I created database in management studio, a model in my project with the ADO.NET Entity Data model for the tables.
I want to use the MVVM pattern to build forms and update, delete, insert data in my forms.
Can you please give me some guidance how to map the models with my viewmodels. Any tutorials would be nice, I`ve already spend whole day looking for something but got confused at the end.
Is there a simple project with Entity Framework and MVVM.
This is a bit of a contentious subject but I personally don't view change notification as belonging in the exclusive domain of the view/view-model relationship, so I add INPC to my models as as well and expose them in their corresponding view model. This can be done by either injecting proxies into your repositories at runtime (e.g. Castle Dynamic Proxy) or by modifying the IL automatically at compile time (e.g. Fody).
From one noob to another - try searching for 'wpf mvvm entity framework example'. Here's what I found useful...
http://www.software-architects.com/devblog/2010/09/10/MVVM-Tutorial-from-Start-to-Finishhttp://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/28209.wpf-entity-framework-mvvm-walk-through-1.aspx
First you can use the repository pattern, to abstract your data access layer, so you viewmodels don't have a tight coupling to Entity Framework and remain easy to test.
Second, you can use an auto mapper like AutoMapper to map from your models to your ViewModels. However, you shouldn't use automappers to map from ViewModels to the View, so you'll have to manually create your model and pass it to your repository for insertion or updating.
Related
I creating my first WPF application, and the goal of this is to basically be a data entry application for the database for CRUD operations (for example, creating a new customer in a new window, editing a customer, displaying a list of customers, etc). A database has been created, and I have thus created a Models folder to contain the .edmx file, dbcontext stuff, and partial classes generated from ADO Entity Data Model tool.
EDIT:
My question is, now, how do I go on with MVVM with my ViewModel and Models working together. All the tutorials I have seen show starting from scratch, and not using existing classes. For example, all tutorials would show creating a brand new Customer class, vs just going off the partial Customer class that was created for me.
I don't want to start over, so how do I follow these tutorials alongside the classes that were created for me through Entity Framework from my database?
In my opinion there is nothing wrong in Database-first approach, even it's quite good, because you would have general view at project (data side).
I would recommend you to start MVVM approach using Caliburn.Micro framework, it's easy, powerful and really nice.
Caliburn.Micro - getting started - part 1 - you can find there all 5 parts.
Caliburn.Micro - framework
MVVM does not specify where you start from, or how you deal with databases.
MVVM specifies you must get rid of the horrible code-behind hacks abundant in some useless dinosaur UI frameworks such as winforms and use DataBinding instead.
Therefore, just go ahead with your existing infrastructure, and make sure you don't manipulate or create UI elements in procedural code.
I am trying to create a WPF project with MVVM and ADO.Net Entity Framework.
I do have a few questions though.
Do i create the Entity Framework Model in the Model Folder of the MVVM Design?
Or do i have to create a new project for each item of the MVVM Model(i.e Views Project as
a WPF Project,Model Project as a class libraray, ViewModel project as a class library)?
It doesn't really matter where you put stuff, but yes I usually put all my EF or Linq-Sql stuff in a Model folder as they will usually house all of my model classes anyway and it keeps it all together. It is a bit of a grey area though, because it's also doing DataLayer stuff, so just bear that in mind too.
Regarding your 2nd point, no. The Model, View Models and Views should all be in the same project.
Take a look at this for some guidance on MVVM.
Do i create the Entity Framework Model in the Model Folder of the MVVM Design?
I usually create a separate project for the model which is storage ignorant (using POCOs) and also usage ignorant.
Or do i have to create a new project for each item of the MVVM Model(i.e Views Project as a WPF Project,Model Project as a class libraray, ViewModel project as a class library)?
If you are planning on having more than one type of view-model per model (e.g. one for WPF, one for a service, one for another service), then separate your view-models into their own assembly.
If your views only represent one model layer, then you can start out your views and view-models in the same assembly, then separate them if you get to a situation that you have multiple models under the same view (each with its own view-model).
You should also consider if you want the ADO.NET's model to be your main model (upon which you base your view-models), or if you want to treat it as a sort of view-model for storing (where the storage service is a sort of view).
If I am generating POCO objects from EntityFramework, and using these to go to/from the WCF server, is there any reason to create client-side Models for the Views & ViewModels to use instead of just using the POCOs directly?
Almost all the MVVM examples I have looked at bind straight to the object returned from the WCF service. Is this good practice? Are there arguments that can be made for actually mapping the POCO to a Model and having the Views/ViewModels working with the Model object instead of the POCO?
The main reason I could think of is validation, however since the EF POCOs are partial classes, they can be expanded on to include validation.
EDIT
Most answers so far have brought up INotifyPropertyChanged as the main reason to build a separate Model. Does your answer change if you are using Self-Tracking entities instead of POCOs which already includes INotifyPropertyChanged? STEs are also partial classes which can be expanded upon to include validation.
Validation is the main reason not to bind directly to a POCO. In addition, if the POCO doesn't already implement INotifyPropertyChanged and other required interfaces, the experience working with the object on the WPF side may be less desirable, and implementing a ViewModel to wrap this makes sense.
