I am trying to execute below query and during that one constraint violation exception is generated and due to that insert statement is terminated.
I want suppose from 10 records 9 records are clean then insertion will done for 9.right now statement is terminated and no insertion is performed.
I am using SQL Server 2012 and i do not want to rollback transaction and Insert ignore command is not there in SQL server and i do not want to insert data which contains error.i just want to insert clean data.
Query :
INSERT INTO rcmschargepostingmastertable
(clinicid,
clinicsiteid,
appointmentid,
patientid
)
SELECT clinicid,
clinicsiteid,
appointmentid,
patientid,
FROM #tempautopostbulkchargepostingmastertable
It is not possible to do what you stated in your comment:
i want to ignore any sql error and want to continue insertion for
clean records
SQL Server doesn't have any pure SQL mechanism for doing this. Your only choice is to use one of the proposed work-arounds (SSIS, WHERE clause).
One work-around that hasn't been mentioned because it's the worst performance-wise, but at least it's one that you haven't shot down, is to replace your set-based insert with a cursor that does the inserts one row at a time.
Then you could put the single-row insert in a TRY block, and if it errors, the cursor will skip it and move on to the next one.
I do not want to insert data which contains error.i just want to insert clean data.
Then you need to identify and filter out the bad data/constraint violating records before inserting into target table which will make your life easier.
........
modifiedbyid
FROM #tempautopostbulkchargepostingmastertable
Where some_column <> 'bad data'
Since you are using SQL Server 2012 you can use TRY_CONVERT to identify and filter out the bad data
Related
I have a stored procedure that relies on a query to a linked server.
This stored procedure is roughly structured as follows:
-- Create local table var to stop query from needing round trips to linked server
DECLARE #duplicates TABLE (eid NVARCHAR(6))
INSERT INTO #duplicates(eid)
SELECT eid FROM [linked_server].[linked_database].[dbo].[linked_table]
WHERE es = 'String'
-- Update on my server using data from linked server
UPDATE [my_server].[my_database].[dbo].[my_table]
-- Many things, including
[status] = CASE
WHEN
eid IN (
SELECT eid FROM #duplicates
)
THEN 'String'
ELSE es
END
FROM [my_server].[another_database].[dbo].[view]
-- This view obscures sensitive information and shows only the data that I have permission to see
-- Many other things
The query itself is much more complex, but the key idea is building this temporary table from a linked server (because it takes the query 5 minutes to run if I don't, versus 3 seconds if I do).
I've recently had an issue where I ended up with updates to my table that failed to get checked against the linked server for duplicate information.
The logical chain of events is this:
Get all of the data from the original view
The original view contains maybe 3000 records, of which maybe 30 are
duplicates of the entity in question, but with 1 field having a
different value.
I then have to grab data from a different server to know which of
the duplicates is the correct one.
When the stored procedure runs, it updates each record.
ERROR STEP - when the stored procedure hits a duplicate record, it
updates my_table again - so es gets changed multiple times in a row.
The temp table was added after the fact when we realized incorrect es values were being introduced to my_table.
'my_database` does not contain the data needed to determine which is the correct tuple, hence the requirement for the linked server.
As far as I can tell, we had a temporary network interruption or a connection timeout that stopped my_server from getting the response back from linked_server, and it just passed an empty table to the rest of the procedure.
So, my question is - how can I guard against this happening?
I can't just check if the table is empty, because it could legitimately be empty. I need to definitively know if that initial SELECT from linked_server failed, if it timed out, or if it intentionally returned nothing.
without knowing the definition of the table you're querying you could get into an issue where your data is to long and you get a truncation error on your table.
Better make sure and substring it...
DECLARE #duplicates TABLE (eid NVARCHAR(6))
INSERT INTO #duplicates(eid)
SELECT SUBSTRING(eid,1,6) FROM [linked_server].[linked_database].[dbo].[linked_table]
WHERE es = 'String'
-- Update on my server using data from linked server
UPDATE [my_server].[my_database].[dbo].[my_table]
-- Many things, including
[status] = CASE
WHEN
eid IN (
SELECT eid FROM #duplicates
)
THEN 'String'
ELSE es
END
FROM [my_server].[another_database].[dbo].[view]
I had a similar problem where I needed to move data between servers, could not use a network connection so I ended up doing BCP out and BCP in. This is fast, clean and takes away the complexity of user authentication, drivers, trust domains. also it's repeatable and can be used for incremental loading.
