isolated scope
The blur is called, but you're not seeing that because you've created a directive with an isolated scope. The ng-blur is executed on the $parent scope. You should only use an isolated scope when the directive is implementing re-useable templates.
Two way binding on trigger
The line 'scope.trigger = false' is also setting a different boolean value because it's on a different scope. If you want to assign a value to a variable from a directive you should always wrap the value inside another object: var focus = { me: true } and set it like trigger=focus.me.
A better solution
But I wouldn't set the trigger to false at all. AngularJS is a MVC/MVVM based framework which has a model state for the user interface. This state should be idempotent; meaning that if you store the current state, reload the page and restore the state the user interface should be in the exact same situation as before.
So what you probably need is a directive that
Has no isolated scope (which allows all other directives to work: ng-blur, ng-focus, ...)
Keeps track of a boolean, which indicates the focus state
Sets this boolean to false when the element has lost focus
It's probably easier to see this thing in action: working plunker.
Maybe this (other) plunker will give you some more insight on scopes and directives.
Code
myApp.directive('myFocus', function($parse, $timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
link: function myFocusLink($scope, $element, $attrs, ctrls) {
var e = $element[0];
// Grab a parser from the provided expression so we can
// read and assign a value to it.
var getModel = $parse($attrs.myFocus);
var setModel = getModel.assign;
// Watch the parser -- and focus if true or blur otherwise.
$scope.$watch(getModel, function(value) {
if(value) {
e.focus();
} else {
e.blur();
}
});
function onBlur() {
$timeout(function() {
setModel($scope, false);
});
}
function onFocus() {
$timeout(function() {
setModel($scope, true);
});
}
$element.on('focus', onFocus);
$element.on('blur', onBlur);
// Cleanup event registration if the scope is destroyed
$scope.$on('$destroy', function() {
$element.off('focus', onFocus);
$element.off('blur', onBlur);
});
}
};
});

Angular.js -- Directive to controller communication

I am very new to angular so please excuse my lack of understanding.
I have a directive called "draggable" which I want to be able to track the x position of and perform some logic on it in the controller. When the user drags the element (a stick figure) to the right, additional stick figures should appear directly behind it. The controller should know the x position and based upon where it is, increment a counter which will dictate how many stick figures appear behind the draggable element.
This code does not currently work as the controller does not have receive the value of x.
My directive:
app.directive('draggable', function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: "=x",
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
$(element).draggable({
containment: "parent",
axis: "x",
drag: function(){
scope.x = $(this).offset().left;
}
});
}
};
});
My controller:
app.controller("main-controller", function($scope) {
$scope.range = function(n) {
return new Array(figures);
};
$scope.$watch("x", function(){
console.log($scope.x);
figures = x / (stick_figure_height)
});
});
My HTML:
<div class="human-slider" ng-controller="main-controller">
<div draggable class="human-draggable">
<img src="images/stickfigure.png"/>
</div>
<div ng-repeat="i in range()">
<img src="images/stickfigure.png"/>
</div>
</div>
The reason the controller was not picking up the updated value of x from the draggable directive was because of where the value of x is being updated. X is updated in a turn that has been created in a method outside of the angularJS library (the drag event handler). The solution to this problem was to use $.apply which will update the binding.
The updated code:
// Create our angular app
var app = angular.module('celgeneApp',[]);
// Main controller
app.controller("main-controller", function($scope) {
$scope.x = 0;
$scope.figures = 0;
$scope.range = function(n) {
return new Array($scope.figures);
};
$scope.$watch('x', function(){console.log($scope.x);});
});
// Draggable directive
app.directive('draggable', function() {
return {
restrict: 'A',
scope: false,
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
$(element).draggable({
containment: "parent",
axis: "x",
drag: function(){
// Need to use $apply since scope.x is updated
// in a turn outside a method in the AngularJS library.
scope.$apply(function(){scope.x = element.offset().left;});
}
});
}
};
});
You can communicate between a directive and a controller through a service. A directive can also access a controller's scope variables via parameters. You can access the variables in different ways, depending on your needs:
As just text with the # prefix
With a one way binding with the & prefix
With a two bay binding with the = prefix
Check out this excellent article about directives, especially the scope section
Take a look at this directive I made, it is just a wrapper around jQuery's draggable just like yours, maybe you can get some ideas:
angular-draggable
Check my this for how parent controller and directive communicates :)
http://plnkr.co/edit/GZqBDEojX6N87kXiYUIF?p=preview plnkr

Resources