Angular.copy inside promise with angularjs - angularjs

I need to make a copy of an object, but this object is inside a promise.
When I modify the object a, the object b is modified too.
I know that it can be due to async mode with promise, but I can not figure out it.
Simplifying my code, I have something like this:
The promise:
$scope.search = function () {
DocumentFactory.getDocuments(dataParams).then(function (data) {
makeFacets(data);
},
function (data) {
$scope.errorMessages.search = true;
});
};
It will search into many topics and will return some of them.
Then I create an array with that topics:
var makeFacets = function(data) {
$scope.topics=[];
$scope.topics[0] ={father: "General", label:""};
$scope.topics[1] ={father: "International", label:""};
$scope.topics[2] ={father: "Crime", label:""};
$scope.topics[3] ={father: "NonLegal", label:""};
[...]
};
Once I have the object, I use it to show that topics and also to filter inside that topics:
<div class="filter-box">
<input type="input" class="form-control" ng-model="filter.topic" ng-change="test1()">
</div>
<div class="filter-name" ng-repeat="data in topics">
<span>{{data.label}}</span>
</div>
My last step is try to filter inside that topics, to do that, I need to make a copy of the topics.
$scope.allTopics = [];
$scope.test1 = function(){
if($scope.allTopics.length === 0){
angular.copy($scope.topics, $scope.allTopics);
}
$scope.topics = $scope.allTopics;
var filter = $scope.filter.topic;
if(filter.length>=3){
for(var i = 0; i<$scope.topics.length; i++){
if($scope.topics[i].children !== undefined){
for(var j = 0; j<$scope.topics[i].children.length; j++){
if($scope.topics[i].children[j].label.toLowerCase().indexOf(filter.toLowerCase()) === -1){
$scope.topics[i].children.splice(j, 1);
}
}
}
}
}
};
This is not working, of course. I have tried a lot of things more but no one is working.
Also I have tried to add the copy here:
$scope.search = function () {
DocumentFactory.getDocuments(dataParams).then(function (data) {
makeFacets(data);
$scope.allTopics = [];
angular.copy($scope.topics, $scope.allTopics);
},
function (data) {
$scope.errorMessages.search = true;
});
};
All time I modify the topics object, the all Topics object is also modified.

The issue is that you are doing an assignment after calling copy. Thus, the two variables reference the same object leading to the problem you observe. Just leave out the assignment after you have copied it or do a copy instead of an assignment.
if($scope.allTopics.length === 0){
angular.copy($scope.topics, $scope.allTopics);
}
$scope.topics = $scope.allTopics; // <-- this assignment is wrong
Note you can also use copy in a more assignment-like fashion:
$scope.topics = angular.copy($scope.allTopics);

