directive with inline tpl containing ng-include - angularjs

I have a directive with inline template containing a ng-include directive element.
When karma testing my directive and logging the result of compiled element . the tesult contains a ng comment saying the ng-include is undefined . What do I make wrong ? The directive works fine but the karma testing seems not work.

I think I know what you're asking but the question can really use some revision, and include some sample code. I'm going attempt to answer because I ran into this issue a while back and it took a lot of hair pulling to finally figure it out and the fix is really easy.
I'm have to make a few assumptions and expand on this question to clarify the scenario for future readers.
Assumption 1: your directive works in normal use outside of testing.
Assumption 2: the root element of your directive template is the one with ng-include. Basically, it looks like this:
module('myapp').directive('myDirective', function(){
return {
restrict: 'E',
replace: true,
template: '<ng-include src="myRealTemplateUrl" ></div>',
}
});
Assumption 3: When you create and run a Jasmine unit-test similar to this one, the result of elem.html() is undefined:
it('Renders something cool">', function(){
var elem = $compile('<my-directive></my-directive>')($scope);
$scope.$digest();
console.log('ELEM', elem.html());
expect(elem.html()).toContain("foo);
});
With that out of the way, this question now can be answered.
ng-include uses element transclusion. When the root node of the HTML fragment passed to $compile uses element transclusion, Angular turns that root node into a comment node. Angular then appends the rendered version of your directive as a sibling node right below that original root node. So elem is now a comment node, and therefore elem.html() is undefined.
More thorough explanations can be seen in this tutorial or here
The solution is simple though, just wrap whatever you passed to $compile inside another root element. So don't do this:
// don't do this
var elem = $compile('<my-directive></my-directive>')($scope);
do this:
// but do this
var elem = $compile('<div><my-directive></my-directive></div>')($scope);
That's all you have to do to make top-level ng-include work in a unit test.

Related

Angular JS Directive - complete background

I am a rookie in angularJS learning about directives (and struggling a lot :)).
I am trying to understand a piece of angularJS code in the plunker
by user tasseKATT for the stack overflow question regarding angular-ui-bootstrap.
I was hoping if anyone can explain this code fragment in more detail.
Specifically
How parsing and compilation happens in directives
How angular knows when to recompile directives ($watch - perhaps, if so how).
I checked the documentation for $parse but dont see any explanation on the service taking a function. What piece of information am I missing.
Also what is the
(value || '').toString();
used for.
What are the properties compileHTML. Where can I see the documentation for the compile function explained in more detail than the one provided by AJS.
What is $$addBindingClass(tElement) and $$addBindingInfo.
Explain the function ngBindHtmlWatchAction
what is $sce.
The fragment from the directive is below
app.directive('compileHtml', ['$sce', '$parse', '$compile',
function($sce, $parse, $compile) {
return {
restrict: 'A',
compile: function ngBindHtmlCompile(tElement, tAttrs) {
var ngBindHtmlGetter = $parse(tAttrs.compileHtml);
var ngBindHtmlWatch = $parse(tAttrs.compileHtml, function getStringValue(value) {
return (value || '').toString();
});
$compile.$$addBindingClass(tElement);
return function ngBindHtmlLink(scope, element, attr) {
$compile.$$addBindingInfo(element, attr.compileHtml);
scope.$watch(ngBindHtmlWatch, function ngBindHtmlWatchAction() {
element.html($sce.trustAsHtml(ngBindHtmlGetter(scope)) || '');
$compile(element.contents())(scope);
});
};
}
};
}
]);
Disclaimer : First thing buddy, you are a rookie in angular and you are trying to understand directives using a very complicated directive. Maybe its better if you start with something a little less complicated :)
I will try to answer your many questions:
How parsing and compilation happens in directives:
Angular knows which all directives are present, so when you write a name which matches one of the directive it compiles the html and link the directive.(I am trying to find a good blog for you to read on these cycles of directive, maybe this post will help)
How angular knows when to recompile directives ($watch - perhaps, if so how): angular doesnot recompile directives, a directive is only compiled once when angular encounters it for the first time.
$watch is basically put on a variable, so whenever angularjs is applying the changes of the scope, it looks for that variable if it is changed.
$parse
It is a way of adding angular to html. So if you directly append html to an element, it does not have angular like features. So we get the html, compile/parse it and then append to the element. Parsing is basically getting all the variables in the html and applying two way binding on those, plus replacing them with their values in controller.
Read this post.
Remember that compile/parse are always done against a scope variable, because variables defined inside the html are properties of the scope variables.
What is this (value || '').toString();
This is a common coding practce of js developers.
This basically amounts to :
(value ? value : '').toString();
Why dont we use value directly like this
value.toString();
Because if the value is undefined or null, it does not have a toString function and it will throw an error.
So the coder is trying to check if the value is there, then convert the value to string otherwise, just put empty string(converting to string results empty string).
what is $sce?
sce is a service, that comes in file angular-sanitize.js which is a part of angular bundle. When somebody tries to modify html to insert his link(malicious activity we call it), angular does not allow and treats his html as simple text.
But what if you want to add html, you pass your html to $sce service(injected in controller/directive etc) and the output is the html which you can insert into the view(this will come as html).
$$addBindingClass
This is just to add "ng-binding" class to the element, so that you can see which element has a model created by angularjs.
$$addBindingInfo
This is to add information to the element for debugging purpose. You can select the element in the inspector and run the following statement in console to get the scope information.
angular.element($0).scope(); //$0 means selected element
Here is a link that explains this thing better.

