Cloudant incremental backup supported? - cloudant

I was working on an incremental backup solution for my Cloudant databases.
I was using the documentation at https://docs.cloudant.com/backup-guide.html and today I tried to go back to that link to look something up and the page is gone.
Is this an error in the documentation, or has support for this been removed?
Thanks

The documentation on the page you were reading was for features that have not yet been released. Once the features are officially released, we will make that page available again. In the meantime, this page may be helpful: https://docs.cloudant.com/backup.html

Related

Updating AppEngine deployed version on GitHub push

Is it possible to auto-deploy to AppEngine when Github receives a new commit? I found a bunch of dead documentation links that suggest it is, however I still have no idea how to set it up. There are some mentions for creating a release pipeline, but I don't see any way to do that in the cloud console anymore.
I've got my code mirroring the GitHub repository already, however I can't figure out how to link this to the deployment pipeline or even how to create a new version. Am I missing something obvious? This seems like it should be incredibly straightforward to do...
The entry on the Google Cloud Platform blog that's supposed to explain how to achieve this is blank. It seems Google quietly killed this feature. Some people have complained that it suddenly stopped working. The only way to do this now is to use Continous Delivery/Integration tools such as Travis CI.

DataStore Full Text Search documentation?

This Google IO video from 2011 introducing the Full Text Search API (at 31:13), refers to DataStore Integration by setting a few properties in attributes.
However I can't seem to find any related documentation to show how to go about using this feature.
Does anyone know if anything's changed since the release of the API and if works in another way now?
Any pointers will be greatly appreciated.

How healthy is the LucidDB project?

I am working on a project that would greatly benefit from a column store database on the backend. I was attracted to LucidDB since the feature set seems perfect, and I cannot commit to the cost of a commercial solution like Infobright or Vertica until the project has shown value.
The problem is, I am concerned about the health of the LucidDB project. The internal wiki hasn't been updated in more than a month, and the website is full of broken links. DynamoBI dying does not help the case.
Is there anyone who knows the state of the project, and how comfortable you'd be with production code relying on this database?
LucidDB is no longer supported by DynamoBI as they are closing the shop.
http://www.nicholasgoodman.com/bt/blog/2012/10/08/dynamobi-is-dead/
Dr.Bharatheesh Jaysimha

Bugzilla Reporting

Is there a really good free tool for BugZilla reporting? I am finding the default search options on the web interface far too limiting. My biggest issue is with the lack of Order By options (only 1 field at a time, and a very limited set of fields to choose from). I have done some Google searches, but I can't find any good free BugZilla reporting tools.
If there isn't one, can someone please point me to an example on how to access the BugZilla web services? If I can get the BugZilla data, then I can easily build my own reports that will better meet our needs.
Take a look at this: http://www.faqs.org/docs/bugzilla/dbdoc.html
Use this database schema for reference: faqs.org/docs/bugzilla/dbschema.html
If you need a web-interface, use your favorite dynamic website scripting language that can access MySQL databases (say PHP)...
Simple-ish Tutorial: freewebmasterhelp.com/tutorials/phpmysql/4
PHP MySQL API Reference: php.net/manual/en/ref.mysql.php
Then use SQL queries such as:
"SELECT * FROM bugs WHERE WHERE bug_status != 'RESOLVED' ORDER BY creation_ts ASC, votes DESC LIMIT 50"
which lists first 50 entries of unresolved bugs ordered first ascending creation time then descending by number of votes.
I have used this in the past and have liked it a lot: http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Bugzilla_Reports
You can also consider other tool eg mantis
(http://www.mantisbt.org/)
I've personally switched from Bugzilla into Mantis and installed some plugins (http://deboutv.free.fr/mantis/) and found this more comfortable
If you are a Java user, you might want to check out Mylyn for eclipse. This is integrates a task-driven development approach into eclipse.
With that, you can raise bugs, tie together SVN changes and bugs, and hide classes that are not relevant to fixing bugs, etc. It's a bit involved to get started with, but quite powerful.
It also comes with a connector for BugZilla. See this introductory article for an example.
If you don't use eclipse, but you do use Java, then note that since Mylyn is open-source, you might want to look at the source code of the Mylyn BugZilla connector for how they do their work.
Good luck.
You can try Deskzilla (http://deskzilla.com/) - it is a multi-platform desktop client for Bugzilla with Outlook-like interface, rich reporting and filtering capabilities, offline work, drag-n-drop, etc. It's a commercial product, but if you're working on an Open Source project you can use it for free.
AFAIK Bugzilla uses MySQL database for storing data. So probably you can connect with some visual db manager (plenty of it exists, see Toad Data Modeler, DbVisualizer) and try do do some sql work...
There is a list of some add-ons (free and commercial) listed on the Buzilla addons wiki.
If you are a Windows user, MyZilla is a possible option.
Otherwise, to work toward your own, see the Bugzilla API documentation, which, in a way, includes how to retrieve the current schema (Bugzilla::DB::Schema), and Bugzilla::WebService.
Netbeans also has Bugzilla integration (I haven't tried it...).
I have analized a bunch of bug tracking tools.
You can try track or mantis, because bugzilla is very unfriendly about reporting.
Mantis
Mantis can export data in excel: all the graphic you need can be generated by that sheet.
For more information take a look to my blog:
http://gioorgi.com/2008/bug-tracking-mantis/
Anyway, Track is used a lot more, so for sake of completeness I should cite it:
Track
Pros:
Can Also work with an embedded database (using sqlite).
Easy to setup and use.
Cons:
Feature are too much, and aims to be also a CMS to some extend.
Take a look to:
http://gioorgi.com/2008/bug-tracking-trac/
Since Bugzilla can be installed on your own server, I presume the simplest way is to do that and play with the databases it creates ("Bugzilla supports MySQL, PostgreSQL and Oracle as database servers"). The documentation also says you can modify the templates as you like.
Otherwise one could try paid support or some other bug trackers.
I use this bookmarklet and like how it searches right with the strings entered in the location bar like smart search. It lets you quickly search bugzilla or jump to a bug number via Bugzilla Quicksearch, and is IE6+, Moz, Op7+ compatible.
Its companions on the same page can be used to refine or help with bug search/report, e.g. collect buglinks (queries bugzilla to show a list of bugs linked to from the current page),ord buglinkify (turns all numbers on the page into bug links).

How to check if a visitor is using the latest version of his/her browser?

Is there a simple and automatic way of checking if a visitor to my website (written in asp.net) is using the latest version of his browser? This would allow me to display a message to inform them that they're running an old version and that they might want to upgrade.
My website is tested on most broswers but I don't test old versions (such as Internet Explorer 6 etc). When one of my visitors is using such an old version, basically, I would like to encourage (not force) them to upgrade.
Of course I could do this myself by getting the version of the browser and look it up in my database but I don't want to have to maintain a 'browser version' database myself.
Any ideas?
Speaking as a user of websites, if I come across a site that advised me to upgrade my browser then that would be an immediate black mark against that site.
I might not be able to upgrade (if I'm accessing from a corporate network for example); I might have a specific reason for using a particular version (if I'm a web developer wanting to ensure compatibility with my user community for example).
So personally, I would say that a blanket disclaimer that you don't test this site on earlier versions would be the way to go. That's quite apart from the technical challenge of what you want to do.
Edit: as Yeti points out, however valid my concerns, I don't answer the question directly. This is done in Pace's answer, and the w3schools resource he points to gives you what you need to do this on the client side.

Resources