Providing a ViewModel to wrap your POCO allows you to encapsulate the logic into ICommand implementations as well as implement required interfaces cleanly.
I disagree only slightly with Reed (an unusual circumstance to be sure). I would NOT implement a ViewModel to wrap the POCO. I would implement a Model class to wrap the POCO and expose the Models to the ViewModel via a Service layer.
The ViewModel's primary job is to appropriately present Model data to the View and react to its requests. The architecture I'm working on for this looks like so:
1 ViewModel for each View
The ViewModel calls a Data Service layer object to retrieve Model instances (not to be confused with a WCF service)
The Data Service layer issues the appropriate CRUD requests to the backend (this uses WCF, RIA, or RESTful Services for Silverlight but could be ADO.NET or EF directly for WPF).
The Data Service uses the returned POCOs to create Model objects.
Model objects wrap the POCO object and implement INotifyPropertyChanged. Model objects enforce business rules.
I'm still working through the details but I will be publishing something more concrete in the near future.
My Models accept a WCF object which exposes those properties which I wish to use in my ViewModel. I can then also extend the object as needed. My properties point to the WCF object's property and when I have to send the object back to the WCF service, I don't have to do any more work. The models inherit INotifyPropertyChanged and INotifyDataErrorInfo which the DTOs (mentioned here as POCOs) will not have. Your business logic / validaton exists in your Silverlight application and not in your WCF Service.
The View binds to the ViewModel which has a Model (or an observable collection of Models). The Models have a WFCObject which is a DTO (mentioned here as POCO). I use my ViewModel to communicate with the service, MVVM Light has the models communicate with the service / provider - which I don't like.
Bind to EF POCOs if you want to do simple CRUD or you want to make something fast.
Otherwise, your server-side models will tend to be very closely related to the database, which changes very slowly, as compared to user interface. For less trivial UI, you'll find yourself putting more and more kludges just to fit your database model into UI (or otherwise, which is even worse).
Also, there are performance issues (e.g. would you like to transmit whole entity when for UI you need only couple of properties?), and maintenance issues (e.g. if you would like to validate premium customer's order quite differently from ordinary one).
See also http://ayende.com/Blog/archive/2010/08/06/data-access-is-contextual-a-generic-approach-will-fail.aspx
Rachel's POCO's are just dumb objects generated by EF and used for transport (DTO). Therefore, they shouldn't have other things cluttering up their domain. This is a very nice way of designing your code because it decouples any client-side requirements from those on the server-side. That's why MVVM exists - to extend the MVC model incorporating those concerns.
There is no reason you can't bind to them in your views as long as you are not modifying them directly. You can add functionality to them by adding a partial class but I wouldn't even do that. In that case you should follow the MVVM design tenants and separate those into model objects that serve your needs in the client. This will be quite automated once you hook up INotifyPropertyChanged events to notify your views.
I am using a WCF service reference in a WPF project, and my entity framework data model resides in WCF project.
And I am using MVVM Light framework. I am doing the following things:
I use LINQ in the service to get data and then fetch it from WPF, obersvablecollections usually.
Everything works in view part like populating datagrid, views as required.
But I have following doubts:
Is this correct way of transferring data between wcf and wpf.
I haven't used the Model for anything yet, I have doubt about when to use it?
I also wanted to save data from datagrid. I was able to pass on the observablecollection of updated data of datagrid to the service's function. But how do i update the entity from this collection? by looping? doesnt sound right. Once I update the entity from this collection I will be able to use saveChanges to update into database.
When I need to show hierarchal data in a treeview, where to make that data hierarichal, from stored procedure xml? use a view to create a grouping criteria column? create this column in service? create this column/property in presentation?
1 - There is no correct way, it depends on your requirements and goals.
2 - With MVVM, the model should sit between WPF and the database. That means all calls to the database should go through the model, and all writes to the database should also go through the model. The WPF GUI should only bind to the model. This usually means that your WPF portion consists mostly of XAML code. All code that accesses the database should be in the model.
There are good reasons for separating this.
You can write unit tests that on the model.
The view model is independent from the look of the GUI. This means that you can easily change the GUI by dropping in different components and just binding to the model.
A quick google search can probably yield more reasons.
3 - I would try to send over only the entities that have changed. This can be done by passing the collection to your view model, and have your view model figure out what has changed.
4 - I don't quite understand what you want to do. Usually, to make a TreeView, you should create HierarchicalDataTemplate for each of your view models. The TreeView control will take care of the rest. You should really do some tutorials on this one, because it's kinda hard to wrap your head around.
I'm writing an application in wpf that uses MVVM. I wondered if I could use ado.net entity data model as a model in MVVM? Is it the same? If not, why?
Thanks for any help.
Regards,
Ev.
Sure, you can use the Entity Data Model as Model part of the MVVM Pattern.
You might have a look at the BookLibrary sample application of the WPF Application Framework (WAF).
This MVVM sample application uses Entity Framework data models as well and it is composed of various Views (UserControls).
as I understand, one can use the entity model. but you will finally have tied coupling with the entity framework. whenever you plan to exchange your model for eg. with another ORM, you'll have more work to replace the model.
better is to use a repository pattern for data access. with this pattern you have more flexibility in the end. similar question here