I've created 4 tables:
`Patient` (Id, Name, ..)
`Donor` (Id, Name, ..)
`BloodBank` (Id, Name, ..)
BloodBankDonors(DonorId, BloodBankId, ..)
And set the Id columns to Identity incremented by 1, seed 1. and made a relationship between (Donor, BloodBank) and (BloodBankDonors).
The problem is when I entered some data in the tables BloodBank and the patient, the auto generated Id column was: 1,3,4 and 1,4,5,8 respectively?!
So many things can cause gaps in an IDENTITY column. For example rollbacks not resetting IDENTITY, deletes, etc.
So, why do you care about gaps? You shouldn't. If you need a contiguous sequence of numbers, stop using IDENTITY.
You might deleting (DELETE command) some records from tables "BloodBank" and the "patient".Deleting record from table holds the log info of column ID(auto generated column) for recovery Purpose. Instead use below mentioned code snippet after "DELETE" command:
DBCC CHECKIDENT('databasename.dbo.tablename', RESEED, number)
if number=0 then in the next insert the auto increment field will contain value 1
if number=101 then in the next insert the auto increment field will contain value 102.
for more clear answer, please share sql script which you are using to create tables and insert records.
Deleting data from table holds the log info holding ID (auto generated columns) for recovery purpose.
Try to truncate table and re-enter the data
truncate table Patient
May this help
Related
I have a script for microsoft sql server database which has hundreds of tables and tables contains data as well. This is the database of a web application.what I want to do is to delete the previous records and reset the primary key to 1 or 0.
I have tried
`DBCC CHECKIDENT ('dbo.tbl',RESEED,0); `
but it does not work for me as in most of the tables the primary key is not identity.
I can not truncate the table as its primary key is being used as FK in many other tables.
I have also tried to add the identity specification in the primary key of the table and run the checkident query and then changing it back to non-identity spec, but after adding the record again it starts from where it left.
Making changes in the code is not an option for me.
please help.
According with your question I am not sure about the main objective, Why? If you need truncate a lot of tables and change their structures to have an Identity property why you can't disabled the FK? . In the past I have used an standard process for rebuild a table and migrate all the information, this represent a group of steps, I would try to help you but you should follow the next steps.
Steps:
1) Disable FK for alter the structure of your tables. You can get the solution for this task in the next link:
Temporarily disable all foreign key constraints
2) Alter the table with the new property Identity, this is a classic process of ALTER TABLE xxxxxx.
3) Execute the syntax that previously posted :
DBCC CHECKIDENT ('dbo.tbl',RESEED,0);
Try to follow this path and if you have any problem only ask us.
You can not truncate table that have relation. You shoud remove relation firstly.
My understanding of this question:
You have a database with tables that you want to empty and next have them use primary key values starting at 0 or 1.
Some of these tables use an identity value and you already have a solution for those (you know you can find out which columns have an identity by using the sys.columns view? Look for the is_identity column).
Some tables do not use an identity but get their pk values from an unknown source, which we can't modify.
The only solution I see, is creating an after insert trigger (or modifying) on those tables that subtracts from the new pk value.
E.g.: your "hidden generator" will generate a next value 5254, but you want the next pk value to become one:
CREATE TRIGGER trg_sometable_ai
ON sometable
AFTER INSERT
AS
BEGIN
UPDATE st
SET st.pk_col = st.pk_col - 5253
FROM sometable AS st
INNER JOIN INSERTED AS i
ON i.pk_col = th.pk_col
END
You'll have to determine the next value and thus the "subtract value" for each table.
If the code also inserts child records into tables with a foreign key to this table, and uses the previously generated value, you have to modify those triggers as well...
This is a "last resort" solution and something I would recommend against in any scenario that has other options. Manipulating primary key values is generally not a good idea.
I have a question to the TRUNCATE command.
How does TRUNCATE work in background ?
I read a text that says TRUNCATE creates a copy from the table and then start to delete all rows of the table. Is it correct?
with the information from here
TRUNCATE logs the deallocation of the data pages in which the data
exists which means that your data rows still actually exist in the data pages, but the extents have been marked as empty for reuse. This is what
makes TRUNCATE a faster operation to perform over DELETE.
You cannot TRUNCATE a table that has any foreign key
constraints. You will have to remove the contraints, TRUNCATE the
table, and reapply the contraints.
TRUNCATE will reset any identity columns to the default seed
value. This means if you have a table with an identity column and
you have 264 rows with a seed value of 1, your last record will have
the value 264 (assuming you started with value 1) in its identity
columns. After TRUNCATEing your table, when you insert a new
record into the empty table, the identity column will have a value of
1
I am troubleshooting a db (not my forte) that has some tables that are auto incrementing on the id column and some tables are not?
Now all the tables are set as identity and marked to disallow null. I am using SSMS what else can I check or do to get these tables back to auto incrementing?
