NHibernate ORDER BY CURRENT_TIMESTAMP conflicts with DISTINCT - sql-server

Could anybody please explain why NHibernate on MsSql2012Dialect generates query that can not be processed by server? It builds query this way when there is no sorting specified explicitly.
...
ORDER BY CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
OFFSET 0 ROWS FETCH FIRST 10 ROWS ONLY

This is unresolved bug registered in jira, based on the suggestions, this is my work around:
public class MyMsSql2012Dialect : MsSql2012Dialect
{
public override SqlString GetLimitString(SqlString querySqlString, SqlString offset, SqlString limit)
{
var result = base.GetLimitString(querySqlString, offset, limit);
return result.Replace("ORDER BY CURRENT_TIMESTAMP", "ORDER BY 1");
}
}

As you said in the question, following query is generated if no ORDER BY is explicitly specified:
SELECT
distinct this_.ColumnName as y0_
FROM
[DB].[dbo].Table this_
ORDER BY
CURRENT_TIMESTAMP OFFSET 0 ROWS FETCH FIRST 10 ROWS ONLY;
Error is:
ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified.
Error only occur if BOTH Projections.Distinct and Take(1) is provided and SQL Server version is above 2012 (Dialect is MsSql2012Dialect or above).
The better solution is to provide the ORDER BY column to NHibernate explicitly and include that column in SELECT list.
Session.QueryOver<Entity>()
.Select(
Projections.Distinct(Projections.Property<Entity>(x => x.ColumnName))
)
.Where(....)
.OrderBy(Projections.Property<Entity>(x => x.ColumnName)).Asc()
.Take(1);

Related

Error: an expression of non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected, near ',' ; Using Cascading Parameters

I am trying to use cascading parameters to filter this Pivot table in SSRS Report Builder.
This is the main dataset query:
SELECT * FROM(
SELECT *,
CASE WHEN PLN=PLN THEN '01. GROSS PREMIUM'
ELSE NULL
END AS PREMIUM
FROM MYI
PIVOT (SUM(GROSS_PREMIUM_1) FOR PERIOD_TYPE IN([MTD],[YTD],[ITD])) pvt
UNION ALL
SELECT *,
CASE WHEN PLN=PLN THEN '02. REFUND'
ELSE NULL
END AS PREMIUM
FROM MYI
PIVOT (SUM(REFUND_2) FOR PERIOD_TYPE IN([MTD],[YTD],[ITD])) pvt
)A
WHERE ACC_PERIOD = #ACC_PERIOD
AND REINSURER IN (#REINSURER)
AND INSURER IN (#INSURER)
AND PLN IN (#PLN)
AND SVC_AGY IN (#SVC_AGY)
These parameters in the WHERE clause each have their own dataset and are cascaded from top to bottom.
Here is the query for the final parameter as an example:
SELECT DISTINCT [fasren_servicingagency]
FROM [FAS_ReinsuranceNumber]
WHERE ACC_PERIOD = #ACC_PERIOD
AND REINSURER IN (#REINSURER)
AND INSURER IN (#INSURER)
AND PLN IN (#PLN)
ORDER BY SVC_AGY
The query runs fine in SSMS, but I keep getting this error when I run it in the SSRS report builder:
An expression of non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected, near ','
It must have something to do with the WHERE clause in either the main query or the parameter dataset queries. I have seen many posts about this error but I could not find a solution that helped with my problem. Any ideas?
NOTE: all parameters are character fields, no integers, no date columns.
EDIT: There is another query that I was successful with;
SELECT [acctyymm],
[retrosummary],
[retroagent],
[coveragedivision],
[policyinsurer],
SUM([NetDue]) AS NET_DUE,
SUM([ActualPayable]) AS PAYABLE
FROM [dbo].[RetroNumberGAAP]
WHERE [acctyymm] IN (#ACC_PERIOD)
AND [retrosummary] IN (#RETSUM)
AND [retroagent] IN (#RETAGT)
AND [coveragedivision] IN (#PLN)
AND [policyinsurer] IN (#INSURER)
AND POWER([fasrtng_NetDue],2)+POWER([ActualPayable],2)<>0
GROUP BY [acctyymm],
[retrosummary],
[retroagent],
[coveragedivision],
[policyinsurer]
How am I successful running the report with cascaded parameters in this second query and not the first query?
I figured out what I did wrong. My Dataset properties were not configured correctly in the Report Builder.
WRONG CONFIGURATION
Dataset properties; Parameters; parameter name: SVC_AGY Parameter Value: [#SVC_AGY]
CORRECTED CONFIGURATION
Dataset properties; Parameters; parameter name: #SVC_AGY Parameter Value: [#SVC_AGY]
Make sure your parameter names match your parameter values, including the # symbol.