I have a XML column in a table and it is defined by a schema. I am trying to insert values into this table by using Insert into tbl1 Select * from tbl for xml. But this is failing due to schema validation failure for one of the records. But i want to insert the records which have passed the validation atleast and i can capture the others later. Can someone help me in this.
SQL server validates all dataset, not single row. If you want to validate Row-by-Row using SQL server tools, methods are:
SQLCLR (fastest) link
SSIS (easy to create) - using loop FOREACH you try to insert row into table. All failed rows are redirecting to another table.
TSQL TRY/CATCH Block - insert xml from single row to schema validated variable. Slowest one.
An iPhone application I have installed uses an SQLite database to log entries with basic INSERTS and DELETES being performed on it.
However I wish to keep a permanent log of the INSERTS made to this table, so when an INSERT occurs, I want it to be written to another table also so as to create a log.
I don't have access to the application source code in order to modify the SQL statements made, but I do have access to the SQLite database.
Can I do this with triggers? If so can somebody provide a short example.
Never used SQLite, but here is the first link from google: http://www.sqlite.org/lang_createtrigger.html
you could write something like this probably:
CREATE TRIGGER duplicate_insert INSERT ON myTable
BEGIN
INSERT INTO myDuplicateTable
VALUES(new.Id, new.Name, new.LastModified)
END;
HTH
Which part of the SQLite reference that you reach with Google and the search terms 'sqlite trigger' (namely SQLite Query Language: CREATE TRIGGER) are you having difficulty understanding?
CREATE TRIGGER ins_maintable AFTER INSERT ON MainTable
FOR EACH ROW BEGIN INSERT INTO LoggingTable VALUES(NEW.Column1, ...); END;
Untested code...if the syntax diagram is to be believed, both semi-colons are needed; or, at least, the one before the END is needed.
I want to insert some data on the local server into a remote server, and used the following sql:
select * into linkservername.mydbname.dbo.test from localdbname.dbo.test
But it throws the following error
The object name 'linkservername.mydbname.dbo.test' contains more than the maximum number of prefixes. The maximum is 2.
How can I do that?
I don't think the new table created with the INTO clause supports 4 part names.
You would need to create the table first, then use INSERT..SELECT to populate it.
(See note in Arguments section on MSDN: reference)
The SELECT...INTO [new_table_name] statement supports a maximum of 2 prefixes: [database].[schema].[table]
NOTE: it is more performant to pull the data across the link using SELECT INTO vs. pushing it across using INSERT INTO:
SELECT INTO is minimally logged.
SELECT INTO does not implicitly start a distributed transaction, typically.
I say typically, in point #2, because in most scenarios a distributed transaction is not created implicitly when using SELECT INTO. If a profiler trace tells you SQL Server is still implicitly creating a distributed transaction, you can SELECT INTO a temp table first, to prevent the implicit distributed transaction, then move the data into your target table from the temp table.
Push vs. Pull Example
In this example we are copying data from [server_a] to [server_b] across a link. This example assumes query execution is possible from both servers:
Push
Instead of connecting to [server_a] and pushing the data to [server_b]:
INSERT INTO [server_b].[database].[schema].[table]
SELECT * FROM [database].[schema].[table]
Pull
Connect to [server_b] and pull the data from [server_a]:
SELECT * INTO [database].[schema].[table]
FROM [server_a].[database].[schema].[table]
I've been struggling with this for the last hour.
I now realise that using the syntax
SELECT orderid, orderdate, empid, custid
INTO [linkedserver].[database].[dbo].[table]
FROM Sales.Orders;
does not work with linked servers. You have to go onto your linked server and manually create the table first, then use the following syntax:
INSERT INTO [linkedserver].[database].[dbo].[table]
SELECT orderid, orderdate, empid, custid
FROM Sales.Orders
WHERE shipcountry = 'UK';
I've experienced the same issue and I've performed the following workaround:
If you are able to log on to remote server where you want to insert data with MSSQL or sqlcmd and rebuild your query vice-versa:
so from:
SELECT * INTO linkservername.mydbname.dbo.test
FROM localdbname.dbo.test
to the following:
SELECT * INTO localdbname.dbo.test
FROM linkservername.mydbname.dbo.test
In my situation it works well.
#2Toad: For sure INSERT INTO is better / more efficient. However for small queries and quick operation SELECT * INTO is more flexible because it creates the table on-the-fly and insert your data immediately, whereas INSERT INTO requires creating a table (auto-ident options and so on) before you carry out your insert operation.
