I am having a small issue sending data from service to a controller with google API. can anyone have a look at code below and give me some advice?
injection is good and I don't see any errors. I tried few things.
1. normal binding using a service method(e.g. getCurrentPos()). it will return an object that stores the pos info
2. $rootScope.$broadcast
3. angular.copy()
//in the service--------
var position = new google.maps.LatLng(markers[i][1], markers[i][2]);
this.marker = new google.maps.Marker({
position: position,
map: map,
title: markers[i][0],
draggable: true,
icon: '../img/png/shopper1.png'
});
var personMarker = this.marker;
this.marker.addListener('drag', function() {
console.log('lat:'+personMarker.getPosition().lat()+' lng:'+personMarker.getPosition().lng());
currentPos.lat = personMarker.getPosition().lat();
currentPos.lng = personMarker.getPosition().lng();
// myPos = personMarker.getPosition();
myPos = [personMarker.getPosition().lat(), personMarker.getPosition().lng()];
angular.copy(myPos, scope.currentPos); //not working
console.log('scope.currentPos',scope.currentPos);
// $rootScope.$broadcast('evtUpdateMyPos', { //tried but not working.
// 'lat': personMarker.getPosition().lat(),
// 'lng': personMarker.getPosition().lng()
// });
console.log("mypos:", myPos);
});
//in the controller-------
$scope.currentPos = [];
//Listen on a broadcast event
// $scope.$on('evtUpdateMyPos', function (event, myPos){
// console.log('evtUpdateMyPos is fired.', myPos); //this logs here.
// // $scope.currentPos = angular.copy(myPos); //this dos not help
// // $scope.currentPos = myPos; //this does not hlep.
// })
In some cases when you're trying to update your model from an external library like in your case using google maps you should wrap the setter in something like this:
$timeout(function(){
myModel = 'Google.map.data'
});
or
$rootScope.$applyAsync(function(){ // this could also be $scope
myModel = 'Google.map.data'
});
myModel could be a property of your service or a $scope variable ($scope.myModel)
Related
My goal is to write a SAPUI5 Fiori app with routing support. One mail goal is to have passable URLs. For example in an E-Mail like "please approve this: link". The link is an URL matched by my rounting config, e.g.index.html#/applicants/8.
I use a typical sap.m.SplitApp kind of application. Clicking a list item in masterview changes the URL to index.html#/applicants/[id of entry in JSON]. I can click on the list, my defined routes are getting matched and the apps loads the (applicant) data as expected.
However, and here comes my question, this doeas not work when using an URL directly, say pasting [my url]/index.html#/applicants/8 into my browser. The app is launched but no detail data is loaded. I have to click on another list item again to get the data.
Actually, the controller is called when passing the URL, but it seems the model is not initiated and undefined. My JSON model is bound in the createContent function of my Component.js
// Update 2015-05-14
The problems seems to be around the getData() function. I have the model, it has the entries, but getData() returns undefined for the first time my app is loaded. I recently read getData() is deprecated. How should I improve my coding below?
// Component.js
ui5testing.Component.prototype.createContent = function(){
// create root view
var oView = sap.ui.view({
id : "app",
viewName : "ui5testing.view.Main",
type : "JS",
viewData : {
component : this
}
var oModel = new sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel("model/mock_applicants.json");
oView.setModel(oModel);
[...]
return oView;
});
// Master controller
handleApplicantSelect : function (evt) {
var oHashChanger = sap.ui.core.routing.HashChanger.getInstance();
var context = evt.getParameter("listItem").getBindingContext();
var path = context.getPath();
var model = this.getView().getModel();
var item = model.getProperty(path);
oHashChanger.setHash("applicants/" + item.id);
},
// Detail controller
onInit: function() {
this.router = sap.ui.core.UIComponent.getRouterFor(this);
this.router.attachRoutePatternMatched(this._handleRouteMatched, this);
},
_handleRouteMatched : function(evt){
var objectId = evt.getParameter("arguments").id;
var model = this.getView().getModel();
var data = model.getData()["applicants"];
var pathId;
if (data) {
for (var i = 0; data.length; i++) {
if ( objectId == data[i].id ) {
pathId = i;
break;
}
}
var sPath = "/applicants/" + pathId;
var context = new sap.ui.model.Context(model, sPath)
this.getView().setBindingContext(context);
}
},
As you've figured out that getData() returns undefined for the first time, which means the model data is still not yet loaded. So you can make use of attachRequestCompleted method of the model & fire an event from the component & listen to that event in the detail controller to ensure the routerPatternMatched() gets executed only after the data is loaded.