BigQuery or SQL Server SPLIT query

I have searched around and can not find much on this topic. I have a table, that gets logging information. As a result the column I am interested in contains multiple values that I need to search against. The column is formatted in a php URL style. i.e.
/test/test.aspx?DS_Vendor=55039&DS_ProdVer=7.90.100.0&DS_ProdLang=EN&DS_Product=MTT&DS_OfficeBits=32
This makes all searches end up with really long regexes to get data. Then join statements to combine data.
Is there a way in BigQuery, or SQL Server that I can pull the information from that column and put it into new columns?
Example:
The information I would like extracted begins after the ?, and ends at &, The string can sometimes be longer, and contains additional headers.
Thanks,
Below is for BigQuery Standard SQL and addresses below aspect of your question
Is there a way in BigQuery, ... that I can pull the information from that column and put it into new columns?
#standardSQL
CREATE TEMP FUNCTION parseColumn(kv STRING, column_name STRING) AS (
IF(SPLIT(kv, '=')[OFFSET(0)]= column_name, SPLIT(kv, '=')[OFFSET(1)], NULL)
);
WITH `project.dataset.table` AS (
SELECT '/test/test.aspx?extra=abc&DS_Vendor=55039&DS_ProdVer=7.90.100.0&DS_ProdLang=EN&DS_Product=MTT&DS_OfficeBits=32' AS url UNION ALL
SELECT '/test/test.aspx?DS_Vendor=55192&DS_ProdVer=4.30.100.0&more=123&DS_ProdLang=DE&DS_Product=MTE&DS_OfficeBits=64'
)
SELECT
MIN(parseColumn(kv, 'DS_Vendor')) AS DS_Vendor,
MIN(parseColumn(kv, 'DS_ProdVer')) AS DS_ProdVer,
MIN(parseColumn(kv, 'DS_ProdLang')) AS DS_ProdLang,
MIN(parseColumn(kv, 'DS_Product')) AS DS_Product,
MIN(parseColumn(kv, 'DS_OfficeBits')) AS DS_OfficeBits
FROM `project.dataset.table`,
UNNEST(REGEXP_EXTRACT_ALL(url, r'[?&]([^?&]+)')) AS kv
GROUP BY url
with the result as below
Row DS_Vendor DS_ProdVer DS_ProdLang DS_Product DS_OfficeBits
1 55039 7.90.100.0 EN MTT 32
2 55192 4.30.100.0 DE MTE 64
Below is also addressed
The string can sometimes be longer, and contains additional headers.
One example using BigQuery (with standard SQL):
SELECT REGEXP_EXTRACT_ALL(url, r'[?&]([^?&]+)')
FROM (
SELECT '/test/test.aspx?DS_Vendor=55039&DS_ProdVer=7.90.100.0&DS_ProdLang=EN&DS_Product=MTT&DS_OfficeBits=32' AS url
)
This returns the parts of the URL as an ARRAY<STRING>. To go one step further, you can get back an ARRAY<STRUCT<key STRING, value STRING>> with a query of this form:
SELECT
ARRAY(
SELECT AS STRUCT
SPLIT(part, '=')[OFFSET(0)] AS key,
SPLIT(part, '=')[OFFSET(1)] AS value
FROM UNNEST(REGEXP_EXTRACT_ALL(url, r'[?&]([^?&]+)')) AS part
) AS keys_and_values
FROM (
SELECT '/test/test.aspx?DS_Vendor=55039&DS_ProdVer=7.90.100.0&DS_ProdLang=EN&DS_Product=MTT&DS_OfficeBits=32' AS url
)
...or with the keys and values as top-level columns:
SELECT
SPLIT(part, '=')[OFFSET(0)] AS key,
SPLIT(part, '=')[OFFSET(1)] AS value
FROM (
SELECT '/test/test.aspx?DS_Vendor=55039&DS_ProdVer=7.90.100.0&DS_ProdLang=EN&DS_Product=MTT&DS_OfficeBits=32' AS url
)
CROSS JOIN UNNEST(REGEXP_EXTRACT_ALL(url, r'[?&]([^?&]+)')) AS part

