Does anyone able to get textAngular.js with RequireJS(even if someone has working example I will replicate the settings)?
I am able to load editor but when applying h1 tags I get
$window.rangy.saveSelection is not a function on textAngular.js file with _savedSelection = $window.rangy.saveSelection();
Here are versions I am using.
Angular 1.4.8
textAngular 1.4.6
Rangy 1.3.1-dev
RequireJS 2.1.22
The issue is textAngular in its core, expects a variable rangy to be available globally (https://github.com/aaronroberson/textAngular/blob/master/src/main.js#L69).
So to fix this problem, we combined the rangy-core and rangy-selectionsaverestore into our window.rangy at the beginning of the bootstrap of our application before we initialise the app with angular.module('appname', [modules...])
define(["angular", "ngRoute", "jquery", "rangy-core", "rangy-selectionsaverestore"], function(angular, ngRoute, $j, rangyCore, rangySelectionSavereStore) {
window.rangy = $j.extend(rangyCore, rangySelectionSavereStore);
});
Configuration for requirejs to load these two modules,
'rangy-core': '../bower_components/rangy/rangy-core',
'rangy-selectionsaverestore': '../bower_components/rangy/rangy-selectionsaverestore'
Related
I'm getting this error when I browse my webapp for the first time (usually in a browser with disabled cache).
Error: Mismatched anonymous define() module: function (require) {
HTML:
<html>
.
.
.
<script src="//ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.0/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script> var require = { urlArgs: "v=0.4.1.32" }; </script>
<script data-main="assets/js/main" src="assets/js/libs/require.js"></script>
<script src="assets/js/ace/ace.js?v=0.4.1.32"></script>
</body>
</html>
JS:
$(function () {
define(function (require) {
// do something
});
});
Anyone know exactly what this error means and why its happening?
source file, a short discussion about it in the github issues page
Like AlienWebguy said, per the docs, require.js can blow up if
You have an anonymous define ("modules that call define() with no string ID") in its own script tag (I assume actually they mean anywhere in global scope)
You have modules that have conflicting names
You use loader plugins or anonymous modules but don't use require.js's optimizer to bundle them
I had this problem while including bundles built with browserify alongside require.js modules. The solution was to either:
A. load the non-require.js standalone bundles in script tags before require.js is loaded, or
B. load them using require.js (instead of a script tag)
In getting started with require.js I ran into the issue and as a beginner the docs may as well been written in greek.
The issue I ran into was that most of the beginner examples use "anonymous defines" when you should be using a "string id".
anonymous defines
define(function() {
return { helloWorld: function() { console.log('hello world!') } };
})
define(function() {
return { helloWorld2: function() { console.log('hello world again!') } };
})
define with string id
define('moduleOne',function() {
return { helloWorld: function() { console.log('hello world!') } };
})
define('moduleTwo', function() {
return { helloWorld2: function() { console.log('hello world again!') } };
})
When you use define with a string id then you will avoid this error when you try to use the modules like so:
require([ "moduleOne", "moduleTwo" ], function(moduleOne, moduleTwo) {
moduleOne.helloWorld();
moduleTwo.helloWorld2();
});
I had this error because I included the requirejs file along with other librairies included directly in a script tag. Those librairies (like lodash) used a define function that was conflicting with require's define. The requirejs file was loading asynchronously so I suspect that the require's define was defined after the other libraries define, hence the conflict.
To get rid of the error, include all your other js files by using requirejs.
Per the docs:
If you manually code a script tag in HTML to load a script with an
anonymous define() call, this error can occur.
Also seen if you
manually code a script tag in HTML to load a script that has a few
named modules, but then try to load an anonymous module that ends up
having the same name as one of the named modules in the script loaded
by the manually coded script tag.
Finally, if you use the loader
plugins or anonymous modules (modules that call define() with no
string ID) but do not use the RequireJS optimizer to combine files
together, this error can occur. The optimizer knows how to name
anonymous modules correctly so that they can be combined with other
modules in an optimized file.
To avoid the error:
Be sure to load all scripts that call define() via the RequireJS API.
Do not manually code script tags in HTML to load scripts that have
define() calls in them.