Dynamically created element not firing click event

$scope.addNew = function(){
$('.thumb-img-gallary').append("<li><span class='img-del' ng-click='delThumbImgGallaryPhoto($event)'>X</span><img class='thumb-img' src='data:image/jpeg;base64,"+imageData+"'/></li>");
}
I am calling this function to add element dynamically. But then delThumbImgGallaryPhoto() is not getting called.
you cannot just append an element with a ng-click or any other directive, and expect it to work. it has got to be compiled by angular.
explenation about compilation from angular docs:
For AngularJS, "compilation" means attaching directives to the HTML to make it interactive
compelation happens in one of two cases:
When Angular bootstraps your application, the HTML compiler traverses the DOM matching directives against the DOM elements
when you call the $compile service inside an angular context
so what you need to do, is first to compile it(remeber to inject the $compile service in your controller), and then append it:
$scope.addNew = function(){
var elem = $compile("<li><span class='img-del' ng-click='delThumbImgGallaryPhoto($event)'>X</span><img class='thumb-img' src='data:image/jpeg;base64,"+imageData+"'/></li>")($scope);
$('.thumb-img-gallary').append(elem);
}
BTW, remember it is prefable not to have any DOM manipulations done in the controller. angular has directives for that.
You have to compile it with scope
try like this
var item="<li><span class='img-del' ng-click='delThumbImgGallaryPhoto($event)'>X</span><img class='thumb-img' src='data:image/jpeg;base64,"+imageData+"'/></li>"
$('.thumb-img-gallary').append(item);
$compile(item)($scope);
angular doesn't know anything about your newly added element. You need to compile your newly added element using $compile. and you should better use directive for this task.
It is a bad habit to access ui elements from controller.
edit: it would be best using ng-repeat for this task. lets say you have a thumb-gallery directive which is repeated using ng-repeat by thumbs array.
when you need to add a new image you only need to add it to your thumbs array.
it is simple and straightforward
Your html would look like
<thumb-gallery ng-repeat="gallery in galleries"></thumb-gallery>
and your js would look like
var gallery = {};
$scope.galleries.add(gallery);

$compile inside link function in angularjs directive not work as expected

I try do something with directive in angular, but I've some problem with $compile function in programmatically html element, call here "phe".
var phe = angular.element('<div style="background-color:orange">{{value}}</div>');
When I append "phe" after or before the directive's element, it work like a charm...
var $phe = $compile(phe)(scope);
element.after($phe);
but if I wrapped the directive element with this "phe" the $compile not work.
element.wrap($phe);
Somebody have some idea?
I have made a plunker http://plnkr.co/edit/0x2MmQ7WYmiNog0IEzTj?p=preview
it works if you change the compilation sequence... compile the element before placing it in the dom
var phe_b = angular.element('<div style="background-color:orange"> b {{value}}</div>');
var $phe_b = $compile(phe_b)(scope);
element.before($phe_b);
do same for after...
The reason it doesn't work with wrap is because wrap clones the DOM element. In other words, if you did:
var wrapper = angular.element("<div>");
element.wrap(wrapper);
console.log(wrapper[0] !== element[0].parentNode); // this would output "true"
So, the element that you compiled/linked is not the same that ends up in the DOM.
You could, of course, get the wrapping element (it's the return value of wrap) and $compile it, but you need to be careful not to re-compile/re-link certain directives that were applied on the current element (including the very same directive) and its children.