Accessing new field value generated in SQL via dbContext

I'm using dbContext and I am running a SQL query that is rather complex (just showing a simple example below), so to avoid having to run the query twice to get a count, I am using COUNT AS to return the total number of records as per other advice on this site.
But, I haven't been able to figure out how to access the resulting property:
using (var db = new DMSContext())
{
string queryString = "select *, COUNT(1) OVER() AS TotalRecords FROM DMSMetas";
var Metas = db.DMSMetas.SqlQuery(queryString).ToList();
for (int i = 0; i <= Metas.Count - 1; i++)
{
var Item = Metas[i];
if (i == 0)
{
//Want to do this, but TotalRecords not part of the DMSMeta class. How to access the created column?
Console.WriteLine("Total records found: " + Item.TotalRecords);
}
}
}
In the sample above, the SQL query generates the extra field TotalRecords. When I run the query in Management Studio, the results are as expected. But how do I access the TotalRecords field through dbContext?
I also tried including the TotalRecords field as part of the DMSMeta class, but then the SQL query fails with the error that the TotalRecords field is specified twice. I tried creating a partial class for DMSMeta containing the TotalRecords field, but then the value remains the default value and is not updated during the query.
I also tried the following:
db.Entry(Item).Property("TotalRecords").CurrentValue
But that generated an error too. Any help would be much appreciated - I am sure I am missing something obvious! All I want is to figure out a way to access the total number of records returned by the query
you have to create a new class (not an entity class but a pure DAO class) DMSMetaWithCount (self explanatory ?) and then
context.Database.SqlQuery<DMSMetaWithCount>("select *, COUNT(1) OVER() AS TotalRecords FROM DMSMetas");
please note that
imho, select * is ALWAYS a bad practice.
you will have no tracking on the not entity new class

c++ builder: getting values via ADOQuery using SELECT

The question is as for delphi coders as for c++ builder coders, cuz I'm using the same components.
I'm trying to fill labels on the form by the data from database. I do a SELECT query via TADOQuery. But when I try to get a result, I always get an error like "ADOQuery1: Field 'count' not found".
'id' passed to the function is an autoincrement field value, which is EXACTLY exists in database (it was got via DBLookupComboBox). Also, executing the query manually to show result in DBGrid is successfull.
Querying without parameters and writing 'id' value to query string fails too.
What's the problem? Here's the code.
void TSellForm::LoadData(int id) {
TADOQuery* q = DataModule1->ADOQuery1;
q->Active = false;
try
{
q->SQL->Text = "select * from drugs where(id=:id)";
q->Parameters->ParamByName("id")->Value = IntToStr(id);
q->ExecSQL();
this->LabelAvail->Caption = q->FieldByName("count")->Value;
}
catch (Exception* e) {
MessageBox(NULL, PChar(WideString(e->Message)),
L"Exception", MB_OK|MB_ICONWARNING);
}
q->SQL->Clear();
}
ExecSQL is only used for SQL statements that don't return a recordset, and to determine the results you use RowsAffected.
For SELECT statements (which return a recordset), you use Open or set Active to true.
Also, count is a reserved word in most SQL dialects (as in SELECT Count(*) FROM ..., so if you have a column with that name you're going to need to escape it, typically by using either [] or double-quotes around it or by aliasing it in the SELECT itself.
ADOQuery1->Close();
ADOQuery1->SQL->Text= "SELECT * FROM reportTble WHERE (firstName =:firstName) " ;
ADOQuery1->Parameters->ParamByName("firstName")->Value = textBox->Text ;
ADOQuery1->Open();
This is how you can use ADOQuery

EF not using SQL index when filtering with StartsWith

The following LINQ query filters rows with a StartsWith() predicate:
db.Pictures.Where(pic => pic.Filename.StartsWith(path)).Count();
Which translates into the following SQL (from SQL Server Profiler):
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT
[GroupBy1].[A1] AS [C1]
FROM ( SELECT
COUNT(1) AS [A1]
FROM [dbo].[Pictures] AS [Extent1]
WHERE [Extent1].[Filename] LIKE #p__linq__0 ESCAPE N''~''
) AS [GroupBy1]',N'#p__linq__0 nvarchar(4000)',#p__linq__0=N'10429\2\6\%'
The Filename column is of type VARCHAR(255) and is indexed.
However, the query does not use the index because of the N in ESCAPE N'~'.
In the query execution plan I can see a warning:
Type conversion in expression (CONVERT_IMPLICIT(NVARCHAR(255), [Extent1].[Filename], 0)) may affect "CardinalityEstimate" in query plan choice
The query runs fine (uses the index) when the N is removed.
How can I fix this issue?
(One obvious solution might be to change the type of the column to NVARCHAR, but that doesn't seem ideal since I do not actually need to store unicode data)
You need to set your model to also be varchar. You can configure that by overriding OnModelCreating in your Context.
protected override void OnModelCreating(DbModelBuilder modelBuilder)
{
modelBuilder.Entity<Picture>().Property(p => p.Filename).IsUnicode(false);
}

Resources