Extending UI-Router-Tabs To Display Form Validation State - angularjs

I'm pretty new to Angular and having a problem figuring out how to bind a value from a data service to a customization of the https://github.com/rpocklin/ui-router-tabs project that I have created.
The customization is to display an icon in the tab heading that toggles based on the validation state of the corresponding ui-view. I've wired up a data service that is updated when validation succeeds or fails, and the binding is being "seen" by the controller that renders the tabs.
The problem arises when I attempt to pass this value into the tab data as "options". The value change/icon toggle is not being processed as the validation state changes. If I pass a hard-coded "true" into the tab data, the desired icon is displayed.
vm.tabs = [
{
heading: "View 1",
route: "manage.view1",
options: {
status: vm.stateService.getForm1State()
}
},
{
heading: "View 2",
disable: vm.disableTabs,
route: "manage.view2",
options:{
status: true
}
}
];
This doesn't seem like something that should be that difficult, so I think I'm just missing something obvious about the scoping. Here is a plunk http://plnkr.co/edit/iefvwcffSZmpfy83NGde?p=preview that demonstrates the issue.
Note: should be tagged as ui-router-tabs, but I lack the reputation to create the tag.

The problem lies here:
options: {
status: vm.stateService.getForm1State()
}
Since stateService.getForm1State() returns a boolean value, this value will be copied and assigned as the value of the status property.
So when this code has executed once it will for example be:
options: {
status: false
}
The options object won't react to any changes within the stateService.
An easy solution is to have stateService.getForm1State() return an object instead.
For example:
function stateService() {
var form1IsValid = {
status: false
};
return {
getForm1State: getForm1State,
setForm1State: setForm1State
};
function getForm1State() {
return form1IsValid;
}
function setForm1State(newValue) {
form1IsValid.status = newValue;
return;
}
Then make the options object refer to the same object:
options: vm.stateService.getForm1State()
Now whenever you have:
options.status
It will be the same as:
vm.stateService.getForm1State().status
And it will correctly reflect the changes.
Demo: http://plnkr.co/edit/KjXVSSMJbLw7uod0ac6O?p=preview

Related

reactjs pre-select radio button

I have a section in Client`s panel to agree (or not) to receive promo emails.
I set this as a choice of two radio buttons, yes or no.
Technically everything is working just fine, I can store proper information in the DB but the initial state of radio buttons is not showing. The proper value is being sent ot its 'parent' but it seems it's not passed down to the actual form.
What I would like to achieve is the initial radio button being checked (true, false):
The info is being sent (in line 52, [PROMO_CONSENT]: promo_consent):
[PROMO_CONSENT_FORM]: {
label: _t(panelMessages.promos),
data: Promo,
form: {
formId: PROMO_CONSENT_FORM,
data: {
[PROMO_CONSENT]: promo_consent
}
}
}
but then it doesn't seems to show anywhere else. To manage the states of radiobuttons, component FormChoiceGroup is being called component: FormChoiceGroup,.
[PROMO_CONSENT_FORM]: {
formId: [PROMO_CONSENT_FORM],
endpoint: '/accounts/set_promo/',
fields: [
{
name: PROMO_CONSENT,
label: _t(panelMessages.promoLabel),
component: FormChoiceGroup,
type: 'radio',
isRequired: false
}
]
}
It's a lot of code, if anyone feels like going through it, I'd appreciate it.
Block:
Panel main block
Form:
Panel form, the part of consent starts at line 96
ChoiceGroup:
Component to manage radio buttons
I had to send NOT a boolean value, but turn it into a string, to send literal "true" or "false" and not true/false.
I set up a const that checked the status of the variable and then assigned it with literal values:
const val = this.state.formData[field.name] == false ? "false" : "true";
This simple thing did the trick.

How to prevent Kendo MultiSelect from losing values after editing in a grid template?