//Component.js
var oModel = new sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel("model/mock_applicants.json");
oModel.attachRequestCompleted(jQuery.proxy(function(){
this.fireEvent("MockDataLoaded"); // fireEvent through component
},this));
oView.setModel(oModel);
//Detail controller
onInit : function(){
this.router = sap.ui.core.UIComponent.getRouterFor(this);
var oComponent = this.getOwnerComponent();
oComponent.attachEvent("MockDataLoaded",jQuery.proxy(function(){
this.router.attachRoutePatternMatched(this._handleRouteMatched, this);
},this));
}
Or the simplest & but the dirty way would be to make an synchronous request instead of an async request to load data.
var oModel = new sap.ui.model.json.JSONModel();
oModel.loadData(""model/mock_applicants.json",{bAsync:false});
oView.setModel(oModel);
I'm new with backbone and faced the following problems. I'm trying to emulate some sort of "has many relation". To achieve this I'm adding following code to initialize method in the model:
defaults: {
name: '',
tags: []
},
initialize: function() {
var tags = new TagsCollection(this.get('tags'));
tags.url = this.url() + "/tags";
return this.set('tags', tags, {
silent: true
});
}
This code works great if I fetch models through collection. As I understand, first collection gets the data and after that this collection populates models with this data. But when I try to load single model I get my property being overridden with plain Javascript array.
m = new ExampleModel({id: 15})
m.fetch() // property tags get overridden after load
and response:
{
name: 'test',
tags: [
{name: 'tag1'},
{name: 'tag2'}
]
}
Anyone know how to fix this?
One more question. Is there a way to check if model is loaded or not. Yes, I know that we can add callback to the fetch method, but what about something like this model.isLoaded or model.isPending?
Thanks!
"when I try to load single model I get my property being overridden with plain Javascript array"
You can override the Model#parse method to keep your collection getting overwritten:
parse: function(attrs) {
//reset the collection property with the new
//tags you received from the server
var collection = this.get('tags');
collection.reset(attrs.tags);
//replace the raw array with the collection
attrs.tags = collection;
return attrs;
}
"Is there a way to check if model is loaded or not?"
You could compare the model to its defaults. If the model is at its default state (save for its id), it's not loaded. If it doesn't, it's loaded:
isLoaded: function() {
var defaults = _.result(this, 'defaults');
var current = _.wíthout(this.toJSON(), 'id');
//you need to convert the tags to an array so its is comparable
//with the default array. This could also be done by overriding
//Model#toJSON
current.tags = current.tags.toJSON();
return _.isEqual(current, defaults);
}
Alternatively you can hook into the request, sync and error events to keep track of the model syncing state:
initialize: function() {
var self = this;
//pending when a request is started
this.on('request', function() {
self.isPending = true;
self.isLoaded = false;
});
//loaded when a request finishes
this.on('sync', function() {
self.isPending = false;
self.isLoaded = true;
});
//neither pending nor loaded when a request errors
this.on('error', function() {
self.isPending = false;
self.isLoaded = false;
});
}
In my Backbone app, I have the following
playlistView = new PlaylistView({ model: Playlist });
Playlist.getNewSongs(function() {
playlistView.initialize();
}, genre, numSongs);
Playlist.getNewSongs() is called back when some ajax request is finished. I want to re-initialize the view then. However, I believe the way I'm doing it leads to this problem of a view listening to a same event twice. Is calling initialize() like this acceptable? If not, what should I do instead?
Update:
I wrote this chrome extension in Backbone to learn Backbone, and it's in a design hell at the moment. I am in the middle of refactoring the entire codebase. The snippet below is my PlaylistView initialize() code block.
var PlaylistView = Backbone.View.extend({
el: '#expanded-container',
initialize: function() {
var playlistModel = this.model;
var bg = chrome.extension.getBackgroundPage();
if (!bg.player) {
console.log("aborting playlistView initialize because player isn't ready");
return;
}
this.listenTo(playlistModel.get('songs'), 'add', function (song) {
var songView = new SongView({ model: song });
this.$('.playlist-songs').prepend(songView.render().el);
});
this.$('#song-search-form-group').empty();
// Empty the current playlist and populate with newly loaded songs
this.$('.playlist-songs').empty();
var songs = playlistModel.get('songs').models;
// Add a search form
var userLocale = chrome.i18n.getMessage("##ui_locale");
var inputEl = '<input class="form-control flat" id="song-search-form" type="search" placeholder="John Lennon Imagine">' +
'<span class="search-heart-icon fa fa-heart"></span>'+
'<span class="search-input-icon fui-search"></span>';
}
this.$('#song-search-form-group').append(inputEl);
var form = this.$('input');
$(form).keypress(function (e) {
if (e.charCode == 13) {
var query = form.val();
playlistModel.lookUpAndAddSingleSong(query);
}
});
// Fetch song models from bg.Songs's localStorage
// Pass in reset option to prevent fetch() from calling "add" event
// for every Song stored in localStorage
if (playlistModel.get('musicChart').source == "myself") {
playlistModel.get('songs').fetch({ reset: true });
songs = playlistModel.get('songs').models;
}
// Create and render a song view for each song model in the collection
_.each(songs, function (song) {
var songView = new SongView({ model: song });
this.$('.playlist-songs').append(songView.render().el);
}, this);
// Highlight the currently played song
var currentSong = playlistModel.get('currentSong');
if (currentSong)
var currentVideoId = currentSong.get('videoId');
else {
var firstSong = playlistModel.get('songs').at(0);
if (!firstSong) {
// FIXME: this should be done via triggering event and by Popup model
$('.music-info').text(chrome.i18n.getMessage("try_different_chart"));
$('.music-info').fadeOut(2000);
//console.log("something wrong with the chart");
return;
}
var currentVideoId = firstSong.get('videoId');
}
_.find($('.list-group-item'), function (item) {
if (item.id == currentVideoId)
return $(item).addClass('active');
});
},
It is not wrong but probably not a good practice. You did not post the code in your initialize but maybe you have too much logic here.