Related

angular push result to controller

(was not sure what to have as a title, so if you have a better suggestion, feel free to come up with one - I will correct)
I am working on an angular application where I have some menues and a search result list. I also have a document view area.
You can sort of say that the application behaves like an e-mail application.
I have a few controllers:
DateCtrl: creates a list of dates so the users can choose which dates they want to see posts from.
SourceCtrl: Creates a list of sources so the user can choose from which sources he/she wants to see posts from.
ListCtrl: The controller populating the list. The data comes from an elastic search index. The list is updated every 10-30 seconds (trying to find the best interval) by using the $interval service.
What I have tried
Sources: I have tried to make this a filter, but a user clicks two checkboxes the list is not sorted by date, but on which checkbox the user clicked first.
If it is possible to make this work as a filter, I'd rather continue doing that.
The current code is like this, it does not do what I want:
.filter("bureauFilter", function(filterService) {
return function(input) {
var selectedFilter = filterService.getFilters();
if (selectedFilter.length === 0) {
return input;
}
var out = [];
if (selectedFilter) {
for (var f = 0; f < selectedFilter.length; f++) {
for (var i = 0; i < input.length; i++) {
var myDate = input[i]._source.versioncreated;
var changedDate = dateFromString(myDate);
input[i]._source.sort = new Date(changedDate).getTime();
if (input[i]._source.copyrightholder === selectedFilter[f]) {
out.push(input[i]);
}
}
}
// return out;
// we need to sort the out array
var returnArray = out.sort(function(a,b) {
return new Date(b.versioncreated).getTime() - new Date(a.versioncreated).getTime();
});
return returnArray;
} else {
return input;
}
}
})
Date: I have found it in production that this cannot be used as a filter. The list of posts shows the latest 1000 posts, which is only a third of all posts arriving each day. So this has to be changed to a date-search.
I am trying something like this:
.service('elasticService', ['es', 'searchService', function (es, searchService) {
var esSearch = function (searchService) {
if (searchService.field === "versioncreated") {
// doing some code
} else {
// doing some other type of search
}
and a search service:
.service('searchService', function () {
var selectedField = "";
var selectedValue = "";
var setFieldAndValue = function (field, value) {
selectedField = field;
selectedValue = value;
};
var getFieldAndValue = function () {
return {
"field": selectedField,
"value": selectedValue
}
};
return {
setFieldAndValue: setFieldAndValue,
getFieldAndValue: getFieldAndValue
};
})
What I want to achieve is this:
When no dates or sources are clicked the whole list shall be shown.
When Source or Date are clicked it shall get the posts based on these selections.
I cannot use filter on Date as the application receives some 3000 posts a day and so I have to query elastic search to get the posts for the selected date.
Up until now I have put the elastic-search in the listController, but I am now refactoring so the es-search happens in a service. This so the listController will receive the correct post based on the selections the user has done.
Question is: What is the best pattern or method to use when trying to achieve this?
Where your data is coming from is pretty irrelevant, it's for you to do the hook up with your data source.
With regards to how to render a list:
The view would be:
<div ng-controller='MyController as myCtrl'>
<form>
<input name='searchText' ng-model='myCtrl.searchText'>
</form>
<ul>
<li ng-repeat='item in myCtrl.list | filter:myCtrl.searchText' ng-bind='item'></li>
</ul>
<button ng-click='myCtrl.doSomethingOnClick()'>
</div>
controller would be:
myApp.controller('MyController', ['ElasticSearchService',function(ElasticSearchService) {
var self = this;
self.searchText = '';
ElasticSearchService.getInitialList().then(function(list) {
self.list = list;
});
self.doSomethingOnClick = function() {
ElasticSearchService.updateList(self.searchText).then(function(list) {
self.list = list;
});
}
}]);
service would be:
myApp.service('ElasticSearchService', ['$q', function($q) {
var obj = {};
obj.getInitialList = function() {
var defer = $q.defer();
// do some elastic search stuff here
// on success
defer.resolve(esdata);
// on failure
defer.reject();
return defer.promise();
};
obj.updateList = function(param) {
var defer = $q.defer();
// do some elastic search stuff here
// on success
defer.resolve(esdata);
// on failure
defer.reject();
return defer.promise();
};
return obj;
}]);
This code has NOT been tested but gives you an outline of how you should approach this. $q is used because promises allow things to be dealt with asynchronously.

Add variable to an existing json object

request = myService.getCases();
request.then(
function(payload) {
$scope.cases = payload.data;
var time = Math.floor((Date.now() - Date.parse($scope.cases[i].date_case_modified))/(60000*60*24));
$scope.cases.duration.push(time);
}
});
Inside the controller I am trying to tack on the cases.duration onto the cases object but it wont add it onto the object that is returned. Any ideas?
I think you just need to introduce a forEach as shown here:
request = myService.getCases();
request.then(
function(payload) {
$scope.cases = payload.data;
angular.forEach($scope.cases, function (el) {
var time = Math.floor((Date.now() - Date.parse(el.date_case_modified))/(60000*60*24));
el.duration = time;
});
}
});
Hope this helps