I have a grid that displays a comma-separated list of values, and it has an array that gets used in a template editor for the grid. (On the server, I transform the comma-separated list to an array for the Kendo multiselect AngularJS directive). I have almost everything working: display, edit, and adding values in the multiselect.
There's just one weird thing happening: after I add a value in the multiselect, click Save in the editor, and reopen the editor, the multiselect then only displays one of the most-recently entered values. I know that the values are there and going through the pipeline, because the values make it into the database. I can refresh the page, open the editor, and all the values display in the multiselect correctly, including the one I just added.
It's as if kendo "forgets" most of the values when I reopen the editor. How can this be prevented? Does the MultiSelect need to be rebound to the values? If so, how?
I have tried adding this onChange event, but it had no effect. I've added valuePrimitive to no effect. I tried specifying k-rebind, but it caused an error.
Here's the directive being used in the text/x-kendo-template:
<select kendo-multi-select
id="zipCode"
k-placeholder="'Enter zip codes...'"
style="width: 225px"
k-on-change="dataItem.dirty=true"
k-auto-bind="false"
k-min-length="3"
k-enforce-min-length="true"
k-data-source="options.zipCodeDataSource"
k-data-text-field="'text'"
k-filter="'startsWith'"
k-filtering="options.zipCodeFiltering"
k-no-data-template="'...'"
k-ng-model="dataItem.zipArray"
k-highlight-first="true" />
And this is the DataSource:
options.zipCodeDataSource = new kendo.data.DataSource({
severFiltering: true,
transport: {
read: {
url: serviceUrl + "ZipCode/Get",
type: "GET",
dataType: "json",
contentType: jsonType,
data: function (e) {
// get your widget.
let widget = $('#zipCode').data('kendoMultiSelect');
// get the text input
let filter = widget.input.val();
// what you return here will be in the query string
return {
filter: filter
};
}
},
},
schema: {
data: "data",
total: "Count",
model:
{
id: "text",
fields: {
text: { editable: false, defaultValue: 0 },
}
},
parse: function (response) {
return response;
}
},
error: function (e) {
}
});
If I display {{dataItem.zipArray}} in a <pre> all of the expected values are there.
I wonder if something needs to be added to the edit event handler in the kendo grid definition, but I'm not sure what it would be. I've had to do binding like that for the dropdownlist directive.
edit: function (e) {
if (e.model.marketId === 0) {
e.container.kendoWindow("title", "Add");
} else {
e.container.kendoWindow("title", "Edit");
}
// re-bind multi-select here??
// These two lines actually cause the multiselect to lose pre-existing items in dataItem.zipArray
// var multiselect = kendo.widgetInstance(angular.element('#zipCode'));
// multiselect.trigger('change');
}
...
Update:
This dojo demonstrates the issue.
Run the dojo
Edit the first record in the Contracts grid
Add a zip code such as 22250
Click Save
Then click Edit on the first row again
Only zip code 22250 is displayed in the editor
Also, I notice that if I change k-min-length="3" to k-min-length="1", then the issue goes away. But in the scenario I'm working on, it needs to be 3.
This seems to be an issue with kendo itself. Back then this issue was reported here.
Ok based on the reply from telerik, this issue has been fixed in 2017 R3 SP1 release (2017.3.1018). You can verify it by using this updated dojo example:
http://dojo.telerik.com/IREVAXar/3

How to uncheck a checkbox that gets filtered in ng-repeat

I've been scratching my head on this one for hours worth of troubleshooting and I can't seem to figure it out so was wondering if any of you could help.
I have an array of objects in a json file, and I'm making a filtering menu based on different properties in the file that one can check/uncheck in view to filter the results. The issue I have is to be able to uncheck any items in the menu that hide as a result of not being available in the current results being displayed.
I have a plunker example here: https://plnkr.co/edit/KZmMiSisA1gKyahG5rHF
Sample from plunker:
$scope.list = [
{ parent : 'fruit', type : 'orange' },
{ parent: 'fruit', type : 'apple' },
{ parent : 'fruit', type : 'kiwi' },
{ parent : 'vegetable', type : 'kale' },
{ parent : 'vegetable', type : 'cabbage' }
];
$scope.filtered = $scope.list;
$scope.selectedType = [];
$scope.selectedParent = [];
$scope.$watch(function () {
return {
selectedType: $scope.selectedType,
selectedParent: $scope.selectedParent,
}
}, function (value) {
var filterType = {
parent : $scope.selectedParent,
type : $scope.selectedType,
};
var startFilter = $scope.list;
for (var i in filterType) {
startFilter = filter(startFilter, filterType[i], i);
}
$scope.filtered = startFilter;
}, true);
Basically, if someone selects "fruit" and then "orange", but then unchecks "fruit", I would want "orange" to uncheck as well.
I just checked your plunker. The code on the bottom is very complicated, but I might be able to help you with these snippets.
Add a ng-change attribute to the parents:
<input type="checkbox"
checklist-model="selectedParent"
checklist-value="key"
data="{{::key}}"
ng-change="checkParent(key, checked)"/>
Now you can detect the changes in your controller:
$scope.checkParent = function(parent, checked) {
if (!checked) {
$scope.list.filter(function(fruit) {
return fruit.parent === parent;
}).forEach(function(fruit) {
$scope.selectedType = $scope.selectedType.filter(function(_selectedType) {
return _selectedType != fruit.type;
});
});
}
};
Plunkr
Beware, that this is inefficient, as it filters Selected type for every fruit to be unselected, it can be refactored with some nice functional tools.
But in general I'd change the controller if possible, and create a map with this structure:
{
parent: {
name: "fruit"
selected: false,
children: [{
type: "organge"
selected: false
}]
...
}
This way you can make your controller code much more readable.
Edit:
I was checking the two filter what you wrote. I couldn't come up with a better code as I still think that you should change the data structure. Iterating over and over lists is an expensive process, and both of your filters has two nested for loops. I cannot think of an easy way of getting rid of them with your data structure.
I spent some time on refactoring your code, getting rid of the watches and utilizing lodash. Check the updated Plunk, I hope it helps.
I added this function to your plunker:
$scope.uncheck = function(key){
$scope.selectedType.splice(key)
}
And this to the parent:
<input type="checkbox" checklist-model="selectedParent" checklist-value="key" data="{{::key}}" ng-change="uncheck(key)" />
It works for me if this is in fact what you are trying to accomplish.