I may be late to the party, but this was the first post I saw when I searched for the 4 part table name insert issue to a linked server. After reading this and a few more posts, I was able to accomplish this by using EXEC with the "AT" argument (for SQL2008+) so that the query is run from the linked server. For example, I had to insert 4M records to a pseudo-temp table on another server, and doing an INSERT-SELECT FROM statement took 10+ minutes. But changing it to the following SELECT-INTO statement, which allows the 4 part table name in the FROM clause, does it in mere seconds (less than 10 seconds in my case).
EXEC ('USE MyDatabase;
BEGIN TRY DROP TABLE TempID3 END TRY BEGIN CATCH END CATCH;
SELECT Field1, Field2, Field3
INTO TempID3
FROM SourceServer.SourceDatabase.dbo.SourceTable;') AT [DestinationServer]
GO
The query is run on DestinationServer, changes to right database, ensures the table does not already exist, and selects from the SourceServer. Minimally logged, and no fuss. This information may already out there somewhere, but I hope it helps anyone searching for similar issues.
I'm still fairly new to T-SQL and SQL 2005. I need to import a column of integers from a table in database1 to a identical table (only missing the column I need) in database2. Both are sql 2005 databases. I've tried the built in import command in Server Management Studio but it's forcing me to copy the entire table. This causes errors due to constraints and 'read-only' columns (whatever 'read-only' means in sql2005). I just want to grab a single column and copy it to a table.
There must be a simple way of doing this. Something like:
INSERT INTO database1.myTable columnINeed
SELECT columnINeed from database2.myTable
Inserting won't do it since it'll attempt to insert new rows at the end of the table. What it sounds like your trying to do is add a column to the end of existing rows.
I'm not sure if the syntax is exactly right but, if I understood you then this will do what you're after.
Create the column allowing nulls in database2.
Perform an update:
UPDATE database2.dbo.tablename
SET database2.dbo.tablename.colname = database1.dbo.tablename.colname
FROM database2.dbo.tablename INNER JOIN database1.dbo.tablename ON database2.dbo.tablename.keycol = database1.dbo.tablename.keycol
There is a simple way very much like this as long as both databases are on the same server. The fully qualified name is dbname.owner.table - normally the owner is dbo and there is a shortcut for ".dbo." which is "..", so...
INSERT INTO Datbase1..MyTable
(ColumnList)
SELECT FieldsIWant
FROM Database2..MyTable
first create the column if it doesn't exist:
ALTER TABLE database2..targetTable
ADD targetColumn int null -- or whatever column definition is needed
and since you're using Sql Server 2005 you can use the new MERGE statement.
The MERGE statement has the advantage of being able to treat all situations in one statement like missing rows from source (can do inserts), missing rows from destination (can do deletes), matching rows (can do updates), and everything is done atomically in a single transaction. Example:
MERGE database2..targetTable AS t
USING (SELECT sourceColumn FROM sourceDatabase1..sourceTable) as s
ON t.PrimaryKeyCol = s.PrimaryKeyCol -- or whatever the match should be bassed on
WHEN MATCHED THEN
UPDATE SET t.targetColumn = s.sourceColumn
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
INSERT (targetColumn, [other columns ...]) VALUES (s.sourceColumn, [other values ..])
The MERGE statement was introduced to solve cases like yours and I recommend using it, it's much more powerful than solutions using multiple sql batch statements that basically accomplish the same thing MERGE does in one statement without the added complexity.
You could also use a cursor. Assuming you want to iterate all the records in the first table and populate the second table with new rows then something like this would be the way to go:
DECLARE #FirstField nvarchar(100)
DECLARE ACursor CURSOR FOR
SELECT FirstField FROM FirstTable
OPEN ACursor
FETCH NEXT FROM ACursor INTO #FirstField
WHILE ##FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
INSERT INTO SecondTable ( SecondField ) VALUES ( #FirstField )
FETCH NEXT FROM ACursor INTO #FirstField
END
CLOSE ACursor
DEALLOCATE ACursor
MERGE is only available in SQL 2008 NOT SQL 2005
insert into Test2.dbo.MyTable (MyValue) select MyValue from Test1.dbo.MyTable
This is assuming a great deal. First that the destination database is empty. Second that the other columns are nullable. You may need an update instead. To do that you will need to have a common key.