AngularJS, Add Rows

Morning,
We are trying to implement this add row Plunkr, it seems to work however our input data seems to repeat. Does anyone know of a solution to add a unique id to preview duplicated fields ?
Here is our current Plunkr and LIVE example.
$scope.addRow = function(){
var row = {};
$scope.productdata.push(row);
};
$scope.removeRow = function(index){
$scope.productdata.splice(index, 1);
};
$scope.formData you have is not an array, but just one object. All your rows are bound to that object and hence all of them reference the same data.
The reason you get a new row added is because your ng-repeat is bound to $scope.productData and you add extra record in it. You should bind your form elements to the properties in the row object that you create
a simple example is :
In your template
<div ng-repeat="product in products">
<input type="text" ng-model="product.title">
</div>
In your controller
$scope.addProduct = function(){
var product = {};
$scope.productData.add(product);
}
You'd then always only work with the productData array and bind your model to them.
Even in your backend calls, you'd use productData instead of your formData.
Hope this helps.
U can use a filter : This will return Unique rows only
app.filter('unique', function () {
return function (items, filterOn) {
if (filterOn === false) {
return items;
}
if ((filterOn || angular.isUndefined(filterOn)) && angular.isArray(items)) {
var hashCheck = {}, newItems = [];
var extractValueToCompare = function (item) {
if (angular.isObject(item) && angular.isString(filterOn)) {
return item[filterOn];
} else {
return item;
}
};
angular.forEach(items, function (item) {
var valueToCheck, isDuplicate = false;
for (var i = 0; i < newItems.length; i++) {
if (angular.equals(extractValueToCompare(newItems[i]), extractValueToCompare(item))) {
isDuplicate = true;
break;
}
}
if (!isDuplicate) {
newItems.push(item);
}
});
items = newItems;
}
return items;
};
});
I think the reason why this is happening is that the addRow() function is just pushing an empty son object into the $scope.productdata array, whereas all input fields are bound to $scope.formData[product.WarrantyTestDescription]. I think you mean to bind the input fields to the properties of the product object.

How to extend returned objects in the list returned by $asArray?

I'm having trouble decorate the objects in my list returned by $asArray in angularfire with a new method (not decorating the array itself).
The angularfire documentation seems to suggest that the right way to do this is to override the $$added method in the factory for $FirebaseArray, returning a new object that either encapsulates or extends the snapshot that gets passed in to that method. From the documentation:
// an object to return in our JokeFactory
app.factory("Joke", function($firebaseUtils) {
function Joke(snapshot) {
this.$id = snapshot.name();
this.update(snapshot);
}
Joke.prototype = {
update: function(snapshot) {
// apply changes to this.data instead of directly on `this`
this.data = snapshot.val();
},
makeJoke: function() {
alert("Why did the " + this.animal + " cross the " + this.obstacle + "?");
},
toJSON: function() {
// since we didn't store our data directly on `this`, we need to return
// it in parsed format. We can use the util function to remove $ variables
// and get it ready to ship
return $firebaseUtils.toJSON(this.data);
}
};
return Joke;
});
app.factory("JokeFactory", function($FirebaseArray, Joke) {
return $FirebaseArray.$extendFactory({
// change the added behavior to return Joke objects
$$added: function(snap) {
return new Joke(snap);
},
// override the update behavior to call Joke.update()
$$updated: function(snap) {
this.$getRecord(snap.name()).update(snap);
}
});
});
However, when I do this in my code, nothing ever gets added to the array, although I can see from outputting to the console that it is getting called.
var printMessageObjConstructor = function(snap) {
this.$id = snap.name();
this.snapshot = snap;
this.$update = function(snap) {
this.snapshot = snap;
};
this.printMessage = function() {
return this.author + "'s question is: " + this.body;
};
};
var ref = new Firebase("https://danculley-test.firebaseio.com/questions");
//What Am I Doing Wrong Here?
var arrayFactory = $FirebaseArray.$extendFactory({
$$added: function(snap, prevChild) {
var x = new printMessageObjConstructor(snap);
console.log("I am being called from FirebaseDecoratedCtlOverloadAddedinNewObj.");
return x;
},
$createObject: function(snap) {
return new printMessageObjConstructor(snap);
},
$$updated: function(snap) {
var i = this.$indexFor(snap.name());
var q = this.$list[i];
q.$update(snap);
}
});
var sync = $firebase(ref, {arrayFactory:arrayFactory});
var list = sync.$asArray();
list.$loaded(function(list) {
$scope.questions = list;
});
I've set up a new plunk stripped down to show the issue with a couple other use cases that I've tried. (The actual method I'm adding is more complex and isn't related to the view, but I wanted to do something simple to reproduce the issue.)
I think the issue is that I don't quite understand what exactly $$added is supposed to return, or what additional behavior beside returning the value to be stored $$added is supposed to have. There also doesn't really seem to be an $$added on the prototype or on $FirebaseArray to call as a super to get the default behavior. Can someone point me in the right direction?
UPDATE
For the benefit of others, after reviewing the like that Kato posted, I was able to solve the issue by adding the following, almost all copied directly from the source except for the commented line below.
$$added: function(snap, prevChild) {
var i = this.$indexFor(snap.name());
if( i === -1 ) {
var rec = snap.val();
if( !angular.isObject(rec) ) {
rec = { $value: rec };
}
rec.$id = snap.name();
rec.$priority = snap.getPriority();
$firebaseUtils.applyDefaults(rec, this.$$defaults);
//This is the line that I added to what I copied from the source
angular.extend(rec, printMessageObj);
this._process('child_added', rec, prevChild);
}
}
For the benefit of others, after reviewing the link that Kato posted, I was able to solve the issue by adding the following, almost all copied directly from the source except for the commented line below.
$$added: function(snap, prevChild) {
var i = this.$indexFor(snap.name());
if( i === -1 ) {
var rec = snap.val();
if( !angular.isObject(rec) ) {
rec = { $value: rec };
}
rec.$id = snap.name();
rec.$priority = snap.getPriority();
$firebaseUtils.applyDefaults(rec, this.$$defaults);
//This is the line that I added to what I copied from the source
angular.extend(rec, printMessageObj);
this._process('child_added', rec, prevChild);
}
}