If you are simply initializing the view again so that the new data is rendered, you should use event listener as such:
myView = Backbone. View.extend ({
initialize : function() {
// We bind the render method to the change event of the model.
//When the data of the model of the view changes, the method will be called.
this.model.bind( "change" , this.render, this);
// Other init code that you only need once goes here ...
this.template = _.template (templateLoader. get( 'config'));
},
// In the render method we update the view to represent the current model
render : function(eventName) {
$ (this.el ).html(this .template ((this.model .toJSON())));
return this;
}
});
If the logic in your initiialize is something totally else, please include it. Maybe there is a beter place for it.
I am trying to nest a Collection View into a Model View.
In order to do so, I used Backbone's Marionnette Composite View and followed that tutorial
At the end he initializes the nested collection view like this:
MyApp.addInitializer(function(options){
var heroes = new Heroes(options.heroes);
// each hero's villains must be a backbone collection
// we initialize them here
heroes.each(function(hero){
var villains = hero.get('villains');
var villainCollection = new Villains(villains);
hero.set('villains', villainCollection);
});
// edited for brevity
});
How would you go doing the same without using the addInitalizer from Marionette?
In my project I am fectching data from the server. And when I try doing something like:
App.candidatures = new App.Collections.Candidatures;
App.candidatures.fetch({reset: true}).done(function() {
App.candidatures.each(function(candidature) {
var contacts = candidature.get('contacts');
var contactCollection = new App.Collections.Contacts(contacts);
candidature.set('contacts', contactCollection);
});
new App.Views.App({collection: App.candidatures});
});
I get an "indefined options" coming from the collection:
App.Collections.Contacts = Backbone.Collection.extend({
model: App.Models.Contact,
initialize:function(models, options) {
this.candidature = options.candidature;
},
url:function() {
return this.candidature.url() + "/contacts";
}
)};
That's because when you're creating the contactCollection, you're not providing a candidatures collections in an options object. You do need to modify your contact collection initialization code to something like:
initialize:function(models, options) {
this.candidature = options && options.candidature;
}
That way the candidature attribute will be set to the provided value (and if not provided, it will be undefined).
Then, you still need to provide the info when you're instanciating the collection:
App.candidatures.each(function(candidature) {
var contacts = candidature.get('contacts');
var contactCollection = new App.Collections.Contacts(contacts, {
candidature: candidature
});
candidature.set('contacts', contactCollection);
});
P.S.: I hope you found my blog post useful!
I'm working on a medium-complex app using backbone.js to handle wordpress data, and i can't figure out how to get the force working in a backbone layout.
basically, i'm trying to instantiate a force layout within a backbone boilerplate layout, like this:
myLayout = Backbone.Layout.extend({
initialize: function() {
var f = this; // i.e. the layout instance
f.force = d3.layout.force()
.nodes(myModels)
.on("tick", f.tick)
.gravity(0)
.friction(0.9)
.start();
console.log(f.force);
},
tick: function() {
// stuff to do when the force ticks
}
});
The problem is that the force is being defined with all blank functions, like gravity: function(x) { //lots of null things here }. i'm pretty sure it's a namespacing issue, but nothing i try works - i've tried doing $(window).force, var force, $this.force...
in my example tick is the only namespaced function, but i've tried doing that with all the others too (gravity, friction, etc.) to no avail (even though they should just be chaining onto the force object).
anyone have any ideas? i can't really post a .jsfiddle because the app is too complicated, so sorry in advance about that. The current version is up here
edit: here's how d3 can access the models successfully:
this works:
myLayout.nodes = myLayout.d3_wrapper.selectAll(".node")
.data(myModels)
.enter().append("g").attr("class", "node")
.attr("x",10)
.attr("y",10);
myLayout.nodes.append("clipPath")
.attr("id", function(d) { return d.get("slug"); })
as does this:
myLayout.nodes.append("clipPath")
.attr("id", function(d) { return d.attributes.slug });
edit: in the interest of clarity, here's the non-nicknamed code:
setforce: function() { // this gets called from the layout's initialize fn
console.log("setting force");
var f = this; // the layout
f.force = d3.layout.force()
.nodes(Cartofolio.elders.models) // Cartofolio is the module, elders is a Backbone Collection
.gravity(0)
.friction(0.9)
.start();
console.log(f.force);
}
I would try using toJSON() on your collection before passing it to d3:
myLayout = Backbone.Layout.extend({
initialize: function() {
var f = this; // i.e. the layout instance
f.force = d3.layout.force()
.nodes(myModels.toJSON())
.on("tick", f.tick)
.gravity(0)
.friction(0.9)
.start();
console.log(f.force);
},
tick: function() {
// stuff to do when the force ticks
}
});