TIA
Interestingly to me...probably old news to you guys. The issue had to do with existing data. So for example a table that had 100 rows in did NOT have the identity column setup. So I would go in and make it an identity with a seed of 1 incrementing 1. Well the seed was somehow having trouble because there was already 100 rows in there. So for all my tables I had to do a row count and seed the identity from the next row. Now it is working as expected.
Having an IDENTITY column is pretty straightforward for a table, and if you are not seeing the auto incrementing behavior of a column on inserts, then I'd first verify that your column is indeed an IDENTITY column:
use <Your Database Name>;
go
select
name,
is_identity
from sys.columns
where object_id = object_id('<Your Table Name>')
order by column_id;
Substitute <Your Database Nam> and <Your Table Name> for their appropriate values.
The other possibility is that data that "appears" to be non-incrementing could have been pushed out to that with a session that set identity insert and pushed out explicit values.
ALTER TABLE YourTable MODIFY COLUMN YourTable_id int(4) auto_increment
We have a production table with 770 million rows and change. We want(/need?) to change the Primary ID column from int to bigint to allow for future growth (and to avoid the sudden stop when the 32bit integer space is exhausted)
Experiments in DEV have shown that this is not as simple as altering the column as we would need to drop the index and then re-create it. So far in DEV (which is a bit humbler than PROD) the dropping of the index has not finished after 1 and a half hours. This table is hit 24/7 and having it offline for such a long time is not an option.
Has anyone else had to deal with a similar situation? How did you get it done?
Are there alternatives?
Edit: Additional Info:
The Primary key is clustered.
You could attempt a staged approach.
Create a new bigint column
Create an insert trigger to keep new entries in sync with the 2 columns
Execute an update to populate all the empty values in the bigint column with the converted value
Change the primary index on the table from your old id column to the new one
Point any FK's and queries to use the new column
Change the new column to become your identity column and remove the insert trigger from #2
Delete the old ID column
You should end up spreading the pain out over these 7 steps instead of hitting it all at once.
Create a parallel table with the longer data type for new rows and UNION the results?
What I had to do was copy the data into a new table with the desired structure (primary/clustered key only, non-clustered/FK once complete). If you don't have the room, you could bcp out the data and back in. You may need an application outage to make this happen.
What doesn't work: alter table Orderhistory alter column ID bigint because of the primary key. Don't drop the key and alter column as you will just fill your log file and take much longer than copy/bcp.
Never use the SSMS tools designer to change a column property, it copies table into temp table then does a rename once done. Lookup the alter table alter column syntax and use it and possibly defrag once complete if you modified a column wider that sits in middle of table.
Is there a way to reserve or skip or increment value of identity column?
I Have two tables joined in one-to-one relation ship. First one has IDENTITY PK column, and second one int PK (not IDENTITY). I used to insert in first, get ID and insert in second. And it works ok.
Now I need to insert values in second table without inserting into first.
Now, how to increment IDENTITY seed, so I can insert it into second table, but leave "hole" in ID's of first table?
EDIT: More info
This works:
-- I need new seed number, but not table row
-- so i will insert foo row, get id, and delete it
INSERT INTO TABLE1 (SomeRequiredField) VALUES ('foo');
SET #NewID = SCOPE_IDENTITY();
DELETE FROM TABLE1 WHERE ID=#NewID;
-- Then I can insert in TABLE2
INSERT INTO (ID, Field, Field) VALUES (#NewID, 'Value', 'Value');
Once again - this works.
Question is can I get ID without inserting into table?
DBCC needs owner rights; is there a clean user callable SQL to do that?
This situation will make your overall data structure very hard to understand. If there is not a relationship between the values, then break the relationship.
There are ways to get around this to do what you are looking for, but typically it is in a distributed environment and not done because of what appears to be a data model change.
Then its no more a one-to-one relationship.
Just break the PK constraint.
Use a DBCC CHECKIDENT statement.
This article from SQL Server Books Online discusses the use of the DBCC CHECKIDENT method to update the identity seed of a table.
From that article:
This example forces the current identity value in the jobs table to a value of 30.
USE pubs
GO
DBCC CHECKIDENT (jobs, RESEED, 30)
GO
I would look into the OUTPUT INTO feature if you are using SQL Server 2005 or greater. This would allow you to insert into your primary table, and take the IDs assigned at that time to create rows in the secondary table.
I am assuming that there is a foreign key constraint enforced - because that would be the only reason you would need to do this in the first place.
How do you plan on matching them up later? I would not put records into the second table without a record in the first, that is why it is set up in a foreign key relationship - to stio that sort of action. Just why do you not want to insert records into the first table anyway? If we knew more about the type of application and why this is necessary we might be able to guide you to a solution.
this might help
SET IDENTITY_INSERT [ database_name . [ schema_name ] . ] table { ON | OFF }
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa259221(SQL.80).aspx
It allows explicit values to be inserted into the identity column of a table.