show dynamic data using checkbox in extjs

I have a combo box in which the user selects a value, that value is passed to the checkbox data store and it is populated dynamically from database (oracle). I tried the code below. It seems that the selected parameter is being passed to checkbox and I can see the data being populated on the console. I just can't render the checkbox on form. The error I get is: typeError: this.items[0] is undefined.
testArray = new Array();
var testStore = new Ext.data.JsonStore({
proxy:new Ext.data.HttpProxy({
method:'GET',
prettyUrls:false,
url:'kiu.htm',
listeners:{
'loadexception':{
fn:test.form.data.loadException
}
}
}),
fields:["id", "display"],
reader:new Ext.data.JsonReader({
id:'id',
root:'results',
totalProperty:'totalCount',
fields:new Ext.data.Record.create([
{name:'id',type:'int'},
{name:'display',type:'string'}
])
}),
listeners:{
load: function(t, records, options, success) {
for(var i=0; i<records.length; i++) {
testArray.push({name:records[i].data.id, boxLabel: records[i].data.display});
alert(testArray[i].id);
}
}
}
});
{
xtype:'combo',
id:'comboid3',
store:combostore,
displayField:'display',
valueField:'id',
tabIndex:1,
loadingText:'Loading combo...',
listeners :{
select:function(event){
testStore.baseParams = {
"comboid":Ext.getCmp('comboid3').getValue()
};
testStore.load();
}
}
},
{
xtype:'checkboxgroup',
fieldLabel:'Check',
items:testArray
}
Help will be appreciated!
Specifying the Ext JS version is always going to be helpful. It appears this must be 2.x or 3.x and not the current version.
The issue is timing, load calls are asynchronous so by attempting to utilize testArray in this fashion you are likely referencing an empty array by the time it parses the items property of your checkboxgroup. You have a couple options around this... one is to grab a reference to the checkbox group and add the items into it, the other is to not put the checkbox group in the form at all until the call returns and then add it with the populated items array. In either case it is likely that you will need to look up a component reference to either the FormPanel or the CheckboxGroup from within the load handler function and call the 'add' method to add child items.

Path notification for changes to an object within an array?

We have a large model object that is owned and managed outside of polymer. We want to expose this model to polymer elements through a proxy element that exposes computed parts of it.
For example, the model may have:
{
blocks: {
...
properties: [
{ ... }, // prop0
{ ... }, // prop1
]
},
}
We are using recursive object observers and array observers to monitor changes to the model and notify polymer appropriately (either using .notifyPath(path, ...) for object changes and ._notifySplice(...) for array changes). However, there doesn't seem to be a good way for us to notify of changes to an object within an array, e.g. prop0 changed in the example above.
Is there? What should the path be?
Here's an example using binding to show an updated Polymer property nested inside an object and array:
code:
<div>
<h1>[[blocks.properties[0]]]</h1>
<p>this updated property should read: Apple</p>
</div>
script:
Polymer({
is: "my-page",
properties: {
blocks: {
type: Object,
value: { properties : ["acorn","banana","carrot"] },
notify: true
},
},
attached: function() {
console.log("update");
this.set('blocks.properties[0]', "Apple");
},
If you need to do array functions you should also use this.push(path, value) or this.splice(path, value) to notify changes.

Resources