Why element is not available in directive's link function

You have probably heard it as many times as I have. "Do all your DOM manipulation in directives". But no one ever seems to say what could happen if you actually do DOM manipulation outside a directive in Angular.
I have a problem that I managed to reproduce in this Plunk
I have made a very simple directive that just outputs the element to the console.
app.directive('dirre', function(){
return {
link: function(scope, element, attrs){
console.log({message:"dirrens linkFn", element: element, count: element.length})
}
}
});
I have two identical jquery UI accordions, the only difference is the way they are called. One is called in a controller and the other one in a directive. Calling accordion from a controller is of course something bad.
As you can see if you run the application there is a situation where one of the dirre-directives does not seem to have an element but there are no errors.
The same thing happens in a big application I'm working with right now. The problem seems to be that someone in our team decided to call Jquery UI's accordion in a controller and not in a directive.
I haven't been able to step through the code to see what actually happens but I strongly suspect that the DOM is modified while Angular is compiling and something goes wrong.
Is this a plausible explanation?
Is this an example of what can go wrong if you do DOM manipulations outside a directive?
The controller and the directive links function are called asynchronously.
Usually you can see directives being built before the main Controller complete. When the controller terminates, the directives update their watched variable (ngModel, $watch(something)...). Basically this is done with promises.
The link/compile function however is not called again. You have to compile, watch, apply the new DOM. Which basically means writing the similar code to angularjs.

Creating an AngularJS Directive for jQuery UI Button

Update: Fiddle w/ full solution: http://jsfiddle.net/langdonx/VXBHG/
In efforts to compare and contrast KnockoutJS and AngularJS, I ran through the KnockoutJS interactive tutorial, and after each section, I'd rewrite it in AngularJS using what little I already knew + the AngularJS reference.
When I got to step 3 of the Creating custom bindings tutorial, I figured it would be a good time to get spun up on Angular Directives and write a custom tag. Then I failed miserably.
I'm up against two issues that I haven't been able to figure out. I created a new Fiddle to try and wrap my head around what was going on...
1 (fiddle): I figured out my scoping issue, but, is it possible to just passthrough ng-click? The only way I could get it to work is to rename it to jqb-click which is a little annoying.
2 (fiddle): As soon as I applied .button() to my element, things went weird. My guess is because both Angular and jQuery UI are manipulating the HTML. I wouldn't expect this, but Angular seems to be providing its own span for my button (see line 21 of the JavaScript), and of course so is jQuery UI, which I would expect. I hacked up the HTML to get it looking right, but even before that, none of the functionality works. I still have the scope issue, and there's no template binding. What am I missing?
I understand that there's an AngularUI project I should be taking a look at and I can probably pull off what I'm trying to do with just CSS, but at this point it's more about learning how to use Directives rather than thinking this is a good idea.
You can create an isolated scope in a directive by setting the scope parameter, or let it use the parent scope by not setting it.
Since you want the ng-click from parent scope it is likely easiest for this instance to use the parent scope within directive:
One trick is to use $timeout within a directive before maniplulatig the DOM within a templated directive to give the DOM time to repaint before the manipulation, otherwise it seems that the elements don't exist in time.
I used an attribute to pass the text in, rather than worrying about transclusion compiling. In this manner the expression will already have been compiled when the template is added and the link callback provides easy access to the attributes.
<jqbutton ng-click="test(3)" text="{{title}} 3"></jqbutton>
angular.module('Components', [])
.directive('jqbutton', function ($timeout) {
return {
restrict: 'E', // says that this directive is only for html elements
replace: true,
template: '<button></button>',
link: function (scope, element, attrs) {
// turn the button into a jQuery button
$timeout(function () {
/* set text from attribute of custom tag*/
element.text(attrs.text).button();
}, 10);/* very slight delay, even using "0" works*/
}
};
});
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/gWjXc/8/
Directives are very powerful, but also have a bit of a learning curve. Also in comparison of angular to knockout, angular is more of a meta framework that in the long run has far more flexibilty than knockout
Very helpful reading for understanding scope in directives:
https://github.com/angular/angular.js/wiki/The-Nuances-of-Scope-Prototypal-Inheritance

Resources