If you manually code an HTML script tag, be
sure it only includes named modules, and that an anonymous module that
will have the same name as one of the modules in that file is not
loaded.
If the problem is the use of loader plugins or anonymous
modules but the RequireJS optimizer is not used for file bundling, use
the RequireJS optimizer.
The existing answers explain the problem well but if including your script files using or before requireJS is not an easy option due to legacy code a slightly hacky workaround is to remove require from the window scope before your script tag and then reinstate it afterwords. In our project this is wrapped behind a server-side function call but effectively the browser sees the following:
<script>
window.__define = window.define;
window.__require = window.require;
window.define = undefined;
window.require = undefined;
</script>
<script src="your-script-file.js"></script>
<script>
window.define = window.__define;
window.require = window.__require;
window.__define = undefined;
window.__require = undefined;
</script>
Not the neatest but seems to work and has saved a lot of refractoring.
Be aware that some browser extensions can add code to the pages.
In my case I had an "Emmet in all textareas" plugin that messed up with my requireJs.
Make sure that no extra code is beign added to your document by inspecting it in the browser.
Or you can use this approach.
Add require.js in your code base
then load your script through that code
<script data-main="js/app.js" src="js/require.js"></script>
What it will do it will load your script after loading require.js.
I was also seeing the same error on browser console for a project based out of require.js. As stated under MISMATCHED ANONYMOUS DEFINE() MODULES at https://requirejs.org/docs/errors.html, this error has multiple causes, the interesting one in my case being: If the problem is the use of loader plugins or anonymous modules but the RequireJS optimizer is not used for file bundling, use the RequireJS optimizer. As it turns out, Google Closure compiler was getting used to merge/minify the Javascript code during build. Solution was to remove the Google closure compiler, and instead use require.js's optimizer (r.js) to merge the js files.
I had print value issue in laravel view, i was trying to print $scope value inside laravel blade. I searched about and find two kind of solution.
1- Change angularjs print tag
By this method i can change angularjs print tag.
var app = angular.module('app', []);
app.config(function($interpolateProvider) {
$interpolateProvider.startSymbol('<%');
$interpolateProvider.endSymbol('%>');
});
app.controller('app', function ($scope, $http) {
$scope.text_print = 'this is text';
});
Now in blade i can print like <% text_print %>
2- Add # for printing angularjs $scope value
I found an up-voted answer in which #Paul A.T. Wilson says that
The easiest way to do this is to simply use # in front of your Angular code
Example #{{text_print}}
Both are working for me, actually i want to make a plugin, so which method should i use? because i'm not sure the second one is compatible with laravel old version. I want my plugin compatible with all version of laravel.
Can anyone guide me about this, i would like to appreciate. Thank You
Changing either interpolation strings for Blade or angular is the best option if you want your plugin to work with older versions of Laravel.
For angularJs you already know how to do it from here.
For Blade, inside your Laravel app's AppServiceProvider.php file add the following code in the boot function:
public function boot() {
Blade::setRawTags("[[", "]]");
// for variables and Blade
Blade::setContentTags('<%', '%>');
// for escaped data
Blade::setEscapedContentTags('<%%', '%%>');
}
Note: In my opinion it's easier to change the interpolation tags for angular as changing the interpolation tags for blade requires you to clear out the storage/framework/views folder.
Apparently there's another way to do this, but I'm not sure if it will work in older versions:
#verbatim
<div>
{{ variableOne }}
{{ variableTwo }}
</div>
#endverbatim
The verbatim annotation indicates that the section is as-is, ie: Blade will leave it out.
I understand that requirejs and browserify can load my files dependent on its current context, and that it is amazing. I would really prefer to use the #section sections syntax that the razor engine uses. Was just wondering if there is a way to implement this into a typescript / angularjs application.
for example
index.html
#renderSection scripts;
// which could turn into something like
<script data-render="scripts"></scripts>
// the app.run() could declare all the scripts that will be needed on every
// page view
view.html
<script ng-section-repeat="injected in injection"></script>
// the ng-section-repeat is basically taking all the items in the
// typescript constructor and then finding out which ones are needed for
// that view.
I like the idea injecting application file dependencies in the view , without a configuration file and all the added extras that comes with the loaders.