Angular filter returning an array of objects causing infinite $digest loop

I have a custom filter which returns an array of matches to search field input and it works, but only after causing an infinite $digest loop. This also apparently only began happening after upgrading from Angular 1.0.6. This is the filter code:
angular.module("Directory.searches.filters", [])
.filter('highlightMatches', function() {
var ary = [];
return function (obj, matcher) {
if (matcher && matcher.length) {
var regex = new RegExp("(\\w*" + matcher + "\\w*)", 'ig');
ary.length = 0;
angular.forEach(obj, function (object) {
if (object.text.match(regex)) {
ary.push(angular.copy(object));
ary[ary.length-1].text = object.text.replace(regex, "<em>$1</em>");
}
});
return ary;
} else {
return obj;
}
}
});
I've seen elsewhere that this could be caused by having the filter inside of an ng-show, or that it's because the array being returned is interpreted as a new array every time it's checked, but I'm not sure how I could fix either problem. You can see a production example of this issue at https://www.popuparchive.com/collections/514/items/4859 and the open source project is available at https://github.com/PRX/pop-up-archive. Thank you!
This is happening because of angular.copy(object). Each time the digest cycle runs, the filter returns an array of new objects that angular has never seen before, so the the digest loop goes on forever.
One solution is return an array containing the original items that match the filter, with a highlightedText property added to each item...
angular.module("Directory.searches.filters", [])
.filter('highlightMatches', function() {
return function (items, matcher) {
if (matcher && matcher.length) {
var filteredItems = [];
var regex = new RegExp("(\\w*" + matcher + "\\w*)", 'ig');
angular.forEach(items, function (item) {
if (item.text.match(regex)) {
item.highlightedText = item.text.replace(regex, "<em>$1</em>");
filteredItems.push(item);
}
});
return filteredItems;
} else {
angular.forEach(items, function (item) {
item.highlightedText = item.text;
});
return items;
}
}
});
You can bind to the highlightedText property, something like...
<div>
Results
<ul>
<li ng-repeat="item in items | highlightMatches : matcher" ng-bind-html="item.highlightedText"></li>
</ul>
</div>

Resources