I just want to easily define what files are needed in the actual view and get them loaded, with angular's dependency injection handling the dependency itself.
If you are handling all your dependencies with $inject then , as far as i can tell, dependency is technically already setup in the controllers, all one would need, is to load this as it is called. Which could even eliminate the need for the #section scripts completely
Update:
What i have done to sort of replicate the module loaders is to just use gulp-concat and define the file order in my gulp.config.js and then pass it to the gulp-src before running $.concat .this allows me to have the files in the gulp steam , in dependent order . They are however loaded on the first load. With gulp-uglify the files are tiny ( its now at 566Kb with 16 external libraries loading in 69ms . To put that into perspective it takes 209ms to load one google font ).
I dont know maybe i am not understanding browserify correctly but i honestly struggle to see the need for it, its seems extremely convoluted for something so simple
It is possible using external modules and an injector to do what you asked for:
I just want to easily define what files are needed in the actual view
import {UserFactory} from 'models/userFactory';
import {UserValidator} from 'models/userValidator';
import {Inject} from 'angular2/di';
and get them loaded, with angular's dependency injection handling the dependency itself.
Note: My example uses angular 2.x because I less familiar with angular 1.x and I'm sure you can do something really similar...
class SomeComponent {
userName: string;
userRating: number;
rating: number;
constructor(
#Inject(UserFactory) UserFactory
#Inject(UserValidator) UserValidator
)
{
this.UserFactory = UserFactory;
this.UserValidator = UserValidator;
}
}
Then you can use Browserify to create a bundle.js file that can be executed in a web browser.
Is there a way in angularjs to dynamically (after angular bootstrap) to enhance a service by proxying it using the decorator pattern.
In the following plunker example I can overload my default search service (google based) but this relies on the declaration/addition of the overloading module (the yahoo one) using the app.requires dependencies of the application before the angular app is bootstrapped. This does not work once the angular application is already bootstrapped, as demoed when clicking on duckduckgo button.
I must do the decoration dynamically by injecting javascript code into the application in a migration scenario where the webapp has to be embed into a java client (using JavaFX webview) and where some actions (the ones introduced dynamically) have to replace standard behavior of the webapp.
I have tried to use some technics described by Ifeanyi Isitor in his blog without success.
One possible method might be to get a hold of the injector of the currently running application (as described at the bottom of the documentation for angular.injector). This is done by using angular.element on an element of the currently running app to get its injector().
To easily get a hold of this element, if you were to give the tag on which you've declared your app the id of mcfoggy-application-search:
<div ng-app="mcfoggy.application.search" id="mcfoggy-application-search">...</div>
... you could .getElementById() and clobber the originally defined service a bit like this (as per your plunkr):
console.info('interpreting duckduckGoService.js');
var appElement = document.getElementById('mcfoggy-application-search');
var injector = angular.element(appElement).injector();
injector.invoke(['SearchService', '$log', function(SearchService, $log) {
// replace search in SearchService
SearchService.search = function(terms) {
var duckduckGoSearch = 'https://duckduckgo.com/?q=' + encodeURI(terms);
$log.info("search called: " + duckduckGoSearch);
// $window.location.href = duckduckGoSearch;
};
}]);
Maybe not as pretty as decoration, but it seems to work!
Updated plnkr
I basically want to use tel tag to make a phone call.
<a class="callButton" href="tel: {{phoneno}}"></a>
I am using $compileProvider to remove unsafe tag which comes by default, It works perfectly fine post 1.0.4v of angularjs. However below this version it doesnt work. Can anyone suggest how to implement this feature using angular version 1.0.4 or below?
Here is the sanitizing code which I am using in js file
app.config(['$compileProvider', function ($compileProvider) {
$compileProvider.urlSanitizationWhitelist(/^\s*(https?|ftp|mailto|file|tel):/);
}
Assume I have already defined app variable.
P.S. This is an enhancement for particular app which basically works below 1.0.4v
Thanks
Add this to your scripts after angular is loaded.
I asume your on 1.1.5, but change to whatever you need the version to be.
http://code.angularjs.org/1.1.5/angular-sanitize.min.js
Example:
sanitizeSomething = function(string) {
return $sanitize(string);
};
sanitizedString = sanitizeSomething(string);